Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T09:25:07.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Sustainability Challenges of the Chemical Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2022

Bala Subramaniam
Bala Subramaniam
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
Get access

Summary

Demand for chemicals is growing. The chemical industry’s global output is expected to double between 2017 and 2030. Lowering the carbon footprint of such growth requires sustainable alternative technologies. Fortunately, green chemistry and engineering research has made remarkable progress, laying the foundation for developing resource-efficient processes that conserve feedstock and energy as well as reduce adverse impacts on human health and the environment. Life cycle assessment (LCA) plays a key role for identifying environmental hotspots along the supply chain, either within the manufacturing plant (catalysts, solvents, reactors, separators) or upstream during raw material extraction or during the generation of energy at any stage. In concert with traditional techno-economic analysis, LCA is an essential tool for the rational development of sustainable chemical processes.

Keywords

life cycle assessment (LCA)sustainabilitychemical industrycarbon footprintenergyfeedstock
Type
Chapter
Information
Green Catalysis and Reaction Engineering
An Integrated Approach with Industrial Case Studies
 , pp. 1 - 12
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Global Chemicals Outlook II: Implementing the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. From Legacies to Innovative Solutions. Available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/28113/GCOII.pdf, last accessed Jan 12, 2020.Google Scholar
IEA, Energy Technology Perspectives 2012 (Paris: IEA, 2012). Available at: www.iea.org/reports/energy-technology-perspectives-2012, last accessed Jan 12, 2020.Google Scholar
Technology Roadmap. Energy and GHG Reductions in the Chemical Industry via Catalytic Processes. IEA/ICCA/DECHEMA. Available at: https://dechema.de/dechema_media/Downloads/Positionspapiere/IndustrialCatalysis/Chemical_Roadmap_2013_Final_WEB-p-4584.pdf, last accessed Jan 12, 2020.Google Scholar
World GHG Emissions Flow Chart. ECOFYS. Available at: https://ingmarschumacher.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/asn-ecofys-2013-world-ghg-emissions-flow-chart-2010.pdf, last accessed Jan 12, 2020.Google Scholar
Eco-profiles of the European Plastics Industry. Plastics Europe. Available at www.plasticseurope.org/en/resources/eco-profiles, last accessed Feb 8, 2020.Google Scholar
Brundtland, C. G., Our Common Future (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar
Luterbacher, J. S., Alonso, D. M. and Dumesic, J. A., Targeted chemical upgrading of lignocellulosic biomass to platform molecules. Green Chem., 16 (2014), 4816–38.Google Scholar
Triantafyllidis, K., Lappas, A. and Stöcker, M. (eds.), The Role of Catalysis for the Sustainable Production of Bio-fuels and Bio-chemicals (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2013).Google Scholar
Milka, L. T., Cséfalvay, E. and Németh, Á., Catalytic conversion of carbohydrates to initial platform chemicals: chemistry and sustainability. Chem. Rev., 118 (2018), 505–613.Google Scholar
Sun, Z., Friedrich, B., de Santi, A., Elangovan, S. and Barta, K., Bright side of lignin depolymerization: toward new platform chemicals. Chem. Rev., 118 (2018), 614–78.Google Scholar
Liao, Y., Koelewijn, S.-F., Van den Bossche, G., Van Aelst, J., Van den Bosch, S., Renders, T., Navare, K., Nicolai, T., Van Aelst, K., Maesen, M., Matsushima, H., Thevelein, J. M., Van Acker, K., Lagrain, B., Verboekend, D. and Sels, B. F., A sustainable wood biorefinery for low-carbon footprint chemicals production. Science, 367 (2020), 1385–90.Google Scholar
Anastas, P. T. and Warner, J. C., Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Anastas, P. T. and Eghbali, N., Green chemistry: Principles and practice. Chem. Soc. Rev., 39 (2010), 301–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anastas, P. T. and Zimmerman, J., Design through the 12 principles of green engineering. Env. Sci. Tech., 37 (2003), 95A–101A.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horvat́h, I. T., Introduction: Sustainable chemistry. Chem. Rev., 118 (2018), 369–71.Google Scholar
Anastas, P. T., Twenty years of green chemistry. Chem. Eng. News, 89 (2011), 62–65.Google Scholar
Sheldon, R. A., Consider the environmental quotient. Chemtech, 24 (1994), 38–47.Google Scholar
Sheldon, R. A., Arends, I. W. C. E. and Hanefeld, U., Green Chemistry and Catalysis (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2007).Google Scholar
Welton, T., Solvents and sustainable chemistry. Proc. R. Soc. A, 471 (2015), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, C. J., Tu, W-C., Levers, O., Bröhl, A. and Hallett, J. P., Green and sustainable solvents in chemical processes. Chem. Rev., 118 (2018), 747–800.Google Scholar
Tundo, P., Anastas, P., Black, D. S., Breen, J., Collins, T., Memoli, S., Miyamoto, J., Poliakoff, M. and Tumas, W., Synthetic pathways and processes in green chemistry: Introductory overview. Pure Appl. Chem., 72 (2000), 1207–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeSimone, J. M., Practical approaches to green solvents. Science, 297 (2002), 799–803.Google Scholar
Adams, D. J., Dyson, P. J. and Tavener, S. J., Chemistry in Alternative Reaction Media (Chichester: Wiley, 2004).Google Scholar
Eckert, C. A., Liotta, C. L., Bush, B., Brown, J. S. and Hallett, J. P., Sustainable reactions in tunable solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B., 108 (2004), 18108–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgenstern, D. A., LeLacheur, R. M., Morita, D. K., Borkowsky, S. L., Feng, S., Brown, G. H., Luan, L., Gross, M. F., Burk, M. J. and Tumas, W., Supercritical carbon dioxide as a substitute solvent for chemical synthesis and catalysis. In Green Chemistry: Designing Chemistry for the Environment, eds. Anastas, P. T. and Williamson, T. C.. ACS Symposium Series, vol. 626 (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 1996), pp. 132–51.Google Scholar
Jessop, P. G. and Leitner, W., Chemical Synthesis Using Supercritical Fluids (Weinhem: Wiley-VCH, 1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amandi, R., Hyde, J. and Poliakoff, M., Heterogeneous reactions in supercritical carbon dioxide. In Carbon Dioxide Recovery and Utilization, ed. Aresta, M. (Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer, 2002), pp. 169–80.Google Scholar
DeSimone, J. M. and Tumas, W., Green Chemistry Using Liquid and Supercritical Carbon Dioxide (New York: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Gordon, C. M. and Leitner, W., Supercritical fluids as replacements for conventional organic solvents. Chimica Oggi., 22 (2004), 39–41.Google Scholar
Beckman, E. J., Using CO2 to produce chemical products sustainably. Env. Sci. Tech., 36 (2002), 347A–53A.Google Scholar
Arai, M., Fujita, S. I. and Shirai, M., Multiphase catalytic reaction in/under dense phase CO2. J. Supercrit. Fluids, 47 (2009), 351–56.Google Scholar
Li, C. J. and Chan, T. H., Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media (New York: Wiley, 1997).Google Scholar
Cornils, B. and Herrmann, W. A., Aqueous-Phase Organometallic Catalysis. (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 1998).Google Scholar
Savage, P. E., A perspective on catalysis in sub- and supercritical water. J. Supercrit. Fluids, 47 (2009), 407–14.Google Scholar
Jessop, P. G. and Subramaniam, B., Gas-expanded liquids. Chem. Revs., 107 (2007), 2666–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akien, G. R. and Poliakoff, M., A critical look at reactions in Class I and II gas-expanded liquids using CO2 and other gases. Green Chem., 11 (2009), 1083–1100.Google Scholar
Scurto, A. M., Hutchenson, K. W. and Subramaniam, B., Gas-expanded liquids (GXLs): Fundamentals and applications. In Gas-Expanded Liquids and Near-Critical Media: Green Chemistry and Engineering, eds. Hutchenson, K. W., Scurto, A. M. and Subramaniam, B.. ACS Symposium Series, vol 1006 (Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, 2009), pp. 3–40.Google Scholar
Wasserscheid, P. and Welton, T., Ionic Liquids in Synthesis (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH, 2002).Google Scholar
Rogers, R. D., Seddon, K. R. and Volkov, S., Green Industrial Applications of Ionic Liquids (Dordrecht: Kluwer, 2003).Google Scholar
Pârvulescu, V. I. and Hardacre, C., Catalysis in ionic liquids. Chem. Rev., 107 (2007), 2615–65.Google Scholar
Olivier-Bourbigou, H., Magna, L. and Morvan, D., Ionic liquids and catalysis: Recent progress from knowledge to applications. Appl. Cat. A., 373 (2010), 1–56.Google Scholar
Jessop, P. G., Mercer, S. M. and Heldebrant, D. J., CO2-triggered switchable solvents, surfactants, and other materials. Energ. Environ. Sci., 5 (2012), 7240–53.Google Scholar
Anastas, P. T. and Zimmerman, J. B., The periodic table of the elements of green and sustainable chemistry. Green Chem., 21 (2019), 6545–66.Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Green Chemistry Challenge Winners. Available at: www.epa.gov/greenchemistry/presidential-green-chemistry-challenge-winners, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
United States Environmental Protection Agency. Information about the Green Chemistry Challenge. Available at: www.epa.gov/greenchemistry/information-about-presidential-green-chemistry-challenge, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Chemical innovation: Technologies to make processes and products more sustainable. United States Government Accounting Office. Available at: www.gao.gov/products/GAO-18-307, last accessed July 28, 2020.Google Scholar
Peters, M. S., Timmerhaus, K. D. and West, R. E., Plant Design and Economics for Chemical Engineers, 5th ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 2003).Google Scholar
ISO 14044. 2006 Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – requirements and guidelines (Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization of Standardization, 2006).Google Scholar
Curran, M. A.. Life Cycle Assessment Handbook (Salem, MA: Wiley-Scrivener, 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellweg, S. and Milà i Canals, L., Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science, 344 (2014), 1109–13.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, B., Licence, P., Allen, D. T. and Moores, A. H., Shaping effective practices for incorporating sustainability assessment in manuscripts submitted to ACS SCE: An initiative by editors. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 9 (2021), 3977−78.Google Scholar
Bode, C. J., Chapman, C., Pennybaker, A. and Subramaniam, B., Developing students’ understanding of industrially relevant economic and life cycle assessments. J. Chem. Educ., 94 (2017), 1798–1801.Google Scholar
Schwarz, J., Beloff, B. and Beaver, E., Use sustainability metrics to guide decision-making. Chem. Eng. Prog., 98 (2002), 58–63.Google Scholar
Sikdar, S. K., Sustainable development and sustainability metrics. AIChE J., 49 (2003), 1928–32.Google Scholar
Debecker, D. P., (Mimi), K. K. Hii, A . H. Moores, L. M. Rossi, B. Sels, D. T. Allen, and Subramaniam, B., Shaping effective practices for incorporating sustainability assessment in manuscripts submitted to ACS sustainable chemistry & engineering: Catalysis and catalytic processes. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 9 (2021), 4936−40.Google Scholar
Trost, B. M., The atom economy: A search for synthetic efficiency. Science, 254 (1991), 1471–77.Google Scholar
Jiménez-González, C., Ponder, C. S., Broxterman, Q. B. and Manley, J. B.. Using the right green yardstick: Why process mass intensity is used in the pharmaceutical industry to drive more sustainable processes. Org. Process Res. Dev., 15 (2011), 912–17.Google Scholar
Lorsbach, B. and Sanghvi, Y. S., Sustainable chemistry. Org. Process Res. Dev., 19 (2015), 685–86.Google Scholar
Sheldon, R. A., The E factor 25 years on: The rise of green chemistry and sustainability. Green Chem., 19 (2017), 18–43.Google Scholar
Cséfalvay, E., Akien, G. R., Qi, L. and Horváth, I. T., Definition and application of ethanol equivalent: Sustainability performance metrics for biomass conversion to carbon-based fuels and chemicals. Catal. Today, 239 (2015), 50–55.Google Scholar
National Research Council. Sustainability in the Chemical Industry (Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Zimmerman, J. B., Anastas, P. T., Eryhtropel, H. C. and Leitner, W., Designing for a green chemistry future. Science, 367 (2020), 397–400.Google Scholar
Allen, D. T., Shonnard, D. R., Huang, Y. and Schuster, D., Green engineering education in chemical engineering curricula: A quarter century of progress and prospects for future transformations. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4 (2016), 5850–54.Google Scholar
Allen, D. T. and Shonnard, D. R., Green Engineering: Environmentally Conscious Design of Chemical Processes (Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002).Google Scholar
iSUSTAINTM, Green Chemistry Index. Available at: http://advancinggreenchemistry.org/green-chemistry-metric-isustain™-green-chemistry-index-v2–0/, last accessed Dec 6, 2020.Google Scholar
U.S. Environmental Green Engineering Software. Available at: www.epa.gov/oppt/greenengineering/pubs/software.html, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Pre Consultants, SIMAPRO Life Cycle Assessment Software. Available at: www.pre-sustainability.com/simapro, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
GaBi Life Cycle Assessment Software. Available at: www.gabi-software.com/america/index/, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Argonne GREET Model. Available at: http://greet.es.anl.gov/, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Karka, P., Papadokonstantakis, S. and Kokossis, A., Cradle-to-gate assessment of environmental impacts for a broad set of biomass-to-product process chains. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess., 22 (2017), 1418–40.Google Scholar
Parvatker, A. G. and Eckelman, M. J., Simulation-based estimates of life cycle inventory gate-to-gate process energy use for 151 organic chemical syntheses. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 8 (2020), 8519–36.Google Scholar
Kleinekorte, J., Fleitmann, L., Bachmann, M., Katelhon, A., Barbosa-Povoa, A., von der Assen, N. and Bardow, A., Life cycle assessment for the design of chemical processes, products, and supply chains. Annu. Rev. Chem. Biomol. Eng., 11 (2020), 203–33.Google Scholar
Beemsterboer, S., Baumann, H. and Wallbaum, H., Ways to get work done: A review and systematisation of simplification practices in the LCA literature. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 25 (2020), 2154–68.Google Scholar
Carnegie Mellon University Green Design Institute. Economic Input–Output Life Cycle Assessment. Available at: www.eiolca.net/, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Hendrickson, C. T., Lave, L. B. and Matthews, H. S., Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Goods and Services: An Input–Output Approach (Washington, DC: Resources for the Future, 2006).Google Scholar
Urban, R. A. and Bakshi, B. R., 1,3-Propanediol from fossils versus biomass: A life cycle evaluation of emissions and ecological resources. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48 (2009), 8068–82.Google Scholar
Yang, Y., Heijungs, R. and Brandão, M., Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) does not necessarily yield more accurate results than process-based LCA. J. Clean. Prod. 150 (2017), 237–42.Google Scholar
Pomponi, F. and Lenzen, M., Hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) will likely yield more accurate results than process-based LCA. J. Clean. Prod. 176 (2018), 210–15.Google Scholar
Crawford, R. H., Bontinck, P.-A., Stephan, A., Wiedmann, T. and Yu, M., Hybrid life cycle inventory methods – A review. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018), 1273–88.Google Scholar
Moni, S. M., Mahmud, R., High, K. and Carbajales-Dale, M., Life cycle assessment of emerging technologies: A review. J. Ind. Ecol., 24 (2020), 52–63.Google Scholar
Bergerson, J., Cucurachi, S. and Seager, T. P., Bringing a life cycle perspective to emerging technology development. J. Ind. Ecol., 24 (2020), 6–10.Google Scholar
Thomassen, G., Van Passel, S. and Dewulf, J., A review on learning effects in prospective technology assessment. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 130 (2020) 109937.Google Scholar
Mendoza Beltran, A., Cox, B., Mutel, C., van Vuuren, D. P., Vivanco, D. F., Deetman, S., Edelenbosch, O. Y., Guinee, J. and Tukker, A., When the background matters: Using scenarios from integrated assessment models in prospective life cycle assessment. J. Ind. Ecol. 24 (2020), 64–79.Google Scholar
Russell, D. A. M. and Shiang, D. L., Thinking about more sustainable products: Using an efficient tool for sustainability education, innovation, and project management to encourage sustainability thinking in a multinational corporation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 1 (2013), 2–7.Google Scholar
McGonagle, F. I., Sneddon, H. F., Jamieson, C. and Watson, A. J. B., Molar efficiency: A useful metric to gauge relative reaction efficiency in discovery medicinal chemistry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2 (2014), 523–32.Google Scholar
Toniolo, S., Aricò, F. and Tundo, P. A., Comparative environmental assessment for the synthesis of 1,3-Oxazin-2-one by metrics: Greenness evaluation and blind spots. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2 (2014), 1056–62.Google Scholar
Talbone, M. D., Cregg, J. J., Beckman, E. J. and Landis, A. E., Sustainability metrics: Life cycle assessment and green design in polymers. Environ. Sci. Technol., 44 (2010), 8264–69.Google Scholar
Mercer, S. M., Andraos, J. and Jessop, P. G., Choosing the greenest synthesis: A multivariate metric green chemistry exercise. J. Chem. Educ., 89 (2012), 215–20.Google Scholar
Andraos, J., Unification of reaction metrics for green chemistry: Applications to reaction analysis. Org. Process Res. Dev., 9 (2005), 149–63.Google Scholar
Xie, Z. and Subramaniam, B., Development of a greener hydroformylation process guided by quantitative sustainability assessments. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2 (2014), 2748–57.Google Scholar
McElroy, C. R., Constantantinou, A., Jones, I. C., Summerton, L. and Clark, J. H.. Towards a holistic approach to metrics for the 21st century pharmaceutical industry. Green Chem., 17 (2015), 3111–21.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. M., Rice, J. W. and Lewandowski, T., Expanding the toolbox: Hazard-screening methods and tools for identifying safer chemicals in green product design. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 6 (2018), 1941–50.Google Scholar
Giraud, R. J., Williams, P. A., Sehgal, A., Ponnusamy, E., Phillips, A. K. and Manley, J. H., Implementing green chemistry in chemical manufacturing: A survey. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2 (2014), 2237–42.Google Scholar
Science and sustainability. Dow Chemical Company. Available at: www.dow.com/en-us/science-and-sustainability/, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
We create chemistry for a sustainable future. BASF. Available at: www.basf.com/us/en/who-we-are/sustainability.html, last accessed Feb 7, 2022.Google Scholar
Using science and innovation to create a sustainable world. DUPONT. Available at: www.dupont.com/corporate-functions/sustainability.html, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Environmental Sustainability. Procter&Gamble. Available at: https://us.pg.com/environmental-sustainability/, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar
Azapagic, A. and Clift, R., The application of life cycle assessment to process optimisation. Comput. Chem. Eng., 23 (1999), 1509–26.Google Scholar
Chen, H. and Shonnard, D. R., Systematic framework for environmentally conscious chemical process design: Early and detailed design stages. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43 (2004), 535–52.Google Scholar
Holman, P. A., Shonnard, D. R. and Holles, J. H., Using life cycle analysis to guide catalysis research. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 48 (2009), 6668–74.Google Scholar
Subramaniam, B., Helling, R. K. and Bode, C. J., Quantitative sustainability analysis: A powerful tool to develop resource-efficient catalytic technologies. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 4 (2016), 5859–65.Google Scholar
Grossmann, I. E., Caballero, J. A. and Yeomans, H., Mathematical programming approaches for the synthesis of chemical process systems. Korean J Chem. Eng., 16 (1999), 407–26.Google Scholar
Chung, P. S., Jhon, M. S. and Biegler, L. T., The holistic strategy in multi-scale modeling. Adv. Chem. Eng., 40 (2011), 59–118.Google Scholar
Bakshi, B. R. and Fiksel, J., The quest for sustainability: Challenges for process systems engineering. AIChE J., 6 (2003), 1350–58.Google Scholar
Vision 2050: The new agenda for business. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (wbccsd). Available at: www.wbcsd.org/Overview/About-us/Vision2050, last accessed Dec 27, 2019.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×