Baumgartner, J. 2017. Treaty Shopping in International Investment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Berger, A. 2013. “Do Trade and Investment Agreements Lead to More FDI? Accounting for Key Provisions inside the Black Box,” International Economics and Economic Policy 10: 247–75.Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J. 2019. “The Impact of Investment Treaties on Domestic Governance in Myanmar.” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3644056.Google Scholar

Bonnitcha, J., Poulsen, L. and Waibel, M. 2017. The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burkhardt, H.-M. 1986. “Investment Protection Treaties: Recent Trends and Prospects,” Aussenwirtschaft 41(1): 99–104.Google Scholar

The British Chambers of Commerce in China. 2018. “British Business in China: Member Sentiment Survey.” www.britishchamber.cn/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/181217_BC_Sentiment-Survey_WEB.pdf.Google Scholar

Brower, C. H. and Blanchard, S. 2014. “What’s in a Meme? The Truth about Investor-State Arbitration: Why It Need Not, and Must Not, Be Repossessed by States,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 52(3): 689–777.Google Scholar

Calamita, J. 2015. “The Rule of Law, Investment Treaties, and Economic Growth: Mapping Normative and Empirical Questions.” In Jowell, J., Thomas, C. and van Zyl Smit, J. (Eds.), The Importance of the Rule of Law in Promoting Development. Singapore: Singapore Academy of Law, pp. 103–28.Google Scholar

Craig, P. 1997. “Formal and Substantive Conceptions of the Rule of Law: An Analytical Framework,” Public Law 467–87.Google Scholar

DePalma, A. 2001. ‘NAFTA’s Powerful Little Secret, Obscure Tribunals Settle Disputes, But Go Too Far, Critics Say,” The New York Times, 11 March.Google Scholar

Denza, E. and Poulsen, L. 2020. “The Euro-Arab Investment Treaty That Nearly Was,” International & Comparative Law Quarterly 69: 267–99.Google Scholar

Dolzer, R. and Stevens, M. 1995. Bilateral Investment Treaties. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar

Echandi, R. 2011. “What Do Developing Countries Expect from the International Investment Regime.” In Alvarez, J., Sauvant, K., Ahmed, K. and Vizcaino, G. (Eds.), The Evolving International Investment Regime. New York: Oxford University Press; pp. 3–21.Google Scholar

European Federation for Investment Law and Arbitration (EFILA), 2015, ‘A Response to the Criticism Against ISDS,’ 17 May, Brussels. http://efila.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/EFILA_in_response_to_the-criticism_of_ISDS_final_draft.pdf.Google Scholar

Franck, S. D. 2007. “Integrating Investment Treaty Conflict and Dispute Systems Design,” Minnesota Law Review 92(1): 161–230.Google Scholar

Gertz, G. 2014. “Book Review: The Empire Trap: The Rise and Fall of U.S. Intervention to Protect American Property Overseas, 1893–2013 by Noel Maurer,” International Affairs 90(4): 1003–5.Google Scholar

Gertz, G. 2016. “Commercial Diplomacy and American Foreign Policy,” GEG Working Paper 2016/119.Google Scholar

Gertz, G., Jandhyala, S. and Poulsen, L. 2018. “Legalization, Diplomacy, and Development: Do Investment Treaties De-politicize Investment Disputes?” World Development 107: 238–52.Google Scholar

Ginsburg, T. 2005. “International Substitutes for Domestic Institutions: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Governance,” International Review of Law and Economics 25(1): 107–23.Google Scholar

Hepburn, J., Paparinskis, M., Poulsen, L. and Waibel, M. 2019. “Investment Law before Arbitration,” Working paper (on file).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kantor, M. 2014. “Comparing Political Risk Insurance and Investment Treaty Arbitration.” In: Borzu, S., Birch, N., Laird, I. and Rivas, J. (Eds.), Revolution in the International Rule of Law: Essays in honor of Don Wallace, Jr. New York: Juris Publishing, pp. 455–74.Google Scholar

Maurer, N. 2013. The Empire Trap: The Rise and Fall of U.S. Intervention to Protect American Property Overseas, 1893–2013. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

OECD 2019a. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – Inward FDI Stocks by Partner Country – OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/fdi/inward-fdi-stocks-by-partner-country.htm#indicator-chart.Google Scholar

OECD 2019b. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – Outward FDI Stocks by Partner Country – OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/fdi/outward-fdi-stocks-by-partner-country.htm#indicator-chart.Google Scholar

OECD 2019c. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – FDI Stocks – OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/fdi/fdi-stocks.htm#indicator-chart.Google Scholar

OECD 2019d. Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) – Outward FDI Flows by Partner Country – OECD Data. https://data.oecd.org/fdi/outward-fdi-flows-by-partner-country.htm#indicator-chart.Google Scholar

OECD 2019e. Development Aid at a Glance – Statistics by Region – Asia. Paris: OECD. www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-data/Asia-Development-Aid-at-a-Glance-2019.pdf.Google Scholar

Paparinskis, M. 2012. “The Limits of Depoliticisation in Contemporary Investor–State Arbitration,” Select Proceedings of the European Society of International Law (3): 271–82.Google Scholar

Paulsson, J. 2005. “Indirect Expropriation: Is the Right to Regulate at Risk?” 12 December, Paris. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/5/52/36055332.pdf. Accessed 22 September 2019.Google Scholar

Puig, S. 2013. “Emergence & Dynamism in International Organizations: ICSID, Investor-State Arbitration & International Investment Law,” Georgetown Journal of International Law 44: 531–608.Google Scholar

Polanco, R. 2019. The Return of the Home State to Investor-State Disputes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Poulsen, L. 2010. “The Importance of BITs for Foreign Direct Investment and Political Risk Insurance: Revisiting the Evidence.” In Sauvant, K. (Ed.), Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2009/2010, New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 539–74.Google Scholar

Poulsen, L. 2015. Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Poulsen, L. 2020. “Beyond Credible Commitments: (Investment) Treaties as Focal Points,” International Studies Quarterly 64(1): 26–34.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. 2014. “State-to-State Investment Treaty Arbitration: A Hybrid Theory of Interdependent Rights and Shared Interpretive Authority,” Harvard International Law Journal 55(1): 1–70.Google Scholar

Sasse, J. P. 2011. An Economic Analysis of Bilateral Investment Treaties. Wiesbaden: Gabler.Google Scholar

Sattorova, M. 2018. The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar

Schill, S. W. 2009. The Multilateralization of International Investment Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schill, S. W. 2010. “Fair and Equitable Treatment, the Rule of Law and Comparative Public Law.” In Schill, S. W. (Ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–82.Google Scholar

St John, T. 2018. The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Salacuse, J. 2007. “Is There a Better Way – Alternative Methods of Treaty-Based, Investor State Dispute Resolution,” Fordham International Law Journal 31: 138–85.Google Scholar

Schwebel, S. 2016. “Introduction.” In Franke, U., Magnusson, A. and Dahquist, J. (Eds.), Arbitrating for Peace: How Arbitration Made a Difference, The Hague: Kluwer Law International, pp. 1–6.Google Scholar

Staley, E. 1935. War and the Private Investor: A Study in the Relations of International Politics and International Private Investment. Doubleday, Doran & Co.Google Scholar

Steinitz, M. 2011. “Whose Claim Is This Anyway – Third-Party Litigation Funding,” Minnesota Law Review 95: 1268–338.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. 2010. “Investment Treaty Arbitration, Procedural Fairness, and the Rule of Law.” In Schill, S. W. (Ed.), International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law. Oxford University Press, pp. 627–57.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. and Malysheuski, P. 2016. “Who Has Benefited Financially from Investment Treaty Arbitration? An Evaluation of the Size and Wealth of Claimants,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal Legal Studies Research Paper Series Research Paper No 14/2016.Google Scholar

Vandevelde, K. 2010. Bilateral Investment Treaties: History, Policy, and Interpretation. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Wälde, T. 2005. “The ‘Umbrella’ Clause in Investment Arbitration: A Comment on Original Intentions and Recent Cases,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 6(2): 183–236.Google Scholar

Welsh, N. A. and Kupfer Schneider, A. 2013. “The Thoughtful Integration of Mediation into Bilateral Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Harvard Negotiation Law Review 18: 71–144.Google Scholar

World Bank 2019. Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI) 2019 Interactive > Interactive Data Access. https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports.+Interactive+Data+Access.+https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/Home/Reports.>Google Scholar

Xiao, Z. 2021. “The Evolution of the Settlement of Investor-State Disputes in China,” draft PhD thesis, on file.Google Scholar

Yackee, J. 2008. “Do We Really Need BITs? Toward a Return to Contract in International Investment Law,” Asian Journal of WTO and Health Law 3: 121–46.Google Scholar

Yackee, J. 2008–9. “Pacta Sunt Servanda and State Promises to Foreign Investors before Bilateral Investment Treaties: Myth and Reality,” Fordham International Law Journal 32(5): 1550–613.Google Scholar

Yackee, J. 2009. “Do BITs Really Work? Revisiting the Empirical Link between Investment Treaties and Foreign Direct Investment.” In Sauvant, K. and Sachs, L. (Eds.), The Effect of Treaties on Foreign Direct Investment: Bilateral Investment Treaties, Double Taxation Treaties and Investment Flows. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 379–94.Google Scholar

Yackee, J. 2011. “Do Bilateral Investment Treaties Promote Foreign Direct Investment? Some Hints from Alternative Evidence,” Virginia Journal of International Law 51(2): 397–441.Google Scholar

Yackee, J. 2014. “Political Risk and International Investment Law,” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 24(3): 477–500.Google Scholar

Yackee, J. 2019. “Investor-State Dispute Settlement at the Dawn of International Investment Law: France, Mauritania, and the Nationalization of the MIFERMA Iron Ore Operations,” American Journal of Legal History 59(1): 71–110.Google Scholar

Yackee, J. 2021. “Expelling the ‘Sinister Vilgrain’: Nationalization, Diplomacy, and Sugar in the People’s Republic of Congo, 1970–1978,” French Historical Studies 44(1): 119–47.Google Scholar

Živković, V. 2019. “Fair and Equitable Treatment between the International and National Rule of Law,” Journal of World Investment and Trade 20(4): 513–52.Google Scholar

Álvarez Zárate, J. M. 2018. “Legitimacy Concerns of the Proposed Multilateral Investment Court: Is Democracy Possible?” Boston College Law Review 59: 2765–90.Google Scholar

Antonietti, A. 2006. “The 2006 Amendments to the ICSID Rules and Regulations and the Additional Facility Rules,” ICSID Review FILJ 21: 427–48.Google Scholar

Boyle, A. 1997. “Dispute Settlement and the Law of the Sea Convention: Problems of Fragmentation and Jurisdiction,” The International and Comparative Law Quarterly 46: 37–54.Google Scholar

Brower, C. and Schill, S. 2009. “Is Arbitration a Threat or a Boon to the Legitimacy of International Investment Law?” Chicago Journal of International Law 9: 471–98.Google Scholar

Bungenberg, M. and Reinisch, A. 2018. From Bilateral Arbitral Tribunals and Investment Courts to a Multilateral Investment Court, London: Springer Nature.Google Scholar

Calamita, N. Jansen 2017. “The (In)Compatibility of Appellate Mechanisms with Existing Instruments of the Investment Treaty Regime,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 18: 585–627.Google Scholar

Chen, H. 2018. “China’s Innovative ISDS Mechanisms and Their Implications,” AJIL Unbound 112: 207–11.Google Scholar

EU 2018. Council of the European Union, “Negotiating Directives for a Convention Establishing a Multilateral Court for the Settlement of Investment Disputes,” EU Doc. No. 12981/17 ADD 1.Google Scholar

De Mestral, A. (Ed.) 2017. Second Thoughts – Investor–State Arbitration Between Developed Democracies, Waterloo: Centre for International Governance Innovation.Google Scholar

De Mestral, A. and Lévesque, C. (Eds.) 2012. Improving International Investment Agreements, Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.Google Scholar

Dolzer, R. and Schreuer, C. 2012. Principles of International Investment Law (2nd ed.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Eberhardt, P. and Olivet, C. 2012. Profiting from Injustice – How Law Firms, Arbitrators and Financiers Are Fuelling an Investment Arbitration Boom, Brussels: Corporate Europe Observatory and Transnational Institute.Google Scholar

Echandi, R. and Sauvé, P. (Eds.) 2013. Prospects in International Investment Law and Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Fach Gómez, K. 2018. “Diversity and the Principle of Independence and Impartiality in the Future Multilateral Investment Court,” The Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribuna/s 17: 78–97.Google Scholar

Hanessian, G. and Duggal, K. 2017. “The Final 2015 Indian Model BIT: Is This the Change the World Wishes to See?” ICSID Review 32: 216–26.Google Scholar

Hindelang, S. and Krajewski, M. (Eds.) 2016. Shifting Paradigms in International Investment Law: More Balanced, Less Isolated, Increasingly Diversified, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) 2017. ‘EU–Japan EPA Negotiations Finalized Without Investment; EU–Mexico Updated FTA Nears Completion,” www.iisd.org/itn/2017/12/21/eu-japan-epa-negotiations-finalized-without-investment-eu-mexico-updated-fta-nears-completion/. Accessed on 27 January 2020.Google Scholar

Kalicki, J. and Joubin-Bret, A. (Eds.) 2015. Reshaping the Investor–State Dispute Settlement System: Journeys for the 21st Century, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Potestà, M. 2016. Can the Mauritius Convention Serve as a Model for the Reform of investor–state Arbitration in Connection with the Introduction of a Permanent Investment Tribunal or an Appeal Mechanism? Analysis and Roadmap. Geneva: CIDS-Geneva Center for International Dispute Settlement.Google Scholar

Kulick, A. (Ed.) 2016. Reassertion of Control over the Investment Treaty Regime, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Langford, M., Behn, D. and Usynin, M. 2018. “Does Nationality Matter? Arbitral Background and the Universality of International Investment Regime,” ESIL Conference, Manchester, September 2018, https://www.jus.uio.no/ior/english/people/aca/malcolml/paper–––does-nationality-matter–––esil-2018-%2820-august%29.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2021.Google Scholar

Leikin, E., Gadodia, S. and Loudon, C. 2018. “The State Doesn’t Strike Back After All: India’s Final Model BIT Takes the Bite Out of Investor Obligations and Eliminates State Counterclaims,” Transnational Dispute Management 15:2.Google Scholar

Miles, K. 2013. The Origins of International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ning, H. and Qi, T. 2018. “Multilateral Investment Court: The Gap Between the EU and China,” Chinese Journal of Global Governance 4: 154–75.Google Scholar

Polanco, R. 2019. The Return of the Home State to Investor–State Disputes – Bringing Back Diplomatic Protection? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Puig, S. 2014. “Social Capital in the Arbitration Market,” European Journal of International Law 25: 387–424.Google Scholar

Puig, S. and Shaffer, G. 2018. “Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law,” American Journal of International Law 112: 361–409.Google Scholar

Rajput, A. 2017. Protection of Foreign Investment in India and Investment Treaty Arbitration, Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar

Ranjan, P. 2019. India and Bilateral Investment Treaties: Refusal, Acceptance, Backlash, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ranjan, P. and Anand, P. 2017. “The 2016 Model Indian Bilateral Investment Treaty: A Critical Deconstruction,” Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 8: 1–54.Google Scholar

Reinisch, A. 2016. “Will the EU’s Proposal Concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP Lead to Enforceable Awards – The Limits of Modifying the ICSID Convention and the Nature of Investment Arbitration,” Journal of International Economic Law 19: 761–86.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. 2018. “Incremental, Systemic, and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor–State Arbitration,” American Journal of International Law 112: 410–32.Google Scholar

Sachetim, H. and Codeço, R. 2019. “The Investor–State Dispute Settlement System Amidst Crisis, Collapse, and Reform,” Arbitration Brief 6: 20–59.Google Scholar

Sauvant, K. and Ortino, F. 2013. Improving the International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Options for the Future, Helsinki: Ministry for Foreign Affairs of Finland.Google Scholar

Sauvant, P. 2016. “The Evolving International Investment Law and Policy Regime: Ways Forward” E15 Task Force on Investment Policy – Policy Options Paper, International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development (ICTSD) and World Economic Forum.Google Scholar

Schill, S. 2009. The Multilateralization of International Investment Law, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schill, S. 2017. “Reforming Investor–State Dispute Settlement: A (Comparative and International) Constitutional Law Framework,” Journal of International Economic Law 20: 649–72.Google Scholar

Schill, S. 2019. “From Investor–State Dispute Settlement to a Multilateral Investment Court? Evaluating Options from an EU Law Perspective,” In European Parliament (Ed.), EU Investment Protection After the ECJ Opinion on Singapore: Question of Competence and Coherence. Brussels: European Union, www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank/en/document.html?reference=EXPO_STU(2019)603476. Accessed 28 January 2020.Google Scholar

Schill, S. and Vidigal, G. 2019. “Designing Investment Dispute Settlement à la Carte: Insights from Comparative Institutional Design Analysis,” The Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 18: 311–44.Google Scholar

Schill, S. and Briese, R. 2009. “If the State Considers: Self-Judging Clauses in International Dispute Settlement,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 13: 61–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneiderman, D. 2008. Constitutionalizing Economic Globalization: Investment Rules and Democracy’s Promise, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Schreuer, C. 2008. “Preliminary Rulings in Investment Arbitration,” In Sauvant, K. (Ed.), Appeals Mechanism in International Investment Disputes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Sornarajah, M. 2015. Resistance and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

St John, T. 2020. The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences and Change in the International Law on Foreign Investment, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tienhaara, K. 2009. The Expropriation of Environmental Governance: Protecting Foreign Investors at the Expense of Public Policy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Titi, C. 2018. “The Evolution of Substantive Investment Protections in Recent Trade and Investment Treaties,” RTA Exchange, Geneva: International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development and the Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2018, “Report of Working Group III (Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the Work of Its Thirty-Sixth Session,” UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/964, 6 November 2018,Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2019a. “Possible Reform of Investor–state Dispute Settlement (ISDS), Note by the Secretariat,” UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.166 and A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.166/Add.1, 30 July 2019.Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2019b, “Possible Reform of Investor–state Dispute Settlement (ISDS) – Submission from the Government of Brazil,” UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.171, 11 June 2019.Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2019c, “Possible Reform of Investor–State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) – Submission from the Government of China,” UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.177, 19 July 2019.Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2019d. “Submission of the European Union and Its Member States to UNCITRAL Working Group III,” http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/html/157631.htm. Accessed 5 March 2019 (reproduced in UNCITRAL, UN Doc. No. A/CN.9/WG.III/WP.159/Add.1, 24 January 2019.Google Scholar

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD), 2019. “World Investment Report 2019 – Special Economic Zones” (United Nations).Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. 2007. Investment Treaty Arbitration and Public Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. 2010. “Public Statement on the International Investment Regime,” 31 August, www.osgoode.yorku.ca/public-statement-international-investment-regime-31-august-2010/. Accessed 27 January 2020.Google Scholar

Vidigal, G. and Stevens, B. 2018. “Brazil’s New Model of Dispute Settlement for Investment: Return to the Past or Alternative for the Future?” Journal of World Investment & Trade 19: 475–512.Google Scholar

Waibel, M. et al. (eds.) 2010. The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality, Alphen aan de Rijn: Wolters Kluwer International.Google Scholar

Wong, J. and Yackee, J. 2010. “The 2006 Procedural and Transparency-Related Amendments to the ICSID Arbitration Rules: Model Intentions, Moderate Proposals, and Modest Returns,” In Sauvant, K. (Ed.), The Yearbook on International Investment Law & Policy 2009-2010. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 233–74.Google Scholar

Yee, S. 2018. “Dispute Settlement on the Belt and Road: Ideas on System, Spirit and Style,” Chinese Journal of International Law 17: 907–14.Google Scholar

Alschner, W., Pauwelyn, J. and Puig, S. 2017. “The Data-Driven Future of International Economic Law,” Journal of International Economic Law 20(2): 217–31.Google Scholar

Arato, J., Brown, C. and Ortino, F. 2020. “Parsing and Managing Inconsistency in Investor-State Dispute Settlement,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 336–73.Google Scholar

Arcuri, A. and Violi, F. 2019. “Human Rights and Investor–State Dispute Settlement: Changing (Almost) Everything, so that Everything Stays the Same?” Diritti Umani e Diritto Internazionale 3: 579–96.Google Scholar

Behn, D. 2018. “Performance of Investment Treaty Arbitration.” In Squatrito, T., et al (Eds.) The Performance of International Courts and Tribunals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–113.Google Scholar

Behn, D., Berge, T. and Langford, M. 2018. “Poor States or Poor Governance? Explaining Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 38(3): 333–89.Google Scholar

Behn, D., Fauchald, O.K. and Langford, M. 2021a. (Eds.) The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Behn, D., Fauchald, O.K. and Langford, M. 2021b. “Private or Public Good? An Empirical Perspective on Investment Arbitration.” In Iovane, M., et al (Eds.) The Protection of General Interests in Contemporary International Law: A Theoretical and Empirical Inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Behn, D., Langford, M., and Létourneau-Tremblay, L. 2020. “Empirical Perspectives on Investment Arbitration: What Do We Know? Does It Matter?” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 188–250.Google Scholar

Bernasconi-Osterwalder, N. and Dietrich Brauch, M.. 2017. “Is “Moonlighting” a Problem? The Role of ICJ Judges in ISDS,” IISD Commentary.Google Scholar

Bjorklund, A., et al 2020. “The Diversity Deficit in International Investment Arbitration,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 410–40.Google Scholar

Brekoulakis, S. 2013. “Systemic Bias and the Institution of International Arbitration: A New Approach to Arbitral Decision-Making,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 4(3): 553–85.Google Scholar

Buergenthal, T. 2006. “The Proliferation of Disputes, Dispute Settlement Procedures and Respect for the Rule of Law,” Transnational Dispute Management 3(5).Google Scholar

Cleis, M. 2017. The Independence and Impartiality of ICSID Arbitrators: Current Case Law, Alternative Approaches, and Improvement Suggestions. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Commission, J. and Moloo, R. 2018. Procedural Issues in International Investment Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Daele, K. 2012. Challenge and Disqualification of Arbitrators in International Arbitration. Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar

De Luca, A., Feldman, M., Paparinskis, M. and Titi, C. 2020. “Responding to Incorrect Decision-Making in Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Policy Options,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 374–409.Google Scholar

Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. 1996. Dealing in Virtue: International Commercial Arbitration and the Construction of a Transnational Legal Order. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Dimitropoulos, G. 2018. “Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform and Theory of Institutional Design,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 9(4): 535–69.Google Scholar

Dupont, C. and Schultz, T. 2013. “Do Hard Economic Times Lead to International Legal Disputes? The Case of Investment Arbitration,” Swiss Political Science Review 19(2): 564–69.Google Scholar

Franck, S. 2007. “Empirically Evaluating Claims About Investment Treaty Arbitration,” North Carolina Law Review 80(1): 1–56.Google Scholar

Franck, S. 2009. “Development and Outcomes of Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Harvard International Law Journal 50(2): 436–87.Google Scholar

Franck, S. 2014. “Conflating Politics and Development: Examining Investment Treaty Outcomes,” Virginia Journal of International Law 55(1): 13–71.Google Scholar

Franck, S. and Wylie, L.. 2015. “Predicting Outcomes in Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Duke Law Journal 65: 459–520.Google Scholar

Franck, S., et al 2017. “Inside the Arbitrator’s Mind,” Emory Law Journal 66: 1116–39.Google Scholar

Friedland, P. and Brekoulakis, S. 2018. “2018 International Arbitration Survey: The Evolution of International Arbitration.” Queen Mary University of London.Google Scholar

Gáspár-Szilágyi, S. and Létourneau-Tremblay, L. 2020. “Question of Impartiality: Who Are the Dissenting Arbitrators in International Investment Treaty Arbitration?” In Baetens, F. (Ed.) Identity on the Bench: Implications for the Legitimacy of International Adjudication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Giorgetti, C., et al 2020. “Lack of Independence and Impartiality of Arbitrators in Investment Dispute Settlement: Assessing Challenges and Reform Options,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 441–74.Google Scholar

Greenwood, L. and Baker, M. 2015. “Is the Balance Getting Better? An Update on the Issue of Gender Diversity,” Arbitration International 31(3): 413–23.Google Scholar

Greenwood, L. 2017. “Tipping the Balance: Diversity and Inclusion in International Arbitration,” Arbitration International 33(1): 99–108.Google Scholar

Grossman, N. 2016. “Achieving Sex-Representative International Court Benches,” American Journal of International Law 110(1): 82–95.Google Scholar

ICSID 2019. “2019 ICSID Annual Report,” October 2019.Google Scholar

Kapeliuk, D. 2010. “Repeat Appointment Factor: Exploring Decision Patterns of Elite Investment Arbitrators,” Cornell Law Review 96: 90–118.Google Scholar

Kidane, W. 2017. The Culture of International Arbitration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Kinnear, M., et al (Eds.) 2015. Building International Investment Law: The First 50 Years of ICSID. Hague: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Potestà, M. 2017. “The Composition of a Multilateral Investment Court and of an Appeal Mechanism for Investment Awards,” CIDS Supplemental Report.Google Scholar

Langford, M., Behn, D. and Lie, R. 2017. “The Revolving Door in International Investment Arbitration,” Journal of International Economic Law 20(2): 301–32.Google Scholar

Langford, M. and Behn, D. 2018. “Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Arbitrator?” European Journal of International Law 29(2): 551–80.Google Scholar

Langford, M., Creamer, C. and Behn, D., ‘Regime Responsiveness in International Economic Disputes’, in S. Gáspár-Szilágyi, D. Behn and M. Langford (eds.), Adjudicating Trade and Investment Disputes: Convergence or Divergence? (Cambridge University Press, 2020): 244–284.Google Scholar

Langford, M. 2020. “The Changing Sociology of the Investment Arbitration Market: The Case of Double Hatting,” Paper presented at IELAP Seminar, 27 February, King’s College London, Working Paper.Google Scholar

Langford, M., Potesta, M., Kaufmann-Kohler, G. and Behn, D. 2020. “Special Issue: UNCITRAL and Investment Arbitration Reform: Matching Concerns and Solutions, An Introduction,” Journal of World Investment & Trade 21(2–3): 167–87.Google Scholar

Langford, M., Behn, D. and Usynin, M. 2021. “The West and the Rest: Geographic Diversity and the Role of Arbitrator Nationality in Investment Arbitration.” In Behn, D., Fauchald, O. K. and Langford, M. (Eds.) The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Levine, J. 2012. “Dealing with Arbitrator ‘Issue Conflicts’ in International Arbitration,” Dispute Resolution Journal 6: 60–72.Google Scholar

Lie, R. 2021. “The Influence of Law Firms in Investment Arbitration.” In Behn, D., Fauchald, O. K. and Langford, M. (Eds.) The Legitimacy of Investment Arbitration: Empirical Perspectives, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pauwelyn, J. 2015. “The Rule of Law Without the Rule of Lawyers? Why Investment Arbitrators Are from Mars, Trade Adjudicators from Venus?” American Journal of International Law 109(4): 761–805.Google Scholar

Puig, S. 2014. “Social Capital in the Arbitration Market,” European Journal of International Law 25(2): 387–424.Google Scholar

Puig, S. 2016. “Blinding International Justice,” Virginia Journal of International Law 56(3): 647–700.Google Scholar

Puig, S. 2019. “Debiasing International Economic Law,” European Journal of International Law 30(4): 1339–57.Google Scholar

Puig, S. and Shaffer, G. 2018. “Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law,” American Journal of International Law 112(3): 361–412.Google Scholar

Puig, S. and Strezhnev, A. 2017a. “Affiliation Bias in Arbitration: An Experimental Approach,” Journal of Legal Studies 46(2): 371–92.Google Scholar

Puig, S. and Strezhnev, A. 2017b. “The David Effect and ISDS,” European Journal of International Law 28(3): 731–61.Google Scholar

Puig, S. and Shaffer, G. 2018. “Imperfect Alternatives: Institutional Choice and the Reform of Investment Law,” American Journal of International Law 112(3): 361–409.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. 2018. “Incremental, Systemic, and Paradigmatic Reform of Investor–state Arbitration,” American Journal of International Law 112(3): 410–32.Google Scholar

Roberts, A. and St John, T. 2019. “UNCITRAL and ISDS Reforms: Agenda-Widening and Paradigm-Shifting,” 20 September, EJIL: Talk!Google Scholar

Sattorova, M. 2018. The Impact of Investment Treaty Law on Host States: Enabling Good Governance? Cambridge: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar

Schultz, T. and Dupont, C. 2015. “Investment Arbitration: Promoting the Rule of Law or Over-Empowering Investors? A Quantitative Study,” European Journal of International Law 25(4): 1147–68.Google Scholar

Schultz, T. 2020. “The Ethos of Arbitration.” In Schultz, T. and Ortino, F. (Eds.) The Oxford Handbook of International Arbitration, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 235–59.Google Scholar

Shaffer, G. and Ginsburg, T. 2012. “The Empirical Turn in International Legal Scholarship,” American Journal of International Law 106(1): 1–46.Google Scholar

St John, T., Behn, D., Langford, M., and Lie, R. 2018. “Glass Ceilings and Arbitral Dealings: Gender and Investment Arbitration,” PluriCourts Working Paper.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A. and Grisel, F. 2017. The Evolution of International Arbitration: Judicialization, Governance, Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Stone Sweet, A., Chung, M. and Saltzman, A. 2017. “Arbitral Lawmaking and State Power: An Empirical Analysis of Investor–State Arbitration,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 8(4): 608–32.Google Scholar

Strezhnev, A. 2016. “Detecting Bias in International Investment Arbitration,” Paper presented at the 57th Annual Convention of the International Studies Association – Atlanta, Georgia, 16–19 March 2016.Google Scholar

Strezhnev, A. 2017. “Why Rich Countries Win Investment Disputes: Taking Selection Seriously,” Working Paper.Google Scholar

Strezhnev, A. and Puig, S. 2019. “Diversity and Compliance in Investment Arbitration: Future Directions in Empirical Research on Investment Law and Arbitration,” Paper presented at the Oslo LEGINVEST Conference, 31 January 2019.Google Scholar

Tienhaara, K. 2011. “Regulatory Chill and the Threat of Arbitration: A View from Political Science.” In Brown, C. and Miles, K. (Eds.), Evolution in Investment Treaty Law and Arbitration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 606–27.Google Scholar

Trakman, L. 2007. “The Impartiality and Independence of Arbitrators Reconsidered,” International Arbitration Law Review 10: 999.Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2017a. “Report of Working Group III (Investor–State Dispute Settlement Reform) on the Work of Its Thirty-Fourth Session (Vienna, 27 November–1 December 2017),” 19 December, UN Doc A/CN.9/930/Rev.1.Google Scholar

UNCITRAL 2017b. “Report of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law, Fiftieth Session,” 3–21 July, UN Doc A/72/17.Google Scholar

van den Berg, A. 2010. “Dissenting Opinions by Party-Appointed Arbitrators in Investment Arbitration.” In Arsanjani, M., et al (Eds.), Looking to the Future: Essays on International Law in Honor of W Michael Reisman. Leiden: Brill, pp. 821–43.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. 2012a. “Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication: An Empirical Study of Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 50(1): 211–68.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. 2012b. “The (Lack of) Women Arbitrators in Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Columbia FDI Perspectives 59.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. 2016. “Arbitrator Behaviour in Asymmetrical Adjudication (Part Two): An Examination of Hypotheses of Bias in Investment Treaty Arbitration,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal 53(2): 540–86.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G. 2018. “Leaders in the Expansive and Restrictive Interpretation of Investment Treaties: A Descriptive Study of ISDS Awards to 2010,” European Journal of International Law 29(2): 507–49.Google Scholar

Van Harten, G., Kelsey, J. and Schneiderman, D. 2019. “Phase 2 of the UNCITRAL ISDS Review: Why ‘Other Matters’ Really Matter,” Osgoode Hall Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2.Google Scholar

Waibel, M. and Wu, Y. 2017. “Are Arbitrators Political? Evidence from International Investment Arbitration,” ASIL Research Forum Working Paper.Google Scholar

Wellhausen, R. 2016. “Recent Trends in Investor–state Dispute Settlement,” Journal of International Dispute Settlement 7(1): 117–35.Google Scholar