Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- Table of UN Resolutions
- List of abbreviations
- 1 The general framework
- 2 The legal nature and basic principles of belligerent occupation
- 3 Human rights and belligerent occupation
- 4 The maintenance of law and order in occupied territories
- 5 Legislation by the Occupying Power
- 6 The judicial system in occupied territories
- 7 Protection of the civilian population under belligerent occupation
- 8 Special protection in occupied territories
- 9 Destruction and pillage of property in occupied territories
- 10 Seizure and use of property in occupied territories
- 11 Other major issues relating to belligerent occupation
- 12 The termination of belligerent occupation
- Conclusion
- Index of persons
- Index of subjects
- References
2 - The legal nature and basic principles of belligerent occupation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 January 2011
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Preface
- Table of cases
- Table of treaties
- Table of UN Resolutions
- List of abbreviations
- 1 The general framework
- 2 The legal nature and basic principles of belligerent occupation
- 3 Human rights and belligerent occupation
- 4 The maintenance of law and order in occupied territories
- 5 Legislation by the Occupying Power
- 6 The judicial system in occupied territories
- 7 Protection of the civilian population under belligerent occupation
- 8 Special protection in occupied territories
- 9 Destruction and pillage of property in occupied territories
- 10 Seizure and use of property in occupied territories
- 11 Other major issues relating to belligerent occupation
- 12 The termination of belligerent occupation
- Conclusion
- Index of persons
- Index of subjects
- References
Summary
69. The term ‘occupation’ is used in several branches of international law, and it is therefore necessary to pay heed to the unique features of ‘belligerent occupation’ (a translation into English of the Latin term occupatio bellica). In particular, belligerent occupation differs markedly from occupation as a mode of acquisition of territory by States, where ‘[t]he only territory which can be the object of occupation is that which does not already belong to any state’.
Conditions for the establishment of a belligerent occupation regime
Belligerent occupation and inter-State armed conflicts
The linkage of belligerent occupation to war
70. As the appellation ‘belligerent occupation’ suggests, there is an inextricable tie between this species of occupation and inter-State war (bellum). Until the conclusion of Geneva Convention (IV), the logical presupposition was that an inter-State war may lead to belligerent occupation. Remarkably, the Convention turned the war-occupation sequence on its head. Article 6 (first paragraph) lays down that the Convention ‘shall apply from the outset of any conflict or occupation mentioned in Article 2’. For its part, Article 2 (second paragraph) sets forth that the Convention applies to ‘all cases of partial or total occupation of the territory of a High Contracting Party, even if the said occupation meets with no armed resistance’ (see supra 49). The last words imply that belligerent occupation may be carried out without any hostilities either preceding or following it.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The International Law of Belligerent Occupation , pp. 31 - 66Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2009
References
, ‘Government in Commission’, 23 British Year Book of International Law112, 140 (1946)Google Scholar
, ‘Germany, Occupation after World War II’, 2 Encyclopedia of Public International Law (R. Bernhardt ed., 1992–2000)582, 587–8 (1995)Google Scholar
, ‘Legal Bases and Character of Military Occupation in Germany and Japan’, 43 American Journal of International Law323, 324 (1949)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Transformative Military Occupation: Applying the Laws of War and Human Rights’, International Law and Armed Conflict: Exploring the Faultlines, Essays in Honour of Yoram Dinstein 439, 467–70 ( and eds., 2007)Google Scholar
, ‘What Is Military Occupation?’, 55 British Year Book of International Law249, 267–71 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Protection of the Civilian Population’, The Handbook of Humanitarian Law in Armed Conflicts237, 272 (2nd edn, ed., 2008)Google Scholar
, ‘Ius in Bello Interno: The Present and Future Law’, Law and Civil War in the Modern World518, 531 ( ed., 1974)Google Scholar
, ‘Occupation, Pacific’, 3 Encyclopedia of Public International Law (R. Bernhardt ed., 1992–2000)766, 766–7 (1997)Google Scholar
, ‘Trustee-Occupant: The Legal Status of Israel's Presence in the West Bank’, 14 Harvard International Law Journal1, 39–46 (1973)Google Scholar
, ‘Peace-Keeping’, 1 The Charter of the United Nations: A Commentary648, 683 (2nd edn, ed., 2002)Google Scholar
, ‘Occupation Law and Multi-National Operations: Problems and Perspectives’, 77 British Year Book of International Law256, 321–2 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Liberation and Occupation: A Commander's Perspective’, 35 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights71, 86 (2005)Google Scholar
, ‘The Development of International Humanitarian Law by the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia’, 2 Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law97, 126 n. 97 (1998)Google Scholar
and , ‘International Humanitarian Law in the Iraq Conflict’, 47 German Yearbook of International Law293, 301 (2004)Google Scholar
, ‘United States Compliance with Humanitarian Law Respecting Civilians during Operation Just Cause’, 133 Military Law Review31, 75 (1991)Google Scholar
, ‘Les Obligations de la Puissance Occupante au Regard de la Jurisprudence et de la Pratique Récentes’, 111 Revue Générale de Droit International Public117, 119–22 (2007)Google Scholar
, ‘Off-shore Oil Exploration by a Belligerent Occupying Power: The Gulf of Suez Dispute’, 71 American Journal of International Law725, 728 (1977)Google Scholar
, ‘The Validity of the Greenland Agreement’, 35 American Journal of International Law506–13 (1941)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Commentary on the 1913 Oxford Manual of Naval War’, The Law of Naval Warfare: a Collection of Agreements and Documents with Commentaries329, 337 ( ed., 1988)Google Scholar
, ‘Occupation under the Laws of War, I’, 25 Columbia Law Review904, 910 (1925)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Constitutional Forms and Some Legal Problems of International Military Command’, 29 British Year Book of International Law325, 355 (1952)Google Scholar
, ‘The Law of Belligerent Occupation: Basic Issues’, 30 Nordisk Tidsskrift for International Ret10, 17 (1960)Google Scholar
, ‘The Legal Relations between an Occupying Power and the Inhabitants’, 33 Law Quarterly Review363, 364 (1917)Google Scholar
, ‘Article 4’, Commentary on the Additional Protocols of 8 June 1977 to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 194971, 73 (, et al. eds., 1987)Google Scholar
, ‘Lessons for Human Rights and Humanitarian Law in the War on Terror: Comparing Hamdan and the Israeli Targeted Killings Case’, 89 International Review of the Red Cross373, 383 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘The Establishment of a Civil Administration in the Areas Administered by Israel’, 12 Israel Yearbook on Human Rights259, 263 (1982)Google Scholar
, ‘Law of Belligerent Occupation: Israeli Practice and Judicial Decisions Affecting the West Bank’, 21 Canadian Yearbook of International Law217, 230 (1983)Google Scholar
, ‘La Croix-Rouge et les Conventions de Genève’, 76 Recueil des Cours de l'Académie de Droit International1, 101 (1950)Google Scholar
, ‘Article 73’, Commentary on the Additional Protocols, supra note 247, at 845, 846
, ‘The Nationality of the Inhabitants of the Palestinian Autonomous Territories’, New Political Entities in Public and Private International Law with Special Reference to the Palestinian Entity, supra note 90, at 231, 244–5
, ‘The Legal Situation of “Unlawful/Unprivileged Combatants”’, 85 International Review of the Red Cross45, 66 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, ‘Article 45’, Commentary on the Additional Protocols, supra note 247, at 543, 559
, ‘Article 5’, Commentary on the Additional Protocols, supra note 247, at 75, 85
, ‘Article 2’, Commentary on the Additional Protocols, supra note 247, at 57, 61–2
, ‘Who Guards the Guardians: Third Parties and the Law of Armed Conflict’, 70 American Journal of International Law41, 46–7 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2
- Cited by