Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T09:41:00.152Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

25 - Carcinoid and Related Neuroendocrine Tumors

from PART III - ORGAN-SPECIFIC CANCERS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2010

Richard R. P. Warner
Affiliation:
Professor of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, NY
Michelle Kang Kim
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York, NY
Jean-François H. Geschwind
Affiliation:
The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Michael C. Soulen
Affiliation:
University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine
Get access

Summary

A convincing and large body of evidence for the benefit of much more aggressive treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has accumulated in recent years (1–6). The interventional radiologist is frequently involved by this trend and hence must have a general knowledge of the many aspects of these tumors. In general, NETs are much slower growing than are the more commonly encountered malignancies. Furthermore, they are rare. Hence, they are usually diagnosed later in their course. Distant metastases are found in 12.9% of all carcinoids at the time of their diagnosis, and the majority of metastases are from small intestinal primary tumors, with the most frequent site of distant metastasis being the liver (7, 8). However, even when far advanced, these tumors usually are amenable to aggressive treatment that would not be undertaken for other, more common malignancies at an equally advanced stage.

NOMENCLATURE AND DESCRIPTION

NETs represent a heterogeneous group of lesions with widely varying natural histories. The term carcinoid was initially coined to describe a carcinoma-like tumor that was believed to be less aggressive than adenocarcinoma (9). It is now known, however, that although they tend to grow more slowly than most other malignancies, these lesions actually represent a wide array of biologic and clinical behavior.

There has been considerable confusion in the literature regarding the classification and nomenclature of NETs and carcinoids. Pathologists have historically referred to all NETs as carcinoids because of their similar histologic appearance.

Type
Chapter
Information
Interventional Oncology
Principles and Practice
, pp. 290 - 300
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Öberg, K. Diagnosis and treatment of carcinoid tumors. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2003; 3: 863–877.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, K A, Talamonti, M S, Nemcek, A, et al. Indications and results of liver resection and hepatic chemoembolization for metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Surgery, 2001; 130: 677–685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, M H, Pisegna, J, Spirt, M, et al. Hepatic cytoreduction followed by a novel long-acting somatostatin analog: A paradigm for intractable neuroendocrine tumors metastatic to the liver. Surgery, 2001; 130: 954–962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Que, F G, Sarmiento, J M, and Nagorney, D M. Hepatic surgery for metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. Cancer Control, 2002; 9: 67–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarmiento, J M, Heywood, G, Rubin, J, et al. Surgical treatment of neuroendocrine metastases to the liver: A plea for resection to increase survival. J Am Coll Surg, 2003; 197: 29–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herder, W W, Krenning, E P, Eijck, C H, et al. Considerations concerning a tailored, individualized therapeutic management of patients with (neuro)endocrine tumours of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Endocr Relat Cancer, 2004; 11: 19–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Modlin, I M, Lye, K D, Kidd, M. A 5-decade analysis of 13,715 carcinoid tumors. Cancer 2003;97:934–959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berge, T and Linell, F. Carcinoid tumors: Frequency in a defined population during a 12-year period. ACTA Pathol Microbiol Scan, 1976; 84: 322–330.Google Scholar
Oberndorfer, S. Karzinoide Tumoren des Dunndarms. Frank Z Pathol, 1907; 1: 426–429.Google Scholar
Solcia, E, Kloppel, G, Sobin, L H. Histological typing of endocrine tumors, 2nd edition. WHO International Histological Classification of Tumors. Berlin: Springer, 2000.Google Scholar
Quaedvlieg, P F, Visser, O, Lamers, C B, et al. Epidemiology and survival in patients with carcinoid disease in The Netherlands. An epidemiological study with 2,391 patients. Ann Oncol, 2001; 12: 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rindi, G, Leiter, A B, Kopin, A S, et al. The “normal” endocrine cell of the gut: Changing concepts and new evidences. Ann NY Acad Sci, 2004; 1014: 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pictet, R L, Rall, L B, Phelps, P, et al. The neural crest and the origin of the insulin-producing and other gastrointestinal hormone-producing cells. Science, 1976; 191: 191–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eriksson, B and Öberg, K. Neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas. Br J Surg, 2000; 87: 129–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delcore, R, Friesen, S R. Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors. J Am Coll Surg, 1994; 178: 187–211.Google ScholarPubMed
Lam, K Y and Lo, C Y. Pancreatic endocrine tumors: A 22-year clinicopathological experience with morphological, immunohistochemical observation and a review of the literature. Eur J Surg Oncol, 1997; 23: 36–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, K D, Johnston, C F, Hare, O' M M, et al. Neuroendocrine tumors: A European review. Am J Med, 1986; 81(Suppl 6B): 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Modlin, I M, Sandor, A. An analysis of 8,305 cases of carcinoid tumors. Cancer, 1997; 79: 813–829.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemminki, K and Li, X. Incidence trends and risk factors of carcinoid tumors: A nationwide epidemiologic study from Sweden. Cancer, 2001; 92: 2204–2210.3.0.CO;2-R>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hemminki, K and Li, X. Familial carcinoid tumors and subsequent cancers: A nationwide epidemiologic study from Sweden. Int J Cancer, 2001; 94: 444–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, W, Kuroda, A, and Morioka, Y. Clinical pathology of endocrine tumors of the pancreas: Analysis of autopsy cases. Dig Dis Sci, 1991; 36: 933–942.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Öberg K. Carcinoid tumors, carcinoid syndrome and related disorders. In: Larsen, , Kronenberg, , Melmed, and Polonsky, , eds. Williams' Textbook of Endocrinology, 10th edition, pp. 1857–1876. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2003.Google Scholar
Mani, S, Modlin, I M, Ballantyne, G, et al. Carcinoids of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg, 1994; 179: 231–248.Google ScholarPubMed
Warner, R R, Mani, S, Profeta, J, et al. Octreotide treatment of carcinoid hypertensive crisis. Mt Sinai J Med, 1994; 61: 349–355.Google ScholarPubMed
Kvols, L K, Martin, J K, Marsh, H M, et al. Rapid reversal of carcinoid crisis with a somatostatin analog. N Engl J Med, 1985; 313: 1229–1230.Google Scholar
Kinney, M A, Warner, M E, Nagorney, D M, et al. Perianesthetic risks and outcomes of abdominal surgery for metastatic carcinoid tumours. Br J Anaesth, 2001; 87: 447–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardill, JES and Erikkson, B. The importance of the measurement of circulating markers in patients with neuroendocrine tumours of the pancreas and gut. Endocr Relat Cancer, 2003; 10: 459–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baere, T. Hepatic malignancies: Rationale for local and regional therapies. J Vasc Interv Radiol, Suppl (s1–s132) 2005; 16: 4–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D B, Geschwind, J F, Soulen, M C, et al. Society of interventional radiology position statement on chemoembolization of hepatic malignancies. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006; 17: 217–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramage, J K, Davies, A H, Ardill, J, et al. Guidelines for the management of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine (including carcinoid) tumours. Gut, Suppl 4, 2005; 54: iv1–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, K T, Koh, B Y, Brody, L A, et al. Particle embolization of hepatic neuroendocrine metastases for control of pain and hormonal symptoms. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1999; 10: 397–403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tajima, T, Honda, H, Kuroiwa, T, et al. Pulmonary complications after hepatic artery chemoembolization or infusion via the inferior phrenic artery for primary liver cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2002; 13: 893–900.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arora, R, Soulen, M, and Haskol, Z. Cutaneous complications of hepatic chemoembolization via extra hepatic collaterals. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1999; 10: 1351–1356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strosberg, J R, Choi, J, Cantor, A D, et al. Selective hepatic artery embolization for treatment of patients with metastatic carcinoid and pancreatic endocrine tumors. Cancer Control, 2006; 13: 72–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, D B, Cardella, J F, Sacks, D, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for transhepatic arterial chemoembolization, embolization, and chemotherapeutic infusion for hepatic malignancy. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2006; 17: 225–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ruutiainen, A T, Soulen, M C, Tuite, C M, et al. Chemoembolization and bland embolization of neuroendocrine tumor metastases to the liver. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2007; 18: 847–855.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, A S, Dezarn, W A, McNeillie, P, et al. Radioembolization for unresectable neuroendocrine hepatic metastases using resin 90Y-microspheres: Early results in 148 patients. Am J Clin Oncol, 2008; 31: 271–279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Walser, E M, Champion, S E, Montoya, M, et al. Chemoembolization improves survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and severely reduced portal perfusion. (Abstract 80). J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2005; Suppl (s1–s32); 16: 530.Google Scholar
Pentecost, M J, Daniels, J R, Teitelbaum, G P, et al. Hepatic chemoembolization: Safety with portal vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 1993; 4: 347–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, M, Maeda, S, Shibata, J, et al. Transcatheter arterial chemotherapy with and without embolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology, 2004; 66: 24–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, D H, Carrasco, C H, Hohn, D C, et al. Hepatic artery chemoembolization or embolization for primary and metabolic liver tumors. Post treatment management and complications. J Surg Oncol, 1995; 60: 116–121.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stuart, K. Chemoembolization in the management of liver tumors. The Oncologist, 2003; 8: 425–437.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geschwind, J F, Kaushik, S, Ramsey, D E, et al. Influence of a new prophylactic antibiotic therapy on the incidence of liver abscess after chemoembolization of liver tumors. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2002; 13: 1163–1666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartnell, G G, Gates, J, Stuart, K, et al. Hepatic chemoembolization: Effect of intra-arterial lidocaine on pain and postprocedure recovery. Cardiovasc & Interven Radiol, 1999; 22: 293–297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salem, R. Yttrium-90: Concepts and principles. J Vasc Interv Radiol, Suppl (s1–s132) 2005; 16: p276–p280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, A S, Coldwell, D, Liu, D, et al De Baere T. Liver directed radiotherapy with microspheres: Second Annual Clinical Symposium. Am J Oncol Rev, 2006; 4(Suppl 5): 1–8.Google Scholar
Baere, T. Complications after ablative therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol, Suppl (s1–s132) 2005; 16: p18–p22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dluhy RG, Lawrence JE, and Williams GH. Pheochromocytoma: Incidence and importance. In: Larsen, , Kronenberg, , Melmed, and Polonsky, , eds. Williams' Textbook of Endocrinology, 10th ed, pp. 555–562. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders, 2003.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×