Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
Judging Civil Justice
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 9
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Koo, AKC 2016. Exploring mediator liability in negligence. Common Law World Review, Vol. 45, Issue. 2-3, p. 165.

    Wall, Ray Ankrah, Nii and Charlson, Jennifer 2016. An investigation into the different styles of the lawyer and construction specialist when mediating construction disputes. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 137.

    Agapiou, Andrew and Clark, Bryan 2014. A reflection on construction mediation in Scotland. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law, Vol. 167, Issue. 6, p. 265.

    Sommerlad, Hilary 2013. Exploring the ‘Socio’ of Socio-Legal Studies. p. 181.

    Mulcahy, Linda 2013. Changing Concepts of Contract. p. 193.

    Moran, Leslie J 2012. Intersections of Law and Culture. p. 31.

    Moran, Leslie J. 2012. Social Research after the Cultural Turn. p. 124.

    Agapiou, Andrew and Clark, Bryan 2011. Scottish construction lawyers and mediation: an investigation into attitudes and experiences. International Journal of Law in the Built Environment, Vol. 3, Issue. 2, p. 159.

    Fielding, Nigel G. 2011. Judges and Their Work. Social & Legal Studies, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    ×

Book description

The civil justice system supports social order and economic activity, but a number of factors over the last decade have created a situation in which the value of civil justice is being undermined and the civil courts are in a state of dilapidation. For the 2008 Hamlyn Lectures, Dame Hazel Genn discusses reforms to civil justice in England and around the world over the last decade in the context of escalating expenditure on criminal justice and vanishing civil trials. In critically assessing the claims and practice of mediation for civil disputes, she questions whether diverting cases out of the public courts and into private dispute resolution promotes access to justice, looks critically at the changed expectations of the judiciary in civil justice and points to the need for a better understanding of how judges 'do justice'.

Reviews

‘Hazel Genn does not pull her punches. [The lectures] should be required reading especially for policy makers in government and for the senior judiciary.’

Michael Zander QC Source: New Law Journal

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Bibliography
Abel, R.L., ‘The contradictions of informal justice’ in Abel, R.L. (ed.), The Politics of Informal Justice, Volume 1: The American Experience (Academic Press, 1982).
Ackerman, R.M.Vanishing trial, vanishing community? The potential effect of the vanishing trial on America’s social capital’, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 7 (2006), 165–81.
Allan, J. ‘Judicial appointments in New Zealand’ in Malleson, K. and Russell, P.H. (eds), Appointing Judges in An Age of Judicial Power (University of Toronto Press, 2006), Chapter 5.
Allen, T., A Closer Look at Halsey and Steel (CEDR, 2004).
Andrews, N., Principles of Civil Procedure (Sweet and Maxwell, 1994).
Andrews, N., ‘English civil justice and remedies, progress and challenges, Nagoya Lectures’ (Nagoya University of Comparative Study of Civil Justice, 2007), Vol. I.
Attorney General Victoria, Justice Statement (Melbourne: Department of Justice, 2004).
Australian Government Productivity Commission, ‘Justice’, Report on Government Services, Vol. I, Part C (2008).
Australian Law Reform Commission, Review of the Federal Civil Justice System, Discussion Paper 62 (Sydney: ALRC, 1999).
Australian Law Reform Commission, Managing Justice: A Review of the Federal Civil Justice System, Report 89 (Sydney: ALRC, 2000).
Baldwin, J., Small Claims in County Courts in England and Wales: The Bargain Basement of Civil Justice? (Clarendon Press, 1997).
Baldwin, J., Monitoring the Rise of the Small Claims Limit: Litigants’ Experiences of Different Forms of Adjudication (Lord Chancellor’s Department, 1997).
Baldwin, J., ‘Small claims hearings: the “interventionist” role played by district judges’, Civil Justice Quarterly 17:1 (1998), 20–34.
Baldwin, J., Lay and Judicial Perspectives on the Expansion of the Small Claims Regime (Lord Chancellor’s Department Research Series 8/02, 2002).
Barak, A., The Judge in a Democracy (Princeton University Press, 2006).
Baruch Bush, R.A. and Folger, J.P., The Promise of Mediation: The Transformative Approach to Conflict (Jossey-Bass, 2005).
Baum, L., The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior (University of Michigan Press, 1997).
Baum, L., Judges and their Audiences (Princeton University Press, 2006).
Bayles, M., ‘Principles for legal procedure’, Law and Philosophy, 5:1 (1986), 33–57.
Bell, J., Judiciaries Within Europe: A Comparative Review (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Bernard, P.E.Minorities, mediation and method: the view from one court-connected mediation program’, Fordham Urban Law Journal, 35:1 (January 2008).
Bingham, Lord, The Business of Judging (Oxford University Press, 2000).
Bingham, Lord, ‘The rule of law’, Sixth David Williams Annual Lecture, Centre for Public Law, Cambridge University (November 2006).
Blader, S. and Tyler, T.R., ‘A four component model of procedural justice: defining the meaning of a “fair” process’, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29 (2003), 747–58.
Bondy, V., Doyle, M. and Reid, V., ‘Mediation and judicial review – mind the research gap’, Judicial Review (September 2005).
Bondy, V. and Sunkin, M., ‘Accessing judicial review’, Public Law (Winter 2008), 647–67.
British Columbia Civil Justice Review Task Force, Effective and Affordable Civil Justice, (British Columbia Justice Review, November 2006).
Brooke, H., ‘The future of civil justice, an address to the Civil Court Users Association’, (26 March 2006).
Brooke, H., Should the Civil Courts be Unified? (Judicial Office, August 2008).
Brown, H. and Marriott, A., ADR Principles and Practice, 2nd edn (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1999).
Buck, A., Pleasence, P. and Balmer, N., ‘Do citizens know how to deal with legal issues? Some empirical insights’, Journal of Social Policy, 37:4 (2008), 661–81.
Butler, P., ‘The case for trials: considering the intangibles’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3, (2004), 627–36.
Campbell, E. and Lee, H.P., The Australian Judiciary (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Canadian Bar Association, Task Force on Systems of Civil Justice (Canadian Bar Association, 1996).
Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, Public Perceptions of the Role of the Judiciary (University of Alberta, 2005).
CEDR, The CEDR Mediator Handbook: Effective Resolution of Commercial Disputes, 4th edn (CEDR, 2004).
Civil Justice Reform Working Group, Effective and Affordable Civil Justice (Vancouver: Justice Review Task Force, 2006).
Conley, J.M. and O’Barr, W.M., ‘Fundamentals of jurisprudence: an ethnography of judicial decision making in informal courts’, North Carolina Law Review, 66 (1988), 467–508.
Coumarelos, C., Wei, Z. and Zhou, A., Justice Made to Measure: NSW Legal Needs Survey in Disadvantaged Areas (Law and Justice Foundation of New South Wales, Australia, 2006).
Couture, E.J., ‘The nature of the judicial process’, Tulane Law Review, 25 (1950), 1–28.
Cowan, D. and Hitchings, E., ‘Pretty boring stuff’: district judges and housing possession proceedings’, Social & Legal Studies, 16:3 (2007), 363–82.
Cranston, R., How Law Works: The Machinery and Impact of Civil Justice (Oxford University Press, 2006).
Cross, F.B., ‘Judicial partisanship and obedience to legal doctrine: whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals’, Yale Law Journal, 107 (1998), 2155–76.
Cross, F.B., Decision Making in the US Courts of Appeals (Stanford University Press, 2007).
Damaska, M.R.The Faces of Justice and State Authority (Yale University Press, 1986).
Darbyshire, P.Where do English and Welsh judges come from?’, Cambridge Law Journal, 66:2 (2007), 365–88.
Davies, G.L., ‘Civil justice reform: why we need to question some basic assumptions’, Civil Justice Quarterly, 25 (2006), 32–51.
Delgado, R. et al., ‘Fairness and formality: minimizing the risk of prejudice in alternative dispute resolution’, Wisconsin Law Review (1985), 1359.
Denning, Lord, The Discipline of Law (Oxford University Press, 1979).
Dhavan, R., Sudarshan, R. and Khurshid, S., Judges and the Judicial Power: Essays in Honour of Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer (Sweet and Maxwell, 1985).
Dingwall, R. and Cloatre, E., ‘Vanishing trials?: An English perspective’, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 7 (2006), 51–70.
Doyle, M., Manchester Small Claims Mediation Scheme Evaluation (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Draper, A.J., ‘Corruptions in the administration of justice: Bentham’s Critique of Civil Procedure, 1806–1811’, Journal of Bentham Studies, 7 (2004).
Eekelaar, J., ‘Family justice: ideal or illusion? Family law and communitarian values’ in Freeman, M.D.A. (ed.), Current Legal Problems (Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 161–216.
Ekman, P., Telling Lies: Clues to Deceit in the Marketplace, Politics and Marriage (W.W. Norton & Co, 2001).
Engel, D.M. and Steele, E.H., ‘Civil cases and society: process and order in the civil justice system’, American Bar Foundation Research Journal (1979), 295–346.
Enterken, J. and Sefton, M., Evaluation of Reading Small Claims Mediation Scheme (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Epstein, L. (ed.), Courts and Judges (The International Library of Essays in Law and Society) (Ashgate, 2005).
Epstein, L. and Knight, J., The Choices Justices Make (C.Q. Press, 1998).
Feenan, D., ‘Women judges: gendering judging, justifying diversity’, Journal of Law and Society, 35:4 (2008), 490–519.
Feenan, D., ‘Women and judging’, Feminist Legal Studies, 17 (2009), 1–9.
Fenn, P., Rickman, N. and Vencappa, D., ‘The impact of the Woolf Reforms on costs and delay’ (Centre for Risk & Insurance Studies, 2009).
Fiss, O.M., ‘Against settlement’, Yale Law Journal, 93 (1984), 1073–90.
Fiss, O.M. and Resnik, J., Adjudication and its Alternatives: An Introduction to Procedure (Foundation Press, 2003).
Frank, J., Courts on Trial, Myth and Beauty in American Justice (Princeton University Press, 1949).
Friedman, L.M., Total Justice (Russell Sage Foundation, 1994).
Friedman, L.M., ‘The day before trials vanished’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 689–703.
Friedman Goldstein, L., ‘From democracy to juristocracy’, Law and Society Review, 38 (2004), 611–29.
Fuller, L.L., ‘The forms and limits of adjudication’, Harvard Law Review, 92 (1978), 353–408.
Further Findings: A Continuing Evaluation of the Civil Justice Reforms (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2002).
Galanter, M., ‘The radiating effects of courts’ in Boyum, K. and Mather, L. (eds), Empirical Theories About Courts (New York, 1983).
Galanter, M., ‘The vanishing trial: an examination of trials and related matters in federal and state courts’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 459–570.
Galanter, M., Lowering the Bar, Lawyer Jokes and Legal Culture (University of Wisconsin Press, 2005).
Galanter, M., ‘A world without trials’, Journal of Dispute Resolution, 7 (2006), 7–34.
Galanter, M., ‘In the winter of our discontent: law, anti–law and social science’, Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 2(2006), 1–16.
Garth, B., ‘From civil litigation to private justice: legal practice at war with the profession and its values’, Brooklyn Law Review, 59 (1993), 931–60.
Genn, H., ‘Understanding civil justice’ in Freeman, M.D.A. (ed.), Law and Public Opinion in the 20th Century, Current Legal Problems Vol. 50 (Oxford University Press, 1997).
Genn, H., Central London Pilot Mediation Scheme, Evaluation Report (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 1998).
Genn, H., Paths to Justice: What People Think and Do About Going to Law (Hart Publishing, 1999).
Genn, H., Court Based ADR Initiatives for Non-Family Civil Cases (Department for Constitutional Affairs, Research series 1/02, 2002).
Genn, H., The Pre-Woolf Litigation Landscape in the County Courts (September 2002), www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/genn.
Genn, H., Solving Civil Justice Problems: What Might Be Best (Scottish Consumer Council Seminar on Civil Justice, January 2005), www.ucl.ac.uk/laws/genn.
Genn, H., The Attractiveness of Senior Judicial Appointment to Highly Qualified Practitioners (Judicial Office for England, December 2008).
Genn, H. et al., Tribunals for Diverse Users (London: Department for Constitutional Affairs, Research Series 1/06, 2006).
Genn, H. et al., Twisting Arms: Court Referred and Court Linked Mediation Under Judicial Pressure (Ministry of Justice Research Series 1/07, 2007).
Genn, H. and Genn, Y., Representation in Tribunals (Lord Chancellor’s Department, 1989).
Glendon, M.A., A Nation Under Lawyers (Harvard University Press, 1996).
Goode, R., Commercial Law in the Next Millennium, 49th Hamlyn Lectures (Sweet and Maxwell, 1998).
Gramatikov, M., ‘Multiple Justiciable Problems in Bulgaria’, Tilburg University Legal Studies Working Paper No. 16/2008 (2008).
Grillo, T., ‘The mediation alternative: process dangers for women’, Yale Law Journal, 100:6 (1991), 1545–610.
Guarneri, C. and Pederzoli, P., From Democracy to Juristocracy? The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Courts and Democracy (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J.J. and Wistrich, A.J., ‘Inside the judicial mind’, Cornell Law Review, 86 (2001), 777.
Guthrie, C., Rachlinski, J.J. and Wistrich, A.J., ‘Blinking on the bench: how judges decide cases’, Cornell Law Review, 93 (2007), 1–43.
Hadfield, G.K., ‘Where have all the trials gone? Settlement, non-trial adjudications, and statistical artifacts in the changing disposition of federal civil cases’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 705–34.
Hale, B., ‘Equality and the judiciary: why should we want more women judges?’, Public Law (2001), 489.
Hann, R.G. and Baar, C., Evaluation of the Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program (Rule 24.1): Final Report – The First 23 Months, (Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, March 2001).
Hanycz, C.M., ‘Through the looking glass: mediator conceptions of philosophy, process and power’, Alberta Law Review, 42 (2004–5), 819–85.
Hanycz, C.M., ‘More access to less justice: efficiency, proportionality and costs in Canadian civil justice reform’, Civil Justice Quarterly, 27:1 (2008), 98–122.
Hensler, D.R., ‘Suppose it’s not true: challenging mediation ideology’, Journal of Dispute Resolution (2002), 81–100.
Hensler, D.R., ‘Our courts, ourselves: how the alternative dispute resolution movement is re-shaping our legal system’, Penn State Law Review, 108 (2003), 167–97.
Higginbotham, P.E., ‘So why do we call them trial courts?, Southern Methodist University Law Review, 55 (2002), 1405–21.
Hirschl, R., Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism (Harvard University Press, 2004).
Hirschl, R., ‘Juristocracy – political, not juridical’, The Good Society, 13:3 (2004), 6–11.
Hollander-Blumoff, R. and Tyler, T.R., ‘Procedural justice in negotiation: procedural fairness, outcome acceptance, and integrative potential’, Law and Social Inquiry, 33:2 (2008), 473–500.
Hong Kong Department of Justice, Consultancy Study on the Demand for and Supply of Legal and Related Services (Hong Kong Department of Justice, 2008).
Hong Kong Judiciary, Reform of the Civil Justice System in Hong Kong, Final Report of the Working Party on Civil Justice Reform (Hong Kong Judiciary, 2004).
House of Commons Constitutional Affairs Committee, ‘Civil legal aid: adequacy of provision’, Conclusions and Recommendations (Fourth Report of Session 2003–04), Vol. I, HC 391–I.
Hyman, J.M. and Love, L.P., ‘If Portia were a mediator: an inquiry into justice in mediation’, Clinical Law Review, 9 (2002), 157.
Jackson, Lord Justice, Civil Litigation Costs Review, Preliminary Report (Judicial Office, 8 May 2009).
Jacob, Sir J., ‘The reform of civil procedural law’, reprinted in The Reform of Civil Procedural Law and Other Essays in Civil Procedure (Sweet and Maxwell, 1982).
Jacob, Sir J., The Fabric of English Civil Justice (Sweet and Maxwell, 1987).
Jacob, J.M., Civil Justice in the Age of Human Rights (Ashgate, 2007).
Jacobs, Sir J., ‘Access to justice in England’ in Cappelletti, M. and Garth, B. (eds), Access to Justice, Vol 1: a World Survey (Alphen aan den Rhijn/Milan, 1978).
Jolowicz, J.A., On Civil Procedure (Cambridge University Press, 2000).
Justice for All, White Paper (The Stationery Office, 2002), CM 5563.
Kenney, S.J., ‘Gender on the agenda: how the paucity of women judges became an issue’, Journal of Politics, 70:3 (2008), 717–35.
Kirby, M., Judicial Activism: Authority, Principle and Policy in the Judicial Method, The Hamlyn Lectures 55th Series (Sweet and Maxwell, 2004).
Kleinig, J., ‘Judicial corrosion: outlines of a theory’, Conference on Confidence in the Judiciary (Canberra, February 2007).
Kritzer, H.M., ‘Disappearing trials? A comparative perspective’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 735–54.
Kritzer, H.M., ‘Towards a theorization of judgecraft’, Social & Legal Studies, 16:3 (2007), 321–40.
Lacey, N., The Prisoner’s Dilemma, The Hamlyn Lectures 59th Series (Cambridge University Press, 2008).
LaFree, G. and Rack, C., ‘The effects of participants’ ethnicity and gender on monetary outcomes in mediated and adjudicated civil cases’, Law and Society Review, 30 (1996), 767–94.
Lande, J., ‘How much justice can we afford? Defining the courts’ roles and deciding the appropriate number of trials, settlement signals, and other elements needed to administer justice’, Journal of Dispute Resolution (2006), 213.
Landsman, S., ‘So what? Possible implications of the vanishing trial phenomenon’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 973–84.
Legal Services Consultation Document, A New Focus For Civil Legal Aid: Encouraging Early Resolution; Discouraging Unnecessary Litigation (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2004).
Leubsdorf, J., ‘The myth of civil procedure reform’ in Zuckerman, A.A.S. (ed.), Civil Justice in Crisis: Comparative Aspects of Civil Procedure (Oxford University Press, 1999), Chapter 2.
Lind, E.A. and Tyler, T.R., The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (Plenum, 1988).
Lines, M., ‘Empirical study of civil justice systems: a look at the literature’, Alberta Law Review, 42:3 (2005), 887–905.
Luban, D., Lawyers and Justice (Princeton University Press, 1988), p. 251.
Luban, D., ‘Settlements and the erosion of the public realm’, Georgetown Law Review, 83 (1995), 2638.
Mack, K. and Roach Anleu, S., ‘Getting through the list: judgecraft and legitimacy in the lower courts’, Social & Legal Studies, 16 (2007), 341–61.
Mackie, K., Miles, D., Marsh, W. and Allen, T., The ADR Practice Guide: Commercial Dispute Resolution, 3rd revised edition (Tottel Publishing, 2007).
Malleson, K., The New Judiciary: The Effects of Expansion and Activism (Ashgate Press, 1999).
Manning, K.L., Carroll, B.A. and Carp, R.A., ‘Does age matter? Judicial decision making in age discrimination cases’, Social Science Quarterly, 85:1 (March 2004), 1–18.
Marcus, R.L., ‘Malaise of the litigation superpower’ in Zuckerman, A.A.S., Civil Justice in Crisis, Comparative Perspectives of Litigation Procedure (Oxford University Press, 1999), Chapter 3.
Mautner, M., ‘Luck in the courts’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9 (2008), 217–38.
McEwan, J., The Verdict of the Court, Passing Judgment in Law and Psychology (Hart Publishing, 2003).
McNeill, D., The Face (Hamish Hamilton, 1998).
Megarry, R.E., Lawyer and Litigant in England, The Hamlyn Lectures 14th Series (Stevens, 1962).
Memon, A., Vrij, A. and Bull, R., Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility, 2nd edn (John Wiley, 2003).
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘The many ways of mediation: the transformation of tradition, ideologies, paradigms and practices’, Negotiation Journal, 11 (1995), 217–42.
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Whose dispute is it anyway? A philosophical and democratic defense of settlement (in some cases)’, Georgetown Law Journal, 83 (1995), 2663–96.
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘The trouble with the adversary system in a postmodern, multicultural world’, William and Mary Law Review, 38 (1996), 5–44.
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Ethics in Alternative dispute resolution: new issues, no answers from the adversary conception of lawyers’ responsibilities’, South Texas Law Review, 38:2 (1997), 407–54.
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Mothers and fathers of invention: the intellectual founders of ADR’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 16:1 (2000), 1–37.
Menkel-Meadow, C. (ed.), Mediation: Theory, Policy and Practice (Ashgate, 2001).
Menkel-Meadow, C., ‘Peace and justice: notes on the evolution and purposes of legal processes’, Georgetown Law Journal, 94 (2006), 553–80.
Mnookin, R.H. and Kornhauser, L., ‘Bargaining in the shadow of the law: the case of divorce’, Yale Law Journal, 88 (1979), 950–97.
Molot, J.T., ‘An old judicial role for a new litigation era’, Yale Law Journal, 113 (2003), 27–118.
Moorhead, R. and Cowan, D., ‘Judgecraft: an introduction’, Social & Legal Studies, 16:3 (2007), 315–20.
Moorhead, R. and Sefton, M., Litigants in Person: Unrepresented Litigants in First Instance Proceedings (Department for Constitutional Affairs, Research Series, 2005).
Moorhead, R., Sefton, M. and Scanlan, L., Just Satisfaction? What Drives Public and Participant Satisfaction with Courts and Tribunals (Ministry of Justice, Research Series 5/08, 2008).
Mulcahy, L., ‘The possibilities and desirability of mediator neutrality – towards an ethics of partiality?’, Social & Legal Studies, 10:4 (2001), 505–27.
Murayama, M., ‘Experiences of problems and disputing behaviour in Japan’, Meiji Law Journal, 14 (2007), 1–59.
Niemeijer, B. and Pel, M., ‘Court-based mediation in the Netherlands: research, evaluation and future expectations’, Penn State Law Review, 110:2 (2005), 345–79.
Nolan-Haley, J.M., ‘Court mediation and the search for justice through law’, Washington University Law Quarterly (January 1996), 49.
Olson, S.M. and Huth, D.A., ‘Explaining public attitudes toward local courts’, Justice System Journal, 20 (1998), 41.
Paterson, A.A. and Goriely, T., A Reader on Resourcing Civil Justice, Oxford Readings in Socio-Legal Studies (Oxford University Press, 1996).
Pleasence, P., Balmer, N.J., Tam, T., Buck, A., Smith, M. and Patel, A., Civil Justice in England and Wales: Report of the 2007 English and Welsh Civil and Social Justice Survey (Legal Services Commission, 2008), LSRC Research Paper No. 22.
Pleasence, P., Buck, A., Balmer, N., Genn, H., O’Grady, A. and Smith, M., Causes of Action: Civil Law and Social Justice (The Stationery Office, 2004).
Posner, R.A., ‘What do judges and justices maximize? (The same thing everybody else does)’, Supreme Court Economic Review, 3 (1993), 1–41.
Posner, R.A., How Judges Think (Harvard University Press, 2008).
Prince, S., Evaluation of Exeter Small Claims Mediation Scheme (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Prince, S., ‘ADR after the CPR’ in Dwyer, D. (ed.), The Civil Procedure Rules Ten Years On (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Prince, S. and Belcher, S., An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Court-based Mediation Processes in Non-Family Civil Proceedings at Exeter and Guildford County Courts (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Radcliffe, Lord, Not in Feather Beds (Hamish Hamilton, 1968).
Reid, Lord, The Law and the Reasonable Man (Proceedings of the British Academy, 1968).
Resnik, J., ‘Managerial judges’, Harvard Law Review, 96 (1982), 374–446.
Resnik, J., ‘Many doors? Closing doors? Alternative dispute resolution and adjudication’, Ohio State Journal on Dispute Resolution, 10:2 (1995), 211–65.
Resnik, J., ‘Trial as error, jurisdiction as injury: transforming the meaning of Article III’, Harvard Law Review, 113 (2000), 924–1038.
Resnik, J., ‘Mediating preferences: litigant preferences for process and judicial preferences for settlement’, Journal of Dispute Resolution (2002), 155–69.
Resnik, J., ‘Migrating, morphing, and vanishing: the empirical and normative puzzles of declining trial rates in courts’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 783–841.
Resnik, J., ‘Courts: in and out of sight, site and cite’, Villanova Law Review, 53 (2008), 771–810.
Resnik, J. and Curtis, D., ‘Representing justice: from Renaissance iconography to twenty-first century courthouses’, Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 151 (2007), 139.
Roach Anleu, S. and Mack, K., ‘Magistrates’ everyday work and emotional labour’, Journal of Law and Society, 32:4 (2005), 590–614.
Robertson, D., Judicial Discretion in the House of Lords (Oxford University Press, 1998).
Rottman, D.B., Public Trust and Confidence in the State Courts: A Primer, National Center for State Courts, Working Paper (March 1999).
Sackville, Justice R., ‘From access to justice to managing justice: the transformation of the judicial role’, Australian Institute of Judicial Administration Annual Conference, ‘Access to Justice – The Way Forward’, Brisbane, Queensland (12–14 July 2002).
Sallmann, P. A. and Wright, R.T., Going to Court: A Discussion Paper on Civil Justice in Victoria, Civil Justice Review Project (Victoria Department of Justice, 2000).
Sandefur, R.L., ‘Access to civil justice and race, class, and gender inequality’, Annual Review of Sociology, 34 (2008), 339–58.
Scott, K.E., ‘Two models of the civil process’, Stanford Law Review, 27:3 (1975), 937–50.
Sherry, S., ‘Civil virtue and the feminine voice in constitutional adjudication’, Virginia Law Review, 72 (1986), 543–616.
Sisk, G.C., ‘The quantitative moment and the qualitative opportunity: legal studies of judicial decision making’ (book review), Cornell Law Review, 93:2 (2008), 873.
Sisk, G.C. and Heise, M., ‘Judges and ideology: public and academic debates about statistical measures’, Northwestern University Law Review, 99 (2005), 743.
Sisk, G.C., Heise, M. and Morriss, A.P., ‘Charting the influences on the judicial mind: an empirical study of judicial reasoning’, New York University Law Review, 73 (1998), 1377–500.
Sisk, G.C., Heise, M. and Morriss, A.P., ‘Searching for the soul of judicial decision making: an empirical study of religious freedom decisions’, Ohio State Law Journal, 65:3 (2004), 491.
Smith, R. (ed.), Achieving Civil Justice: Appropriate Dispute Resolution for the 1990s (Legal Action Group, 1996).
Solum, L.B., ‘Procedural justice’, Southern California Law Review, 78 (2004), 181.
Stipanowick, T.J., ‘ADR and the ‘vanishing trial’: the growth and impact of alternative dispute resolution’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 843–912.
Strasser, F. and Randolph, P., Mediation: A Psychological Insight into Conflict Resolution (Continuum, 2004).
Stratton, M., ‘Public perceptions of the role of the Canadian judiciary’, The Canadian Forum on Civil Justice (December 2005).
Stulberg, J.B., ‘Mediation and justice: what standards govern?Cardozo Journal of Conflict Resolution, 6 (2005), 213–45.
Sun, I.Y. and Wu, Y., ‘Citizens’ perceptions of the courts: the impact of race, gender and recent experience’, Journal of Criminal Justice, 34 (2006), 457–67.
Susskind, R., The End of Lawyers: Rethinking the Nature of Legal Services (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Tamanaha, B., On The Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Thomas, Lord Justice, Senior Presiding Judge of England and Wales, The Maintenance of Local Justice, The Sir Elwyn Jones Memorial Lecture (Bangor University, October 2004).
Van de Walle, S. and Raine, J.W., Explaining Attitudes Towards the Justice System in the UK and Europe (Ministry of Justice Research Series 9/08, 2008).
Victorian Law Reform Commission, Civil Justice Review, Report 14 (Victorian Law Reform Commission, 28 May 2008).
Voight, S. ‘Economic growth, certainty in the law and judicial independence’ in Transparency International, Global Corruption Report 2007: Corruption in Judicial Systems (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Vrij, A., Detecting Lies and Deceit: The Psychology of Lying and the Implications for Professional Practice (Wiley, 2000).
Waldron, J., ‘Lucky in your judge’, Theoretical Inquiries in Law, 9:1 (January 2008), 185–216.
Webley, L., Abrams, P. and Bacquet, S., Evaluation of Birmingham Fast and Multi Track Mediation Scheme (Department for Constitutional Affairs, 2006).
Welsh, N., ‘Making deals in court-connected mediation: what’s justice got to do with it?’, Washington University Law Quarterly, 79 (2001), 787–860.
Woo, M.K. and Wang, Y., ‘Civil justice in China: An empirical study of courts in three provinces’, American Journal of Comparative Law, 53 (2005), 911.
Lord, Woolf, The Rt Hon., Access to Justice: Interim Report to the Lord Chancellor on the Civil Justice System in England and Wales (HMSO, 1995).
Lord, Woolf, The Rt Hon., The Pursuit of Justice (Oxford University Press, 2008).
Wright, T., ‘Australia: a need for clarity’, Justice System Journal, Special Issue on Understanding Civil Justice Reform in Anglo–American Legal Systems, 20 (1999), 131.
Yeazell, S.C., ‘Getting what we asked for, getting what we paid for, and not liking what we got: the vanishing civil trial’, Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 1:3 (2004), 943–71.
Zander, M., The State of Justice, Hamlyn Lectures 51st Series (Sweet and Maxwell, 2000).
Zuckerman, A.A.S., ‘Justice in crisis: comparative aspects of civil procedure’ in Zuckerman, A.A.S. (ed.), Civil Justice in Crisis: Comparative Aspects of Civil Procedure (Oxford University Press, 1999).
Zuckerman, A.A.S., Civil Procedure (LexisNexis Butterworths, 2003).
Zuckerman, A.A.S. and Cranston, R. (eds), The Reform of Civil Procedure: Essays on Access to Justice (Clarendon Press, 1996).

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed