Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword: Sorting Out Our National Liability Crisis by Richard A. Epstein
- Acknowledgments
- LAWYER BARONS
- Introduction
- 1 The Origin of the Contingency Fee
- 2 How Profitable Are Contingency Fees?
- 3 Are Contingency Fee Profits “Reasonable”?
- 4 How Tort Lawyers Have Increased Their Profits by Restraining Competition
- 5 Why the Market Has Failed to Correct the Absence of Price Competition
- 6 Impediments Imposed by the Bar to Price Competition
- 7 The Effects of Incentives Created by Contingency Fees
- 8 How the Quest for Profits Influenced the Development of the Tort System
- 9 Lawyers' Role in the Expansion of Tort Liability
- 10 The Role of the Judiciary in Tort System Expansion
- 11 Current and Future Expansions of Tort Liability
- 12 The “Litigation Explosion”
- 13 Measures of the Rate of Expansion of Tort Liability
- 14 The Relationship between Injury Rates and Tort System Costs
- 15 The Impacts of Substantial Increases in Tort Lawyers' Effective Hourly Rates
- 16 Class Actions
- 17 Fees in Class Actions
- 18 How Class Action Lawyers Game Fee Setting
- 19 Securities Class Actions
- 20 Regulation through Litigation
- 21 A New Role for Punitive Damages
- 22 For-Profit Partnerships between State Attorneys General and Contingency Fee Lawyers
- Conclusion
- Appendix A A Critique of Alex Tabarrok
- Appendix B Calculating Tort Lawyers' Effective Hourly Rates in 1960
- Appendix C Electronic Discovery and the Use of Contract Lawyers
- Appendix D The HMO Litigation
- Appendix E The GM “Side Saddle” Truck Litigation
- Appendix F Modern Class Actions Undermine Democratic Precepts
- Appendix G Other Ways Lawyers Game Class Action Fees
- Appendix H Nonrecourse Financing of Tort Litigation
- Appendix I Political Contributions by Tort Lawyers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
- Appendix J Special Rules Favoring Lawyers
- Appendix K The Ultimate Medical Expense “Buildup”: Whiplash
- Appendix L The Effect of Punitive Damages on Compensatory Awards
- Index
Appendix B - Calculating Tort Lawyers' Effective Hourly Rates in 1960
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 June 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword: Sorting Out Our National Liability Crisis by Richard A. Epstein
- Acknowledgments
- LAWYER BARONS
- Introduction
- 1 The Origin of the Contingency Fee
- 2 How Profitable Are Contingency Fees?
- 3 Are Contingency Fee Profits “Reasonable”?
- 4 How Tort Lawyers Have Increased Their Profits by Restraining Competition
- 5 Why the Market Has Failed to Correct the Absence of Price Competition
- 6 Impediments Imposed by the Bar to Price Competition
- 7 The Effects of Incentives Created by Contingency Fees
- 8 How the Quest for Profits Influenced the Development of the Tort System
- 9 Lawyers' Role in the Expansion of Tort Liability
- 10 The Role of the Judiciary in Tort System Expansion
- 11 Current and Future Expansions of Tort Liability
- 12 The “Litigation Explosion”
- 13 Measures of the Rate of Expansion of Tort Liability
- 14 The Relationship between Injury Rates and Tort System Costs
- 15 The Impacts of Substantial Increases in Tort Lawyers' Effective Hourly Rates
- 16 Class Actions
- 17 Fees in Class Actions
- 18 How Class Action Lawyers Game Fee Setting
- 19 Securities Class Actions
- 20 Regulation through Litigation
- 21 A New Role for Punitive Damages
- 22 For-Profit Partnerships between State Attorneys General and Contingency Fee Lawyers
- Conclusion
- Appendix A A Critique of Alex Tabarrok
- Appendix B Calculating Tort Lawyers' Effective Hourly Rates in 1960
- Appendix C Electronic Discovery and the Use of Contract Lawyers
- Appendix D The HMO Litigation
- Appendix E The GM “Side Saddle” Truck Litigation
- Appendix F Modern Class Actions Undermine Democratic Precepts
- Appendix G Other Ways Lawyers Game Class Action Fees
- Appendix H Nonrecourse Financing of Tort Litigation
- Appendix I Political Contributions by Tort Lawyers and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce
- Appendix J Special Rules Favoring Lawyers
- Appendix K The Ultimate Medical Expense “Buildup”: Whiplash
- Appendix L The Effect of Punitive Damages on Compensatory Awards
- Index
Summary
Although there is no data available indicating the average net income of contingency fee lawyers in 1960, a reasonable substitute is the average net income of sole practitioners in 1960. This substitute data should yield reasonably reliable equivalent data because (1) most contingency fee lawyers at that time were sole practitioners; (2) sole practitioner's incomes did not include the profit generated by associates as did law firm partners; and (3) the average net profit of a sole practitioner is a conservative substitute for the subclass of tort lawyers' incomes because tort lawyers “fared less well” income-wise than most other lawyers in 1960.
The average net profit of a sole practitioner in 1960 was $7,080 (in 1960 dollars), which is 32 percent lower than Tabarrok's estimate of $9,326 (in 1960 dollars). This data is based on a compilation by the Treasury Department and is more precise data than the data that Tabarrok used, which was an estimate of the income of “deans, lawyers and judges” in 1960 ($9,326 in 1960 dollars). Using the Treasury Department-derived data and estimates of overhead and the number of hours worked, sole practitioners earned an effective hourly rate of $6.68 in 1960 dollars.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Lawyer BaronsWhat Their Contingency Fees Really Cost America, pp. 497 - 500Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2011