Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-31T23:35:26.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The Roman law tradition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2010

Odd Langholm
Affiliation:
Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen-Sandviken
Get access

Summary

The legal approach

Medieval Latin Aristotle commentators, discussing acts done through fear, would alternate between Grosseteste's timor and the technical term metus of Roman law. Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas, as well as such later commentators as Buridan, would distinguish between different degrees of external compulsion, one decisive criterion being whether the threat was such as to frighten a “courageous man,” a “man of character” (vir constans). This man of character is a Roman law exemplar. When the new translation of the Nicomachean Ethics appeared in the middle of the thirteenth century, law was a firmly established academic discipline, just like theology, and the interchange of terms and ideas with Aristotelian philosophy started to flow immediately. It is particularly striking in the writings of Albert the Great, the doctor universalis. In his first commentary, Super Ethica, there is a series of replies to objections drawn from legal texts against Aristotle's concept of a mixed will. They are mostly of a terminological character, but one of them goes to the substantive core of the two disciplines, whose ideas about compulsion and the voluntary are to be the subjects of this and the following chapter. It can serve as an introduction to the present one and as a preview of the next.

According to law, Albert remarks, force and fear (vis et metus) excuse completely, for (quoting the Digest) that which is done through force or fear will not be upheld in law. If such acts are similar to voluntary acts (as Aristotle claims), however, there is no excuse; hence it seems that Aristotle is in error. To this, Albert replies that fear remits all loss but not all shame.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought
Antecedents of Choice and Power
, pp. 30 - 42
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • The Roman law tradition
  • Odd Langholm, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen-Sandviken
  • Book: The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought
  • Online publication: 13 March 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528491.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • The Roman law tradition
  • Odd Langholm, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen-Sandviken
  • Book: The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought
  • Online publication: 13 March 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528491.005
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • The Roman law tradition
  • Odd Langholm, Norwegian School of Economics and Business Administration, Bergen-Sandviken
  • Book: The Legacy of Scholasticism in Economic Thought
  • Online publication: 13 March 2010
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511528491.005
Available formats
×