Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T08:19:46.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

85 - Induction of apoptosis

from Part 4 - Pharmacologic targeting of oncogenic pathways

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2015

Dario C. Altieri
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA
Edward P. Gelmann
Affiliation:
Columbia University, New York
Charles L. Sawyers
Affiliation:
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York
Frank J. Rauscher, III
Affiliation:
The Wistar Institute Cancer Centre, Philadelphia
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Apoptosis, or programmed cell death, is an evolutionary conserved genetic process of cellular suicide, which plays a crucial role in sculpting the developing organism and in “pruning” billions of unwanted, unneeded, or damaged cells every day during adult life (1). Aberrations of apoptosis leading to abnormal cell viability or excess cell death contribute to the pathogenesis of human diseases (2). However, these alterations are particularly important in cancer, where they impact virtually every facet of the disease, from onset to progression to treatment (3). As our knowledge of apoptotic pathways has dramatically increased over the past decade, so have the opportunities to harness this powerful cellular suicidal program for novel molecular cancer therapeutics (4).

As a result, apoptosis-based therapy is now a reality, and several new agents engineered to (re)awaken various mechanisms of cell death in tumors have entered clinical testing (5), producing, at least in some cases, intriguing, if not spectacular, patient responses. The early clinical trials have also opened fresh prospects for further elucidation of basic cell-death mechanisms, and identified key molecular requirements for sensitivity or resistance to this new class of therapeutics. From a drug-development perspective, the design of apoptosis-targeting agents has often defied conventional tenets of what may constitute a “drugable” target, and unlocked avenues for innovative drug-discovery platforms.

Type
Chapter
Information
Molecular Oncology
Causes of Cancer and Targets for Treatment
, pp. 903 - 907
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Meier, P, Finch, A, Evan, GI. Apoptosis in development. Nature 2000;407:796–801.CrossRef
Danial, NN, Korsmeyer, SJ. Cell death: critical control points. Cell 2004;116:205–19.CrossRef
Evan, GI, Vousden, KH. Proliferation, cell cycle and apoptosis in cancer. Nature 2001;411:342–8.CrossRef
Fesik, SW. Promoting apoptosis as a strategy for cancer drug discovery. Nature Reviews Cancer 2005;5:876–85.CrossRef
Wright, CW, Duckett, CS. Reawakening the cellular death program in neoplasia through the therapeutic blockade of IAP function. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2005;115:2673–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, DR, Kroemer, G. Pharmacological manipulation of cell death: clinical applications in sight?Journal of Clinical Investigation 2005;115:2610–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hengartner, MO. The biochemistry of apoptosis. Nature 2000;407:770–6.CrossRef
Green, DR, Kroemer, G. The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death. Science 2004;305:626–9.CrossRef
Cory, S, Adams, JM. The Bcl2 family: regulators of the cellular life-or-death switch. Nature Reviews Cancer 2002;2:647–56.CrossRef
Chittenden, T. BH3 domains: intracellular death-ligands critical for initiating apoptosis. Cancer Cell 2002;2:165–6.CrossRef
Fridman, JS, Lowe, SW. Control of apoptosis by p53. Oncogene 2003;22:9030–40.CrossRef
Debatin, KM, Krammer, PH. Death receptors in chemotherapy and cancer. Oncogene 2004;23:2950–66.CrossRef
Srinivasula, SM, Ashwell, JD. IAPs: what's in a name? Molecular Cell 2008;30:123–35.
Shiozaki, EN, Shi, Y. Caspases, IAPs and Smac/DIABLO: mechanisms from structural biology. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 2004;29:486–94.CrossRef
Wang, W, El-Deiry, WS. Restoration of p53 to limit tumor growth. Current Opinion on Oncology 2008;20:90–6.CrossRef
Schuler, M, Herrmann, R, De Greve, JLP, et al. Adenovirus-mediated wild-type p53 gene transfer in patients receiving chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a multicenter phase II study. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2001;19:1750–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeimet, AG, Marth, C. Why did p53 gene therapy fail in ovarian cancer? Lancet Oncology 2003;4:415–22.
Gabrilovich, DI. INGN 201 (Advexin): adenoviral p53 gene therapy for cancer. Expert Opinion on Biological Therapy 2006;6:823–32.CrossRef
Shangary, S, Wang, S. Small-molecule inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 protein-protein interaction to reactivate p53 function: a novel approach for cancer therapy. Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology 2009;49:223–41.CrossRef
Vassilev, LT, Vu, BT, Graves, B, et al. In vivo activation of the p53 pathway by small-molecule antagonists of MDM2. Science 2004;303:844–8.CrossRef
Debatin, KM, Poncet, D, Kroemer, G. Chemotherapy: targeting the mitochondrial cell death pathway. Oncogene 2002;21:8786–803.CrossRef
Lessene, G, Czabotar, PE, Colman, PM. BCL-2 family antagonists for cancer therapy. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2008;7:989–1000.CrossRef
Bouchier-Hayes, L, Lartigue, L, Newmeyer, DD. Mitochondria: pharmacological manipulation of cell death. Journal of Clinical Investigation 2005;115:2640–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeitlin, BD, Zeitlin, IJ, Nor, JE. Expanding circle of inhibition: small-molecule inhibitors of Bcl-2 as anticancer cell and antiangiogenic agents. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008;26:4180–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, MH, Reynolds, CP. Bcl-2 inhibitors: targeting mitochondrial apoptotic pathways in cancer therapy. Clinical Cancer Research 2009;15:1126–32.CrossRef
Konopleva, M, Contractor, R, Tsao, T, et al. Mechanisms of apoptosis sensitivity and resistance to the BH3 mimetic ABT-737 in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 2006;10:375–88.CrossRef
Ashkenazi, A. Directing cancer cells to self-destruct with pro-apoptotic receptor agonists. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 2008;7:1001–12.CrossRef
Wang, Y, Quon, KC, Knee, DA, Nesterov, A, Kraft, AS. RAS, MYC, and sensitivity to tumor necrosis factor-alpha-related apoptosis-inducing ligand-induced apoptosis. Cancer Research 2005;65:1615–6; author reply 6–7.
Daniel, D, Yang, B, Lawrence, DA, et al. Cooperation of the proapoptotic receptor agonist rhApo2L/TRAIL with the CD20 antibody rituximab against non-Hodgkin lymphoma xenografts. Blood 2007;110:4037–46.CrossRef
Wagner, KW, Punnoose, EA, Januario, T, et al. Death-receptor O-glycosylation controls tumor-cell sensitivity to the proapoptotic ligand Apo2L/TRAIL. Nature Medicine 2007;13:1070–7.CrossRef
Ichikawa, K, Liu, W, Zhao, L, et al. Tumoricidal activity of a novel anti-human DR5 monoclonal antibody without hepatocyte cytotoxicity. Nature Medicine 2001;7:954–60.CrossRef
LaCasse, EC, Mahoney, DJ, Cheung, HH, et al. IAP-targeted therapies for cancer. Oncogene 2008;27:6252–75.CrossRef
Altieri, DC. Survivin, cancer networks and pathway-directed drug discovery. Nature Reviews Cancer 2008;8:61–70.CrossRef
Holcik, M, Gibson, H, Korneluk, RG. XIAP: apoptotic brake and promising therapeutic target. Apoptosis 2001;6:253–61.CrossRef
Nakahara, T, Takeuchi, M, Kinoyama, I, et al. YM155, a novel small-molecule survivin suppressant, induces regression of established human hormone-refractory prostate tumor xenografts. Cancer Research 2007;67:8014–21.CrossRef
Giaccone, G, Zatloukal, P, Roubec, J, et al. Multicenter Phase II trial of YM155, a small-molecule suppressor of survivin, in patients with advanced, refractory, non-small-cell lung cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2009;27:4481–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Satoh, T, Okamoto, I, Miyazaki, M, et al. Phase I study of YM155, a novel survivin suppressant, in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical Cancer Research 2009;15:3872–80.CrossRef
Tolcher, AW, Mita, A, Lewis, LD, et al. Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of YM155, a small-molecule inhibitor of survivin. Journal of Clinical Oncology 2008;26:5198–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varfolomeev, E, Blankenship, JW, Wayson, SM, et al. IAP antagonists induce autoubiquitination of c-IAPs, NF-kappaB activation, and TNFalpha-dependent apoptosis. Cell 2007;131:669–81.CrossRef
Wu, H, Tschopp, J, Lin, S-C. Smac mimetics and TNF[alpha]: a dangerous liaison? Cell 2007;131:655–8.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×