Book contents
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Glossary and Commonly Used Abbreviations
- Section 1 Basic Principles
- Section 2 Maternal Cardiovascular Characteristics and the Placenta
- Section 3 Screening for Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 4 Prophylaxis and Treatment
- Section 5 Characteristics of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 6 Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 7 Postnatal Aspects of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 26 Fetal Growth Restriction and Neonatal Outcomes
- Chapter 27 Fetal Growth Restriction and Later Disease in the Mother and the Offspring
- Chapter 28 Fetal Growth Restriction: Recurrence Risks and Counseling
- Index
- References
Chapter 26 - Fetal Growth Restriction and Neonatal Outcomes
from Section 7 - Postnatal Aspects of Fetal Growth Restriction
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 July 2018
Book contents
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Preface
- Glossary and Commonly Used Abbreviations
- Section 1 Basic Principles
- Section 2 Maternal Cardiovascular Characteristics and the Placenta
- Section 3 Screening for Placental–Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 4 Prophylaxis and Treatment
- Section 5 Characteristics of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 6 Management of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Section 7 Postnatal Aspects of Fetal Growth Restriction
- Chapter 26 Fetal Growth Restriction and Neonatal Outcomes
- Chapter 27 Fetal Growth Restriction and Later Disease in the Mother and the Offspring
- Chapter 28 Fetal Growth Restriction: Recurrence Risks and Counseling
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Placental-Fetal Growth Restriction , pp. 237 - 245Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2018
References
Damodaram, M, Story, L, Kulinskaya, E, et al. Early adverse perinatal complications in preterm growth-restricted fetuses. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2011;51:204–9.Google Scholar
WHO 1995, Expert Committee Report: Physical Status: The Use and Interpretation of Anthropometry. Technical report series 854. World Health Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
Lin, CC, Santolaya-Forgas, J. Current concepts of fetal growth restriction. Part 1. Causes, classification and pathophysiology. Obstet Gynecol 1998;92:1044–55.Google Scholar
Wilcox, M, Gardosi, J, Mongelli, M, et al. Birth weight from pregnancies dated by ultrasonography in a multicultural British population. BMJ 1993 Sep 4; 307(6904):588–91.Google Scholar
Gardosi, J, Chang, A, et al. Customised antenatal growth charts. Lancet 1992;339:283–7.Google Scholar
Zhang, J, Mikolajczyk, R, et al. Prenatal application of the individualised fetal growth reference. Am J Epidemiol 2011;173:539–43.Google Scholar
Unterscheider, J, Daly, S, et al. Optimising the definition of intrauterine growth restriction: The multicentre prospective PORTO study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;208:290,e1–6.Google Scholar
Tolsa, CB, Zimine, S, Warfield, SK et al. Early alteration of structural and functional brain development in premature infants born with intrauterine growth restriction. Pediatr Res 2004 Jul;56(1):132–8.Google Scholar
Duncan, KR, Issa, B, Moore, R et al. A comparison of fetal organ measurements by echo-planar magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound. BJOG 2005 Jan;112(1):43–9.Google Scholar
Parkinson, C, Wallis, S, Harvey, D School achievement and behaviour of children who were small-for-dates at birth develop. Med Child Neurol 1981;23:41–50.Google Scholar
Walther, F, Ramaekers, L, et al. The ponderal index as a measure of the nutritional status at birth and its relation to some aspects of neonatal morbidity. J Perinat Med 1982;10:42–7.Google Scholar
Williams, MC, O’Brien, WF. Cerebral palsy in infants with asymmetric growth restriction. Am J Perinatol 1997 Apr 14;(4):211–15.Google Scholar
The GRIT Study group. Infant wellbeing at 2 years of age in the growth restriction intervention trial (GRIT): Multicentred randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:513–20.Google Scholar
Lees, C, Marlow, N, et al. Perinatal morbidity and mortality in early-onset fetal growth restriction: Cohort outcomes of the trial of randomised umbilical and fetal flow in Europe (TRUFFLE). Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013;42:400–8.Google Scholar
Jarvis, S, Glinianaia, SV, Torrioli, MG, et al. Cerebral palsy and intrauterine growth in single births: European collaborative study. Lancet 2003;362:1106–11.Google Scholar
Moore, T, Hennessy, EM, Myles, J, et al. Neurological and developmental outcome in extremely preterm children born in England in 1995 and 2006: The EPICure studies. BMJ 2012 Dec 4;345:e7961.Google Scholar
Morris, RK, Malin, G, at al. Fetal umbilical artery Doppler predict compromise of fetal/neonatal wellbeing in a high risk population: Systematic review and bivariate meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2011;37:135–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brodszki, J, Morsing, E, et al. Early intervention in management of very preterm growth-restricted fetuses: 2-year outcome of infants delivered in fetal indication before 30 gestational weeks. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009;34:288–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Manzanares, S, Sanchez, M, et al. Perinatal outcomes in preterm growth-restricted twins: Effects of gestational age and fetal condition. Twin Res Hum Genet 2013 Jun;16(3):727–31.Google Scholar
Garite, T, Clark, R, Thorp, J. Intrauterine growth restriction increases morbidity and mortality among premature neonates. AJOG 2004;191:481e7.Google Scholar
Tyson, JE, Kennedy, KA. Minimal enteral nutrition for promoting feeding tolerance and preventing morbidity in parenterally fed infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD000504.Google Scholar
Kempley, S, Gupta, N, Linsell, L, et al. Feeding infants below 29 weeks’ gestation with abnormal antenatal Doppler: Analysis from a randomised trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2014 Jan;99(1):F6–F11.Google Scholar
Dorling, J, Kempley, S, Leaf, A. Feeding growth restricted preterm infants with abnormal antenatal Doppler results. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2005;90:F359–F363.Google Scholar
Manzoni, P, Meyer, M, Stolfi, I, et al. Bovine lactoferrin supplementation for prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in very-low-birthweight neonates: A randomized clinical trial. Early Hum Dev 2014;90 Suppl 1:S60–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costeloe, K, Hardy, P, Juszczak, E, et al. Bifidobacterium breve BBG-001 in very preterm infants: A randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2016 Feb 13; 387(10019):649–60.Google Scholar
Garland, SM, Tobin, JM, Pirotta, M. The ProPrems trial: Investigating the effects of probiotics on late onset sepsis in very preterm infants. BMC Infect Dis 2011 Aug 4;11:210.Google Scholar
Barrington, KJ, Assaad, MA, Janvier, A. The Lacuna Trial: A double-blind randomized controlled pilot trial of lactoferrin supplementation in the very preterm infant. J Perinatol 2016 Mar 3. doi: 10.1038Google Scholar
Soothill, PW, Ajayi, RA, Nicolaides, KN. Fetal biochemistry in growth retardation. Early Hum Dev 1992 Jun–Jul;29(1–3):91–7.Google Scholar
Scherjon, SA, Oosting, H, Smolders-DeHaas, H Neurodevelopmental outcome at three years of age after fetal “brain-sparing.” Early Hum Dev 1998 Aug 28;52(1):67–79.Google Scholar
Vossbeck, S, Kamargo, OKD, et al. Neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcome in infants born before 30 weeks of gestation with absent or reversed end-diastolic velocities in the umbilical arteries. Eur J Pediatr 2001;160:128–34.Google Scholar
Morsing, E, Asard, M, et al. Cognitive function after intrauterine growth restriction and very preterm birth. Pediatrics 2011;127:e874–82.Google Scholar
Shand, AW, Hornbuckle, J, Nathan, E. Small for gestational age preterm infants and relationship of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler blood flow to perinatal mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2009 Feb;49(1):52–8.Google Scholar
Macdonald, TM, McCarthy, EA, Walker, SP. Shining light in dark corners: Diagnosis and management of late onset fetal growth restriction. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2015;55:3–10.Google Scholar
Figueras, F, Gardosi, J. Intrauterine growth restriction: New concepts in antenatal surveillance, diagnosis and management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011 Apr;204(4):288–300.Google Scholar
Leitner, Y, Fattal-Valevski, A, Geva, R, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of children with intrauterine growth retardation: A longitudinal, 10-year prospective study. J Child Neurol May 2007;22(5):580–7.Google Scholar
Crispi, F, Hernandez-Andrade, E, et al. Cardiac dysfunction and cell damage across clinical stages of severity in growth-restricted fetuses. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008 Sep;199(3):254.e1–8.Google Scholar
Comas, M, Crispi, F, et al. Usefulness of myocardial tissue Doppler vs conventional echocardiography in the evaluation of cardiac dysfunction in early-onset intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010 Jul;203(1):45.e1–7.Google Scholar
Demicheva, E, Crispi, F. Long-term follow-up of intrauterine growth restriction: Cardiovascular disorders. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014;36:143–53.Google Scholar
Nilsson, PM, Ostergren, PO, Nyberg, P, et al. Low birth weight is associated with elevated systolic blood pressure in adolescence: A prospective study of a birth cohort of 149,378 Swedish boys. J Hypertens 1997;15:1627–31.Google Scholar
Engineer, N, Kumar, S. Perinatal variables and neonatal outcomes in severely growth restricted preterm fetuses. Acta Obstet Gynecol 2010;89:1174–81.Google Scholar
Maruyama, H, et al. Thrombocytopenia in preterm infants with intrauterine growth restriction. Acta Med Okayama 2008;62(5):313–17.Google Scholar
Vlug, RD, Lopriore, E, et al. Thrombocytopenia in neonates with polycythemia: Incidence, risk factors and clinical outcome. Expert Rev Hematol 2015; 8(1):123–9.Google Scholar
Tröger, BM, Müller, T, Faust, K. Intrauterine growth restriction and the innate immune system in preterm infants of <32 weeks gestation. Neonatology 2013; 103:199–204.Google Scholar
Marlow, N, Morris, T, Brocklehurst, P. A randomised trial of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor for neonatal sepsis: Childhood outcomes at 5 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015 Jul;100(4):F320–6.Google Scholar
Gluckman, PD, Cutfield, W, et al. Metabolic consequences of intrauterine growth retardation. Acta Paediatr (suppl) 1999;417:306.Google Scholar
Longo, S, Bollani, L, Decembrino, L, et al. Short-term and long-term sequelae in intrauterine growth retardation (IUGR) J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2013;26(3):222–5.Google Scholar
Barker, DJP, Eiksson, JG, et al. Fetal origins of adult disease: Strength of effects and biological basis. Int J Epidemiol 2002;31:1235–9.Google Scholar
Soto, N, Bazaes, RA, et al. Insulin sensitivity and secretion are related to catch-up growth in small for gestational age infants at age 1 year: Results from a prospective cohort. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2003;88:3645–50.Google Scholar
Meas, T, Deghmoun, S, Alberti, C, et al. Independent effects of weight gain and fetal programming on metabolic complications in adults born small for gestational age. Diabetologia 2010 May;53(5):907–13.Google Scholar
Barker, DJP. Adult consequences of fetal growth restriction. Clin Obstet and Gynaecol 49(2):270–83.Google Scholar
Bocca-Tjeertes, I, Bos, A, et al. Symmetrical and asymmetrical growth restriction in preterm-born children. Pediatrics 2014;133:e650–6.Google Scholar
Torrance, HL, Bloemen, MCT, et al. Predictors of outcome at 2 years of age after early intrauterine growth restriction. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;36:171–7.Google Scholar