Book contents
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2015
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Politics of Parliamentary DebateParties, Rebels and Representation, pp. 186 - 198Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2014
References
Aarts, Kees, and Thomassen, Jacques. 2008. “Satisfaction with Democracy: Do Institutions Matter?” Electoral Studies 27(1): 5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, John H., and McKelvey, Richard D.. 1977. “A Method of Scaling with Applications to the 1968 and 1972 Presidential Elections.” American Political Science Review 71(1): 111–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alivizatos, Nikos. 1990. “The Difficulties of ‘Rationalization’ in a Polarized Political System: The Greek Chamber of Deputies.” In Parliament and Democratic Consolidation in Southern Europe: Greece, Italy, Portugal, Spain, and Turkey, ed. Liebert, Ulrike, and Cotta, Maurizio. Pinter, 131–153.Google Scholar
Ames, Barry. 1995. “Electoral Strategy under Open-List Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 39(2): 406–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ames, Barry. 2001. The Deadlock of Democracy in Brazil. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Christopher J., and Guillory, Christine A.. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems.” American Political Science Review 91(1): 66–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David. 1990. “Information Transmission in Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 34(1): 124–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Austen-Smith, David, and Feddersen, Timothy. 2006. “Deliberation, Preference Uncertainty and Voting Rules.” American Political Science Review 100(2): 209–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bächtiger, André, and Hangartner, Dominik. 2010. “When Deliberative Theory Meets Empirical Political Science: Theoretical and Methodological Challenges in Political Deliberation.” Political Studies 58(4): 609–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barker, Fiona, Boston, Jonathan, Levine, Stephen, McLeay, Elizabeth, and Roberts, Nigel S.. 2001. “An Initial Assessment of the Consequences of MPP in New Zealand.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew and Wattenberg, Martin. Oxford University Press, pp. 297–322.Google Scholar
Bawn, Kathleen, and Thies, Michael F.. 2003. “A Comparative Theory of Electoral Incentives: Representing the Unorganized under PR, Plurality, and Mixed-Member Electoral Systems.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 15(1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BBC. 2009. “MP Suspended after Mace Protest (15 January 2009).” http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/politics/7830937.stm.Google Scholar
Benoit, Kenneth, Laver, Michael, and Mikhaylov, Slava. 2009. “Treating Words as Data with Error: Uncertainty in Text Statements of Policy Positions.” American Journal of Political Science 53(2): 495–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernauer, Julian, and Bräuninger, Thomas. 2009. “Intra-Party Preference Heterogeneity and Faction Membership in the 15th German Bundestag: A Computational Text Analysis of Parliamentary Speeches.” German Politics 18(3): 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blais, André, and Bodet, Marc André. 2006. “Does Proportional Representation Foster Closer Congruence between Citizens and Policy Makers?” Comparative Political Studies 39(10): 1243–1262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boston, Jonathan, Levine, Stephen, McLeay, Elizabeth, and Roberts, Nigel S.. 1996. New Zealand under MMP: A New Politics? Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, Shaun. 2000. “Parties in Legislatures: Two Competing Explanations.” In Parties without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, ed. Dalton, R.J. and Wattenberg, M.P.. Oxford University Press, pp. 157–179.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael D.. 2007. “Election and Party System Effects on Policy Representation: Bringing Time into a Comparative Perspective.” Electoral Studies 26(1): 168–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundesfinanzministerium. 2008. “Schutzschirm für Arbeitsplätze. Die Bundesregierung stärkt mit 15 Maßnahmen die Wirtschaft, sichert Arbeitsplätze und entlastet private Haushalte (5 November 2008).” www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/nn_69120/DE/Buergerinnen_und_Buerger/Gesellschaft_und_Zukunft/themenschwerpunkt_konjunkturpakete/073_Schutzschirm_arbeitsplaetze.html?_nnn=true.Google Scholar
Bundesfinanzministerium. 2009. “Das zweite Konjunkturpaket. Deutschland in Bewegung halten (14 January 2009).” www.bundesfinanzministerium.de/nn_69120/DE/Buergerinnen_und_Buerger/Gesellschaft_und_Zukunft/themenschwerpunkt_konjunkturpakete/Stellschrauben-des-Konjunkturpakets-2/075_in_Bewegung_halten.html?_nnn=true.Google Scholar
Bundestag. 1998. “Die Mitglieder des Deutschen Bundestages 1.-13. Wahlperiode.” Materialien des Wissenschaftlichen Dienstes des Deutschen Bundestages 127.Google Scholar
Butler, David, and Butler, Gareth. 2005. British Political Facts since 1979. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M. 2007. “Competing Principals: Political Institutions and Party Unity in Legislative Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 51(1): 92–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, John M. 2009. Legislative Voting and Accountability. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carey, John, and Shugart, Matthew. 1995. “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas.” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., Gabel, Matthew J., and Hug, Simon. 2008. “Legislative Voting Behavior, Seen and Unseen: A Theory of Roll-Call Vote Selection.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 23(4): 543–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrubba, Clifford J., Gabel, Matthew J., Murrah, Lacey, Clough, Ryan, Montgomery, Elizabeth, and Schambach, Rebecca. 2006. “Off the Record: Unrecorded Legislative Votes, Selection Bias and Roll-Call Vote Analysis.” British Journal of Political Science 36(4): 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CDU/CSU. 2005. “Arbeitsordnung der CDU/CSU Bundestagsfraktion der 16. Wahlperiode (28 November 2005).” www.cducsu.de.Google Scholar
Chang, Eric C.C., and Golden, Miriam A.. 2007. “Electoral Systems, District Magnitude and Corruption.” British Journal of Political Science 37(1): 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98(2): 355–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corbett, Richard, Jacobs, Francis, and Shackleton, Michael. 2007. The European Parliament. 7th ed. John Harper.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary. 2006. “The Organization of Democratic Legislatures.” In The Oxford Handbook of Political Economy, ed. Weingast, Barry, and Wittman, Donald. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 141–161.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. The Legislative Leviathan. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the US House of Representatives. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary W., and Thies, Michael F.. 1998. “The Cost of Intraparty Competition: The Single, Nontrasferable Vote and Money Politics in Japan.” Comparative Political Studies 31(3): 267–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Karen E., and Schoppa, Leonard J.. 2002. “Interaction Effects in Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Theory and Evidence from Germany, Japan, and Italy.” Comparative Political Studies 35(9): 1027–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crisp, Brian, Escobar-Lemmon, Maria, Jones, Bradford, Jones, Mark, and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle. 2004. “Vote-Seeking Incentives and Legislative Representation in Six Presidential Democracies.” Journal of Politics 66(3): 823–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, Lee J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16(3): 297–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Farrell, David M., and McAllister, Ian. 2011. Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denemark, David. 2001. “Choosing MMP in New Zealand: Explaining the 1993 Electoral Reform.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew and Wattenberg, Martin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 70–95.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher. 2011 a. “130. Sitzung des Deutschen Bundestages am Donnerstag, 29 September 2011. Endgültiges Ergebnis der Namentlichen Abstimmung Nr. 1.” www.bundestag.de/bundestag/plenum/abstimmung/20110929_euro.pdf.Google Scholar
Bundestag, Deutscher. 2011b. “Stenografischer Bericht. 130. Sitzung (17/130). 29 September 2011.” http://dipbt.bundestag.de/dip21/btp/17/17130.pdf.Google Scholar
Dewan, Torun, and Myatt, David P.. 2008. “The Qualities of Leadership: Direction, Communication, and Obfuscation.” American Political Science Review 102(3): 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Die Welt. 2011. “‘Für mich war klar, Berlin muss Hauptstadt sein’ (Interview with Wolfgang Schäuble, 19 June 2011).” www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article13438037/Fuer-mich-war-klar-Berlin-muss-Hauptstadt-sein.html.Google Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, and Feddersen, Timothy. 1998. “Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure.” American Political Science Review 92(3): 611–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diermeier, Daniel, Godbout, Jean-François, Yu, Bei, and Kaufmann, Stefan. 2012. “Language and Ideology in Congress.” British Journal of Political Science 42(1): 31–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Herbert. 1995. “Time as a Scarce Resource: Government Control of the Agenda.” In Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe, ed. Döring, Herbert. Campus Verlag, pp. 223–246.Google Scholar
Eurogroup. 2010. “Terms of Reference of the Eurogroup: European Financial Stability Facility (7 June 2010).” www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/misc/114977.pdf.Google Scholar
Ezrow, Lawrence. 2010. Linking Citizens and Parties: How Electoral Systems Matter for Political Representation. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrell, David. 2011. Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. 2nd ed. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FDP. 2005. “Geschäftsordnung der FDP Fraktion im Deutschen Bundestag beschlossen am 12.11.1991 zuletzt geändert am 13.12.2005.” www.fdp-fraktion.de.Google Scholar
Ferrara, Federico, and Herron, Erik S.. 2005. “Going It Alone? Strategic Entry under Mixed Electoral Rules.” American Journal of Political Science 49(1): 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Follesdal, Andreas, and Hix, Simon. 2006. “Why There Is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik.” Journal of Common Market Studies 44(3): 533–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, and Marsh, Michael, eds. 1988. Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. Sage.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, and Mitchell, Paul, eds. 2005. The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Michael, Laver, Michael, and Mair, Peter. 2006. Representative Government in Modern Europe. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Gay, Oonagh. 2009. “Members since 1979.” House of Commons Library Research Paper 09/31.Google Scholar
Giannetti, Daniela, and Laver, Michael. 2005. “Policy Positions and Jobs in the Government.” European Journal of Political Research 44(1): 91–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golder, Matthew, and Stramski, Jacek. 2010. “Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions.” American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 90–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greens. 2007. “Geschäftsordnung der Fraktion Bündnis 90/Die Grünen im Bundestag, beschlossen am 27.9.2005, geändert mit Beschluss vom 5.9.2007.” GRÜNE Bundestagsfraktion.Google Scholar
Gschwend, Thomas, Schmitt, Hermann, Wüst, Andreas, and Zittel, Thomas. 2005. German Candidate Survey, Bundestag Election 2005 (ZA4923 data set). Mannheim Center for European Social Research (MZES) and GESIS Cologne.Google Scholar
Guardian. 2009. “Labour Survives Vote on Heathrow Expansion but 28 MPs Join Revolt (29 January 2009).” www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jan/28/labour-survives-heathrow-expansion-vote.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1985. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vols. 1 & 2. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Douglas B. 2005. “Orchestrating Party Talk: A Party-Based View of One-Minute Speeches.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30(1): 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2006. “The Influence of Candidate Selection Methods on Legislatures and Legislators: Theoretical Propositions, Methodological Suggestions and Empirical Evidence.” The Journal of Legislative Studies 12(3): 366–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herron, Erik S. 2002. “Electoral Influences on Legislative Behavior in Mixed-Member Systems: Evidence from Ukraine’s Verkhovna Rada.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 27(3): 361–382.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon. 2002. “Parliamentary Behavior with Two Principals: Preferences, Parties, and Voting in the European Parliament.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 688–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon. 2004. “Electoral Institutions and Legislative Behavior: Explaining Voting Defection in the European Parliament.” World Politics 56(1): 194–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, and Marsh, Michael. 2007. “Punishment or Protest? Understanding European Parliament Elections.” Journal of Politics 69(2): 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, and Noury, Abdul. 2009. “After Enlargement: Voting Patterns in the Sixth European Parliament.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(2): 159–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hix, Simon, Noury, Abdul, and Roland, Gerard. 2007. Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HM Treasury. 2008. Pre-Budget Report. Facing Global challenges: Supporting People through Difficult Times. The Stationery Office (CM 7484).Google Scholar
Hopkins, Daniel J., and King, Gary. 2010. “A Method of Automated Nonparametric Content Analysis for Social Science.” American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D. 1996. “The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Political Science Review 90(2): 269–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, John D., and Bingham Powell, G.. 1994. “Congruence between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.” World Politics 46(3): 291–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon. 2010. “Selection Effects in Roll Call Votes.” British Journal of Political Science 40(1): 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hug, Simon, and Martin, Danielle. 2012. “How Electoral Systems Affect MPs’ Positions.” Electoral Studies 38:192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Lau, Olivia. 2007. “negbin: Negative Binomial Regression for Event Count Dependent Variables.” In Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software. http://gking.harvard.edu/zelig.Google Scholar
Jensen, Christian B., Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2013. “Parliamentary Questions, Oversight, and National Opposition Status in the European Parliament.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 38(2): 259–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Christopher J. 2009. Party Discipline and Parliamentary Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey. 2002. “Members of Parliament and Representation.” In Proportional Representation on Trial: The 1999 New Zealand General Election and the Fate of MMP, ed. Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Karp, Jeffrey, Banducci, Susan, Miller, Raymond, and Sullivan, Ann. Auckland University Press, pp. 130–145.Google Scholar
Karp, Jeffrey. 2009. “Candidate Effects and Spill-Over in Mixed Systems: Evidence from New Zealand.” Electoral Studies 28(1): 41–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, Richard S. 1986. “Intraparty Preference Voting.” In Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, ed. Grofman, Bernard and Lijphart, Arend. Agathon Press, pp. 85–103.Google Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1991. The Logic of Delegation: Congressional Parties and the Appropriations Process. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1999. “Mapping Political Support in the 1990s: A Global Analysis.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford University Press, pp. 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Volkens, Andrea, Bara, Judith, Budge, Ian, and McDonald, Michael. 2006. Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors and Governments in Central and Eastern Europe, European Union and OECD 1990–2003. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koger, Gregory. 2010. Filibustering: A Political History of Obstruction in the House and Senate. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreppel, Amie. 2002. The European Parliament and Supranational Party System. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Benoit, Kenneth. 2002. “Locating TDs in Policy Spaces: Wordscoring Daíl Speeches.” Irish Political Studies 17(1): 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael, Benoit, Kenneth, and Garry, John. 2003. “Extracting Policy Positions from Political Texts Using Words as Data.” American Political Science Review 97(2): 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lijphart, Arend. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lindstädt, René, Slapin, Jonathan B., and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2011. “Balancing Competing Demands: Position Taking and Election Proximity in the European Parliament.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 36(1): 37–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindstädt, René, Slapin, Jonathan B., and Vander Wielen, Ryan J.. 2012. “Adaptive Behaviour in the European Parliament: Learning to Balance Competing Demands.” European Union Politics 13(4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Londregan, John. 2002. “Appointment, Reelection, and Autonomy in the Senate of Chile.” In Legislative Politics in Latin America, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Nacif, Benito. Cambridge University Press, pp. 341–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maltzman, Forrest, and Sigelman, Lee. 1996. “The Politics of Talk: Unconstrained Floor Time in the US House of Representatives.” The Journal of Politics 58(3): 819–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Michael. 1998. “Testing the Second-Order Election Model after Four European Elections.” British Journal of Political Science 28(4): 591–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsh, Michael. 2000. “Candidate Centred by Party Wrapped: Campaigning in Ireland under STV.” In Elections in Australia, Ireland and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote, ed. Bowler, Shaun and Grofman, Bernard. University of Michigan Press, pp. 114–130.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2006. “Applied Bayesian Inference in R Using MCMCpack.” R News 6(1): 2–7.Google Scholar
Martin, Andrew D., Quinn, Kevin M., and Park, Jong Hee. 2011. “MCMCpack: Markov Chain Monte Carlo in R.” Journal of Statistical Software 42(9): 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, John E. 2006. “A Shifting Balance: Parliament, the Executive and the Evolution of Politics in New Zealand.” Australasian Parliamentary Review 21(2): 113–131.Google Scholar
Martin, Lanny W., and Stevenson, Randolph T.. 2001. “Government Formation in Parliamentary Democracies.” American Journal of Political Science 45(1): 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lanny W., and Vanberg, Georg. 2008. “Coalition Government and Political Communication.” Political Research Quarterly 61: 502–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Lanny W., and Vanberg, Georg. 2011. Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Shane. 2010. “Electoral Rewards for Personal Vote Cultivation under PR-STV.” West European Politics 33(2): 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Shane. 2011. “Using Parliamentary Questions to Measure Constituency Focus: An Application to the Irish Case.” Political Studies 59(2): 472–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDonald, Michael D., and Budge, Ian. 2005. Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKay, William, ed. 2004. Erskine May’s Treatise on The Law, Privileges, Proceedings and Usage of Parliament. 23rd ed. Lexis Nexis Butterworths.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1991. Considerations on Representative Government. Promethus Books (originally published in 1861).Google Scholar
Monroe, Burt L., Colaresi, Michael, and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2008. “Fightin’ Words: Lexical Feature Selection and Evaluation for Identifying the Content of Political Conflict.” Political Analysis 16(4): 372–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, Burt L., and Maeda, Ko. 2004. “Talk’s Cheap: Text-Based Estimation of Rhetorical Ideal-Points.” 21st Meeting, Society for Political Methodology, July 29–31.Google Scholar
Morgenstern, Scott. 2004. Patterns of Legislative Politics: Roll Call Voting in the United States and Latin America’s Southern Cone. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morris, Jonathan S. 2001. “Reexamining the Politics of Talk: Partisan Rhetoric in the 104th House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26(1): 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Wolfgang C., and Strøm, Kaare, eds. 1999. Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nagel, Jack H. 2004. “New Zealand: Reform by (Nearly) Immaculate Design.” In Handbook of Electoral System Choice, ed. Colomer, Josep M.. Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 530–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neblo, Michael A., Esterling, Kevin M., Kennedy, Ryan P., Lazer, David M.J., and Sokhey, Anand E.. 2010. “Who Wants to Deliberate – and Why?” American Political Science Review 104(3): 566–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New Zealand Parliament. 2012. “Speakers’ Rulings. 1876 to 2011 Inclusive.” Office of the Clerk of the House of Representatives, New Zealand Parliament.Google Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 1999. “Institutional Explanations for Political Support.” In Critical Citizens: Global Support for Democratic Government, ed. Norris, Pippa. Oxford University Press, pp. 217–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2004. Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa. 2011. Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, Pippa, and Luvenduski, Joni. 2001. “The British Representation Study, 2001.” Available at www.hks.harvard.edu/fs/pnorris/datafiles/BRS2001.zip.Google Scholar
Page, Benjamin. 1996. Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29(2): 357–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poole, Keith, Rosenthal, Howard, Lewis, Jeffrey, Lo, James, and Carroll, Royce. 2010. “basicspace: A Package to Recover a Basic Space from Issue Scales.” Ver. 0.01.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2000. Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2004. “Political Representation in Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, G. Bingham. 2009. “The Ideological Congruence Controversy.” Comparative Political Studies 42(12): 1475–1497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2010. “Position Taking in European Parliament Speeches.” British Journal of Political Science 40(3): 587–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2011. “Parliamentary Questions and Oversight in the European Union.” European Journal of Political Research 50(1): 53–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proksch, Sven-Oliver, and Slapin, Jonathan B.. 2012. “Institutional Foundations of Legislative Speech.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3): 520–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, Kevin M., Monroe, Burt L., Colaresi, Michael, Crespin, Michael H., and Radev, Dragomir. 2010. “How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs.” American Journal of Political Science 54(1): 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, Gideon, and Hazan, Reuven Y.. 2001. “Candidate Selection Methods: An Analytical Framework.” Party Politics 7(3): 297–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahat, G. Hazan, R.Y., and Katz, R.S.. 2008. “Democracy and Political Parties: On the Uneasy Relationships between Participation, Competition and Representation.” Party Politics 14(6): 663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, Bjørn Erik. 2000. “Parliamentary Floor Voting Procedures and Agenda Setting in Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 25(1): 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasch, Bjørn Erik, and Tsebelis, George, eds. 2011. The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting. Routledge/ECPR Studies in European Political Science.Google Scholar
Raunio, Tapio. 2000. “Losing Independence or Finally Gaining Recognition? Contacts between MEPs and National Parties.” Party Politics 6(2): 211–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz. 1984. “National Election Cycles and European Elections, 1979 and 1984.” Electoral Studies 3(3): 244–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, Karlheinz, and Schmitt, Hermann. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8(1): 3–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Jason M. 2007. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll-Call Data: A Cautionary Tale.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 32(3): 341–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryckewaert, Laura. 2013. “Tory Backbenchers Voice Support for a House Committee to Better Protect MPs’ Freedom, Powers in Commons.” The Hill Times Weekly 22 April.Google Scholar
Salmond, Robert C. 2007. Parliamentary Question Times: How Legislative Accountability Mechanisms Affect Citizens and Politics. PhD thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Scarrow, Susan. 1997. “Political Career Paths and Their Consequences in the European Parliament.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(2): 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2005. “Measuring Ideas More Effectively: An Analysis of Bush and Kerry’s National Security Speeches.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38(4): 701–711.Google Scholar
Schonhardt-Bailey, Cheryl. 2008. “The Constitutional Debate on Partial-Birth Abortion: Constitutional Gravitas and Moral Passion.” British Journal of Political Science 38(3): 383–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiner, Hermann J. 2005. “Die Berliner Stunde – Funktionsweise und Erfahrungen: Zur Redeordnung des Deutschen Bundestages.” Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 36(3): 573–588.Google Scholar
Shepsle, Kenneth A., and Weingast, Barry R.. 1987. “The Institutional Foundations of Committee Power.” The American Political Science Review 81(1): 85–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S. 2003. “Extreme Electoral Systems and the Appeal of the Mixed-Member Alternative.” In Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds?, ed. Shugart, Matthew S. and Wattenberg, Martin P.. Oxford University Press, pp. 25–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shugart, M.S., Valdini, M.E., and Suominen, K.. 2005. “Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote-Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 49(2): 437–449.Google Scholar
Shugart, Matthew S., and Wattenberg, Martin P., eds. 2003. Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: The Best of Both Worlds? Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slapin, Jonathan B., and Proksch, Sven-Oliver. 2008. “A Scaling Model for Estimating Time-Series Party Positions from Texts.” American Journal of Political Science 52(3): 705–722.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Steven. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
SPD. 2004. “Beschluss zum Selbstverständnis der Fraktion vom 23.6.1981 in der Fassung vom 19.5.1992.” In Das Regierungssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, ed. Hesse, Joachim J. and Ellwein, Thomas. De Gruyter, p. 466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel Online. 2011. “Euro Abweichler erzürnen die Parteigranden (29 September 2011).” www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/0,1518,789100,00.html.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, Bächtiger, André, Spörndli, Markus, and Steenbergen, Marco R.. 2004. Deliberative Politics in Action: Analysing Parliamentary Discourse. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stern. 2011. “Zoff um Redezeit für Rebellen (29 September 2011).” www.stern.de/politik/deutschland/euro-abstimmung-im-bundestag-zoff-umredezeit-fuer-rebellen-1733571.html.Google Scholar
Stewart, John. 2010. “Victory against All the Odds: The Story of How the Campaign to Stop a Third Runway at Heathrow Was Won.” http://hacan.org.uk/resources/reports/victory.pdf.Google Scholar
Stone, Walter J., and Simas, Elizabeth N.. 2010. “Candidate Valence and Ideological Positions in the U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 54(2): 371–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strøm, Kaare, Müller, Wolfgang C., and Bergman, Torbjörn, eds. 2003. Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuttgarter Zeitung. 2011. “‘Auch Minderheiten haben Rechte’ (Interview with Norbert Lammert, 5 October 2011).” www.stuttgarterzeitung.de/inhalt.interview-mit-norbert-lammert-auch-minderheitenhaben-rechte.1136cfc4-1de3-482e-ab5a-7f6424777e58.html.Google Scholar
Süddeutsche Zeitung. 2011. “Abstimmung über Euro-Rettungsschirm –Rotkäppchen unter Fraktionszwang (28 September 2011).” www.sueddeutsche.de/politik/abstimmung-ueber-euro-rettungsschirmrotkaeppchen-unter-fraktionszwang-1.1151514.Google Scholar
Thames, Frank, and Edwards, Martin. 2006. “Differentiating Mixed-Member Electoral Systems: Mixed-Member Majoritartian and Mixed-Member Proportional Systems and Government Expenditures.” Comparative Political Studies 39(7): 905–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, Matt, Pang, Bo, and Lee, Lillian. 2006. “Get Out the Vote: Determining Support or Opposition from Congressional Floor-Debate Transcripts.” Proceedings of Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing Conference, pp. 327–335.Google Scholar
Thompson, Dennis F. 2008. “Deliberative Democratic Theory and Empirical Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 497–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1990. Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 1999. “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis.” American Political Science Review 93(3): 591–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsebelis, George. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Russell Sage/Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UK Hansard. 2009. “Daily Hansard – Debate on 15 January 2009, column 367.” www.parliament.uk/business/publications/hansard.Google Scholar
Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Catt, Helena, Lamare, Jim, and Miller, Raymond. 1995. Towards Consensus? The 1993 General Election and Referendum in New Zealand and the Transition to Proportional Representation. Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Vowles, Jack, Aimer, Peter, Karp, Jeffrey, Banducci, Susan, Miller, Raymond, and Sullivan, Ann, eds. 2002. Proportional Representation on Trial: The 1999 New Zealand General Election and the Fate of MMP. Auckland University Press.Google Scholar
Vowles, Jack, Banducci, Susan A., and Karp, Jeffrey A.. 2006. “Forecasting and Evaluating the Consequences of Electoral Change in New Zealand.” Acta Politica 41(3): 267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welt Online. 2011. “Heftiges Nachspiel nach Rederecht für Euro-Rebellen (29 September 2011).” www.welt.de/politik/deutschland/article13633653/Heftiges-Nachspiel-nach-Rederecht-fuer-Euro-Rebellen.html.Google Scholar
Wüst, Andreas M., Schmitt, Hermann, Gschwend, Thomas, and Zittel, Thomas. 2006. “Candidates in the 2005 Bundestag Election: Mode of Candidacy, Campaigning and Issues.” German Politics 15(4): 420–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar