Skip to main content Accessibility help
  • Cited by 4
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: September 2014

Introduction: power, order, and change in world politics



The global system is in the midst of a great transformation. The distribution of power is shifting. Great powers are rising and declining. For almost a century, the United States dominated world politics. But today, China and other rising non-Western states, such as India and Brazil, are growing in wealth, power, influence, and ambition. The old order – led by the United States and its allies – is still a commanding presence in the global system. But the power once concentrated in the hands of the United States is diffusing outward and, as a result, new struggles are emerging over global rules and institutions. In the midst of these changes, scholars have been asking basic questions about the logic and character of contemporary international order. How profound is the change that is underway in global order? If the United States is losing its position of preeminence, will the order that it created weaken and break apart, giving way to a new type of global order? Or will non-Western rising states ultimately become stakeholders in the existing order? Do rising states want great authority and privileges in the existing international order or do they want to use their growing power to reorganize the basic principles and norms of the system?

The struggles underway today over international order are, of course, not new. The rise and decline of great powers and convulsive shifts in international order have played out many times over the centuries. In past eras, states have risen up, fought wars, and built international order. Spain, France, Great Britain, Germany – each of these states grew in power in a past century and made a bid to dominate Europe and the wider world. In turn, each declined or was defeated in war, triggering a renewal of geopolitical struggle over leadership and the organizing rules and arrangements of global order. Over the centuries, the actors on the global stage have changed but the scripts and plot lines of struggle over order have appeared and reappeared many times. As a result, scholars are asking questions about the past. Are there recurring historical dynamics and patterns that can help us understand today’s power transitions and struggles over international order? What can we learn from the past? Is the past prolog?

Gilpin, Robert, War and Change in World Politics (New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 1981).
Waltz, Kenneth, The Theory of International Politics (New York, NY: Wiley, 1979).
Wohlforth, William C., “Gilpinian Realism and International Relations,” International Relations, Vol. 25, No. 4 (December 2011), pp. 499–511.
Organski, A.F.K., World Politics (New York, NY: Knopf, 1958)
Organski, and Kugler, Jacek, The War Ledger (University of Chicago Press, 1980)
Tammen, Ronald, Kugler, Jacek, and Lemke, Douglas, et al., Power Transitions: Strategies for the 21st Century (New York, NY: Chatham House, 2000).
Modelski, George, Long Cycles in World Politics (Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press, 1987)
Modelski, George, ed., Exploring Long Cycles (Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1987)
Thompson, William R., On Global War: Historical-Structural Approaches to World Politics (Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1988)
Rasler, Karen and Thompson, William R., The Great Powers and Global Struggle, 1490–1900 (Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press, 1994).
Kindleberger, Charles, The World in Depression, 1929–39 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1974)
Krasner, Stephen D., “State Power and the Structure of International Trade,” World Politics, Vol. 28, No. 3 (April 1976), pp. 317–347
Keohane, Robert, “The Theory of Hegemonic Stability Theory and Changes in International Economic Regimes,” in Holsti, Ole R., Siverson, Randolph M., and George, Alexander L., ed., Change in the International System (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1980)
Gilpin, Robert, The Political Economy of International Relations (Princeton University Press, 1987).