Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Schrecker, Ted 2017. Priority Setting: Right Answer to a Far Too Narrow Question? Comment on "Global Developments in Priority Setting in Health". International Journal of Health Policy and Management, Vol. 7, Issue. 1, p. 86.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 2003
  • Online publication date: September 2009

5 - The Intellectual Property Committee and transnational mobilization

Summary

If war is much too important a subject to leave up to generals, as Bismarck said, the rules of international commerce are far too important to leave up to government bureaucrats.

James Enyart, director, International Affairs, Monsanto Agricultural Company

In March 1986, six months before the Punta del Este meeting launching the Uruguay Round of GATT negotiations, twelve corporate executives of US-based multinational corporations formed the Intellectual Property Committee (IPC). The IPC sought to develop international support for improving the international protection of intellectual property (patents, copyrights, trademarks, and trade secrets). The IPC, in conjunction with its counterparts in Europe and Japan, crafted a proposal based on existing industrialized country laws and presented its proposals to the GATT Secretariat. By 1994, the IPC had achieved its goal in the Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property (TRIPS) accord of the Uruguay trade round. The United States, and ultimately the parties to the GATT negotiations, accepted the particular vision articulated by the IPC. What is new in this case is that industry identified a trade problem, devised a solution, and reduced it to a concrete proposal that it then advanced to governments. These private sector actors succeeded in getting most of what they wanted from an IP agreement, which now has the status of public international law.

In effect, twelve corporations made public law for the world.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Private Power, Public Law
  • Online ISBN: 9780511491665
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491665
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×