Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 43
  • Cited by
    This (lowercase (translateProductType product.productType)) has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Mortillaro, Marcello and Dukes, Daniel 2018. Jumping for Joy: The Importance of the Body and of Dynamics in the Expression and Recognition of Positive Emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 9, Issue. ,

    Miceli, Maria and Castelfranchi, Cristiano 2018. Contempt and disgust: the emotions of disrespect. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 48, Issue. 2, p. 205.

    Moors, Agnes 2017. Integration of Two Skeptical Emotion Theories: Dimensional Appraisal Theory and Russell's Psychological Construction Theory. Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 1.

    Trichas, Savvas 2017. Educational Leadership and Administration. p. 2070.

    Deska, Jason C. and Hugenberg, Kurt 2017. The face-mind link: Why we see minds behind faces, and how others' minds change how we see their face. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, Vol. 11, Issue. 12, p. e12361.

    Adams, Reginald B. Albohn, Daniel N. and Kveraga, Kestutis 2017. Social Vision: Applying a Social-Functional Approach to Face and Expression Perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, Vol. 26, Issue. 3, p. 243.

    Fischer, Agneta H. and Sauter, Disa A. 2017. What the Theory of Affective Pragmatics Does and Doesn't Do. Psychological Inquiry, Vol. 28, Issue. 2-3, p. 190.

    Corneanu, Ciprian Adrian Simon, Marc Oliu Cohn, Jeffrey F. and Guerrero, Sergio Escalera 2016. Survey on RGB, 3D, Thermal, and Multimodal Approaches for Facial Expression Recognition: History, Trends, and Affect-Related Applications. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, Vol. 38, Issue. 8, p. 1548.

    Lewinski, Peter Fransen, Marieke L. and Tan, Ed S. 2016. Embodied Resistance to Persuasion in Advertising. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 7, Issue. ,

    Mesquita, Batja 2016. The legacy of Nico H. Frijda (1927–2015). Cognition and Emotion, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 603.

    Reinl, Maren and Bartels, Andreas 2015. Perception of temporal asymmetries in dynamic facial expressions. Frontiers in Psychology, Vol. 6, Issue. ,

    Jäger, Christoph and Bänninger-Huber, Eva 2015. Looking into meta-emotions. Synthese, Vol. 192, Issue. 3, p. 787.

    Trichas, Savvas 2015. Multidimensional Perspectives on Principal Leadership Effectiveness. p. 207.

    Bacher, L.F. 2014. Development and manipulation of spontaneous eye blinking in the first year: Relationships to context and positive affect. Developmental Psychobiology, Vol. 56, Issue. 4, p. 783.

    Reisenzein, Rainer Studtmann, Markus and Horstmann, Gernot 2013. Coherence between Emotion and Facial Expression: Evidence from Laboratory Experiments. Emotion Review, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 16.

    Scherer, Klaus R. Mortillaro, Marcello and Mehu, Marc 2013. Understanding the Mechanisms Underlying the Production of Facial Expression of Emotion: A Componential Perspective. Emotion Review, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 47.

    Scholl, Wolfgang 2013. The socio-emotional basis of human interaction and communication: How we construct our social world. Social Science Information, Vol. 52, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    Parkinson, Brian 2013. Contextualizing Facial Activity. Emotion Review, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 97.

    Aue, Tatjana and Scherer, Klaus R 2013. Facilitation of arm movements by their outcome desirability. Social Science Information, Vol. 52, Issue. 3, p. 471.

    Fernández-Dols, José-Miguel 2013. Advances in the Study of Facial Expression: An Introduction to the Special Section. Emotion Review, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 3.

    ×
  • Print publication year: 1997
  • Online publication date: March 2010

4 - Facial expressions as modes of action readiness

Summary

Many questions one could ask about facial expressions seem to be fixed by the use of the very word expression. Facial expression, first, refers to facial behavior that suggests emotional meaning to an outside observer. Second, the term carries the implication that that facial behavior has the function or purpose of conveying such meaning. Third, it suggests that there exists something (say, an inner feeling) independently of that behavior to which the behavior called expression is added as an extra.

These aspects are not necessarily all true of the same behaviors. Facial behaviors may suggest emotional meanings to observers, but that may not be their function or purpose. Receiving the epithet “expressive” in fact says nothing about the nature of the behavior concerned. “Hasty” or “greedy” behaviors, for instance, are made to arrive as fast as one can at the object of desire, and not to inform others about one's state of mind. Also, nonbehavior may on occasion be highly expressive, such as underacting in the theater and Jesus's remaining silent under accusation. And there are phenomena that are expressive by suggesting emotional meanings in which no inner feelings of whatever produced the phenomena are involved, such as joyful bird songs, angry bursts of wind, sad music, nervous lines, and solemn penguins.

Most past and current theorizing on facial expression starts from the assumption that it expresses emotional feelings and exists for the sake of doing so. The study of expression pretty much originated in the philosophical problem of the knowledge of other minds.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Psychology of Facial Expression
  • Online ISBN: 9780511659911
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511659911
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×