Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: An Overview
- Part I Static efficiency and the diversified firm
- 1 The multimarket firm
- 2 Theories linking multimarket contact and market power
- 3 Diversifying mergers and strategic congruence
- 4 Multimarket contact and resource allocation
- 5 The market power of diversified oligopolists
- Part II Firm and industry effects versus traditional models
- Part III Dynamic efficiency and the diversified firm
- Part IV Industrial policy
- Afterword: Perspectives through time and across countries
- Notes
- References
- Index
3 - Diversifying mergers and strategic congruence
from Part I - Static efficiency and the diversified firm
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of tables and figures
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: An Overview
- Part I Static efficiency and the diversified firm
- 1 The multimarket firm
- 2 Theories linking multimarket contact and market power
- 3 Diversifying mergers and strategic congruence
- 4 Multimarket contact and resource allocation
- 5 The market power of diversified oligopolists
- Part II Firm and industry effects versus traditional models
- Part III Dynamic efficiency and the diversified firm
- Part IV Industrial policy
- Afterword: Perspectives through time and across countries
- Notes
- References
- Index
Summary
Chapter 2 explained that one way conglomerate mergers could create market power is by increasing multimarket contact and symmetry among a market's firms. Chapter 2 showed that multimarket contact can theoretically increase the stability of cooperative-like behavior among the rivalrous firms in any given market in which the firms meet. Further, as emphasized in Chapter 1, if the various motives for diversification rest on industry-specific properties, then the extension of diversification will tend to increase multimarket contact with the potential for increasing cooperative-like behavior (whether or not bolstering such behavior was primary among the firm's objectives). This chapter tests the hypothesis that mergers serve to increase multimarket contact and symmetry.
Overview
Section 3.2 measures the contact and symmetry created by two large conglomerate mergers just after the passage of the Celler–Kefauver Act and illustrates the change in market structure expected if a merger were designed to increase market power. Of course, the diversification and ensuing symmetry could be a response to any sort of synergy based on industry characteristics. As explained in Chapter 2, gains in potential for cooperative-like behavior from increased multimarket contact could in principle induce diversification, but as Chapter 1 has explained, there are strong “innocent” explanations for diversification that can make it impossible to show that much diversification is on balance because of such potential.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Purposive Diversification and Economic Performance , pp. 32 - 41Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 1993