Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T18:12:36.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Reproductive donation in the context of environmental and global justice

from Part I - International, cross-border and global issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 March 2016

By
Anja J. Karnein  and
Mattias Iser
Edited by
Susan Golombok ,
Rosamund Scott ,
John B. Appleby ,
Martin Richards  and
Stephen Wilkinson
Susan Golombok
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Rosamund Scott
Affiliation:
King's College London
John B. Appleby
Affiliation:
King's College London
Martin Richards
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Stephen Wilkinson
Affiliation:
Lancaster University
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Regulating Reproductive Donation , pp. 84 - 104
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Broome, J. (2012). Climate Matters. Ethics in a Warming World. New York: W.W. Horton.Google Scholar
Cafaro, P. (2012). ‘Climate ethics and population policy’. WIREs Climate Change, 3, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cafaro, P. and Staples, W. (2009). ‘The environmental argument for reducing immigration into the United States’. Environmental Ethics, 31, 3–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cripps, E. (forthcoming). ‘Acknowledging the Elephant: Population, Justice and Urgency’. Paper manuscript on file with the authors.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. (1968). The Population Bomb. New York: A Sierra Club/Ballantine Book.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. and Holden, J. (1972). ‘A Bulletin dialogue on the closing circle: critique of “One Dimensional Ecology”’. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 28, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, J., Hoorans, S., Sivadasan, S., van het Loo, M. et al. (2004). Low Fertility and Population. Ageing Causes, Consequences, and Policy Options. Leiden: RAND Europe.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. (1974). ‘Lifeboat ethics: the case against helping the poor’. Psychology Today, 800–12, reprinted in: Aiken, W. and LaFollette, H. (eds.) (1996). World Hunger and Morality, 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 5–15.Google Scholar
Heyward, C. (2012). ‘A growing problem? Dealing with population increases in climate justice’. Ethical Perspectives, 19, 703–32.Google Scholar
Honneth, A. (2014). Freedom's Right. The Social Foundations of Democratic Life. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, L.J. (1982). ‘Planned fertility of one-couple/one-child-policy in the People's Republic of China’. The Journal of Marriage and Family, 44, 775–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (2014). ‘Technical Summary’. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III. Fifth Assessment Report. Available at www.report.mitigation2014.org/drafts/final-draft-postplenary/ipcc_wg3_ar5_final-draft_postplenary_technical-summary.pdf.Google Scholar
Iser, M. (2013). ‘Recognition’, in E.N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Available at www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/recognition/.Google Scholar
Iser, M. (forthcoming). Indignation and Progress. Foundations of a Critical Theory of Society. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Karnein, A. (2012a). A Theory of Unborn Life. From Abortion to Genetic Manipulation. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnein, A. (2012b). ‘Parenthood – whose right is it anyway?’, in Richards, M., Pennings, G. and Appleby, J.B. (eds.), Reproductive Donation: Practice, Policy and Bioethics. Cambridge University Press, 51–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karnein, A. (2014). ‘Putting fairness in its place: Why there is a duty to take up the slack’. The Journal of Philosophy, 111, 593–607.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R. (2003). ‘Who can be wronged?’ Philosophy & Public Affairs, 31, 99–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Ferrara, E., Chong, A. and Duryea, S. (2008). ‘Soap operas and fertility: evidence from Brazil’. BREAD Working Paper, 172. Available at www.iadb.org/res/files/WP-633updated.pdf.Google Scholar
Malthus, T.R. (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population, Gilbert, G. (ed.) (2004). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pennings, G. (2000). ‘The right to choose your donor: a step towards commercialization or a step towards empowering the patient?’ Human Reproduction, 15, 503–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pogge, T. (2008). World Poverty and Human Rights. Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1999). The Law of Peoples. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (1994). ‘Population: delusion and reality’. The New York Review of Books, September 22, 62–71.Google Scholar
Shiffrin, S. (1999). ‘Wrongful life, procreative responsibility and the significance of harm’. Legal Theory, 5, 117–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, H. (1993). ‘Subsistence emissions and luxury emissions’. Law and Policy, 15, 39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Velleman, D. (2008). ‘Persons in prospect’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 36, 221–88.Google Scholar
Warnock, M. (1984). A Question of Life. The Warnock Report on Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Young, I.M. (2011). Responsibility for Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, T. (2001). ‘Overconsumption and procreation: are they morally equivalent?’ Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18, 183–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×