Bibliography

Evan Gerstmann

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511619762.011

Ackerman, Bruce . “Beyond Carolene Products.” Harvard Law Review 98 (1985): 713–746.CrossRef Google Scholar

ACLU Web site: www.aclu.org/issues/gay/sodomy.hmtl.

Albertson, Bethany. “Victorian Courtship: The Restrained Relationship between Social Science and the Court.” Paper presented at the American Politics Workshop at the University of Chicago, May 30, 2001.

Alexander, Larry, and Schauer, Frederick. “Defending Judicial Supremacy: A Reply.” Constitutional Commentary 17 (winter 2000): 455–482.Google Scholar

Alfange, Dean. “On Judicial Policymaking and Constitutional Change: Another Look at the ‘Original Intent’ Theory of Constitutional Interpretation.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 5 (1978): 603–606.Google Scholar

Allport, Gordon. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1979Google Scholar

Amar, Akhil Reed. “A Tale of Three Wars: Tinker in Constitutional Context.” Drake Law Review 48 (2000): 507–518.Google Scholar

“Americans Narrowing Support for Abortion.” Sunday Los Angeles Times, June 18, 2000.

Badgett, M. V. Lee. “Will Providing Marriage Rights to Same-Sex Couples Undermine Heterosexual Couples? Evidence from Scandinavia and the Netherlands.” Discussion Paper July 2004.

Ball, Carlos, and Pea, Janice Farrell. “Warring with Wardle: Morality, Social Science, and Gay and Lesbian Parents.” University of Illinois Law Review (1998): 253–339, 272.Google Scholar

Berger, Raoul. Government by Judiciary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Beschle, Donald. “Defining the Scope of the Constitutional Right to Marry: More than Tradition, Less than Unlimited Autonomy.” Notre Dame Law Review 70 (1994): 39–64.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander. Politics and the Warren Court. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.Google Scholar

Bickel, Alexander. The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar

Black, Charles L. “The Lawfulness of the Segregation Decisions.” Yale Law Journal 69 (1960): 421–430.CrossRef Google Scholar

Blake, Jennie Holman. “Religious Liberty Book Review Symposium: The History and Evolution of Marriage from Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition.” Brigham Young University Law Review (1999): 847–857.Google Scholar

Bonauto, Mary, Susan, M. Murrat, and Robinson, Beth. “The Freedom to Marry for Same-Sex Couples: The Reply Brief of Plaintiffs Stan Baker, et al. in Baker, et al. v. State of Vermont. ” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 6 (1999): 1–41.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47 (1971): 1–35.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert. “Stop Courts from Imposing Same-Sex Marriage.” Wall Street Journal, September 21, 2001.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert. “Styles in Constitutional Theory.” South Texas Law Journal 26 (1985): 383–395.Google Scholar

Bork, Robert. The Tempting of America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990.Google Scholar

Bradley, Craig M. “The Right Not to Endorse Gay Rights: A Reply to Sunstein.” Indiana Law Journal 70 (1994): 29–38.Google Scholar

Bratt, Carolyn S. “Incest Statutes and the Fundamental Right of Marriage: Is Oedipus Free to Marry?” Family Law Quarterly 18 (fall 1994): 257–297.Google Scholar

Buchanan, G. Sydney. “Same-Sex Marriage: The Linchpin Issue.” University of Dayton Law Review 10 (1985): 541–573.Google Scholar

“Bush Says His Party Is Wrong to Oppose Civil Unions.” The New York Times, October 26, 2004.

Caldeira, Gregory. “Courts and Public Opinion.” In The American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Ed. John, B. Gates and Charles, A. Johnson. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Carter, Leif H.Reason in Law. 5th ed. New York: Longman, 1998.Google Scholar

Carter, Stephen. “‘Defending’ Marriage: A Modest Proposal.” Howard Law Journal 41 (1998): 215–228.Google Scholar

Chambers, David. “Polygamy and Same Sex Marriage.” Hofstra Law Review 26 (fall 1997): 53–83.Google Scholar

Chambers, David. “What If? The Legal Consequences of Marriage and the Legal Needs of Lesbian and Gay Male Couples.” Michigan Law Review 95 (1996): 447–491.CrossRef Google Scholar

Chapman, Steve. “Two's Company; Three's a Marriage.” Slate On-Line, June 4, 2001.Google Scholar

“Cheney Describes Same-Sex Marriage as a State Issue.” CNN.com, August 24, 2004.

Christensen, Craig W. “If Not Marriage? On Securing Gay and Lesbian Family Values by a ‘Simulacrum of Marriage.’” Fordham Law Review 66 (1998): 1700–1746.Google Scholar

Clark, Sarah Harton. “Substantive Due Process in a State of Flux: Should the Courts Develop New Fundamental Rights for Alien Children?” Boston University Law Review 72 (1992): 579–606.Google Scholar

Coolidge, David Orgon. “Same-Sex Marriage? Baehr v. Miike and the Meaning of Marriage.” Southern Texas Law Review 38 (March 1997): 1–119.Google Scholar

Coolidge, David Orgon. “Law and the Politics of Marriage: Loving v. Virginia after Thirty Years.” Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 12 (1998): 201–238.Google Scholar

Corwin, Edward S.Liberty against Government. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1948.Google Scholar

Courrie, David P.The Constitution and the Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Cox, Barbara J. “Symposium: Toward a Radical and Plural Democracy: The Lesbian Wife: Same-Sex Marriage as an Expression of Radical and Plural Democracy.” California Western Law Review 33 (spring 1997): 155–167.Google Scholar

Dahl, Robert. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1957): 279.Google Scholar

Damslet, Otis R. “Note: Same-Sex Marriage.” New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 10 (1993): 555–592.Google Scholar

“Defending the Sex Discrimination Argument.” UCLA Law Review 49 (2001): 519–538.

Destro, Robert A. “Law and the Politics of Marriage: Loving v. Virginia after Thirty Years: Introduction.” The Catholic University Law Review 47 (1998): 1207–1230.Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert. “The New Substantive Due Process and the Democratic Ethic: A Prolegomenon.” Brigham Young Law Review 1976 (1976): 43–84.Google Scholar

Downs, Donald A.Nazis in Skokie: Freedom, Community and the First Amendment. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Duncan, Richard F. “Homosexual Marriage and the Myth of Tolerance: Is Cardinal O'Connor a ‘Homophobe’?” Notre Dame Law Journal of Ethics and Public Policy 10 (1996): 587–607.Google Scholar

Duncan, Richard F. “Symposium: Romer v. Evans: The Narrow and Shallow Bite of Romer and the Eminent Rationality of Dual-Gender Marriage: A [Partial] Response to Professor Koppelman.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 6 (winter 1994): 147–166.Google Scholar

Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Egan, Patrick, and Sherrill, Kenneth, “Marriage and the Shifting Priorities of a New Generation of Lesbians and Gays.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (April 2005): 229–233.Google Scholar

Egan, Patrick, and Kenneth Sherrill. “Neither an In-Law Nor an Outlaw Be: Trends in Americans' Attitudes Toward Gay People.” http://publicopinionpros.com (February 2005): 12.

Egelko, Robert. “Top State Court Voids San Francisco's Gay Marriages.” San Francisco Chronicle, August 13, 2004, p. A1.Google Scholar

Elshtain, Jean Bethke. Democracy on Trial. New York: Basic Books, 1995.Google Scholar

Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Epstein, Lee, and Joseph, E. Kobylka. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.Google Scholar

Epstein, Richard A. “Caste and the Civil Rights Laws: From Jim Crow to Same Sex Marriages.” Michigan Law Review 92 (August 1994): 2456–2478.CrossRef Google Scholar

Erikson, Robert S., and Kent, L. Tedin. American Public Opinion. 6th ed. New York: Longman, 2001.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William. The Case for Same-Sex Marriage: From Sexual Liberty to Civilized Commitment. New York: Free Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William. “Comparative Law and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate: A Step-by-Step Approach toward State Recognition.” McGeorge Law Review 31 (spring 2000): 641–670.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William. “Lecture: Equality Practice: Liberal Reflections on the Jurisprudence of Civil Unions.” Albany Law Review 64 (2001): 853–881.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William. “Symposium: Constructing Family, Constructing Change: Shifting Legal Perspectives on Same-Sex Relationships: Panel Two: Same-Sex Marriage: Article: Three Cultural Anxieties Undermining the Case for Same-Sex Marriage.” Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review 7 (1998): 307–318.Google Scholar

Eskridge, William. “Why Gay Legal History Matters.” Harvard Law Review 113 (June 2000): 2035–2060.Google Scholar

Ettelbrick, Paula L. “Youth, Family, and the Law: Defining Rights and Establishing Recognition: Article: Wedlock Alert: A Comment on Lesbian and Gay Family Recognition.” Journal of Law and Policy 5 (1996): 108–160.Google Scholar

Fajer, Mark. “Can Two Real Men Eat Quiche Together? Storytelling, Gender Stereotypes and Legal Protection for Gays and Lesbians,” University of Miami Law Review 46 (1992): 511–615.Google Scholar

Farber, Daniel, and Frickey, Philip. Law and Public Choice: A Critical Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.CrossRef Google Scholar

Farrell, Megan E. “Baehr v. Lewin: Questionable Reasoning, Sound Judgment.” Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy 11 (spring 1995): 589–616.Google Scholar

Finnis, John M. “Law, Morality, and ‘Sexual Orientation.’” Notre Dame Law Review 69 (1994): 1049–1076.Google Scholar

Fiorina, Morris P.Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005.Google Scholar

Fish, Stanley. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech and It's a Good Thing Too. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Fiss, Owen. “Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools: The Constitutional Concepts.” Harvard Law Review 78 (1965): 564–617.CrossRef Google Scholar

Flaherty, Martin S. “History in Constitutional Argumentation.” In Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: MacMillan, 2000.Google Scholar

Foster, Sheila Rose. “Symposium: Constructing Family, Constructing Change: Shifting Legal Perspectives on Same-Sex Relationships: Panel Two: Same-Sex Marriage: Article: The Symbolism of Rights and the Costs of Symbolism: Some Thoughts on the Campaign for Same-Sex Marriage.” Temple Political & Civil Law Review 7 (1998): 319–328.Google Scholar

Friedman, Barry. “Symposium: Defining Democracy for the Next Century: Neutral Principles: A Retrospective.” Vanderbilt Law Review 50 (March 1997): 503–536.Google Scholar

Garfield, Helen. “Privacy, Abortion, and Judicial Review: Haunted by the Ghost of Lochner. ” Washington Law Review 61 (April 1986): 293–365.Google Scholar

George, Robert P., and Gerard, V. Bradley. “Marriage in the Liberal Imagination.” Georgetown Law Journal 84 (December 1995): 301–320.Google Scholar

Gerstmann, Evan. The Constitutional Underclass: Gays, Lesbians and the Failure of Class-Based Equal Protection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Gerstmann, Evan. “Litigating Same-Sex Marriage: Might the Courts Actually Be Bastions of Rationality?” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (April 2005): 217–220.Google Scholar

Gillman, Howard. “What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behaviorists Test the ‘Legal Model’ of Judicial Decision Making.” Law and Social Inquiry 26 (spring 2001): 465–498.CrossRef Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann. A Nation under Lawyers: How the Crisis in the Legal Profession Is Transforming American Society. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1994.Google Scholar

Glendon, Mary Ann. Rights Talk. New York: Free Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Goldford, Dennis J. “Does the Constitution Require Originalism?” Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

Grad, Frank B. “Communicable Disease and Mental Health: Restrictions of the Person.” American Law Journal and Medicine 12 (1986): 318–383.Google Scholar

Graff, E. J. “Marriage a la Mode. ” Boston Globe Magazine, June 13, 1999, pp. 11–32.Google Scholar

Graff, E. J.What Is Marriage For?Boston: Beacon Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Grano, Joseph. “Judicial Review and a Written Constitution in a Democratic Society.” Wayne Law Review 46 (2000): 1305–1402.Google Scholar

Griffin, Stephen. “Has the Hour of Democracy Come Round at Last? The New Critique of Judicial Review.” Constitutional Commentary 17 (2000): 683–693.Google Scholar

Gunther, Gerald. “Forward: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection.” Harvard Law Review 86 (1972): 1–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hafen, Bruce C. “The Constitutional Status of Marriage, Kinship and Sexual Privacy: Balancing the Individual and Social Interests.” Michigan Law Review 81 (January 1983): 463–509.CrossRef Google Scholar

Halpern, Jake. “Out for a Buck.” The New Republic, May 8, 2000, p. 23.Google Scholar

Harris, Angela. “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.” Stanford Law Review 42 (1990)” 581–616.CrossRef Google Scholar

“Hawaiian Aye: Nearing the Altar on Gay Marriage.” In Same-Sex Marriage. Ed. Baird, Robert and Rosenbaum, Stuart. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997.Google Scholar

Hedges, Rebra Carrasquillo. “The Forgotten Children: Same-Sex Partners, Their Children's Unequal Treatment.” Boston College Law Review 410 (July 2002): 883–912.Google Scholar

Herbert Kritzer, J. Mitchell Pickerill, and Mark Richards. “Bringing the Law Back In: Finding a Role for Law in Models of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” Paper presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.

Herman, Judith, Russell, Diana, and Trocki, Karen. “Long-Term Effects of Incestuous Abuse in Childhood.” American Journal of Psychiatry 143 (1986): 1293–1296.Google Scholar PubMed

Hodges, Heather. “Dean v. The District of Columbia: Goin' to the Chapel and We're Gonna Get Married.” American Journal of Gender & the Law 5 (1996): 93–146.Google Scholar

Hohengarten, William M. “Note: Same-Sex Marriage and the Right to Privacy.” Yale Law Journal 103 (April 1994): 1495–1531.CrossRef Google Scholar

Jaber, Lutfi, G. Halpern, and Shohot, M.. “The Impact of Consanguinity Worldwide.” Community Genetics 1 (1998): 12–17.Google Scholar PubMed

Jackson, Robert H.The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1941.Google Scholar

Jeffrey, Julie Roy. Frontier Women: Civilizing the West? 1840–1880. Rev. ed. New York: Hill & Wang, 1998.Google Scholar

Johnson, Greg. “Vermont Civil Unions: The New Language of Marriage.” Vermont Law Review 25 (fall 2000): 15–59.Google Scholar

Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. Rev. ed. New York: Pantheon Books, 1990.Google Scholar

Karst, Kenneth L. “The Freedom of Intimate Association.” Yale Law Journal 89 (1980): 624–692.CrossRef Google Scholar

Katz, Leo. Bad Acts and Guilty Minds: Conundrums of the Criminal Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.CrossRef Google Scholar

Klarman, Michael. “An Interpretive History of Equal Protection.” Michigan Law Review 90 (1991): 213–318.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koppelman, Andrew. “Forum: Sexual Morality and the Possibility of Same-Sex Marriage: Is Marriage Inherently Heterosexual?” American Journal of Jurisprudence 42 (1997): 51–95.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koppelman, Andrew. “1997 Survey of Books Relating to the Law: II. Sex, Law, and Equality: Three Arguments for Gay Rights.” Michigan Law Review 95 (1997): 1636–1667.CrossRef Google Scholar

Koppelman, Andrew. “Romer v. Evans and Invidious Intent.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 6 (1997): 89–146.Google Scholar

Koppelman, Andrew. “Why Discrimination against Lesbians and Gay Men Is Sex Discrimination.” New York University Law Review 69 (1994): 197–287.Google Scholar

Kurtz, Stanley. “Deathblow to Marriage.” National Review On-Line. http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz200402050842.asp (February 5, 2004).

Law, Sylvia A. “Homosexuality and the Social Meaning of Gender.” Wisconsin Law Review 1998 (1988): 187–235Google Scholar

Leonard, Arthur. “The Case for Same Sex Marriage.” (book review) Cornell Law Review 82 (1997): 572–593.Google Scholar

Lupu, Ira. “Untangling the Strands of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Michigan Law Review 77 (April 1979): 981–1077.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lusky, Louis. “Footnote Redux: A Carolene Products Reminiscence. ” Columbia Law Review 82 (1982): 1093–1105.CrossRef Google Scholar

Macedo, Steven. “The New Natural Lawyers.” The Harvard Crimson, October 28, 1993.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catherine. Feminism Unmodified Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

MacKinnon, Catherine. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Marcosson, Samuel. “The Lesson of the Same-Sex Marriage Trial: The Importance of Pushing Opponents of Gay Rights to Their Second Tier of Defense.” University of Louisville Journal of Family Law 36 (fall 1996/1997): 721–753.Google Scholar

“Massachusetts Lawmakers Reject Bid to Stop Same-Sex Marriages.” Washington Post, September 15, 2005.

“Massachusetts Voters Support Gay Marriage: Polls.” Agence France Presse (English Edition), November 23, 2003.

Massaro, Toni M. “Gay Rights, Thick and Thin.” Stanford Law Review 49 (November 1996): 45–110.CrossRef Google Scholar

“Maybe Same-Sex Marriage Didn't Make the Difference.” The New York Times, November 7, 2004.

McCann, Michael. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Mehren, Elizabeth. “More Backlash than Bliss 1 Year after Marriage Law.” Los Angeles Times, May 17, 2005, p. A1.Google Scholar

Michelman, Frank. “The Supreme Court 1968 Term – Forward: On Protecting the Poor through the Fourteenth Amendment.” Harvard Law Review 83 (1969): 7–52.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart, and Harriet Taylor Mill. Essays on Sex Equality. Ed. Alice, S. Rossi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Minnow, Martha. “The Free Exercise of Families.” University of Illinois Law Review 1991 (1991): 925–947.Google Scholar

Monaghan, Henry. “Of ‘Liberty’ and ‘Property.’” Cornell Law Review 62 (1977): 405–444.Google Scholar

“Moral Issues and Voter Decision Making in the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38, no. 2 (April 2005): 201.

Morant, Blake D. “The Teachings of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Contract Theory: An Intriguing Comparison.” Alabama Law Review 50 (fall 1998): 64–113.Google Scholar

“Most in Poll Approve of Interracial Marriage.” St. Louis Dispatch, August 16, 1991.

New York Times. Information Bank Abstracts. August 30, 1978.

The O'Reilly Factor. Transcript #030804cb.256. March 8, 2004.

“Panel Asks New York to Join Era of No Fault Divorce,” New York Times, February 7, 2006.

“The Path of the Law after One Hundred Years: The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review (1997): 991–1009, 1001.

Perry, Michael. The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Pinello, Daniel R.America's Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.CrossRef Google Scholar

Podhoretz, Norman. “How the Gay-Rights Movement Won.” Commentary 5 (1996): 32–40.Google Scholar

Polikoff, Nancy D. “We Will Get What We Ask For: Why Legalizing Gay and Lesbian Marriage Will Not ‘Dismantle the Legal Structure of Gender in Every Marriage.’” University of Virginia Law Review 79 (October 1993): 1535–1549.CrossRef Google Scholar

Pollak, Louis. “Racial Discrimination and Judicial Integrity: A Reply to Professor Wechsler.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 108 (1959): 1–39.CrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. “Ask, Tell.” Review of Gay Law: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet, by William Eskridge. The New Republic, October 11, 1999, 52–58.Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. “1997 Survey of Books Relating to the Law: II. Sex, Law, and Equality: Should There Be Homosexual Marriage? And If So, Who Should Decide?” Michigan Law Review 95 (1997): 1578–1585.CrossRef Google Scholar

Posner, Richard. “Relations between Consenting Adults: Sodomy Laws and Homosexual Marriage,” from Same-Sex Marriage. Ed. Baird, Robert and Rosenbaum, Stuart. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997.Google Scholar

Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.Google Scholar

Regan, Milton C. Jr. “Reason, Tradition, and Family Law: A Comment on Social Constructionism.” Virginia Law Review 79 (1993): 1515–1533.CrossRef Google Scholar

“Roe v. Wade v. Ginsburg: The Case against the Case: Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Concerns about the Abortion Ruling.” The Washington Post, June 20, 1993, p. C3.

Rosenberg, Gerald. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Rosenberg, Gerald. “The Road Taken: Robert Dahl's Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker,” Emory Law Journal 50 (2001): 613.Google Scholar

Rubenstein, William. “Since When Is the 14th Amendment Our Route to Equality? Some Reflections on the Constructions of the Hate Speech Debate from a Lesbian/Gay Perspective.” Law and Sexuality 2 (1992): 19–27.Google Scholar

Rubenstein, William, ed. Lesbians, Gay Men and the Law. New York: New Press, 1993.Google Scholar

The St Louis Dispatch, August 16, 1991 Most in Poll Approve of Interracial Marriage.

Santoro, Marc. “Spritzer's Opinion Mixed on Status of Gay Marriage.” New York Times, March 4, 2004, p. A1.Google Scholar

Schacter, Jane S. “Book Review: Skepticism, Culture and the Gay Civil Rights Debate in a Post–Civil-Rights Era.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1997): 684–731.CrossRef Google Scholar

Schroeder, Theodore A. “Fables of the Deconstruction: The Practical Failures of Gay and Lesbian Theory in the Realm of Employment Discrimination.” Journal of Gender & the Law 6 (1998): 334–367.Google Scholar

Schultz, David, and Stephen, E. Gottlieb. “Legal Functionalism and Social Change: A Reassessment of Rosenberg's The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?” Journal of Law and Politics 12 (1996): 63–99.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Bernard. The Ascent of Pragmatism: The Burger Court in Action. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1990.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffery, and Harold, J. Spaeth. Majority Rule or Majority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Segal, Jeffery, and Harold, J. Spaeth. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Scheef, Robert W. “Note: ‘Public Citizens’ and the Constitution: Bridging the Gap between Popular Sovereignty and Original Intent.” Fordham Law Review 69 (April 2001): 2201.Google Scholar

Siegel, Lee. “The Gay Science.” The New Republic, November 9, 1998.Google Scholar

Silverstein, Helena. “Revisiting the Logic of Equal Protection: Insights from Baehr v. Lewin.” Presentation at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Los Angeles, California, March 19–21, 1998.Google Scholar

Simmons, Tavia, and O'Connell, Martin. “Married Couple and Unmarried Partner Households 2000,” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2003.Google Scholar

Sitkoff, Harvard. The Struggle for Black Equality 1954–1992. New York: Hill & Wang, 1993.Google Scholar

Smith, Miriam. “Social Movements and Equality Seeking: The Case of Gay Liberation in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (1998): 285–309.CrossRef Google Scholar

Stoddard, Thomas B. “Bleeding Heart: Reflections on Using the Law to Make Social Change.” New York University Law Review 72 (1997): 967–991.Google Scholar

Strasser, Mark. “Domestic Relations and the Great Slumbering Baehr: On Definitional Preclusion, Equal Protection and Fundamental Interests.” Fordham Law Review 64 (December 1995): 921–986.Google Scholar

Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed: Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Andrew. “State of the Union.” The New Republic, May 8, 2000.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Andrew. “Three's a Crowd.” The New Republic. June 17, 1996.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. “Homosexuality and the Constitution.” Indiana Law Journal 70 (1994): 1–28.Google Scholar

Sunstein, Cass. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism and the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Terrell, Timothy. “‘Property,’ ‘Due Process,’ and the Distinction between Definition and Theory in Legal Analysis.” Georgetown Law Journal 70 (1982): 861–941.Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence. “The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories.” Yale Law Journal 89 (1980): 1063–1080.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tribe, Laurence, and Dorf, Michael. “Levels of Generality in the Definition of Rights.” University of Chicago Law Review 57 (fall 1990): 1057–1108.CrossRef Google Scholar

Trosino, James. “American Weddings: Same-Sex Marriage and the Miscegenation Analogy.” Boston University Law Review 73 (1993): 93–120.Google Scholar

“Truth in Numbers: Moral Values and the Gay Marriage Backlash Did Not Help Bush.” Boston Review, February/March 2005.

Tushnet, Mark. “And Only Wealth Will Bring You Justice – Some Notes on the Supreme Court, 1972 Term.” Wisconsin Law Review 1974 (1974): 177–197.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark “Following the Rules Laid Down: A Critique of Interpretivism and Neutral Principles.” Harvard Law Review 96 (1983): 781–827.CrossRef Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Tushnet, Mark. “Two Notes on the Jurisprudence of Privacy.” Constitutional Commentary 8 (1991): 75–86.Google Scholar

Twiss, Benjamin R.Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez-Faire Came to the Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1942.Google Scholar

Volokh, Eugene. “How the Justices Voted in Free Speech Cases, 1994–2000.” UCLA Law Review 48 (2001): 1191–1202.Google Scholar

Waaldijk, Kees. “Civil Developments: Pattern of Reform in the Legal Positions of Same-Sex Partners in Europe.” Canadian Journal of Family Law 17 (2000): 62–88.Google Scholar

Waite, Linda, and Gallagher, Maggie. The Case for Marriage. New York: Doubleday, 2000.Google Scholar

Wardle, Lynn. “A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Claims for Same-Sex Marriage.” Brigham Young University Law Review 1996 (1996): 1–101.Google Scholar

Wardle, Lynn. “Loving v. Virginia and the Constitutional Right to Marry, 1790–1990.” Howard Law Journal 41 (1998): 289–347.Google Scholar

Wardle, Lynn. “The Potential Impact of Homosexual Parenting on Children.” University of Illinois Law Review 1997 (1997): 833–920.Google Scholar

Webster, Noah. An American Dictionary of the English Language 66 (1828) (6th ed. 1989).Google Scholar

Wechsler, Herbert. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 73 (1959): 1–35.CrossRef Google Scholar

Westen, Peter. “The Empty Idea of Equality.” Harvard Law Review 95 (1982): 537–560.CrossRef Google Scholar

Wheeler, Malcolm. “In Defense of Economic Equal Protection.” Kansas Law Review 22 (1973): 1–77.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith E. “Commentaries on Mark Tushnet's Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts: Herbert Wechsler's Complaint and the Revival of Grand Constitutional Theory.” University of Richmond Law Review 34 (2000): 509–519.Google Scholar

Whittington, Keith E.Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Wilkinson, J. Harvie III. “The Supreme Court, the Equal Protection Clause and the Three Faces of Constitutional Equality.” Virginia Law Review 61 (June 1975): 945–1017. Wintemute, Robert. “Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah?” Brigham Young Law Review 20 (2006) 527–546.CrossRef Google Scholar

Witt, Elder. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Alan. “The Homosexual Exception.” New York Times, February 8, 1998, p. 46.Google Scholar

Wolfe, Naomi. The Beauty Myth. New York: William Morrow, 1990.Google Scholar

Wolin, Sheldon. “Democracy, Difference, and Re-Cognition.” Political Theory 21 (1993): 468–475.CrossRef Google Scholar

Yaworsky, Michael J. “Rights and Obligation Resulting from Human Artificial Insemination.” A.L.R. 4th 83 (1991): 295–302.Google Scholar

Young, Gary L. Jr. “Don't Ask Don't Tell: Gays in the Military: The Price of Public Endorsement: A Reply to Dr. Marcosson.” University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review 64 (1995): 99–114.Google Scholar