Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution
  • Cited by 12
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2012
Print publication year:
2008
Online ISBN:
9780511619762
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619762
Subjects:
Area Studies, American Studies, US Law, American Government, Politics and Policy, Law, Politics and International Relations
Information

Book description

Following the widely reviewed success of the first edition, the updated and expanded second edition of Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution argues that there is a long-standing constitutional protection of the right to marry that applies to same-sex couples. Balancing strong advocacy of this position with respectful engagement with those who oppose same-sex marriage, Evan Gerstmann concludes not only that the Constitution protects same-sex marriage but that it is the proper role of the courts to enforce this right. The book also takes on many of the same-sex marriage myths: that it will lead down that 'slippery slope' to such things as polygamy, that same-sex marriage has been a political albatross for liberals and progressives, and that courts are 'usurping' the democratic process. Without overheated rhetoric or legal jargon, Gerstmann makes the case for same-sex marriage as a constitutional guarantee.

Reviews

Review of previous edition:'… this book is a welcome addition to the expanding literature on same-sex marriage …'

Source: Common Law World Review

Review of previous edition:'… it is scholarly and thorough. It honestly and vigourously addresses the arguments of its opponents. It brings reasoned arguments … It treats both sides with respect and takes seriously their arguments.'

Source: INTAMS Journal for the Study of Marriage and Spirituality

Review of previous edition:'[Gerstmann] asks (and answers) the questions that everyone wants to know and many of us are afraid to tackle.'

Source: Lambda Book Report

Review of previous edition:'… a well-organized, extremely articulate, and fearlessly logical analysis of the foundations of laws against same-sex marriage …'

Source: Perspectives on Political Science

Review of previous edition:'Evan Gerstmann has here presented a carefully crafted, highly nuanced, and important argument about same-sex marriage. His conclusion will be controversial, but in the best sense: people will be forced to reckon with his powerful argument.'

H. N. Hirsch - MacAlester College, Minnesota

Review of previous edition:'This book does the best job I have seen in relating the constitutional law and theory of equal protection and the implied fundamental right of privacy to the politics of whether the Supreme Court should decide the important question of the right to same-sex marriage. This well-written, sensitive, and original book will be of invaluable use in undergraduate and law school classrooms. Evan Gerstmann demonstrates the tautological nature of arguments against gay marriage, while still being respectful to alternative arguments such as Sunstein's call for Supreme Court minimalism on this matter.'

Ronald Kahn - Oberlin College, Ohio

Review of previous edition:'Gerstmann has developed a vitally important work in the ongoing legal debate over same-sex marriage. He presents an insightful framework for the Court's recognition of fundamental rights more generally - an area of constitutional interpretation that he terms a 'shambles' at present - and makes a strong argument that principle, rather than the potential of a backlash against an unpopular Court decision, should guide jurists. Highly recommended.'

Source: Choice

Review of previous edition:'Reading Evan Gerstmann's book bolsters my hope that someday justice will come to same-sex couples.'

Kenneth Sherrill Source: Political Science Quarterly

Review of previous edition:'Evan Gerstmann has now produced a forceful and tough-minded brief for the result that Scialia dreads. Careful, interesting [and] worthwhile.'

Source: New Republic

Review of previous edition:'In Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution, Evan Gerstmann once again applies his considerable analytical scalpel to an issue of constitutional and moral importance. Showing due regard for competing normative and legal arguments, Gerstmann exposes the weaknesses in existing positions on both sides of the debate. He then presents an illuminating and convincing case on behalf of same-sex marriage rights based on a conception of equal protection that is applicable to all citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation. The book will enlighten not only those concerned with the issue of same-sex marriage, but also those interested in jurisprudence, constitutional law, and the relationship between constitutional law and citizenship. Gerstmann's innovative approach points us toward a more productive understanding of equal protection.'

Donald A. Downs - University of Wisconsin, Madison

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Contents

Contents
References
Bibliography
Bibliography
Ackerman, Bruce . “Beyond Carolene Products.” Harvard Law Review 98 (1985): 713–746.
ACLU Web site: www.aclu.org/issues/gay/sodomy.hmtl.
Albertson, Bethany. “Victorian Courtship: The Restrained Relationship between Social Science and the Court.” Paper presented at the American Politics Workshop at the University of Chicago, May 30, 2001.
Alexander, Larry, and Schauer, Frederick. “Defending Judicial Supremacy: A Reply.” Constitutional Commentary 17 (winter 2000): 455–482.
Alfange, Dean. “On Judicial Policymaking and Constitutional Change: Another Look at the ‘Original Intent’ Theory of Constitutional Interpretation.” Hastings Constitutional Law Quarterly 5 (1978): 603–606.
Allport, Gordon. The Nature of Prejudice. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1979
Amar, Akhil Reed. “A Tale of Three Wars: Tinker in Constitutional Context.” Drake Law Review 48 (2000): 507–518.
“Americans Narrowing Support for Abortion.” Sunday Los Angeles Times, June 18, 2000.
Badgett, M. V. Lee. “Will Providing Marriage Rights to Same-Sex Couples Undermine Heterosexual Couples? Evidence from Scandinavia and the Netherlands.” Discussion Paper July 2004.
Ball, Carlos, and Pea, Janice Farrell. “Warring with Wardle: Morality, Social Science, and Gay and Lesbian Parents.” University of Illinois Law Review (1998): 253–339, 272.
Berger, Raoul. Government by Judiciary. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.
Beschle, Donald. “Defining the Scope of the Constitutional Right to Marry: More than Tradition, Less than Unlimited Autonomy.” Notre Dame Law Review 70 (1994): 39–64.
Bickel, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1962.
Bickel, Alexander. Politics and the Warren Court. New York: Harper & Row, 1965.
Bickel, Alexander. The Supreme Court and the Idea of Progress. New York: Harper & Row, 1970.
Black, Charles L. “The Lawfulness of the Segregation Decisions.” Yale Law Journal 69 (1960): 421–430.
Blake, Jennie Holman. “Religious Liberty Book Review Symposium: The History and Evolution of Marriage from Sacrament to Contract: Marriage, Religion, and Law in the Western Tradition.” Brigham Young University Law Review (1999): 847–857.
Bonauto, Mary, Susan, M. Murrat, and Robinson, Beth. “The Freedom to Marry for Same-Sex Couples: The Reply Brief of Plaintiffs Stan Baker, et al. in Baker, et al. v. State of Vermont. ” Michigan Journal of Gender and Law 6 (1999): 1–41.
Bork, Robert. “Neutral Principles and Some First Amendment Problems.” Indiana Law Journal 47 (1971): 1–35.
Bork, Robert. “Stop Courts from Imposing Same-Sex Marriage.” Wall Street Journal, September 21, 2001.
Bork, Robert. “Styles in Constitutional Theory.” South Texas Law Journal 26 (1985): 383–395.
Bork, Robert. The Tempting of America. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1990.
Bradley, Craig M. “The Right Not to Endorse Gay Rights: A Reply to Sunstein.” Indiana Law Journal 70 (1994): 29–38.
Bratt, Carolyn S. “Incest Statutes and the Fundamental Right of Marriage: Is Oedipus Free to Marry?” Family Law Quarterly 18 (fall 1994): 257–297.
Buchanan, G. Sydney. “Same-Sex Marriage: The Linchpin Issue.” University of Dayton Law Review 10 (1985): 541–573.
“Bush Says His Party Is Wrong to Oppose Civil Unions.” The New York Times, October 26, 2004.
Caldeira, Gregory. “Courts and Public Opinion.” In The American Courts: A Critical Assessment. Ed. John, B. Gates and Charles, A. Johnson. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1991.
Carter, Leif H.Reason in Law. 5th ed. New York: Longman, 1998.
Carter, Stephen. “‘Defending’ Marriage: A Modest Proposal.” Howard Law Journal 41 (1998): 215–228.
Chambers, David. “Polygamy and Same Sex Marriage.” Hofstra Law Review 26 (fall 1997): 53–83.
Chambers, David. “What If? The Legal Consequences of Marriage and the Legal Needs of Lesbian and Gay Male Couples.” Michigan Law Review 95 (1996): 447–491.
Chapman, Steve. “Two's Company; Three's a Marriage.” Slate On-Line, June 4, 2001.
“Cheney Describes Same-Sex Marriage as a State Issue.” CNN.com, August 24, 2004.
Christensen, Craig W. “If Not Marriage? On Securing Gay and Lesbian Family Values by a ‘Simulacrum of Marriage.’” Fordham Law Review 66 (1998): 1700–1746.
Clark, Sarah Harton. “Substantive Due Process in a State of Flux: Should the Courts Develop New Fundamental Rights for Alien Children?” Boston University Law Review 72 (1992): 579–606.
Coolidge, David Orgon. “Same-Sex Marriage? Baehr v. Miike and the Meaning of Marriage.” Southern Texas Law Review 38 (March 1997): 1–119.
Coolidge, David Orgon. “Law and the Politics of Marriage: Loving v. Virginia after Thirty Years.” Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 12 (1998): 201–238.
Corwin, Edward S.Liberty against Government. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1948.
Courrie, David P.The Constitution and the Supreme Court. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
Cox, Barbara J. “Symposium: Toward a Radical and Plural Democracy: The Lesbian Wife: Same-Sex Marriage as an Expression of Radical and Plural Democracy.” California Western Law Review 33 (spring 1997): 155–167.
Dahl, Robert. “Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker.” Journal of Public Law 6 (1957): 279.
Damslet, Otis R. “Note: Same-Sex Marriage.” New York Law School Journal of Human Rights 10 (1993): 555–592.
“Defending the Sex Discrimination Argument.” UCLA Law Review 49 (2001): 519–538.
Destro, Robert A. “Law and the Politics of Marriage: Loving v. Virginia after Thirty Years: Introduction.” The Catholic University Law Review 47 (1998): 1207–1230.
Dixon, Robert. “The New Substantive Due Process and the Democratic Ethic: A Prolegomenon.” Brigham Young Law Review 1976 (1976): 43–84.
Downs, Donald A.Nazis in Skokie: Freedom, Community and the First Amendment. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame Press, 1985.
Duncan, Richard F. “Homosexual Marriage and the Myth of Tolerance: Is Cardinal O'Connor a ‘Homophobe’?” Notre Dame Law Journal of Ethics and Public Policy 10 (1996): 587–607.
Duncan, Richard F. “Symposium: Romer v. Evans: The Narrow and Shallow Bite of Romer and the Eminent Rationality of Dual-Gender Marriage: A [Partial] Response to Professor Koppelman.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 6 (winter 1994): 147–166.
Dworkin, Ronald. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.
Egan, Patrick, and Sherrill, Kenneth, “Marriage and the Shifting Priorities of a New Generation of Lesbians and Gays.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (April 2005): 229–233.
Egan, Patrick, and Kenneth Sherrill. “Neither an In-Law Nor an Outlaw Be: Trends in Americans' Attitudes Toward Gay People.” http://publicopinionpros.com (February 2005): 12.
Egelko, Robert. “Top State Court Voids San Francisco's Gay Marriages.” San Francisco Chronicle, August 13, 2004, p. A1.
Elshtain, Jean Bethke. Democracy on Trial. New York: Basic Books, 1995.
Ely, John Hart. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Epstein, Lee, and Knight, Jack. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1998.
Epstein, Lee, and Joseph, E. Kobylka. The Supreme Court and Legal Change: Abortion and the Death Penalty. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1992.
Epstein, Richard A. “Caste and the Civil Rights Laws: From Jim Crow to Same Sex Marriages.” Michigan Law Review 92 (August 1994): 2456–2478.
Erikson, Robert S., and Kent, L. Tedin. American Public Opinion. 6th ed. New York: Longman, 2001.
Eskridge, William. The Case for Same-Sex Marriage: From Sexual Liberty to Civilized Commitment. New York: Free Press, 1996.
Eskridge, William. “Comparative Law and the Same-Sex Marriage Debate: A Step-by-Step Approach toward State Recognition.” McGeorge Law Review 31 (spring 2000): 641–670.
Eskridge, William. “Lecture: Equality Practice: Liberal Reflections on the Jurisprudence of Civil Unions.” Albany Law Review 64 (2001): 853–881.
Eskridge, William. “Symposium: Constructing Family, Constructing Change: Shifting Legal Perspectives on Same-Sex Relationships: Panel Two: Same-Sex Marriage: Article: Three Cultural Anxieties Undermining the Case for Same-Sex Marriage.” Temple Political & Civil Rights Law Review 7 (1998): 307–318.
Eskridge, William. “Why Gay Legal History Matters.” Harvard Law Review 113 (June 2000): 2035–2060.
Ettelbrick, Paula L. “Youth, Family, and the Law: Defining Rights and Establishing Recognition: Article: Wedlock Alert: A Comment on Lesbian and Gay Family Recognition.” Journal of Law and Policy 5 (1996): 108–160.
Fajer, Mark. “Can Two Real Men Eat Quiche Together? Storytelling, Gender Stereotypes and Legal Protection for Gays and Lesbians,” University of Miami Law Review 46 (1992): 511–615.
Farber, Daniel, and Frickey, Philip. Law and Public Choice: A Critical Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
Farrell, Megan E. “Baehr v. Lewin: Questionable Reasoning, Sound Judgment.” Journal of Contemporary Health Law & Policy 11 (spring 1995): 589–616.
Finnis, John M. “Law, Morality, and ‘Sexual Orientation.’” Notre Dame Law Review 69 (1994): 1049–1076.
Fiorina, Morris P.Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman, 2005.
Fish, Stanley. There's No Such Thing as Free Speech and It's a Good Thing Too. New York: Oxford University Press, 1994.
Fiss, Owen. “Racial Imbalance in the Public Schools: The Constitutional Concepts.” Harvard Law Review 78 (1965): 564–617.
Flaherty, Martin S. “History in Constitutional Argumentation.” In Encyclopedia of the American Constitution. New York: MacMillan, 2000.
Foster, Sheila Rose. “Symposium: Constructing Family, Constructing Change: Shifting Legal Perspectives on Same-Sex Relationships: Panel Two: Same-Sex Marriage: Article: The Symbolism of Rights and the Costs of Symbolism: Some Thoughts on the Campaign for Same-Sex Marriage.” Temple Political & Civil Law Review 7 (1998): 319–328.
Friedman, Barry. “Symposium: Defining Democracy for the Next Century: Neutral Principles: A Retrospective.” Vanderbilt Law Review 50 (March 1997): 503–536.
Garfield, Helen. “Privacy, Abortion, and Judicial Review: Haunted by the Ghost of Lochner. ” Washington Law Review 61 (April 1986): 293–365.
George, Robert P., and Gerard, V. Bradley. “Marriage in the Liberal Imagination.” Georgetown Law Journal 84 (December 1995): 301–320.
Gerstmann, Evan. The Constitutional Underclass: Gays, Lesbians and the Failure of Class-Based Equal Protection. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1999.
Gerstmann, Evan. “Litigating Same-Sex Marriage: Might the Courts Actually Be Bastions of Rationality?” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (April 2005): 217–220.
Gillman, Howard. “What's Law Got to Do with It? Judicial Behaviorists Test the ‘Legal Model’ of Judicial Decision Making.” Law and Social Inquiry 26 (spring 2001): 465–498.
Glendon, Mary Ann. A Nation under Lawyers: How the Crisis in the Legal Profession Is Transforming American Society. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux, 1994.
Glendon, Mary Ann. Rights Talk. New York: Free Press, 1991.
Goldford, Dennis J. “Does the Constitution Require Originalism?” Paper presented at the 2001 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Grad, Frank B. “Communicable Disease and Mental Health: Restrictions of the Person.” American Law Journal and Medicine 12 (1986): 318–383.
Graff, E. J. “Marriage a la Mode. ” Boston Globe Magazine, June 13, 1999, pp. 11–32.
Graff, E. J.What Is Marriage For?Boston: Beacon Press, 1991.
Grano, Joseph. “Judicial Review and a Written Constitution in a Democratic Society.” Wayne Law Review 46 (2000): 1305–1402.
Griffin, Stephen. “Has the Hour of Democracy Come Round at Last? The New Critique of Judicial Review.” Constitutional Commentary 17 (2000): 683–693.
Gunther, Gerald. “Forward: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for a Newer Equal Protection.” Harvard Law Review 86 (1972): 1–48.
Hafen, Bruce C. “The Constitutional Status of Marriage, Kinship and Sexual Privacy: Balancing the Individual and Social Interests.” Michigan Law Review 81 (January 1983): 463–509.
Halpern, Jake. “Out for a Buck.” The New Republic, May 8, 2000, p. 23.
Harris, Angela. “Race and Essentialism in Feminist Legal Theory.” Stanford Law Review 42 (1990)” 581–616.
“Hawaiian Aye: Nearing the Altar on Gay Marriage.” In Same-Sex Marriage. Ed. Baird, Robert and Rosenbaum, Stuart. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997.
Hedges, Rebra Carrasquillo. “The Forgotten Children: Same-Sex Partners, Their Children's Unequal Treatment.” Boston College Law Review 410 (July 2002): 883–912.
Herbert Kritzer, J. Mitchell Pickerill, and Mark Richards. “Bringing the Law Back In: Finding a Role for Law in Models of Supreme Court Decision-Making.” Paper presented at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Herman, Judith, Russell, Diana, and Trocki, Karen. “Long-Term Effects of Incestuous Abuse in Childhood.” American Journal of Psychiatry 143 (1986): 1293–1296.
Hodges, Heather. “Dean v. The District of Columbia: Goin' to the Chapel and We're Gonna Get Married.” American Journal of Gender & the Law 5 (1996): 93–146.
Hohengarten, William M. “Note: Same-Sex Marriage and the Right to Privacy.” Yale Law Journal 103 (April 1994): 1495–1531.
Jaber, Lutfi, G. Halpern, and Shohot, M.. “The Impact of Consanguinity Worldwide.” Community Genetics 1 (1998): 12–17.
Jackson, Robert H.The Struggle for Judicial Supremacy. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1941.
Jeffrey, Julie Roy. Frontier Women: Civilizing the West? 1840–1880. Rev. ed. New York: Hill & Wang, 1998.
Johnson, Greg. “Vermont Civil Unions: The New Language of Marriage.” Vermont Law Review 25 (fall 2000): 15–59.
Kairys, David. The Politics of Law: A Progressive Critique. Rev. ed. New York: Pantheon Books, 1990.
Karst, Kenneth L. “The Freedom of Intimate Association.” Yale Law Journal 89 (1980): 624–692.
Katz, Leo. Bad Acts and Guilty Minds: Conundrums of the Criminal Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1987.
Klarman, Michael. “An Interpretive History of Equal Protection.” Michigan Law Review 90 (1991): 213–318.
Koppelman, Andrew. “Forum: Sexual Morality and the Possibility of Same-Sex Marriage: Is Marriage Inherently Heterosexual?” American Journal of Jurisprudence 42 (1997): 51–95.
Koppelman, Andrew. “1997 Survey of Books Relating to the Law: II. Sex, Law, and Equality: Three Arguments for Gay Rights.” Michigan Law Review 95 (1997): 1636–1667.
Koppelman, Andrew. “Romer v. Evans and Invidious Intent.” William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal 6 (1997): 89–146.
Koppelman, Andrew. “Why Discrimination against Lesbians and Gay Men Is Sex Discrimination.” New York University Law Review 69 (1994): 197–287.
Kurtz, Stanley. “Deathblow to Marriage.” National Review On-Line. http://www.nationalreview.com/kurtz/kurtz200402050842.asp (February 5, 2004).
Law, Sylvia A. “Homosexuality and the Social Meaning of Gender.” Wisconsin Law Review 1998 (1988): 187–235
Leonard, Arthur. “The Case for Same Sex Marriage.” (book review) Cornell Law Review 82 (1997): 572–593.
Lupu, Ira. “Untangling the Strands of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Michigan Law Review 77 (April 1979): 981–1077.
Lusky, Louis. “Footnote Redux: A Carolene Products Reminiscence. ” Columbia Law Review 82 (1982): 1093–1105.
Macedo, Steven. “The New Natural Lawyers.” The Harvard Crimson, October 28, 1993.
MacKinnon, Catherine. Feminism Unmodified Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1982.
MacKinnon, Catherine. Only Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
Marcosson, Samuel. “The Lesson of the Same-Sex Marriage Trial: The Importance of Pushing Opponents of Gay Rights to Their Second Tier of Defense.” University of Louisville Journal of Family Law 36 (fall 1996/1997): 721–753.
“Massachusetts Lawmakers Reject Bid to Stop Same-Sex Marriages.” Washington Post, September 15, 2005.
“Massachusetts Voters Support Gay Marriage: Polls.” Agence France Presse (English Edition), November 23, 2003.
Massaro, Toni M. “Gay Rights, Thick and Thin.” Stanford Law Review 49 (November 1996): 45–110.
“Maybe Same-Sex Marriage Didn't Make the Difference.” The New York Times, November 7, 2004.
McCann, Michael. Rights at Work: Pay Equity Reform and the Politics of Legal Mobilization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
Mehren, Elizabeth. “More Backlash than Bliss 1 Year after Marriage Law.” Los Angeles Times, May 17, 2005, p. A1.
Michelman, Frank. “The Supreme Court 1968 Term – Forward: On Protecting the Poor through the Fourteenth Amendment.” Harvard Law Review 83 (1969): 7–52.
Mill, John Stuart, and Harriet Taylor Mill. Essays on Sex Equality. Ed. Alice, S. Rossi. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1970.
Minnow, Martha. “The Free Exercise of Families.” University of Illinois Law Review 1991 (1991): 925–947.
Monaghan, Henry. “Of ‘Liberty’ and ‘Property.’” Cornell Law Review 62 (1977): 405–444.
“Moral Issues and Voter Decision Making in the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38, no. 2 (April 2005): 201.
Morant, Blake D. “The Teachings of Martin Luther King, Jr. and Contract Theory: An Intriguing Comparison.” Alabama Law Review 50 (fall 1998): 64–113.
“Most in Poll Approve of Interracial Marriage.” St. Louis Dispatch, August 16, 1991.
New York Times. Information Bank Abstracts. August 30, 1978.
The O'Reilly Factor. Transcript #030804cb.256. March 8, 2004.
“Panel Asks New York to Join Era of No Fault Divorce,” New York Times, February 7, 2006.
“The Path of the Law after One Hundred Years: The Path of the Law.” Harvard Law Review (1997): 991–1009, 1001.
Perry, Michael. The Constitution, the Courts, and Human Rights. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1982.
Pinello, Daniel R.America's Struggle for Same-Sex Marriage. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Podhoretz, Norman. “How the Gay-Rights Movement Won.” Commentary 5 (1996): 32–40.
Polikoff, Nancy D. “We Will Get What We Ask For: Why Legalizing Gay and Lesbian Marriage Will Not ‘Dismantle the Legal Structure of Gender in Every Marriage.’” University of Virginia Law Review 79 (October 1993): 1535–1549.
Pollak, Louis. “Racial Discrimination and Judicial Integrity: A Reply to Professor Wechsler.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 108 (1959): 1–39.
Posner, Richard. “Ask, Tell.” Review of Gay Law: Challenging the Apartheid of the Closet, by William Eskridge. The New Republic, October 11, 1999, 52–58.
Posner, Richard. “1997 Survey of Books Relating to the Law: II. Sex, Law, and Equality: Should There Be Homosexual Marriage? And If So, Who Should Decide?” Michigan Law Review 95 (1997): 1578–1585.
Posner, Richard. “Relations between Consenting Adults: Sodomy Laws and Homosexual Marriage,” from Same-Sex Marriage. Ed. Baird, Robert and Rosenbaum, Stuart. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997.
Rawls, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971.
Regan, Milton C. Jr. “Reason, Tradition, and Family Law: A Comment on Social Constructionism.” Virginia Law Review 79 (1993): 1515–1533.
“Roe v. Wade v. Ginsburg: The Case against the Case: Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Concerns about the Abortion Ruling.” The Washington Post, June 20, 1993, p. C3.
Rosenberg, Gerald. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1991.
Rosenberg, Gerald. “The Road Taken: Robert Dahl's Decision-Making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-Maker,” Emory Law Journal 50 (2001): 613.
Rubenstein, William. “Since When Is the 14th Amendment Our Route to Equality? Some Reflections on the Constructions of the Hate Speech Debate from a Lesbian/Gay Perspective.” Law and Sexuality 2 (1992): 19–27.
Rubenstein, William, ed. Lesbians, Gay Men and the Law. New York: New Press, 1993.
The St Louis Dispatch, August 16, 1991 Most in Poll Approve of Interracial Marriage.
Santoro, Marc. “Spritzer's Opinion Mixed on Status of Gay Marriage.” New York Times, March 4, 2004, p. A1.
Schacter, Jane S. “Book Review: Skepticism, Culture and the Gay Civil Rights Debate in a Post–Civil-Rights Era.” Harvard Law Review 110 (1997): 684–731.
Schroeder, Theodore A. “Fables of the Deconstruction: The Practical Failures of Gay and Lesbian Theory in the Realm of Employment Discrimination.” Journal of Gender & the Law 6 (1998): 334–367.
Schultz, David, and Stephen, E. Gottlieb. “Legal Functionalism and Social Change: A Reassessment of Rosenberg's The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change?” Journal of Law and Politics 12 (1996): 63–99.
Schwartz, Bernard. The Ascent of Pragmatism: The Burger Court in Action. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley, 1990.
Segal, Jeffery, and Harold, J. Spaeth. Majority Rule or Majority Will: Adherence to Precedent on the U.S. Supreme Court. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
Segal, Jeffery, and Harold, J. Spaeth. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1993.
Scheef, Robert W. “Note: ‘Public Citizens’ and the Constitution: Bridging the Gap between Popular Sovereignty and Original Intent.” Fordham Law Review 69 (April 2001): 2201.
Siegel, Lee. “The Gay Science.” The New Republic, November 9, 1998.
Silverstein, Helena. “Revisiting the Logic of Equal Protection: Insights from Baehr v. Lewin.” Presentation at the 1998 Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, Los Angeles, California, March 19–21, 1998.
Simmons, Tavia, and O'Connell, Martin. “Married Couple and Unmarried Partner Households 2000,” Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau, 2003.
Sitkoff, Harvard. The Struggle for Black Equality 1954–1992. New York: Hill & Wang, 1993.
Smith, Miriam. “Social Movements and Equality Seeking: The Case of Gay Liberation in Canada.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 31 (1998): 285–309.
Stoddard, Thomas B. “Bleeding Heart: Reflections on Using the Law to Make Social Change.” New York University Law Review 72 (1997): 967–991.
Strasser, Mark. “Domestic Relations and the Great Slumbering Baehr: On Definitional Preclusion, Equal Protection and Fundamental Interests.” Fordham Law Review 64 (December 1995): 921–986.
Strasser, Mark. Legally Wed: Same-Sex Marriage and the Constitution. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997.
Sullivan, Andrew. “State of the Union.” The New Republic, May 8, 2000.
Sullivan, Andrew. “Three's a Crowd.” The New Republic. June 17, 1996.
Sunstein, Cass. “Homosexuality and the Constitution.” Indiana Law Journal 70 (1994): 1–28.
Sunstein, Cass. One Case at a Time: Judicial Minimalism and the Supreme Court. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Terrell, Timothy. “‘Property,’ ‘Due Process,’ and the Distinction between Definition and Theory in Legal Analysis.” Georgetown Law Journal 70 (1982): 861–941.
Tribe, Laurence. “The Puzzling Persistence of Process-Based Constitutional Theories.” Yale Law Journal 89 (1980): 1063–1080.
Tribe, Laurence, and Dorf, Michael. “Levels of Generality in the Definition of Rights.” University of Chicago Law Review 57 (fall 1990): 1057–1108.
Trosino, James. “American Weddings: Same-Sex Marriage and the Miscegenation Analogy.” Boston University Law Review 73 (1993): 93–120.
“Truth in Numbers: Moral Values and the Gay Marriage Backlash Did Not Help Bush.” Boston Review, February/March 2005.
Tushnet, Mark. “And Only Wealth Will Bring You Justice – Some Notes on the Supreme Court, 1972 Term.” Wisconsin Law Review 1974 (1974): 177–197.
Tushnet, Mark “Following the Rules Laid Down: A Critique of Interpretivism and Neutral Principles.” Harvard Law Review 96 (1983): 781–827.
Tushnet, Mark. Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999.
Tushnet, Mark. “Two Notes on the Jurisprudence of Privacy.” Constitutional Commentary 8 (1991): 75–86.
Twiss, Benjamin R.Lawyers and the Constitution: How Laissez-Faire Came to the Supreme Court. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1942.
Volokh, Eugene. “How the Justices Voted in Free Speech Cases, 1994–2000.” UCLA Law Review 48 (2001): 1191–1202.
Waaldijk, Kees. “Civil Developments: Pattern of Reform in the Legal Positions of Same-Sex Partners in Europe.” Canadian Journal of Family Law 17 (2000): 62–88.
Waite, Linda, and Gallagher, Maggie. The Case for Marriage. New York: Doubleday, 2000.
Wardle, Lynn. “A Critical Analysis of Constitutional Claims for Same-Sex Marriage.” Brigham Young University Law Review 1996 (1996): 1–101.
Wardle, Lynn. “Loving v. Virginia and the Constitutional Right to Marry, 1790–1990.” Howard Law Journal 41 (1998): 289–347.
Wardle, Lynn. “The Potential Impact of Homosexual Parenting on Children.” University of Illinois Law Review 1997 (1997): 833–920.
Webster, Noah. An American Dictionary of the English Language 66 (1828) (6th ed. 1989).
Wechsler, Herbert. “Toward Neutral Principles of Constitutional Law.” Harvard Law Review 73 (1959): 1–35.
Westen, Peter. “The Empty Idea of Equality.” Harvard Law Review 95 (1982): 537–560.
Wheeler, Malcolm. “In Defense of Economic Equal Protection.” Kansas Law Review 22 (1973): 1–77.
Whittington, Keith E. “Commentaries on Mark Tushnet's Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts: Herbert Wechsler's Complaint and the Revival of Grand Constitutional Theory.” University of Richmond Law Review 34 (2000): 509–519.
Whittington, Keith E.Constitutional Interpretation: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press, 1999.
Wilkinson, J. Harvie III. “The Supreme Court, the Equal Protection Clause and the Three Faces of Constitutional Equality.” Virginia Law Review 61 (June 1975): 945–1017. Wintemute, Robert. “Same-Sex Marriage: When Will It Reach Utah?” Brigham Young Law Review 20 (2006) 527–546.
Witt, Elder. Guide to the U.S. Supreme Court. Washington, DC: CQ Press, 1990.
Wolfe, Alan. “The Homosexual Exception.” New York Times, February 8, 1998, p. 46.
Wolfe, Naomi. The Beauty Myth. New York: William Morrow, 1990.
Wolin, Sheldon. “Democracy, Difference, and Re-Cognition.” Political Theory 21 (1993): 468–475.
Yaworsky, Michael J. “Rights and Obligation Resulting from Human Artificial Insemination.” A.L.R. 4th 83 (1991): 295–302.
Young, Gary L. Jr. “Don't Ask Don't Tell: Gays in the Military: The Price of Public Endorsement: A Reply to Dr. Marcosson.” University of Missouri at Kansas City Law Review 64 (1995): 99–114.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.