Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T10:32:46.720Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Pseudo-wells: statistics-based generation

from Part II - Synthetic seismic amplitude

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 April 2014

Jack Dvorkin
Affiliation:
Stanford University, California
Mario A. Gutierrez
Affiliation:
Shell Exploration and Production Inc., Texas
Dario Grana
Affiliation:
University of Wyoming
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Well log data provide information about petrophysical and elastic properties of the subsurface but do not necessarily cover all possible scenarios of interest that we could encounter away from well control. To account for plausible variations in the subsurface, we may decide, for example, to stretch a shale interval or increase or reduce the clay content in the sand. One way of implementing such perturbations is to use statistical simulations. Such simulations should be based on realistic spatial distributions of a single property (e.g., porosity) as well as account for deterministic or statistical relations between two or more properties (e.g., between clay content and porosity).

Assume, for example, that we wish to simulate different geological scenarios for a clastic reservoir by changing the porosity values. Also assume that the probability distribution of porosity is known, and then sample from this distribution a porosity value at each point in depth. At two adjacent locations in the borehole, if we sample independently (i.e., we draw a random sample for the first location and then the second random sample for the second location independently of the value we drew at the first location), we may obtain a very high value of porosity at the first location and a very low value at the second location, or vice versa. Such independent random sampling ignores the spatial continuity expected in porosity variations according to depositional and sedimentological laws. Similarly, if we want to simulate clay content, we cannot simulate it independently from the previously obtained values of porosity, since porosity variations can depend on mineralogical variations in sand and clay content. Hence, proposed rock properties should be correlated in space and also with other properties.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×