Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T13:06:59.960Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Risk Assessment and Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2009

Jeom Kee Paik
Affiliation:
Pusan National University, Korea
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Typically, the term “risk” is defined as either the product or a composite of (a) the probability or likelihood that any accident or limit state leading to severe consequences, such as human injuries, environmental damage, and loss of property or financial expenditure, occurs; and (b) the resulting consequences. In the design and operation of ship-shaped offshore units, as in many other types of structures, there are a number of hazards that must be dealt with in the process of risk assessment. Wherever there are potential hazards, a risk always exists.

To minimize the risk, one may either attempt to reduce the likelihood of occurrence of the undesirable events or hazards concerned, or contain, reduce, or mitigate the consequences, or both. In the lifecycle of a ship-shaped offshore installation, assessing managing, and controlling the risk is required so that it remains under a tolerable level. The risk management and control should, in fact, be an ongoing process throughout the lifecycle of an installation – that is, involving feasibility study, concept, or front-end design, detailed design, operation, and decommissioning. The different stages of the lifecycle will offer different opportunities for risk management and control, as may be expected.

Substantial efforts, such as the SAFEDOR project (http://www.safedor.org), are being directed by the maritime industry toward the application of the risk-assessment techniques together with risk-evaluation criteria to offshore design, operation, and human and environmental safety (e.g., Skjong et al. 2005).

Type
Chapter
Information
Ship-Shaped Offshore Installations
Design, Building, and Operation
, pp. 463 - 488
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AICE (1989). Chemical process quantitative risk analysis. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
AICE (1992). Guidelines for hazard evaluation procedure. Center for Chemical Process Safety, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, New York.
API RP 2FPS (2001). Recommended practice for planning, designing, and constructing floating production systems. American Petroleum Institute, USA.
Ballard, E. J., Frieze, P. A., Fyfe, A. J., and Smedley, P. A. (2004). “Update of risk and reliability issues for FPSO structural design.” Proceedings of OMAE–FPSO 2004, OMAE FPSO'04–0053, OMAE Specialty Symposium on FPSO Integrity, Houston, August 30–September 2.Google Scholar
Boyle, P., and Smith, E. J. (2000). Emergency planning using HSE's evacuation, escape, and Rescue(EER) HAZOP technique. (Hazards XV, Symposium Series No. 147), Institution of Chemical Engineers, Rugby, England.Google Scholar
CMPT (1999). A guide to quantitative risk assessment for offshore installations. The Center for Maritime and Petroleum Technology (CMPT), UK.
Conachey, R. M. (2004). Development of RCM requirements for the marine industry. American Bureau of Shipping, Houston.Google Scholar
Daughdrill, W. H., and Clark, T. A. (2002). Considerations in reducing risks in FPSOand shuttle vessel lightening operations. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 14000, Houston, May.Google Scholar
DeFranco, S., Connor, P., Tallin, A., Roy, R., and Puskar, F. (1999). Development of a risk based underwater inspection (RBUI) process for prioritizing inspections of large numbers of platforms. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 10846, Houston, May.Google Scholar
DNV (1980–2006). Worldwide offshore accident databank statistical report. Det Norske Veritas, Norway.
DNV (1997). Offshore reliability data bank. Det Norske Veritas, Norway.
Haughie, I. J. (2004). Application of risk-based design relative to health, environment, and safety. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 16990, Houston, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HSE (1988). The tolerability of risk from nuclear power stations. Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (1992). A guide to the offshore (safety case) regulations. Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (1997a). Approaches to hazard identification. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 1997/068), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (1997b). Offshore hydrocarbon release statistics. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 1997/050), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (1997c). Close proximity study. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 1997/055), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (1998). Hazard management in structural integrity: Vol. 3 Hazard management measures. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 1998/150), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (1999). Effective collision risk management for offshore installations. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 1999/052), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (2000a). Operational safety of FPSOs: Initial summary report. (Offshore Technology Report, 2000/086), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (2000b). Injuries on offshore oil and gas installations: An analysis of temporal and occupational factors. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 1999/097), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
HSE (2001). Marine risk assessment. (Offshore Technology Report, OTO 2001/063), Health and Safety Executive, UK.
IMO (2002). Guidelines for the application of formal safety assessment (FSA) for use in the IMO rule-making process. Marine Safety Committee MSC/Circ. 1023, MEPC/Circ. 392, International Maritime Organization, London, April.
Gilbert, R. B., Ward, E. G., and Wolford, A. J. (2001). A comparative risk analysis of FPSOs with other deepwater production systems in the Gulf of Mexico. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 13173, Houston, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISO 17776 (1999). Petroleum and natural gas industries – Offshore production installations – Guidelines on tools and techniques for the identification and assessment of hazardous events. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva.
Lassagne, M. G., Pang, D. X., and Vieira, R. (2001). Prescriptive and risk-based approaches to regulation: The case of FPSOs in deepwater Gulf of Mexico. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 12950, Houston, May.Google Scholar
Lees, F. P. (1996). Loss prevention in the process industries. Oxford, UK: Butterworth Heinemann.Google Scholar
MacDonald, A., Cain, M., Aggarwal, R. K., Vivalda, C., and Lie, O. E. (1999). Collision risks associated with FPSOs in deep water Gulf of Mexico. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 10999, Houston, May.Google Scholar
Nesje, J. D., Aggarwal, R. K., Petrauskas, C., Vinnem, J. E., Keolanui, G. L., Hoffman, J., and McDonnell, R. (1999). Risk assessment technology and its application to tanker based floating production storage and offloading (FPSO) systems. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 10998, Houston, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paik, J. K., Amdahl, J., Barltrop, N., Donner, E. R., Gu, Y., Ito, H., Ludolphy, H., Pedersen, P. T., Rohr, U., and Wang, G. (2003). “Collision and grounding.” International Ships and Offshore Structures Congress, Specialist Committee V.3, 2: 71–107.Google Scholar
Skjong, R., Vanem, E., and Endresen, , Ø. (2005). SAFEDOR project: Design, operation, and regulation for safety – Risk evaluation criteria. Det Norske Veritas, Oslo (http://www.safedor.org).Google Scholar
Smith, K. M., and Schmidt, F. E. (2005). “Marine accident investigation techniques: Finding the root causes.” Marine Technology, 42(4): 210–219.Google Scholar
UKOOA (1999). A framework for risk related decision support. Offshore Operators Association, UK.
UKOOA (2000). Guidelines for quantitative risk assessment uncertainty. Offshore Operators Association, UK.
Verzbolovskis, M. (2004). ABSapproach to classification using risk analysis. American Bureau of Shipping, Houston.Google Scholar
Vinnem, J. E., Hokstad, P., Dammen, T., Saele, H., Chen, H., Haver, S., Kieran, O., Kleppestoe, H., Thomas, J. J., and Toennessen, L. I. (2003). Operational safety analysis of FPSO – shuttle tanker collision risk reveals areas of improvement. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 15317, Houston, May.Google Scholar
Wiig, E., Nesse, E., and Kittelsen, A. (1996). Environmental quantitative risk assessment (EQRA). SPE International Conference on Health, Safety, and Environment, Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE 35945, New Orleans, LA, June.Google Scholar
Williams, J. S., Brown, D. A., Shaw, M. L., and Howard, A. R. (1999). Tanker loading export systems for harsh environments: A risk-management challenge. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 10905, Houston, May.Google Scholar
Wolford, A. J., Lin, J. C., Liming, J. K., and Lidstone, A. (2001). Integrated risk based design of FPSO topsides, structural, and marine systems. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 12948, Houston, May.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, T., Bai, Y., Wang, M., and Bea, R. G. (2001). Risk based optimum inspection for FPSO hulls. Offshore Technology Conference, OTC 12949, Houston, May.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×