Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-qxsvm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T21:14:26.543Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 August 2009

Teun A. van Dijk
Affiliation:
Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Society and Discourse
How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk
, pp. 256 - 277
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abell, J. and Stokoe, E. H. (2001). Broadcasting the royal role: Constructing culturally situated identities in the Princess Diana Panorama interview. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(3), 417–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrams, D. (1999). Social identity, social cognition, and the self: The flexibility and stability of self-categorization. In: Abrams, D., and Hogg, M. A. (eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 197–229). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Abrams, D. and Hogg, M. A. (eds.). (1999). Social identity and social cognition. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Agnew, J. A. (1987). Place and politics. The geographical mediation of state and society. Boston and London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Agnew, J. A. (ed.). (1989). The power of place. Bringing together geographical and sociological imaginations. Boston and London: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Ahearn, L. (2001). Language and agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, 30, 109–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Albert, E. M. (1972). Culture patterning of speech behavior in Burundi. In: Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 72–105). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. C. (ed.). (1987). The micro-macro link. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Altman, I. and Low, S. (eds.). (1992). Place attachment. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antaki, C. (ed.). (1988). Analysing everyday explanation: A casebook of methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Argyle, M. (1978). The psychology of interpersonal behaviour. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Argyle, M., Furnham, A. and Graham, J. A. (1981). Social situations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkin, R. M. (1981). Self-presentation styles. In: Tedeschi, J. T. (ed.), Impression management. Theory and social psychological research (pp. 311–333). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Arminen, I. (2000). On the context sensitivity of institutional interaction. Discourse & Society, 11(3), 435–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arminen, I. (2005). Institutional interaction. Studies of talk at work. Aldershot, Hants, UK and Burlington, VT: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E. (2001). Role transitions in organizational life. An identity-based perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. and Drew, P. (1979). Order in Court: The organisation of verbal interaction in judicial settings. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.). (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, New York and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des sciences de l'homme.Google Scholar
Auer, J. C. P., Couper-Kühlen, E. and Müller, F. (1999). Language in time: The rhythm and tempo of spoken interaction. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Augoustinos, M. (ed.). (2001). Understanding prejudice, racism, and social conflict. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Augoustinos, M. and Walker, I. (1995). Social cognition. An integrated introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Avedon, E. M. (1981). The structural elements of games. In: Furnham, A. and Argyle, M. (eds.), The psychology of social situations (pp. 11–17). Oxford: Pergamon PressGoogle Scholar
Bailey, B. (1997). Communication of respect in interethnic service encounters. Language in Society, 26(3), 327–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhurst, D. (ed.). (1995). The social self. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (1984). Automatic and conscious processing of social information. In: Wyer, R. S. and Srull, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of socialcognition, Vol. 3 (pp. 1–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer, R. S. and Srull, T. K. (eds.), Handbook of social cognition, (2nd edn.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Barkan, E. (1992). Retreat of scientific racism: Changing concepts of race in Britain and the United States between the World Wars. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, R. G. (ed.). (1963). The stream of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods of studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, R. G. et al. (1978). Habitats, environments and human behavior. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Bartsch, R. (1995). Situations, tense, and aspect. Dynamic discourse ontology and the semantic flexibility of temporal system in German and English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (1974). Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumeister, R. F. (ed.). (1999). The Self in social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Belk, R. (1975). Situational variables and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 157–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, P. A., Greene, T. C., Fisher, J. D. and Baum, A. (2001). Environmental psychology (5th edn). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Benn, S. I. and Gauss, G. F. (eds.). (1983). Public and private in social life. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, D. J. and Bennett, J. D. (1981). In: Furnham, A. and Argyle, M. (eds.), The psychology of social situations (pp. 18–25). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Berger, P. L. and Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Bertolet, R. (1990). What is said: A theory of indirect speech reports. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besnier, N. (2004). Diversity, hierarchy and modernity in Pacific Island communities. In: Duranti, A. (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 95–120). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing genre. Language use in professional settings. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Biber, D. and Finegan, E. (eds.). (1994). Sociolinguistic perspectives on register. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London and Newbury Park: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Billig, M. (1999a). Conversation analysis and the claims of naivity. Discourse & Society 10(4), 572–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. (1999b). Whose terms? Whose ordinariness? Rhetoric and ideology in conversation analysis. Discourse & Society 10(4), 543–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, J. P. and Gumperz, J. J. (1972). Social meaning in linguistic structures: Code-switching in Norway. In: Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 407–434). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism: Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Blum-Kulka, S. (1997). Dinner talk: Cultural patterns of sociability and socialization in family discourse. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Boden, D. (1994). The business of talk: Organizations in action. London and Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Boden, D. and Bielby, D. D. (1986). The way it was: Topical organization in elderly conversation. Language & Communication, 6(1–2), 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boden, D. and Zimmerman, D. H. (eds.). (1991). Talk and social structure: Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronte, L. (1972). A sense of place. Princeton, NJ: National Humanities Series.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Fraser, C. (1979). Speech as a marker of situation. In: Scherer, K. R. and Giles, H. (eds.), Social markers in speech (pp. 33–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, P. and Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness. Some universals in language usage. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, R. (ed.). (2000). Social identity processes. Trends in theory and research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Brown, R. and Gilman, A. (1960). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In: Sebeok, T. A. (ed.), Style in language (pp. 253–277). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bublitz, W. (1988). Supportive fellow-speakers and cooperative conversations: Discourse topics and topical actions, participant roles and “recipient action” in a particular type of everyday conversation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. (2002). Youth and cultural practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 31, 525–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M. and Hall, K. (2004). Language and identity. In: Duranti, S. (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 369–394). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bullock, M. (ed.). (1991). The development of intentional action: Cognitive, motivational, and interactive processes. Basel and New York: Karger.Google Scholar
Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buss, A. R. (1981). The trait-situation controversy and the concept of interaction. In: Furnham, A. and Argyle, M. (eds.), The psychology of social situations. Selected readings (pp. 227–249). Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Buttny, R. (1993). Social accountability in communication. London and Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Caldas-Coulthard, C. R. and Coulthard, M. (eds.). (1996). Texts and practices: Readings in critical discourse analysis. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Calsamiglia, H., Cots, J. M., Lorda, C., Nussbaum, L., Payrato, L. and Tuson, A. (1995). Communicative strategies and socio-cultural identities in talk shows. Pragmatics, 5(3), 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canter, D. V. (1977). The psychology of place. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Cantor, N. and Kihlstrom, J. F. (eds.). (1981). Personality, cognition, and social interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Cantor, N. and Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology, Vol. 12. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Carbaugh, D. A. (2005). Cultures in conversation. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Carlson, D. and Apple, M. W. (eds.). (1998). Power, knowledge, pedagogy. The meaning of democratic education in unsettling times. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Casey, E. S. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Chafe, W. L. (1994). Discourse, consciousness, and time: the flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Chen, L. and Cegala, D. J. (1994). Topic management, shared knowledge, and accommodation: A study of communication adaptability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(4), 389–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheng, W. (2003). Intercultural conversation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherny, L. (1999). Conversation and community: Chat in a virtual world. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chouliaraki, L. (ed.). (2005). The soft power of war. Legitimacy and community in Iraq war discourses. Special issue of Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christie, F. and Martin, J. R. (eds.). (1997). Genre and institutions: Social processes in the workplace and school. London and Washington: Cassell.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A. V. (1973). Cognitive sociology: Language and meaning in social interaction. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Education.Google Scholar
Cicourel, A. V. (1992). The interpenetration of communicative contexts: examples from medical encounters. In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 291–310). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clayman, S. E. (1990). From talk to text: newspaper accounts of reporter-source interactions. Media, Culture and Society, 12, 79–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, I. J. (1996). Theories of action and praxis. In: Turner, B. S. (ed.), The Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 111–142). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Collett, P. (1989). Time and action. In: Roger, D. and Bull, P. (eds.), Conversation: An interdisciplinary perspective. Intercommunication series, 3 (pp. 218–237). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Collins, J. (1987). Conversation and knowledge in bureaucratic settings. Discourse Processes, 10(4), 303–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coser, R. L. (1991). In defense of modernity: Role complexity and individual autonomy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Coulmas, F. (ed.). (1986). Direct and indirect speech. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Covarrubias, P. (2002). Culture, communication, and cooperation: Interpersonal relations and pronominal address in a Mexican organization. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (2000). The feeling of what happens. Body, emotion and the making of consciousness. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Certeau, M. (1985). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Fina, A., Schiffrin, D. and Bamberg, M. (eds.). (2006). Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. (1962). Cours de linguistique générale, 3rd edition (first edition published 1915). Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Devine, P. G. (1989). Automatic and controlled processes in prejudice. The role of stereotypes and personal beliefs. In: Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J. and Greenwald, A. G. (eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 181–212). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.Google Scholar
Dias, P., Freedman, A., Medway, P. and Pare, A. (1999). Worlds apart: Acting and writing in academic and workplace contexts. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Dixon, J. and Durrheim, K. (2000). Displacing place-identity. A discursive approach to locating self and other. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, J. D. (1980). Introduction to the sociologies of everyday life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Douglas, J. D. (ed.). (1970). Understanding everyday life. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F. and Gaertner, S. L. (eds.). (1986). Prejudice, discrimination, and racism. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Drew, P. (1991). Asymmetries of knowledge in conversational interactions. In: Marková, Ivana and Foppa, Klaus (eds.), Asymmetries in dialogue (pp. 21–48). Savage, MD: Barnes & Noble Books/Bowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds.). (1992). Talk at work. Interaction in institutional settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Drew, P. and Sorjonen, M. L. (1997). Institutional dialogue. In: Dijk, Teun A. (ed.), Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction, Vol. 2 (pp. 92–118). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Du Bois, J. W. (1992). Meaning without intention: Lessons from divination. In: Hill, J. H. and Irvine, J. T. (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (pp. 48–71). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dundes, A., Leach, J. W. and Özkök, B. (1972). The strategy of Turkish boys' duelling rhymes. In: Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics. The ethnography of communication (pp. 130–160). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1992a). Intentions, self and responsibility: An essay in Samoan ethnopragmatics. In: Hill, J. H. and Irvine, J. T. (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (pp. 24–47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1992b). Language in context and language as context: The Samoan respect vocabulary. In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 77–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (1994). From grammar to politics: Linguistic anthropology in a western Samoan village. Berkeley and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (ed.). (2001). Linguistic anthropology: A reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. (ed.). (2004). A companion to linguistic anthropology. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Duranti, A. (2006). The social ontology of intentions. Discourse Studies, 8(1), 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.). (1992). Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1964/1895). The rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. and Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. The linguistic construction of identity in Belten High. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (1992). Communities of practice: Where language, gender and power all live. In: Hall, K., Bucholtz, M. and Moonwomon, B. (eds.), Locating power: Proceedings of the Second Berkeley Women and Language Conference, Vol. 1 (pp. 89–99). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Women and Language Group.Google Scholar
Eckert, P. and McConnell-Ginet, S. (2003). Language and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eckert, P. and Rickford, J. R. (eds.) (2001). Style and Sociolinguistic Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. and Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Edwards, J. and Martin, J. (eds.). (2004). Interpreting tragedy: the language of 11 September 2001. Special issue, Discourse & Society, 15(2–3).Google Scholar
Ekehammar, B. (1974). Interactionism in personality from an interactional perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 80, 1026–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, F. and Shultz, J. J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper. Social interaction in interviews. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ervin-Tripp, S. M. (1972). Sociolinguistic rules of address. In: Pride, J. B. and Holmes, J. (eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 225–240). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Essed, P. (1991). Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Essed, P. and Goldberg, D. T. (eds.). (2002). Race critical theories. Text and context. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. The critical study of language. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
Fardon, R. (ed.). (1985). Power and knowledge. Anthropological and sociological approaches: Proceedings of a conference held at the University of St. Andrews in December 1982. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.Google Scholar
Farr, R. M. and Moscovici, S. (eds.). (1984). Social representations. Cambridge, New York and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Firth, A. (ed.). (1995). The discourse of negotiation: Studies of language in the workplace. Oxford and New York: Pergamon/Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. and Davis, K. (1993). Negotiating at the margins. The gendered discourses of power and resistance. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, S. and Todd, A. D. (eds.). (1983). The social organization of doctor-patient communication. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.Google Scholar
Fishman, J. A. (1972). Domains and the relationship between micro- and macrosociolinguistics. In: Gumperz, J. J., and Hymes, D. H., (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 435–464). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (1982). Schema-triggered affect: Applications to social perception. In: Clark, M. S. and Fiske, S. T. (eds.), Affect and cognition: The 17th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition (pp. 56–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination. In Gilbert, D. T., Fiske, S. T. and Lindzey, G. (eds.), Handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (4th edn, pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T. and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., Lin, M. and Neuberg, S. L. (1999). The continuum model: Ten years on. In: Chaiken, S. and Trope, Y. (eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 231–254). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P. (1979). Social episodes: The study of interaction routines. London and New York: published in cooperation with the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology by Academic Press.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P., Williams, K. D. and Wheeler, L. (eds.). (2001). The social mind. Cognitive and motivational aspects of interpersonal behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Forrester, M. A. and Ramsden, C. A. H. (2000). Discursive ethnomethodology: Analysing power and resistance in talk. Psychology, Crime and Law, 6(4), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Frake, C. O. (1972). “Struck by Speech”: The Yakan concept of litigation. In: Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 106–129). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Fraser, C. and Gaskell, G. (eds.). (1990). The social psychological study of widespread beliefs. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frederiksen, N. (1972). Toward a taxonomy of situations. American Psychologist, 27, 114–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedrich, P. (1972). Social context and semantic feature: The Russian pronominal usage. In: Gumperz, J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics (pp. 270–300). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fuller, J. M. (2003). The influence of speaker roles on discourse marker use. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(1), 23–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (ed.). (1986). Social behavior in context. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Furnham, A. and Argyle, M. (eds.). (1981). The psychology of social situations. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Gans, H. J. (1979). Deciding what's news. New York: Vintage Books/Random House.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. and Sacks, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In: McKinney, J. C. and Tiryakian, E. A. (eds.) Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments (pp. 337–366). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Gergen, K. J. and Gergen, M. M. (1981). Social psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Gibbs, R. W. J. (1987). Mutual knowledge and the psychology of conversational inference. Journal of Pragmatics, 11(5), 561–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory. Action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, A. (ed.). (1987). Social theory today. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Giles, D. C. (2002). Keeping the public in their place: Audience participation in lifestyle television programming. Discourse & Society, 13(5), 603–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, H. (ed.). (1979). Language and social psychology. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Giles, H. (ed.). (1991). Contexts of accommodation. Developments in applied sociolinguistics. Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine.Google Scholar
Glenberg, A. M. (1997). Mental models, space, and embodied cognition. In: Ward, T. B. and Smith, S. M. (eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 495–522). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1956). The presentation of self in everyday life. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh, Social Sciences Research Centre.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. The American Anthropologist, 66, 2, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago, IL: Aldine Co.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1979). Gender advertisements. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, D. T. and Solomos, J. (eds.). (2002). A companion to racial and ethnic studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. and Bargh, J. A. (eds.). (1996). The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. (1984). Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. In: Atkinson, J. M. and Heritage, J. (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis (pp. 225–246). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. and Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C. and Goodwin, M. H. (2004). Participation. In: Duranti, A. (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 222–244). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Goodwin, M. H. (1990). He-said-she-said: Talk as social organization among Black children. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Greenberg, J. (1990). The theory of social situations: A Game-theoretic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, L. (1968). Spanish and English usage self-ratings in various situational contexts. In: Fishman, J. A., Cooper, R. L., Ma, R. et al. (eds.), Bilingualism in the barrio. New York: Yeshiva University.Google Scholar
Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. (2003). Cross-cultural and intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Gudykunst, W. B. (ed.). (2005). Theorizing about intercultural communication. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1977). Sociocultural knowledge in conversational inference. In: Saville-Troike, M. (ed.), Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics 1977. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982a). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (ed.). (1982b). Language and social identity. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1992). Contextualization and understanding. In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 229–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hackett, R. A. and Zhao, Y. Z. (1994). Challenging a master narrative: Peace protest and opinion. Editorial Discourse in the United-States press during the Gulf-War. Discourse & Society, 5(4), 509–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hak, T. (1999). “Text” and “con-text”: Talk bias in studies of health care work. In: Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds.), Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings (pp. 427–451). Berlin: Mouton-De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. (1959). The silent language. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. and Hall, M. R. (1987). Hidden differences. Doing business with the Japanese. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press/Doubleday.Google Scholar
Hamilton, D. L. (ed.). (2005). Social cognition. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Hamilton, V., Bower, G. H. and Frijda, N. H. (eds.). (1988). Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 43–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (1996). Language & communicative practices. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (2000). Intertexts: Writings on language, utterance & context. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (2005). Pierre Bourdieu and the practices of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harré, R. (1979). Social being. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harré, R. (1998). The singular self: An introduction to the psychology of personhood. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Harré, R. and Secord, P. F. (1972). The explanation of social behavior. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hassard, J. (1990). The sociology of time. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayduk, L. A. (1994). Personal space: Understanding the simplex model. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18(3), 245–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, C. and Luff, P. (2000). Technology in action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heritage, J. C. (1984). Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. C. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In: Dijk, T. A. (ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 3 (pp. 95–119). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. C. (1987). Ethnomethodology. In: Giddens, A. and Turner, J. (eds.), Social theory today (pp. 224–272). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. C. (2005). Conversation analysis and institutional talk. In: Fitch, K. L. and Sanders, R. E. (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 103–147). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. C. and Watson, D. R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In: Psathas, G. (ed.), Everyday language: studies in ethnomethodology (pp. 123–62). New York: Irvington.Google Scholar
Heritage, J. C. and Watson, D. R. (1980). Aspects of the properties of formulations in natural conversations: Some instances analysed. Semiotica, 30(3–4), 245–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hester, S. and Francis, D. (2001). Is institutional talk a phenomenon? Reflections on ethnomethodology and applied conversation analysis. In: McHoul, A. and Rapley, M. (eds.), How to analyse talk in institutional settings. A casebook of methods (pp. 206–217). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hewitt, J. P. (1991). Self and society: A symbolic interactionist social psychology. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Hewstone, M. and Stroebe, W. (eds.). (2001). Introduction to social psychology. A European perspective (3rd edn.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Highmore, B. (ed.). (2002). The everyday life reader. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hill, J. H. and Irvine, J. T. (eds.). (1992). Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, D. and Quinn, N. (eds.). (1987). Cultural models in language and thought. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, J. and Meyerhoff, M. (eds.). (2003). The handbook of language and gender. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holstein, J. A. and Gubrium, J. F. (2004). Context: working it up, down, or across. In: Seale, C., Gobo, G., Gubrium, J. F. and Silverman, D. (eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 297–311). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Holt, E. (1996). Reporting on talk: The use of direct reported speech in conversation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 29(3), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houston, M. and Kramarae, C. (eds.). (1991). Women speaking from silence. Discourse & Society, 2(4), special issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. (1991). Macro-micro linkages in sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Hutchby, I. (1996). Power in discourse: the case of arguments on a British talk radio show. Discourse & Society, 7, 481–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1962). The ethnography of speaking. In: Gladwin, T. and Sturtevant, W. C. (eds.), Anthropology and human behavior (pp. 13–53). Washington, DC: Anthropological Society of Washington (reprinted in Fishman, J. A. (ed.), Readings in the sociology of language, pp. 99–138. The Hague: Mouton, 1968).Google Scholar
Hymes, D. (1972). Models of the interaction of language and social life. In: Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 35–71). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T. (1974). Strategies of status manipulation in Wolof greeting. In: Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 167–191). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, J. T. (1992). Insult and responsibility: verbal abuse in a Wolof village. In: Hill, J. H. and Irvine, J. T. (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (pp. 105–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, J. B. (1994). A sense of place, a sense of time. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jaspars, J. M. F. and Fraser, C. (1984). Attitudes and social representations. In: Farr, R. M. and Moscovici, S. (eds.), Social representations (pp. 101–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jenkins, R. P. (2002). In the present tense: Time, identification and human nature. AnthropologicalTheory, 2(3), 267–280.Google Scholar
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models. Towards a cognitive science of language, inference, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2000). The individual voice in language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 29, 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, L. (2000). Immigration and parliamentary discourse in Great Britain. An analysis of the debates related to the 1996 Asylum and Immigration Act. In: Wodak, R. and Dijk, T. A. (eds.), Racism at the Top (pp. 283–310). Klagenfurt: Drava Verlag.Google Scholar
Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993). From discourse to logic: Introduction to modeltheoretic semantics of natural language, formal logic and discourse representation theory. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Kataoka, H. C. and Kusumoto, T. (1991). Japanese cultural encounters and how to handle them. Lincolnwood, IL: Passport Books.Google Scholar
Keating, E. (1998). Power sharing: Language, rank, gender and social space in Pohnpei, Micronesia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Keating, E. and Egbert, M. (2004). Conversation as cultural activity. In: Duranti, A. (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 169–196). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Keenan, E. (1974). Norm-makers, norm-breakers: Uses of speech by men and women in a Malagasy community (pp. 125–143). In: Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kendon, A. (1992). The negotiation of context in face-to-face interaction. In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context (pp. 323–334). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kitzinger, C. (2005). “Speaking as a heterosexual”: (How) does sexuality matter for talk-in-interaction?Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(3), 221–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1997). The social psychology of protest. Oxford and Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Knoblauch, H. (2001). Communication, contexts and culture. A communicative constructivist approach to intercultural communication. In: Di Luzio, A., Günthner, S. and Orletti, F. (eds.), Culture in communication. Analyses of intercultural situations (pp. 3–33). Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Knorr-Cetina, K. and Cicourel, A. V. (eds.). (1981). Advances in social theory and methodology. Towards an integration of micro- and macrosociologies. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Komter, M. L. (1995). The distribution of knowledge in courtroom interaction. In: Ten Have, P. and Psathas, G. (eds.), Situated order: Studies in the social organization of talk and embodied activities (pp. 107–28). Washington, DC: University Press of America.Google Scholar
Kotthoff, H. and Wodak, R. (eds.). (1997). Communicating gender in context. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krauss, R. M. and Fussell, S. R. (1991). Perspective-taking in communication: Representations of others' knowledge in reference. Social Cognition, 9(1), 2–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuper, A. (1999). Culture. The anthropologists' account. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, A., and Kuper, J. (1986). The social science encyclopedia. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972a). Language in the inner city: Studies in the Black English vernacular. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W. (1972b). Sociolinguistic patterns. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and women's place. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lasswell, H. D. (1977). Psychopathology and politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawrence, C. and Leather, P. (1999). Stereotypical processing: the role of environmental context. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(4), 383–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazar, M. (ed.). (2005). Feminist critical discourse analysis. Gender, power and ideology in discourse. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lefebvre, H. (1971). Everyday life in the modern world. New York: Harper & Row (Harper Torchbooks).Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1982). Linearization in describing spatial networks. In: Peters, S. and Saarinen, E., (eds.) Processes, beliefs and questions. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (1996). Language and space. Annual Review of Anthropology, 25, 353–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in language and cognition. Explorations in cognitive diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Light, A. and Smith, J. M. (eds.). (1998). Philosophy and geography III: Philosophies of place. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, Inc.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, L. (1992). Context contests: debatable truth statements on Tanna (Vanuatu). In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 101–124). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Litosseliti, L. and Sunderland, J. (eds.). (2002). Gender identity and discourse analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lofland, J. and Lofland, L. H. (1995). Analyzing social settings. A guide to qualitative observation and analysis. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Magnusson, D. (1978). On the psychological situation. Stockholm: University of Stockholm Reports.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnusson, D. (ed.). (1981). Toward a psychology of situations. An interactional perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Magnusson, D. and Endler, N. (eds.). (1977). Personality at the crossroads: Current issues in interactional psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Mäkitalo, Å. and Säljö, R. (2001). Talk in institutional context and institutional context in talk: Categories as situated practices. Text, 22(1), 57–82.Google Scholar
Malone, M. J. (1997). Worlds of talk: The presentation of self in everyday conversation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 63–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín Rojo, L. and Dijk, T. A. (1997). “There was a problem, and it was solved!” Legitimating the expulsion of ‘illegal’ immigrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society, 8(4), 523–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maynard, D. W. (2003). Bad news, good news. Conversational order in everyday talk and clinical settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Maynard, S. K. (1997). Japanese communication language and thought in context. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
McCroskey, J. C. (ed.). (1987). Personality and interpersonal communication. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
McElroy, J. C., Morrow, P. C. and Wall, L. C. (1983). Generalizing impact of object language to other audiences: Peer response to office design. Psychological Reports, 53, 315–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGinty, S. (1999). Gatekeepers of knowledge. Journal editors in the sciences and the social sciences. Westport, CT: Bergin & Garvey.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. E. and Kelly, J. E. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
McGrath, J. E. and Tschan, F. (2003). Temporal matters in social psychology. Examining the role of time in the lives of groups and individuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
McHoul, A. and Rapley, M. (eds.). (2001). How to analyse talk in institutional settings. A casebook of methods. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1968). On sociological theories of the middle range. In: Merton, R. K. (ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 39–71). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Milgram, S. (1984). Cities as social representations. In: Farr, R. M. and Moscovici, S. (eds.), Social representations (pp. 289–309). Cambridge and Paris: Cambridge University Press and Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.Google Scholar
Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.Google Scholar
Milroy, L. (1980). Language and social networks. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mitchell-Kernan, C. (1972). Signifying and marking: Two Afro-American speech acts. In: Gumperz, J. J. and Hymes, D. (eds.), Directions in sociolinguistics: The ethnography of communication (pp. 161–179). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2000). Décrire la ville. La construction des savoirs urbains dans l'interaction et dans le texte. Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
Morrow, P. C. and McElroy, J. C. (1981). Interior office design and visitor response. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 630–646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moscovici, S. (2000). Social representations. Explorations in social psychology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Mühlen, U. (1985). Talk als Show. Eine linguistische Untersuchung der Gesprächsführung in den Talkshows des deutchen Fernsehens. Frankfurt am Main: Lang.Google Scholar
Mullings, L. (2005). Interrogating racism: Towards an antiracist anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 34, 667–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neisser, U. and Jopling, D. A. (eds.). (1997). The conceptual self in context: Culture, experience, self-understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nippert-Eng, C. E. (1996). Home and work. Negotiating boundaries through everyday life. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nystrand, M. (1987). The role of context in written communication. In: Horowitz, Rosalind and Samuels, S. Jay (eds.), Comprehending oral and written language (pp. 197–214). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Nystrand, M., Himley, M. and Doyle, A. (1986). The structure of written communication: Studies in reciprocity between writers and readers. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A. and Reynolds, K. J. (1999). Social categorization and social context: Is stereotype change a matter of information or of meaning? In: Abrams, Dominic and Hogg, Michael A. (eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 55–79). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
O'Barr, W. M. and Conley, J. M. (1990). Rules versus relationships: The ethnography of legal discourse. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 335–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. and Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Olson, S. K. and Olson, P. M. (1993). Communicating in the workplace. Goshen, NY: Aloray.Google Scholar
Operario, D. and Fiske, S. T. (1999). Integrating social identity and social cognition: A framework for bridging diverse perspectives. In: Abrams, D. and Hogg, M. A. (eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 26–54). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ortner, S. (1984). Theory in anthropology since the sixties. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 26, 126–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owsley, H. H. and Scotton, C. M. (1984). The conversational expression of power by television interviewers. Journal of Social Psychology, 123, 261–271.Google Scholar
Paechter, C. F. (eds.). (2001). Knowledge, power, and learning. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: P. Chapman in association with Open University, Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Perinbanayagam, R. (1974). The definition of the situation: An analysis of the ethnomethodological and dramaturgical view. Sociological Quarterly, 15, 521–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peräkylä, A. and Vehviläinen, S. (2003). Conversation analysis and the professional stocks of interactional knowledge. Discourse & Society, 14(6), 727–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pervin, L. A. (ed.). (1978). Perspectives in interactional psychology. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Philips, S. U. (1974). Warm springs “Indian Time”: How the regulation of participation affects the progress of events. In: Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Philips, S. U. (2004). Language and social inequality. In: Duranti, A. (ed.), A companion to linguistic anthropology (pp. 474–495). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Philipsen, G. and Coutu, L. M. (2005). The ethnography of speaking. In: Fitch, K. L. and Sanders, R. E. (eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 355–379). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Planalp, S. and Garvin-Doxas, K. (1994). Using mutual knowledge in conversation: Friends as experts on each other. In: Duck, S. (ed.), Understanding relationship processes IV: The dynamics of relationships. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Plummer, K. (1996). Symbolic interactionism in the twentieth century: The rise of empirical social theory. In: Turner, B. S. (ed.), The Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 223–251). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluations. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 233–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, J. and Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Proshansky, H. M., Fabian, A. K. and Kaminoff, R. (1983). Place identity: Physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 3, 57–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Psathas, G. (1995). Conversation analysis: The study of talk-in interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage (Qualitative Research Methods 35).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, L. L. and Poole, M. S. (1987). Conflict and negotiation. In: Putnam, L. L. and Jablin, F. M., (eds.), Handbook of organizational communication: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 549–599). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Ranyard, R., Crozier, W. R. and Svenson, O. (eds.). (1997). Decision making: Cognitive models and explanations. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, S. and Hopkins, N. (1996). Self-category constructions in political rhetoric: An analysis of Thatcher's and Kinnock's speeches concerning the British miners' strike (1984–85). European Journal of Social Psychology, 26(3), 353–371.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (eds.). (2000). The semiotics of racism. Approaches in critical discourse analysis. Vienna: Passagen.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M. and Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Resnick, L. B. (1991). Shared cognition: Thinking as social practice. In: Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. and Teasley, S. D. (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 1–20). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. and Teasley, S. D. (eds.). (1991). Perspectives on socially shared cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinck, M., Williams, P., Bower, G. H. and Becker, E. S. (1996). Spatial situation models and narrative understanding: Some generalizations and extensions. Discourse Processes, 21(1), 23–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodin, J. and Steinberg, S. P. (eds.). (2003). Public discourse in America. Conversation and community in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ross, L. and Nisbett, R. E. (1991). The person and the situation. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rucht, D., Koopmans, R. and Neidhardt, F. (eds.). (1999). Acts of dissent. New developments in the study of protest. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Sacks, H. (1995 [1992]). Lectures on conversation, Vols. 1 and 2 (ed. Jefferson, G., with an Introduction by Schegloff, E. A.). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. and Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salmond, A. (1974). Rituals of encounter among the Maori: Sociolinguistic study of a scene. In: Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds.), Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 192–212). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds.). (1999). Talk, work, and institutional order: Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saville-Troike, M. (2003). The ethnography of communication. An introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. (1977). Scripts, plans, goals, and understanding. An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schank, R. C. and Langer, E. (eds.). (1994). Beliefs, reasoning, and decision making: Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Scheff, T. J. (2005). The structure of context: Deciphering frame analysis. Sociological Theory, 23(4), 368–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Between micro and macro: contexts and other connections. In: Alexander, J. C., Giesen, B., Münch, R. and Smelser, N. J. (eds.), The micro–macro link (pp. 207–233). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1991a). Conversation analysis and socially shared cognition. In: Resnick, L. B., Levine, J. M. and Teasley, S. D. (eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 150–171). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1991b). Reflections on talk and social structure. In: Boden, D. and Zimmerman, D. H. (eds.), Talk and social structure: studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 44–71). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992a). In another context. In: Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking context: Language as an interactive phenomenon (pp. 191–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1992b). On talk and its institutional occasions. In: Drew, P. and Heritage, J. (eds.), Talk at work: interaction in institutional settings (pp. 101–134). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 457–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1999a). Naivete vs. sophistication or discipline vs self-indulgence: A rejoinder to Billig. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 577–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1999b). ‘Schegloff's texts’ as ‘Billig's data’: A critical reply. Discourse & Society, 10(4), 558–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. and Sacks, H. (1973). Opening up closings. Semiotica, 8, 289–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherer, K. R. and Giles, H. (1979). Social markers in speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, D. J., Hastorf, A. H. and Ellsworth, P. C. (1979). Person perception (2nd ed.). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
Schober, M. F. and Clark, H. H. (1989). Understanding by addressees and overhearers. Cognitive Psychology, 21(2), 211–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schutz, A. (1962). Collected papers. The Hague: M. Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schutz, A. (1970). On phenomenology and social relations. Selected writings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scollon, R. and Scollon, S. B. K. (1981). Narrative, literacy, and face in interethnic communication. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Pub. Corp.Google Scholar
Searle, J. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Seeger, A. (1986). Oratory is spoken, myth is told, and song is sung. But they are all music to my ears. In: Sherzer, J. and Urban, G. (eds.), Native South American discourse (pp. 59–82). Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Seidman, S. (2003). The social construction of sexuality. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Shore, B. (1996). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities. Constructing life through language. London and Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Shotter, J. and Gergen, K. J. (eds.). (1989). Texts of identity. London and Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Shuman, A. (1992). “Get outa my face”: entitlement and authoritative discourse. In: Hill, J. H. and Irvine, J. T. (eds.), Responsibility and evidence in oral discourse (pp. 135–160). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverman, D. (1999). Warriors and collaborators: Reworking methodological controversies in the study of institutional interaction. In: Sarangi, S. and Roberts, C. (eds.), Talk, work and institutional order. Discourse in medical, mediation and management settings. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Simmel, G. (1909). The problem of sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 15, 289–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, R., Lele, J. K. and Martohardjono, G. (1995). Communication in a multilingual society: some missed opportunities. In: Singh, R., Dasgupta, P. and Lele, J. K. (eds.), Explorations in Indian sociolinguistics (pp. 105–123). New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Smith, M. P. (ed.). (2001). City and nation. Rethinking place and identity. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Speer, S. A. (2005). Gender talk. Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and cognition. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
Stalnaker, R. C. (1999). Context and content. Essays on intentionality in speech and thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, R. A. (1967). A theory of the definition of the situation. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, Winter, 148–164.Google Scholar
Sternberg, M. (1990). Telling in time (I): Chronology and narrative theory. Poetics Today, 11(4), 901–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stothard, P. (2003). Thirty days. Tony Blair and the test of history. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Stross, B. (1974). Speaking of speaking: Tenejapa Tzeltal metalinguistics. In: Bauman, R. and Sherzer, J. (eds.),. Explorations in the ethnography of speaking (pp. 213–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suchman, L. A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communication. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, E. (1987). Work places: The psychology of the physical environment in offices and factories. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (ed.). (1982). Social identity and intergroup relations. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men inconversation. New York: William Morrow.Google ScholarPubMed
Tannen, D. (ed.). (1993). Gender and conversational interaction. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ten Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. A practical guide. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. E. (1999). Accountability theory: Mixing properties of human agents with properties of social systems. In: Thompson, L. L. and Levine, J. M. (eds.), Shared cognition in organizations: The management of knowledge (pp. 117–137). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Thimm, C., Rademacher, U. and Kruse, L. (1995). “Power-related talk”: Control in verbal interaction. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 14(4), 382–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. J. (ed.). (1979). Role theory: Concepts and research. Huntington, NY: R.E. Krieger Co.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. I. (1966/1928). Situational analysis: The behavior pattern and the situation. In: Janovitz, M. (ed.), W. I. Thomas on social organization and social personality. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Thornborrow, J. and Morris, D. (2004). Gossip as strategy: The management of talk about others on reality TV show ‘Big Brother’. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(2), 246–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolson, A. (ed.)(2001). Television talk shows: Discourse, performance, spectacle. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Tomasello, M. (1999). The cultural origins of human cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tuan, Y. F. (2001). Space and place: The perspective of experience. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Tuchman, G. (1978). Making news: A study in the construction of reality. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Turnbull, S. (2004). Perceptions and experience of time-space compression and acceleration. The shaping of leaders' identities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(8), 809–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D. and Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, R. H. (2002). Role theory. In: Turner, R. H. (ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 233–254). New York: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (1991). Spatial mental models. In: Bower, G. H. (ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 27 (pp. 109–145). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, B. (2004). Narratives of space, time, and life. Mind & Language, 19(4), 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urry, J. (1996). Sociology of time and place. In: Turner, B. S. (ed.), The Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 369–395). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Benthem, J. F. A. K. (1991). Language in action: Categories, lambdas, and dynamic logic. Amsterdam and New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1972). Some aspects of text grammars. A study in theoretical linguistics and poetics. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1977). Text and context. Explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1980). Macrostructures: An interdisciplinary study of global structures in discourse, interaction, and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1981). Studies in the pragmatic of discourse. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse. An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. Amsterdam and Philadelphia, PA: J. Benjamins Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (ed.). (1985). Handbook of discourse analysis (4 vols.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1987). Communicating racism: Ethnic prejudice in thought and talk. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1988a). News analysis: Case studies of international and national news in the press. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1988b). News as discourse. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1990). Social cognition and discourse. In: Giles, H. and Robinson, W. P. (eds.), Handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 163–183). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the press. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1992). Discourse and the denial of racism. Discourse & Society, 3(1), 87–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1993a). Elite discourse and racism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1993b). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society 4(2), 249–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (ed.). (1997). Discourse studies. A multidisciplinary introduction (2 vols.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology. A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (1999). Context models in discourse processing. In: Oostendorp, H. and Goldman, S. R. (eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 123–148). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2003a). Dominación étnica y racismo discursivo en España y América Latina. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2003b). Ideología y discurso. Una introducción multidisciplinaria. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2003c). Knowledge in parliamentary debates. Journal of Language and Politics, 2(1), 93–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2003d). Text and context of parliamentary debates. In: Bayley, P. (ed.), Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse (pp. 339–372). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2003e). War rhetoric of a little ally. Political implicatures of Aznar's legitimization of the war in Iraq. Journal of Language and Politics, 4(1), 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2005a). Contextual knowledge management in discourse production. In: Wodak, R. and Chilton, P. (eds.), A new agenda in (critical) discourse analysis (pp. 71–100). Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2005b). Discourse and racism in Spain and Latin America. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2006a). Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society, 17(2), 359–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (ed.). (2006b). Discourse, interaction and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8(1), special issue.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (ed.). (2007). Racismo y discurso en América Latina. Barcelona: Gedisa.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2008a). Discourse and context. A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijk, T. A. (2008b). Discourse and power. Contributions to critical discourse studies. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dijk, T. A. and Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978/1921). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (2 vols.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M. and Bargh, J. A. (1998). Control and automaticity in social life. In: Gilbert, D. T. and Fiske, S. T., (eds.), The handbook of social psychology, Vol. 2 (4th edn., pp. 446–496). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Weiner, B. (2006). Social motivation, justice, and the moral emotions. An attributional approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Weiss, G. and Wodak, R. (eds.). (2003). Critical discourse analysis. Theory and interdisciplinarity. Houndmills, UK and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C. (1979). ‘Against our will': Male interruptions of females in cross-sex conversation. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 327, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, C. (1984). Routine complications: Troubles with talk between doctors and patients. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretive repertoires: conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9(3), 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiemer, B. (1997). Narrative units and the temporal organization of ordinary discourse. Journal of Narrative and Life History, 7(1–4), 245–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J. (1990). Politically speaking: The pragmatic analysis of political language. Oxford, UK and Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Wilson, P. A. (1999). A theory of power and politics and their effects on organizational commitment of senior executive service members. Administration & Society, 31(1), 120–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, T. P. (1991). Social structure and the sequential organization of interaction. In: Boden, D. and Zimmerman, D. H. (eds.), Talk and social structure. Studies in ethnomethodology and conversation analysis (pp. 22–43). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. (1987). ‘And where is the Lebanon?’ A socio-psycholinguistic investigation of comprehension and intelligibility of news. Text, 7(4), 377–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (ed.). (1997). Gender and discourse. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (eds.). (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. and Reisigl, M. (1999). Discourse and racism: European perspectives. Annual Review of Anthropology, 28, 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. and Dijk, T. A. (eds.). (2000). Racism at the top. Parliamentary discourses on ethnic issues in six European states. Klagenfurt, Austria: Drava Verlag.Google Scholar
Wortham, S. E. F. (1996). Mapping participant deictics: A technique for discovering speakers' footing. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 331–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wyer, R. S. J., Swan, S. and Gruenfeld, D. H. (1995). Impression formation in informal conversations. Social Cognition, 13(3), 243–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacks, J. M., Tversky, B. and Iyer, G. (2001). Perceiving, remembering, and communicating structure in events. Journal of Experimental Psychology- General, 130(1), 29–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zalk, S. R. (ed.). (1992). Revolutions in knowledge: Feminism in the social sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social mindscapes: An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Teun A. van Dijk, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
  • Book: Society and Discourse
  • Online publication: 31 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575273.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Teun A. van Dijk, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
  • Book: Society and Discourse
  • Online publication: 31 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575273.008
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Teun A. van Dijk, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona
  • Book: Society and Discourse
  • Online publication: 31 August 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511575273.008
Available formats
×