The Grammatical Margins of Class

Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade

doi:10.1017/9781108120470.010

10 - The Grammatical Margins of Class

from Part III - Norms and Margins: Moving into the Twenty-First Century

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 March 2018

Ingrid Tieken-Boon van Ostade

Edited by

Valérie Kerfelec and

Linda Pillière: Affiliation:
Aix Marseille Univ, LERMA
Wilfrid Andrieu: Affiliation:
Aix Marseille Univ, LERMA
Valérie Kerfelec: Affiliation:
Aix Marseille Univ, LERMA
Diana Lewis: Affiliation:
Aix Marseille Univ, LERMA

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Usage guides for English, which first arose as a genre in England in 1770 and in America in 1847, are published in ever increasing numbers today. The year 2014 alone saw the publication of a new edition of Gowers’s Complete Plain Words (1954), a reissue as an e-book of David Crystal’s Who Cares about English Usage (2000) and a completely new usage guide by Steven Pinker. All three, moreover, will be published by Penguin alone. Other publishers also bring out new titles or reissue old ones. This chapter focuses on the rise and popularity of the usage guide from the earliest days onwards. The genre is defined following Weiner (1988), focussing at the same time on what characterises a usage problem. In particular, an important part of the discussion of usage problems by Weiner, i.e. what he terms “sociolinguistic considerations”, is analysed in order to discover how – in a British context – social class plays a role in the way in which particular forms or constructions become usage problems, now as well as in the past.

Type: Chapter
Information: Standardising English
Norms and Margins in the History of the English Language
, pp. 193 - 212

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108120470.010 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Alford, H. (1864). The Queen's English. Stray Notes on Speaking and Spelling, London: A. Strahan.Google Scholar

Allen, R. E. (1999). Pocket Fowler's Modern English Usage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Amis, K. (1997). The King's English: A Guide to Modern Usage, London: Harper Collins Publishers.Google Scholar

Amis, K. (2011). The King's English: A Guide to Modern Usage, new edn, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Anon., (1856). Five Hundred Mistakes of Daily Occurrence in Speaking, Pronouncing, and Writing the English Language, Corrected, New York: Daniel Burgess and Co.Google Scholar

Anon., (1856?). Live and Learn: A Guide for All, Who Wish to Speak and Write Correctly, New York: Dick and Fitzgerald Publishers.Google Scholar

Ayto, J. (2002). Good English!, 2nd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, R. (1770). Reflections on the English Language, London: J. Bell.Google Scholar

Brown, G. (1851). The Grammar of English Grammars, New York: Samuel S. and William Wood.Google Scholar

Bryson, B. (1984). The Penguin Dictionary of Troublesome Words, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Burchfield, R. W. (1996). Fowler's Modern English Usage, 3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Burt, A. (2000). An A to Z of Correct English, Oxford: How to Books Ltd.Google Scholar

Butterfield, J. (2007). Oxford A-Z of English Usage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

CIA. (2012). Style Manual and Writers Guide. www.nationalsecuritylaw.org.Google Scholar

Cochrane, J. (2003). Between You and I: A Little Book of Bad English, Thriplow, Cambridge: Icon Books.Google Scholar

Crystal, D. (2000). Who Cares about English Usage? 2nd edn, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Fogarty, M. (2008). Grammar Girl's Quick and Dirty Tips for Better Writing, New York: St. Martin's Griffin.Google Scholar

Fowler, H. W. (1926). A Dictionary of Modern English Usage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Fowler, H. W. and Fowler, F. G. (1906). The King's English, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Garner, B. A. (1998). A Dictionary of Modern American Usage, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gowers, Sir E. (1948). Plain Words: A Guide to the Use of English, London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Gowers, Sir E. (1951). ABC of Plain Words, London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Gowers, Sir E. (1954). Complete Plain Words, London: HMSO.Google Scholar

Gowers, R. (2014). Plain Words: A Guide to the Use of English, new edn, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Gowers, R. (2016). Horrible Words: A Guide to the Misuse of English, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Greenbaum, S. and Whitcut, J. (1988). The Longman Guide to English Usage, Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar

Heffer, S. (2010). Strictly English: The Correct Way to Write…and Why it Matters, London: Random House.Google Scholar

Hurd, S. T. (1847). A Grammatical Corrector, or, Vocabulary of the Common Errors of Speech, Philadelphia: E. H. Butler and Co.Google Scholar

Krapp, G. P. (1927). A Comprehensive Guide to Good English, New York: Rand McNally.Google Scholar

Lamb, B. C. (2010). The Queen's English: And How to Use It, London: Michael O'Mara Books.Google Scholar

Lowth, R. (1762). A Short Introduction to English Grammar, London: A. Millar, and R. and J. Dodsley.Google Scholar

Masson, R. (1896). Use and Abuse of English, Edinburgh: James Thin.Google Scholar

O'Conner, P. (1996). Woe Is I, New York: Riverhead Books.Google Scholar

Parody, A. (2004). Eats, Shites and Leaves: Crap English and How to Use It, London: Michael O'Mara Books Ltd.Google Scholar

Partridge, E. (1942). Usage and Abusage: A Guide to Good English, New York: Harper and Bros.Google Scholar

Peters, P. (2004). The Cambridge Guide to English Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Pinker, S. (2014). The Sense of Style: The Thinking Person's Guide to Writing in the 21st Century, New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Priestley, J. (1768). The Rudiments of English Grammar, 2nd edn, London: T. Becket, P.A. de Hondt and J. Johnson.Google Scholar

Sayce, K. (2006). What Not to Write: A Guide to the Dos and Don'ts of Good English, London: Words at Work.Google Scholar

Strunk, W. and White, E. B. (1979). The Elements of Style, 3rd edn, New York: Collier Macmillian.Google Scholar

Swan, M. (1984). Basic English Usage, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Taggart, C. (2010). Her Ladyship's Guide to the Queen's English, London: National Trust.Google Scholar

Trask, R. L. (2001). Mind the Gaffe: The Penguin Guide to Common Errors in English, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Treble, H. A. and Vallins, G. H. (1936). An A.B.C. of English Usage. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Truss, L. (2003). Eats, Shoots and Leaves: The Zero Tolerance Approach to Punctuation, London: Profile Books Ltd.Google Scholar

Webster's Dictionary of English Usage. (1989). Springfield, MA: Merriam-Webster Publishers.Google Scholar

Weiner, E. (1983). The Oxford Guide to English Usage, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

White, R. G. (1870). Words and Their Uses, Past and Present, New York: Sheldon and Company.Google Scholar

Secondary Sources

Abbassiyannejad, M., Talif, R. and Heidari, M. (2012). A reflection of Ian McEwan's life in his fiction, English Language and Literature Studies, 2 (2), 56–61.CrossRef Google Scholar

Bailey, R.W. (1996). Nineteenth-Century English, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar

Benedictus, L. (2014). The CIA style guide goes online: Now you can learn to write like a spy. The Guardian Online, 9 July 2014. www.theguardian.com/world/shortcuts/2014/jul/09/cia-writers-guide-leaked-online.Google Scholar

Bennett, P. (1996). Bennett's wordfinder: A handy companion to the second edition of the world's most famous book on modern English usage. http://bridgingtheunbridgeable.files.wordpress.com/2014/07/bennettswordfinder.pdf.Google Scholar

Bodine, A. (1975). Androcentrism in prescriptive grammar: Singular ‘they’, sex-indefinite ‘he’, and ‘he or she’. Language in Society, 4, 129–146.Google Scholar

Burchfield, R. W. (1991). The Fowler brothers and the tradition of usage handbooks. In Leitner, G., ed., English Traditional Grammars: An International Perspective, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 93–111.Google Scholar

Busse, U. and Schröder, A. (2006). From prescriptivism to descriptivism? 140 years of English usage guides: Some old and new controversies. In Houswitschka, C., Knappe, G. and Müller, A., A., eds., Anglistentag 2005, Bamberg. Proceedings, Trier: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag, pp. 457–473.Google Scholar

Busse, U. and Schröder, A. (2009). Fowler's Modern English Usage at the interface of lexis and grammar in Römer, U. and Schulze, R., eds., Exploring the Lexis-Grammar Interface, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 69–87.Google Scholar

Butterfield, J. (2015). Fowler's Dictionary of Modern English Usage, 4th edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. (1995). Verbal Hygiene, London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Cameron, D. (2009). ‘The virtues of good prose’: Verbal hygiene and the Movement. In Leader, Z., ed., The Movement Reconsidered. Essays on Larkin, Amis, Gunn, Davie and their Contemporaries, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 139–154.Google Scholar

Cheshire, J. (1978). Present tense verbs in Reading English. In Trudgill, P., ed., Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English, London: Edward Arnold, pp. 52–68.Google Scholar

Dykema, K. W. (1947). An example of prescriptive linguistic change: ‘Don't’ to ‘doesn't’. The English Journal, 36, 370–376.CrossRef Google Scholar

Ebner, C. (2015). Language guardian BBC? Investigating the BBC's language advice in its 2003 News Styleguide. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 3, 308–320.Google Scholar

de France, T. (2010). What speakers’ gender, age, and native language reveal about their notions of English usage norms. Historical Sociolinguistics and Sociohistorical Linguistics, 10. www.let.leidenuniv.nl/hsl_shl.Google Scholar

Honey, J. (1983). The Language Trap: Race, Class, and the ‘Standard English’ Issue in British Schools. Kay Shuttleworth Papers on Education, 3. Kenton, Middlesex: National Council for Educational Standards.Google Scholar

HUGE. Hyper Usage Guide of English. www.huge.ullet.net.Google Scholar

Hughes, A. and Trudgill, P. (1979). English Accents and Dialects, London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar

Ilson, R. F. (1985). Usage problems in British and American English. In Greenbaum, S., ed., The English Language Today, Oxford: Pergamon Institute of English, pp. 166–182.Google Scholar

Kamm, O. (2015). Accidence Will Happen: The Non-Pedantic Guide to English Usage, London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar

Luscombe, A. (2012). Sending the Right Message: Forty Years of BBC Radio News, PhD thesis, University of Utrecht.Google Scholar

Mair, C. (2006). Twentieth-Century English, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

McEwan, I. (2001). Mother Tongue. www.ianmcewan.com/bib/articles/mother-tongue.html.Google Scholar

McNay, M. (2004). Neither pedantic nor wild…, The Guardian Style Guide. http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2004/07/15/styleguidepdfjuly2004.pdf.Google Scholar

Mesthrie, R., Swann, J., Deumert, A. and Leap, W. L. (2009). Introducing Sociolinguistics, 2nd edn, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar

Milroy, L. (1987). Language and Social Networks, 2nd edn, repr. 1989, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Milroy, L. (2001). Britain and the United States: Two nations divided by the same language (and different language ideologies). Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 10 (1), 56–89.Google Scholar

Milroy, J. and Milroy, L. [1985] (2012). Authority in Language: Investigating Standard English, 4th edn, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.CrossRef Google Scholar

Mittins, W. H., Salu, M., Edminson, M. and Coyne, S. (1970). Attitudes to English Usage, repr. 1975, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Nevalainen, T. and Raumolin-Brunberg, H. (2003). Historical Sociolinguistics, London: Longman.Google Scholar

OED: Oxford English Dictionary Online. www.oed.com.Google Scholar

Peters, P. (2006). English usage: Prescription and description. In Aarts, B. and McMahon, A., eds., Handbook of English Linguistics, Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 759–780.Google Scholar

Phillipps, K. C. (1984). Language and Class in Victorian England, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Pullum, G. K. (2018). The usage game: Catering to perverts. In van Ostade, I. Tieken-Boon, ed., English Usage Guides: History, Advice, Attitudes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 177–196.Google Scholar

Reid, I. (1989). Social Class Differences in Britain, 3rd edn, Glasgow: Fontana Press.Google Scholar

Ritchie, H. (2013). English for the Natives, London: John Murray.Google Scholar

Scott, A. (2009). Ernest Gowers Plain Words and Forgotten Deeds, Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar

Straaijer, R. (2011). Joseph Priestley, Grammarian: Late Modern English Normativism and Usage in a Sociohistorical Context, Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar

Straaijer, R. (2014). Hyper Usage Guide of English. http://huge.ullet.net.Google Scholar

Straaijer, R. (2018). The usage guide: Evolution of a genre. In Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I., ed., English Usage Guides: History, Advice, Attitudes, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 11–29.Google Scholar

Sundby, B., Bjørge, A. K. and Haugland, K. E. (1991). A Dictionary of English Normative Grammar 1700–1800, Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (1982). Double negation and eighteenth-century English grammars. Neophilologus, 66, 278–285.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2005). Bad English and the grammarians. Finn-Brits Magazine (Autumn), 8–14.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2011). The Bishop's Grammar: Robert Lowth and the Rise of Prescriptivism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2012). Codifying the English Language. In Schröder, A., Busse, U. and Schneider, R., eds., Codification, Canons, and Curricula: Description and Prescription in Language and Literature, Bielefeld: Aisthesis Verlag, pp. 61–77.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2013). Studying attitudes to English usage. English Today, 29 (4), 3–12.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2015). Five Hundred Mistakes Corrected: An early American English usage guide. In Dossena, M., ed., Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 55–71.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2018). The King's English by Kingsley Amis: A publisher's project. In Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I., ed., English Usage Guides: History, Advice, Attitudes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 51–68.Google Scholar

Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. and Kostadinova, V. (2015). Have went – an American usage problem. English Language and Linguistics, 19 (2), 293–312.Google Scholar

Trudgill, P. (1974). Sociolinguistics: An Introduction, London: Penguin.Google Scholar

Vorlat, E. (2001). Lexical rules in Robert Baker's ‘Reflections on the English Language’. Leuvense Bijdragen, 90 (4), 391–401.Google Scholar

Weiner, E. (1988). On editing a usage guide. In Stanley, E. G. and Hoad, T. F., eds., Words: For Robert Burchfield's Sixty-Fifth Birthday, Cambridge: D. S. Brewer, pp. 171–183.Google Scholar