Skip to main content
×
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: June 2014

Chapter 46 - Predicting activities after stroke

from Section 7 - Disease-specific neurorehabilitation systems
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511995590
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511995590
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *
×

References

1. WHO. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), 2001.
2. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011; 377: 1693–702.
3. Wang D, Bakhai A. Clinical Trials. A Practical Guide to Design, Analysis, and Reporting. London: Remedica, 2006.
4. Katz MH. Multivariate Analysis. A Practical Guide for Clinicians. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
5. Altman D. Systematic reviews of evaluations of prognostic variables. BMJ 2001; 323: 224–8.
6. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Muller KE, et al. Applied Regression Analysis and other Multivariable Methods. 3rd edn. Pacific Grove: Duxbury Press, 1998.
7. Miller E, Murray L, Richards L, et al. Comprehensive overview of nursing and interdisciplinary rehabilitation care of the stroke patient: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Stroke 2010; 41: 2402–48.
8. Hachinski V, Donnan G, Gorelick P, et al. Stroke: working toward a prioritized world agenda. Stroke 2010; 41: 1084–99.
9. Cramer SC. Stratifying patients with stroke in trials that target brain repair. Stroke 2010; 41: S114–16.
10. Moons K, Royston P, Vergouwe Y, et al. Prognosis and prognostic research: what, why, and how? BMJ 2010; 338: 1317–20.
11. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke 2004; 35: 2529–39.
12. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil 2004; 18: 833–62.
13. Young F, Lees K, Weir C. Improving trial power through use of prognosis-adjusted end points. Stroke 2005; 3: 597–601.
14. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek J, van Wegen E, et al. Predictive value of the NIHSS for ADL outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke: does timing of early assessment matter? J Neurol Sci 2010; 294: 57–61.
15. Nijland RH, van Wegen EE, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, et al. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery. Stroke 2010; 41: 745–50.
16. Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, et al. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 64–71.
17. Jørgenson H, Nakayama H, Raaschou H, et al. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 27–32.
18. Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Longitudinal robustness of variables predicting independent gait following severe middle cerebral artery stroke: a prospective cohort study. Clin Rehabil 2006; 20: 262–8.
19. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181–6.
20. Nakayama H, Jørgensen HS, Raaschou HO, et al. Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen stroke study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 394–8.
21. Wade D, Hewer R. Functional abilities after stroke measurement, natural history and prognosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 177–82.
22. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar R, Kollen B, et al. Predicting disability in stroke–a critical review of the literature. Age Ageing 1996; 25: 479–89.
23. Counsell C, Dennis M. Systematic review of prognostic models in patients with acute stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis 2001; 12: 159–70.
24. Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, et al. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke 2011; 42: 1482–8.
25. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191–4.
26. Hayden J, Côté P, Bombardier C. Evaluation of the quality of prognosis studies in systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med 2004; 144: 427–37.
27. Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y, et al. Prognosis and prognostic research: application and impact of prognostic models in clinical practice. BMJ 2009; 4: 606.
28. Von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, et al. The strengthening of reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE): guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet 2008; 370: 1453–7.
29. Meijer R, van Limbeek J, Kriek B, et al.. Prognostic social factors in the subacute phase after a stroke for the discharge destination from the hospital stroke-unit. A systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 191–7.
30. Rothman KJ, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology. 2nd edn. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 1998.
31. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Twisk J. Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke. Stroke 2006; 37: 2348–53.
32. Van de Port IG, Kwakkel G, van Wijk I, et al. Susceptibility to deterioration of mobility long-term after stroke: a prospective cohort study. Stroke 2006; 37: 167–71.
33. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Lindeman E. Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 281–99.
34. Koyama T, Matsumoto K, Okuno T, et al. A new method for predicting functional recovery of stroke patients with hemiplegia: logarithmic modelling. Clin Rehabil 2005; 19: 779–89.
35. Zarahn E, Alon L, Ryan SL, et al. Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke. Cereb Cortex 2011; 21: 2712–21.
36. Andrews K, Brocklehurst JC, Richards B, et al. The rate of recovery from stroke–and its measurement. Int Rehabil Med 1981; 3: 155–61.
37. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, et al. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke 1992; 23: 1084–9.
38. Heller A, Wade DT, Wood VA, et al. Arm function after stroke: measurement and recovery over the first three months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1987; 50: 714–19.
39. Skilbeck C, Wade D, Hewer R, et al. Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 5–8.
40. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Horner RD, et al. Similar motor recovery of upper and lower extremities after stroke. Stroke 1994; 25: 1181–8.
41. Gresham GE. Stroke outcome research. Stroke 1986; 17: 358–62.
42. Newman M. The process of recovery after hemiplegia. Stroke 1972; 3: 702–10.
43. van Hartingsveld F, Lucas C, Kwakkel G, et al. Improved interpretation of stroke trial results using empirical Barthel item weights. Stroke 2006; 37: 162–6.
44. Granger CV, Linn RT. Biologic patterns of disability. J Outcome Meas 2000; 4: 595–615.
45. Tennant A, Geddes JM, Fear J, et al. Outcome following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1997; 19: 278–84.
46. Dallmeijer AJ, Dekker J, Roorda LD, et al. Differential item functioning of the Functional Independence Measure in higher performing neurological patients. J Rehabil Med 2005; 37: 346–52.
47. Nilsson AL, Sunnerhagen KS, Grimby G. Scoring alternatives for FIM in neurological disorders applying Rasch analysis. Acta Neurol Scand 2005; 111: 264–73.
48. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min Lai S, et al. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003; 84: 950–63.
49. Heinemann AW, Harvey RL, McGuire JR, et al. Measurement properties of the NIH stroke scale during acute rehabilitation. Stroke 1997; 28: 1174–80.
50. Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, et al. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke 2001; 32: 1627–34.
51. Koh CL, Hsueh IP, Wang WC, et al. Validation of the action research arm test using item response theory in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2006; 38: 375–80.
52. Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients. Sci Wld J 2007; 20: 2031–45.
53. Smith MT, Baer GD. Achievement of simple mobility milestones after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1999; 80: 442–7.
54. Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ 2000; 320: 1385–8.
55. Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 861–72.
56. Dobkin BH. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med 2005; 352: 1677–84.
57. Duncan P, Jørgensen H, Wade M. Outcome measures in acute stroke trials. A systematic review and some recommendations to improve practice. Stroke 2000; 31: 1429–38.
58. Kollen B, Van de Port I, Lindeman E, et al. Predicting improvement in gait after stroke: a longitudinal prospective study. Stroke 2005; 36: 2676–80.
59. Ween JE, Mernoff ST, Alexander MP. Recovery rates after stroke and their impact on outcome prediction. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14: 229–35.
60. Goldstein H, Browne W, Rasbash J. Multilevel modeling of medical data. Stat Med 2002; 21: 3291–315.
61. Tilling K, Sterne J, Rudd A, et al. A new method for predicting recovery after stroke. Stroke 2001; 32: 2867–73.
62. Twisk JWR. Applied Multilevel Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
63. Ng YS, Stein J, Ning M, et al. Comparison of clinical characteristics and functional outcomes of ischemic stroke in different vascular territories. Stroke 2007; 38: 2309–14.
64. Löfgren B, Gustafson Y, Nyberg L. Psychological well-being 3 years after severe stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 567–72.
65. Paolucci S, Grasso MG, Antonucci G, et al. Mobility status after inpatient stroke rehabilitation: 1-year follow-up and prognostic factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 2–8.
66. Pohjasvaara T, Leppävuori A, Siira I, et al. Frequency and clinical determinants of poststroke depression. Stroke 1998; 29: 2311–17.
67. Kwakkel G, Kollen B, Wagenaar R. Long term effects of intensity of arm and leg training in stroke patients: a randomized trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 473–9.
68. Kwakkel G, Veerbeek JM, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of the Barthel Index for measuring activities of daily living outcome after ischemic hemispheric stroke: does early poststroke timing of assessment matter? Stroke 2011; 42: 342–6.
69. Schiemanck SK, Kwakkel G, Post MW, et al. Predicting long-term independency in activities of daily living after middle cerebral artery stroke: does information from MRI have added predictive value compared with clinical information? Stroke 2006; 37: 1050–4.
70. Schiemanck SK, Kwakkel G, Post MW, et al. Predictive value of ischemic lesion volume assessed with magnetic resonance imaging for neurological deficits and functional outcome poststroke: a critical review of the literature. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2006; 20: 492–502.
71. Adams HJ, del Zoppo G, Alberts M, et al. Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke. Circulation 2007; 115: 478–534.
72. Kasner S. Clinical interpretation and use of stroke scales. Lancet Neurol 2006; 5: 603–12.
73. Jongbloed L. Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review. Stroke 1986; 17: 765–76.
74. Lord SE, Rochester L. Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: current status and future developments. Stroke 2005; 36: 1457–61.
75. Barer DH. Continence after stroke: useful predictor or goal of therapy? Age Aging 1989; 183: 183–91.
76. Sanchez-Blanco I, Ochoa-Sangrador C, Lopez-Munain I, et al. Predictive model of functional independence in stroke patients admitted to a rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil 1999; 13: 464–75.
77. Patel A, Duncan P, Lai S, et al. The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 1357–63.
78. Franchignoni F, Tesio L, Ricupero C, et al. Trunk control test as an early predictor of stroke rehabilitation outcome. Stroke 1997; 28: 1382–5.
79. Loewen S, Anderson B. Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke 1990; 21: 78–81.
80. Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, et al. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 173–9.
81. Buurke J, Nene A, Kwakkel G, et al. Recovery of gait after stroke: what changes? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 676–83.
82. De Haart M, Geurts A, Huidekoper S, et al. Recovery of standing balance in postacute stroke patients: a rehabilitation cohort study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004; 85: 886–95.
83. Den Otter AR, Geurts AC, Mulder T, et al. Gait recovery is not associated with changes in the temporal patterning of muscle activity during treadmill walking in patients with post-stroke hemiparesis. Clin Neurophysiol 2006; 117: 4–15.
84. van Asseldonk EHF, Buurke JH, Bloem BR, et al. Disentangling the contribution of the paretic and non-paretic leg to balance control in stroke patients. Exp Neurol 2006; 201: 441–51.
85. Kirker SG, Jenner JR, Simpson DS, et al. Changing patterns of postural hip muscle activity during recovery from stroke. Clin Rehabil 2000; 14: 618–26.
86. Roerdink M, De Haart M, Daffertshofer A, et al. Dynamical structure of center-of-pressure trajectories in patients recovering from stroke. Exp Brain Res 2006; 174: 256–69.
87. Kollen BJ, Lennon S, Lyons B, et al. The effectiveness of the Bobath concept in stroke rehabilitation: what is the evidence? Stroke 2009; 40: e89–97.
88. Sunderland A, Fletcher D, Bradley L, et al. Enhanced physical therapy for arm function after stroke: a one year follow up study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 856–8.
89. Wade DT, Langton-Hewer R, Wood VA, et al. The hemiplegic arm after stroke: measurement and recovery. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 521–4.
90. Beebe JA, Lang CE. Relationships and responsiveness of six upper extremity function tests during the first six months of recovery after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2009; 33: 96–103.
91. Katrak P, Bowring G, Conroy P, et al. Predicting upper limb recovery after stroke: the place of early shoulder and hand movement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 758–61.
92. Smania N, Gambarin M, Tinazzi M, et al. Are indexes of arm recovery related to daily life autonomy in patients with stroke? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2009; 45: 349–54.
93. Smania N, Paolucci S, Tinazzi M, et al. Active finger extension: a simple movement predicting recovery of arm function in patients with acute stroke. Stroke 2007; 38: 1088–90.
94. Matsui T, Hirano A. An Atlas of the Human Brain for Computerized Tomography. Tokyo: Igaku-Shoin, 1978.
95. Pineiro R, Pendlebury ST, Smith S, et al. Relating MRI changes to motor deficit after ischemic stroke by segmentation of functional motor pathways. Stroke 2000; 31: 672–9.
96. Stinear C. Prediction of recovery of motor function after stroke. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 1228–32.
97. Fries W, Danek A, Scheidtmann K, et al. Motor recovery following capsular stroke. Role of descending pathways from multiple motor areas. Brain 1993; 116: 369–82.
98. Morecraft RJ, Herrick JL, Stilwell-Morecraft KS, et al. Localization of arm representation in the corona radiata and internal capsule in the non-human primate. Brain 2002; 125: 176–98.
99. Newton JM, Ward NS, Parker GJ, et al. Non-invasive mapping of corticofugal fibres from multiple motor areas–relevance to stroke recovery. Brain 2006; 129: 1844–58.
100. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, et al. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain 2007; 130: 170–80.
101. van Kuijk AA, Pasman JW, Hendricks HT, et al. Predicting hand motor recovery in severe stroke: the role of motor evoked potentials in relation to early clinical assessment. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2009; 23: 45–51.
102. Pendlebury ST, Blamire AM, Lee MA, et al. Axonal injury in the internal capsule correlates with motor impairment after stroke. Stroke 1999; 30: 956–62.
103. Schiemanck SK, Kwakkel G, Post MW, et al. Impact of internal capsule lesions on outcome of motor hand function at one year post-stroke. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 96–101.
104. Fritz SL, Light KE, Patterson TS, et al. Active finger extension predicts outcomes after constraint-induced movement therapy for individuals with hemiparesis after stroke. Stroke 2005; 36: 1172–7.
105. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, et al. Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2006; 296: 2095–104.