Skip to main content
  • Print publication year: 2014
  • Online publication date: May 2014

Chapter 12 - The role of extracellular matrix in plasticity in the spinal cord

from Section 3 - Plasticity after injury to the central nervous system
Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

Textbook of Neural Repair and Rehabilitation
  • Online ISBN: 9780511995583
  • Book DOI:
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to *


1. RossignolS, SchwabM, SchwartzM, et al. Spinal cord injury: time to move? J Neurosci 2007; 27: 11782–92.
2. HulseboschCE. Recent advances in pathophysiology and treatment of spinal cord injury. Adv Physiol Educ 2002; 26: 238–55.
3. FawcettJW, CurtA, SteevesJD, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord 2007; 45: 190–205.
4. SteevesJD, KramerJK, FawcettJW, et al. Extent of spontaneous motor recovery after traumatic cervical sensorimotor complete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord 2011; 49: 257–65.
5. SadowskyCL, McDonaldJW. Activity-based restorative therapies: concepts and applications in spinal cord injury-related neurorehabilitation. Dev Disabil Res Rev 2009; 15: 112–16.
6. BarbeauH, NormanK, FungJ, et al. Does neurorehabilitation play a role in the recovery of walking in neurological populations? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 860: 377–92.
7. Garcia-AliasG, BarkhuysenS, BuckleM, et al. Chondroitinase ABC treatment opens a window of opportunity for task-specific rehabilitation. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 1145–51.
8. MatthewsRT, KellyGM, ZerilloCA, et al. Aggrecan glycoforms contribute to the molecular heterogeneity of perineuronal nets. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 7536–47.
9. GaltreyCM, FawcettJW. The role of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in regeneration and plasticity in the central nervous system. Brain Res Rev 2007; 54: 1–18.
10. HenschTK. Critical period regulation. Annu Rev Neurosci 2004; 27: 549–79.
11. DeepaSS, CarulliD, GaltreyC, et al. Composition of perineuronal net extracellular matrix in rat brain: a different disaccharide composition for the net-associated proteoglycans. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 17789–800.
12. KwokJC, AfshariF, García-AlíasG, et al. Proteoglycans in the central nervous system: plasticity, regeneration and their stimulation with chondroitinase ABC. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2008; 26: 131–45.
13. AsherRA, MorgensternDA, FidlerPS, et al. Neurocan is up-regulated in injured brain and in cytokine-treated astrocytes. J Neurosci 2000; 20: 2427–38.
14. AsherRA, ScheibeRJ, KeiserHD, et al. On the existence of a cartilage-like proteoglycan and link proteins in the central nervous system. Glia 1995; 13: 294–308.
15. EngelM, MaurelP, MargolisRU, et al. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in the developing central nervous system. I. Cellular sites of synthesis of neurocan and phosphacan. J Comp Neurol 1996; 366: 34–43.
16. SeidenbecherCI, GundelfingerED, BöckersTM, et al. Transcripts for secreted and GPI-anchored brevican are differentially distributed in rat brain. Eur J Neurosci 1998; 10: 1621–30.
17. YamadaH, FredetteB, ShitaraK, et al. The brain chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan brevican associates with astrocytes ensheathing cerebellar glomeruli and inhibits neurite outgrowth from granule neurons. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 7784–95.
18. YamadaH, WatanabeK, ShimonakaM, et al. Molecular cloning of brevican, a novel brain proteoglycan of the aggrecan/versican family. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 10119–26.
19. MaurelP, RauchU, FladM, et al. Phosphacan, a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan of brain that interacts with neurons and neural cell-adhesion molecules, is an extracellular variant of a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase. PNAS 1994; 91: 2512–16.
20. TangX, DaviesJE, DaviesSJ. Changes in distribution, cell associations, and protein expression levels of NG2, neurocan, phosphacan, brevican, versican V2, and tenascin-C during acute to chronic maturation of spinal cord scar tissue. J Neurosci Res 2003; 71: 427–44.
21. JonesLL, YamaguchiY, StallcupWB, et al. NG2 is a major chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan produced after spinal cord injury and is expressed by macrophages and oligodendrocyte progenitors. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 2792–803.
22. StallcupWB, BeasleyL. Bipotential glial precursor cells of the optic nerve express the NG2 proteoglycan. J Neurosci 1987; 7: 2737–44.
23. CarulliD, PizzorussoT, KwokJC, et al. Animals lacking link protein have attenuated perineuronal nets and persistent plasticity. Brain 2010; 133: 2331–2347.
24. DityatevA, SchachnerM. Extracellular matrix molecules and synaptic plasticity. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4: 456–468.
25. BrakebuschC, SeidenbecherCI, AsztelyF, et al. Brevican-deficient mice display impaired hippocampal CA1 long-term potentiation but show no obvious deficits in learning and memory. Mol Cell Biol 2002; 22: 7417–27.
26. BukaloO, SchachnerM, DityatevA. Modification of extracellular matrix by enzymatic removal of chondroitin sulfate and by lack of tenascin-R differentially affects several forms of synaptic plasticity in the hippocampus. Neuroscience 2001; 104: 359–69.
27. ZhouXH, BrakebuschC, MatthiesH, et al. Neurocan is dispensable for brain development. Mol Cell Biol 2001; 21: 5970–8.
28. SaghatelyanAK, DityatevA, SchmidtS, et al. Reduced perisomatic inhibition, increased excitatory transmission, and impaired long-term potentiation in mice deficient for the extracellular matrix glycoprotein tenascin-R. Mol Cell Neurosci 2001; 17: 226–40.
29. NikonenkoA, SchmidtS, SkiboG, et al. Tenascin-R-deficient mice show structural alterations of symmetric perisomatic synapses in the CA1 region of the hippocampus. J Comp Neurol 2003; 456: 338–49.
30. MorelliniF, SivukhinaE, StoenicaL, et al. Improved reversal learning and working memory and enhanced reactivity to novelty in mice with enhanced GABAergic innervation in the dentate gyrus. Cereb Cortex 2010; 20: 2712–27.
31. PasterkampRJ, GigerRJ. Semaphorin function in neural plasticity and disease. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2009; 19: 263–74.
32. PasterkampRJ, VerhaagenJ. Semaphorins in axon regeneration: developmental guidance molecules gone wrong? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006; 361: 1499–511.
33. SchultzeW, EulenburgV, LessmannV, et al. Semaphorin 4F interacts with the synapse-associated protein P90/PSD-95. J Neurochem 2001; 783: 482–9.
34. InagakiS, OhokaY, SugimotoH, et al. Sema4c, a transmembrane semaphorin, interacts with a post-synaptic density protein, PSD-95. J Biol Chem 2001; 276: 9174–81.
35. KüryP, AbankwaD, KruseF, et al. Gene expression profiling reveals multiple novel intrinsic and extrinsic factors associated with axonal regeneration failure. Eur J Neurosci 2004; 19: 32–42.
36. Moreau-FauvarqueC, KumanogohA, CamandE, et al. The transmembrane semaphorin Sema4D/CD100, an inhibitor of axonal growth, is expressed on oligodendrocytes and up-regulated after CNS lesion. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 9229–39.
37. PasterkampRJ, KolkSM, HellemonsAJ, et al. Expression patterns of semaphorin7A and plexinC1 during rat neural development suggest roles in axon guidance and neuronal migration. BMC Dev Biol 2007; 7: 98.
38. ShiomiT, LemaîtreV, D’ArmientoJ, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases, a disintegrin and metalloproteinases, and a disintegrin and metalloproteinases with thrombospondin motifs in non-neoplastic diseases. Pathol Int 2010; 60: 477–96.
39. AgrawalSM, LauL, YongVW. MMPs in the central nervous system: where the good guys go bad. Semin Cell Dev Biol 2008; 19: 42–51.
40. AnthonyDC, FergusonB, MatyzakMK, et al. Differential matrix metalloproteinase expression in cases of multiple sclerosis and stroke. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 1997; 23: 406–15.
41. BussA, PechK, KakulasBA, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases and their inhibitors in human traumatic spinal cord injury. BMC Neurol 2007; 7: 17.
42. MeighanSE, MeighanPC, ChoudhuryP, et al. Effects of extracellular matrix-degrading proteases matrix metalloproteinases 3 and 9 on spatial learning and synaptic plasticity. J Neurochem 2006; 96: 1227–41.
43. NagyV, BozdagiO, MatyniaA, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 is required for hippocampal late-phase long-term potentiation and memory. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 1923–34.
44. SilverJ, MillerJH. Regeneration beyond the glial scar. Nat Rev Neurosci 2004; 5: 146–56.
45. PrestonE, WebsterJ, SmallD. Characteristics of sustained blood–brain barrier opening and tissue injury in a model for focal trauma in the rat. J Neurotrauma 2001; 18: 83–92.
46. FawcettJW, AsherRA. The glial scar and central nervous system repair. Brain Res Bull 1999; l49: 377–91.
47. RollsA, ShechterR, SchwartzM. The bright side of the glial scar in CNS repair. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009; 10: 235–41.
48. BushTG, PuvanachandraN, HornerCH, et al. Leukocyte infiltration, neuronal degeneration, and neurite outgrowth after ablation of scar-forming, reactive astrocytes in adult transgenic mice. Neuron 1999; 23: 297–308.
49. FaulknerJR, HerrmannJE, WooMJ, et al. Reactive astrocytes protect tissue and preserve function after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2004; 24: 2143–55.
50. HobohmC, GüntherA, GroscheJ, et al. Decomposition and long-lasting downregulation of extracellular matrix in perineuronal nets induced by focal cerebral ischemia in rats. J Neurosci Res 2005; 80: 539–48.
51. HarrisNG, MironovaYA, HovdaDA, et al. Pericontusion axon sprouting is spatially and temporally consistent with a growth-permissive environment after traumatic brain injury. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2010; 69: 139–54.
52. MasseyJM, HubscherCH, WagonerMR, et al. Chondroitinase ABC digestion of the perineuronal net promotes functional collateral sprouting in the cuneate nucleus after cervical spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 4406–14.
53. ApostolovaI, IrintchevA, SchachnerM. Tenascin-R restricts posttraumatic remodeling of motoneuron innervation and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in adult mice. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 7849–59.
54. DouCL, LevineJM. Inhibition of neurite growth by the NG2 chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan. J Neurosci 1994; 14: 7616–28.
55. FriedlanderDR, MilevP, KarthikeyanL, et al. The neuronal chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan neurocan binds to the neural cell adhesion molecules Ng-CAM/L1/NILE and N-CAM, and inhibits neuronal adhesion and neurite outgrowth. J Cell Biol 1994; 125: 669–80.
56. Smith-ThomasL, Fok-SeangJ, StevensJ, et al. An inhibitor of neurite outgrowth produced by astrocytes. J Cell Sci 1994; 107:1687–95.
57. SnowDM, LemmonV, CarrinoDA, et al. Sulfated proteoglycans in astroglial barriers inhibit neurite outgrowth in vitro. Exp Neurol 1990; 109: 111–30.
58. Smith-ThomasLC, StevensJ, Fok-SeangJ, et al. Increased axon regeneration in astrocytes grown in the presence of proteoglycan synthesis inhibitors. J Cell Sci 1995; 108: 1307–15.
59. LaabsTL, WangH, KatagiriY, et al. Inhibiting glycosaminoglycan chain polymerization decreases the inhibitory activity of astrocyte-derived chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 14494–501.
60. SnowDM, AtkinsonPB, HassingerTD, et al. Chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan elevates cytoplasmic calcium in DRG neurons. Dev Biol 1994; 166: 87–100.
61. BorisoffJF, ChanCC, HiebertGW, et al. Suppression of Rho-kinase activity promotes axonal growth on inhibitory CNS substrates. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003; 22: 405–16.
62. DerghamP, EllezamB, EssagianC, et al. Rho signaling pathway targeted to promote spinal cord repair. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 6570–7.
63. MonnierPP, SierraA, SchwabJM, et al. The Rho/ROCK pathway mediates neurite growth-inhibitory activity associated with the chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans of the CNS glial scar. Mol Cell Neurosci 2003; 22: 319–30.
64. SivasankaranR, PeiJ, WangKC, et al. PKC mediates inhibitory effects of myelin and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans on axonal regeneration. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 261–8.
65. KoprivicaV, ChoKS, ParkJB, et al. EGFR activation mediates inhibition of axon regeneration by myelin and chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans. Science 2005; 310: 106–10.
66. ZhouFQ, WalzerM, WuYH, et al. Neurotrophins support regenerative axon assembly over CSPGs by an ECM-integrin-independent mechanism. J Cell Sci 2006; 119: 2787–96.
67. ShenY, TenneyAP, BuschSA, et al. PTPsigma is a receptor for chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan, an inhibitor of neural regeneration. Science 2009; 326: 592–6.
68. WellsJE, RiceTK, NuttallRK, et al. An adverse role for matrix metalloproteinase-12 after spinal cord injury in mice. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 10107–15.
69. HsuJY, BourguignonLY, AdamsCM, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-9 facilitates glial scar formation in the injured spinal cord. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 13467–77.
70. NobleLJ, DonovanF, IgarashiT, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases limit functional recovery after spinal cord injury by modulation of early vascular events. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 7526–35.
71. HsuJY, McKeonR, GoussevS, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-2 facilitates wound healing events that promote functional recovery after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 9841–50.
72. TateCC, TateMC, LaPlacaMC. Fibronectin and laminin increase in the mouse brain after controlled cortical impact injury. J Neurotrauma 2007; 24: 226–30.
73. HausmannR, BetzP. The time course of the vascular response to human brain injury–an immunohistochemical study. Int J Legal Med 2000; 113: 288–92.
74. HermannsS, KlapkaN, GasisM, et al. The collagenous wound healing scar in the injured central nervous system inhibits axonal regeneration. Adv Exp Med Biol 2006; 557: 177–90.
75. DavisGE, SengerDR. Endothelial extracellular matrix: biosynthesis, remodeling, and functions during vascular morphogenesis and neovessel stabilization. Circ Res 2005; 97: 1093–107.
76. De WinterF, OudegaM, LankhorstAJ, et al. Injury-induced class 3 semaphorin expression in the rat spinal cord. Exp Neurol 2002; 175: 61–75.
77. WeidnerN, GrillRJ, TuszynskiMH. Elimination of basal lamina and the collagen “scar” after spinal cord injury fails to augment corticospinal tract regeneration. Exp Neurol 1999; 160: 40–50.
78. LiHP, HommaA, SangoK, et al. Regeneration of nigrostriatal dopaminergic axons by degradation of chondroitin sulfate is accompanied by elimination of the fibrotic scar and glia limitans in the lesion site. J Neurosci Res 2007; 85: 536–547.
79. JoesterA, FaissnerA. The structure and function of tenascins in the nervous system. Matrix Biol 2001; 20: 13–22.
80. CelioMR, SpreaficoR, De BiasiS, et al. Perineuronal nets: past and present. Trends Neurosci 1998; 21: 510–15.
81. AndrewsMR, CzvitkovichS, DassieE, et al. Alpha9 integrin promotes neurite outgrowth on tenascin-C and enhances sensory axon regeneration. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 5546–57.
82. ChristophersonKS, UllianEM, StokesCC, et al. Thrombospondins are astrocyte-secreted proteins that promote CNS synaptogenesis. Cell 2005; 120: 421–33.
83. LiauwJ, HoangS, ChoiM, et al. Thrombospondins 1 and 2 are necessary for synaptic plasticity and functional recovery after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008; 28: 1722–32.
84. CalancieB, LuttonS, BrotonJG. Central nervous system plasticity after spinal cord injury in man: interlimb reflexes and the influence of cutaneous stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996; 101: 304–15.
85. CalancieB, MolanoMR, BrotonJG. Interlimb reflexes and synaptic plasticity become evident months after human spinal cord injury. Brain 2002; 125: 1150–61.
86. DitunnoJF Jr, CohenME, HauckWW, et al. Recovery of upper-extremity strength in complete and incomplete tetraplegia: a multicenter study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 389–93.
87. WeidnerN, NerA, SalimiN, et al. Spontaneous corticospinal axonal plasticity and functional recovery after adult central nervous system injury. PNAS 2001; 98: 3513–8.
88. BareyreFM, KerschensteinerM, RaineteauO, et al. The injured spinal cord spontaneously forms a new intraspinal circuit in adult rats. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 269–77.
89. BallermannM, FouadK. Spontaneous locomotor recovery in spinal cord injured rats is accompanied by anatomical plasticity of reticulospinal fibers. Eur J Neurosci 2006; 23: 1988–96.
90. FouadK, PedersenV, SchwabME, et al. Cervical sprouting of corticospinal fibers after thoracic spinal cord injury accompanies shifts in evoked motor responses. Curr Biol 2001; 11: 1766–70.
91. GhoshA, HaissF, SydekumE, et al. Rewiring of hindlimb corticospinal neurons after spinal cord injury. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 97–104.
92. GhoshA, SydekumE, HaissF, et al. Functional and anatomical reorganization of the sensory-motor cortex after incomplete spinal cord injury in adult rats. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 12210–9.
93. RosenzweigES, CourtineG, JindrichDL, et al. Extensive spontaneous plasticity of corticospinal projections after primate spinal cord injury. Nat Neurosci 2010; 13: 1505–10.
94. McKeonRJ, HökeA, SilverJ. Injury-induced proteoglycans inhibit the potential for laminin-mediated axon growth on astrocytic scars. Exp Neurol 1995; 136: 32–43.
95. AsherRA, MorgensternDA, ShearerMC, et al. Versican is up-regulated in CNS injury and is a product of oligodendrocyte lineage cells. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 2225–36.
96. BradburyEJ, MoonLD, PopatRJ, et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes functional recovery after spinal cord injury. Nature 2002; 416: 636–40.
97. YickLW, CheungPT, SoKF, et al. Axonal regeneration of Clarke’s neurons beyond the spinal cord injury scar after treatment with chondroitinase ABC. Exp Neurol 2003; 182: 160–8.
98. ShieldsLB, ZhangYP, BurkeDA, et al. Benefit of chondroitinase ABC on sensory axon regeneration in a laceration model of spinal cord injury in the rat. Surg Neurol 2008; 69: 568–77.
99. CaggianoAO, ZimberMP, GangulyA, et al. Chondroitinase ABCI improves locomotion and bladder function following contusion injury of the rat spinal cord. J Neurotrauma 2005; 22: 226–39.
100. TesterNJ, HowlandDR. Chondroitinase ABC improves basic and skilled locomotion in spinal cord injured cats. Exp Neurol 2008; 209: 483–96.
101. JeffersonSC, TesterNJ, HowlandDR. Chondroitinase ABC promotes recovery of adaptive limb movements and enhances axonal growth caudal to a spinal hemisection. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 5710–20.
102. BarrittAW, DaviesM, MarchandF, et al. Chondroitinase ABC promotes sprouting of intact and injured spinal systems after spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 10856–67.
103. Garcia-AliasG, LinR, AkrimiSF, et al. Therapeutic time window for the application of chondroitinase ABC after spinal cord injury. Exp Neurol 2008; 210: 331–8.
104. CaffertyWB, BradburyEJ, LidierthM, et al. Chondroitinase ABC-mediated plasticity of spinal sensory function. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 11998–2009.
105. GaltreyCM, AsherRA, NothiasF, et al. Promoting plasticity in the spinal cord with chondroitinase improves functional recovery after peripheral nerve repair. Brain 2007; 130: 926–39.
106. WieselTN, HubelDH. Comparison of the effects of unilateral and bilateral eye closure on cortical unit responses in kittens. J Neurophysiol 1965; 28: 1029–40.
107. FagioliniM, PizzorussoT, BerardiN, et al. Functional postnatal development of the rat primary visual cortex and the role of visual experience: dark rearing and monocular deprivation. Vision Res 1994; 34: 709–20.
108. PizzorussoT, MediniP, BerardiN, et al. Reactivation of ocular dominance plasticity in the adult visual cortex. Science 2002; 298: 1248–51.
109. PizzorussoT, MediniP, LandiS, et al. Structural and functional recovery from early monocular deprivation in adult rats. PNAS 2006; 103: 8517–22.
110. TropeaD, CaleoM, MaffeiL. Synergistic effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and chondroitinase ABC on retinal fiber sprouting after denervation of the superior colliculus in adult rats. J Neurosci 2003; 23: 7034–44.
111. GogollaN, CaroniP, LüthiA, et al. Perineuronal nets protect fear memories from erasure. Science 2009; 325: 1258–61.
112. CorvettiL, RossiF. Degradation of chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan induces sprouting of intact purkinje axons in the cerebellum of the adult rat. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 7150–8.
113. FrischknechtR, HeineM, PerraisD, et al. Brain extracellular matrix affects AMPA receptor lateral mobility and short-term synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 897–904.
114. LovelyRG, GregorRJ, RoyRR, et al. Effects of training on the recovery of full-weight-bearing stepping in the adult spinal cat. Exp Neurol 1986; 92: 421–35.
115. IchiyamaRM, CourtineG, GerasimenkoYP, et al. Step training reinforces specific spinal locomotor circuitry in adult spinal rats. J Neurosci 2008; 28: 7370–5.
116. GrillnerS, WallénP. Central pattern generators for locomotion, with special reference to vertebrates. Annu Rev Neurosci 1985; 8: 233–61.
117. BrownstoneRM, WilsonJM. Strategies for delineating spinal locomotor rhythm-generating networks and the possible role of Hb9 interneurones in rhythmogenesis. Brain Res Rev 2008; 57: 64–76.
118. LanderC, KindP, MaleskiM, et al. A family of activity-dependent neuronal cell-surface chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans in cat visual cortex. J Neurosci 1997; 17: 1928–39.
119. McRaePA, RoccoMM, KellyG, et al. Sensory deprivation alters aggrecan and perineuronal net expression in the mouse barrel cortex. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 5405–13.
120. KalbRG, HockfieldS. Molecular evidence for early activity-dependent development of hamster motor neurons. J Neurosci 1988; 8: 2350–60.
121. SaleA, Maya VetencourtJF, MediniP, et al. Environmental enrichment in adulthood promotes amblyopia recovery through a reduction of intracortical inhibition. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 679–81.
122. MiyataS, AkagiA, HayashiN, et al. Activity-dependent regulation of a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan 6B4 phosphacan/RPTPbeta in the hypothalamic supraoptic nucleus. Brain Res 2004; 1017: 163–71.
123. GirgisJ, MerrettD, KirklandS, et al. Reaching training in rats with spinal cord injury promotes plasticity and task specific recovery. Brain 2007; 130: 2993–3003.
124. de LeonRD, HodgsonJA, RoyRR, et al. Full weight-bearing hindlimb standing following stand training in the adult spinal cat. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 83–91.
125. de LeonRD, HodgsonJA, RoyRR, et al. Locomotor capacity attributable to step training versus spontaneous recovery after spinalization in adult cats. J Neurophysiol 1998; 79: 1329–40.
126. AllredRP, JonesTA. Maladaptive effects of learning with the less-affected forelimb after focal cortical infarcts in rats. Exp Neurol 2008; 210: 172–81.
127. WangD, IchiyamaRM, ZhaoR, et al. Chondroitinase combined with rehabilitation promotes recovery of forelimb function in rats with chronic spinal cord injury. J Neurosci 2011; 31: 9332–44.
128. KrajacicA, GhoshM, PuentesR, et al. Advantages of delaying the onset of rehabilitative reaching training in rats with incomplete spinal cord injury. Eur J Neurosci 2009; 29: 641–51.
129. Karimi-AbdolrezaeeS, EftekharpourE, et al. Synergistic effects of transplanted adult neural stem/progenitor cells, chondroitinase, and growth factors promote functional repair and plasticity of the chronically injured spinal cord. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 1657–76.
130. TomVJ, Sandrow-FeinbergHR, MillerK, et al. Combining peripheral nerve grafts and chondroitinase promotes functional axonal regeneration in the chronically injured spinal cord. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 14881–90.