Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 41
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
September 2009
Print publication year:
2005
Online ISBN:
9780511482175

Book description

Ovid's Heroides, a catalogue of letters by women who have been deserted, has too frequently been examined as merely a lament. In a new departure, this book portrays the women of the Heroides as a community of authors. Combining close readings of the texts and their mythological backgrounds with critical methods, the book argues that the points of similarity between the different letters of the Heroides, so often derided by modern critics, represent a brilliant exploitation of intratextuality, in which the Ovidian heroine self-consciously fashions herself as an alluding author influenced by what she has read within the Heroides. Far from being naive and impotent victims, therefore, the heroines are remarkably astute, if not always successful, at adapting textual strategies that they perceive as useful for attaining their own ends. With this new approach Professor Fulkerson shows that the Heroides articulate a fictional poetic, mirroring contemporary practices of poetic composition.

Reviews

Review of the hardback:' ... of interest to classicists and medievalists, as well as scholars with interests in gender studies. The strengths of this book are numerous: the argument is clearly stated and each chapter is tightly organized. Fulkerton's writing is lucid and vivd ... a wonderful organizational structure for encouraging students to draw connections between the various letters. '

Source: Bryn Mawr Classical Review

'The book is written in an agreeable style that is pleasant to read. … the author's arguments are expressed in vivid and clear rhetoric that will likely make the book enjoyable to laymen and scholars alike.'

Source: De novis libris iudicia

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

Bibliography
Bibliography
Adamietz, J. (1984) “Zu Ovids Dido-Brief,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 10: 121–34.
Allan, W. (2000) The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy. Oxford.
Altman, J. G. (1983) Epistolarity: Approaches to a Form. Columbus, Ohio.
Anderson, J. N. (1896) On the Sources of Ovid's Heroides I, III, VII, X, XII. Berlin.
Anderson, W. S. (1986) “The Theory and Practice of Poetic Arrangement from Vergil to Ovid,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. Fraistat, N.. Chapel Hill and London: 44–65.
Arena, A. (1995) “Ovidio e l'Ideologia Augustea,” Latomus 54: 822–41.
Austin, R. G. (1955) P. Vergili Maronis Aeneidos Liber Quartus. Oxford.
Baca, A. R. (1971) “Ovid's Epistle from Sappho to Phaon (Heroides 15),” Transactions of the American Philological Association 102: 29–38.
Barchiesi, A. (1992) P. Ovidii Nasonis Epistulae Heroidum 1–3. Florence.
Barchiesi, A. (1993a) “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.
Barchiesi, A. (1993b) “Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2, 1 e Ovidio, Tristia II,” Materiali e Discussioni 31: 149–84.
Barchiesi, A. (1994) Review of Friedrich Spoth, Ovids Heroides als Elegien, Atene e Roma 39: 111–12.
Barchiesi, A. (1995) Review of Cornelia Hintermeier, Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation, Journal of Roman Studies 85: 325–7.
Barchiesi, A. (1997a) The Poet and the Prince: Ovid and Augustan Discourse. Berkeley.
Barchiesi, A. (1997b) “Endgames: Ovid's Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton: 181–208.
Barreca, R. (1993) “Writing as Voodoo: Sorcery, Hysteria, and Art,” in Death and Representation, eds. Goodwin, S. W. and Bronfen, E.. Baltimore and London: 174–91.
Barreno, M. I., Horta, M. T., and Velho da Costa, M. (1975) The Three Marias: New Portuguese Letters, trans. Lane, H. R.. New York.
Barrett, W. S. (1964) Euripides: Hippolytus. Oxford.
Barsby, J. (1978) Ovid (Greece and Rome New Surveys in the Classics No. 12). Oxford.
Barthes, R. (1978) A Lover's Discourse: Fragments, trans. Howard, R.. New York.
Belfiore, E. (1980–1) “Ovid's Encomium of Helen,” Classical Journal 76: 136–48.
Bessone, F. (1997) P. Ovidii Nasonis: Heroidum Epistula XII: Medea Iasoni. Florence.
Bettini, M. (1992) Il Ritratto dell'amante. Turin.
Beye, C. R. (1969) “Jason as Love-hero in Apollonios' Argonautika,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10: 31–55.
Birt, T. (1877) “Animadversiones ad Ovidi heroidum epistulas,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 32: 386–432.
Birt, T. (1882) Das antike Buchwesen, repr. 1974. Berlin.
Bloom, H. (1973) The Anxiety of Influence: A Theory of Poetry. Oxford.
Bolton, M. C. (1997) “In Defence of Heroides 9,” Mnemosyne 50: 424–35.
Bömer, F. (1976, 1977, and 1980) P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar (Bücher vi–vii, viii–ix, and x–xi). Heidelberg.
Bond, G. W. (1963) Euripides: Hypsipyle. Oxford.
Bonner, S. F. (1949) Roman Declamation in the Late Republic and Early Empire. Liverpool.
Bopp, H. (1966) “Inscia capta puella: Akontius und Kydippe bei Kallimachos und bei Ovid.” Dissertation, Westfalia.
Boym, S. (1991) Death in Quotation Marks: Cultural Myths of the Modern Poet. Cambridge, Mass.
Bradley, E. M. (1969) “Ovid Heroides V: Reality and Illusion,” Classical Journal 64: 158–62.
Brescia, G. (1996) “Laodamia ‘ammaestra’ Protesilao (Ov. Her. 13): una lezione di viltà,” Aufidus 29: 27–70.
Bronfen, E. (1992) Over Her Dead Body: Death, Femininity and the Aesthetic. New York and London.
Brownlee, M. S. (1990). The Severed Word: Ovid's Heroides and the Novela Sentimental. Princeton.
Brownstein, R. M. (1982) Becoming a Heroine: Reading About Women in Novels. New York.
Burmann, P. (1727) Publii Ovidii Nasonis Opera Omnia, vol. i. Amsterdam.
Butler, J. (1990) Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York.
Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York.
Cantarella, R. (1964) Euripide: I Cretesi. Milan.
Carson, A. (1986) Eros the Bittersweet: An Essay. Princeton.
Casali, S. (1992) “Enone, Apollo pastore e l'amore immedicabile: giochi ovidiani su di un topos elegiaco,” Materiali e Discussioni 28: 85–100.
Casali, S. (1995a) Heroidum Epistula IX: Deianira Herculi. Florence.
Casali, S. (1995b) “Strategies of Tension (Ovid, Heroides 4),” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 41: 1–15.
Casali, S. (1995c) “Tragic Irony in Ovid, Heroides 9 and 11,” Classical Quarterly 45: 505–11.
Casali, S. (1997a) “The Cambridge Heroides,” Classical Journal 92: 305–14.
Casali, S. (1997b) “Quaerenti plura legendum: On the Necessity of ‘Reading More’ in Ovid's Exile Poetry,” Ramus 26.1: 80–112.
Casali, S. (1998a) “Ovidio e la preconoscenza della critica: qualche generalizzazione a partire da Heroides 14,” Philologus 142: 94–113.
Casali, S. (1998b) “Ovid's Canace and Euripides' Aeolus: Two Notes on Heroides 11,” Mnemosyne 51: 700–10.
Castle, T. (1982) Clarissa's Ciphers: Meaning and Disruption in Richardson's Clarissa. Ithaca and London.
Chelte, J. S. (1994) “Philomela's Tapestry: Empowering Voice through Text, Texture, and Silence.” Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Citroni, M. (1995) Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forma della communicazione letteraria. Rome and Bari.
Clare, R. J. (1995) “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: Allusion and Exemplarity,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 42: 60–88.
Clauss, J. J., and Johnston, S. I. (eds.) (1997) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art. Princeton.
Coffey, M. and Mayer, R. (1990) Seneca: Phaedra. Cambridge.
Comparetti, D. (1876) Sull'autenticità della epistola ovidiana di Saffo a Faone. Florence.
Conacher, D. J. (1967) Euripidean Drama: Myth, Theme and Structure. Toronto.
Connor, P. J. (1974) “His Dupes and Accomplices: A Study of Ovid the Illusionist in the Amores,” Ramus 3: 18–40.
Conte, G. B.(1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Vergil and Other Latin Poets, trans. Segal, C.. Ithaca and London.
Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius' Satyricon, trans. E. Fantham. (Sather Lectures vol. 60). Berkeley.
Courtney, E. (1965) “Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 12: 63–6.
Courtney, E. (1990) “Ovid and an Epigram of Philodemus,” Liverpool Classical Monthly117–18.
Courtney, E. (1993) The Fragmentary Latin Poets. Oxford.
Courtney, E. (1998) “Echtheitskritik: Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides Again,” Classical Journal 93: 157–66.
Croiset, M. (1965) Eschyle: Études sur l'Invention Dramatique dans son Théâtre. Paris.
Cucchiarelli, A. (1995) “Ma il giudice delle dee non era un pastore?: Reticenze e arte retorica di Paride (Ov. Her. 16),” Materiali e Discussioni 34: 135–52.
Culler, J. (1975) Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca.
Cunningham, M. P. (1949) “The Novelty of Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Philology 44: 100–6.
Curley, D. E. (1999) “Metatheater: Heroines and Ephebes in Ovid's Metamorphoses.” Dissertation, University of Washington.
Damsté, P. H. (1905) “Ad Ovidii Heroides,” Mnemosyne 33: 1–56.
Davis, P. J. (1995) “Rewriting Euripides: Ovid, Heroides 4,” Scholia 4: 41–55.
Dean, N. (1967) “Chaucer's Complaint, A Genre Descended from the Heroides,” Comp.Lit. 19: 1–27.
Jean, J. (1989) Fictions of Sappho, 1546–1937. Chicago.
D'Elia, S. (1959) Ovidio. Naples.
Della Corte, F. (1969) “Perfidus hospes,” in Hommages à Marcel Renard, ed. J. Bibauw. Brussels: Collection Latomus: 312–21 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 29–38).
Della Corte, F. (1970) “I Miti delle Heroides,” in Scripti in honorem Marii Untersteiner. Genoa: 157–69 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 39–51).
Desmond, M. (1993) “When Dido Reads Vergil: Gender and Intertextuality in Ovid's Heroides 7,” Helios 20: 56–68.
Vito, A. F. (1994) “The Essential Seriousness of Heroides 4,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 137: 312–30.
Vries, S. G. (1885) Epistula Sapphus ad Phaonem. Leiden.
Diggle, J. (1967) “Notes on the Text of Ovid, Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 17: 136–44.
Di Lorenzo, E., Carrano, A., and Viscido, D. (1992) Heroides Epistola XIII (Laodamia a Protesilao). Salerno.
Diotti, U. (1966) “Il ‘Teseo’ di Sofocle,” Dioniso 40: 43–62.
Dörrie, H. (1967) “Die dichterische Absicht Ovids in den Epistulae Heroidum,” Antike und Abendland 13: 41–55.
Dörrie, H. (1968) Der heroische Brief: Bestandaufnahme, Geschichte, Kritik einer humanistisch-barocken Literaturgattung. Berlin and New York.
Dörrie, H. (1972) Epistulae Heroidum. Berlin and New York.
Dörrie, H. (1975) P. Ovidius Naso: Der Brief der Sappho an Phaon (Zetemata 58). Munich.
Duchêne, R. (1998) “La Lettre: genre masculin et pratique féminine,” in L'Épistolaire, un genre féminin? ed. Planté, C.. Paris: 27–50.
Dyck, A. R. (1989) “On the Way from Colchis to Corinth: Medea in Book 4 of the ‘Argonautica’,” Hermes 117: 455–70.
Easterling, P. E. (1981) “The End of the Trachiniae,” Illinois Classical Studies 6: 56–74.
Eco, U. (1992) Interpretation and Overinterpretation. Cambridge.
Edmunds, L. (2001) Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore and London.
Eggerding, F. (1908) “De Heroidum Oviduanarum Epistulis Quae Vocantur Commentationes: Agitur Imprimis de Didone, Phaedra, Penelopa.” Dissertation, Frederick Halensis Academy.
Ehwald, R. (1900) “Exegetischer Kommentar zur XIV Heroide Ovids.” Programm des Herzoglichen Gymnasium Ernestinum zu Gotha. Gotha.
Eisner, R. (1977) “Ariadne in Art, Prehistory to 400 B.C.,” Rivista di Studi Classici 25: 165–81.
Eitrem, S. (1941) “La magie comme motif Littéraire chez les Grecs et les Romains,” Symbolae Osloenses 21: 39–83.
Fantham, R. E. (1996) Roman Literary Culture from Cicero to Apuleius. Baltimore and London.
Faraone, C. A., and Obbink, D. (eds.) (1991) Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion. New York and Oxford.
Faraone, C. A., and Obbink, D. (1999) Ancient Greek Love Magic. Cambridge, Mass.
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York and Oxford.
Farrell, J. (1998) “Reading and Writing the Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 307–38.
Feeney, D. C. (1992) “Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London: 1–25.
Fetterley, J. (1978) The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington, Ind.
Fischer, U. (1969). “Ignotum hoc aliis ille novavit opus: Beobachtungen zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Briefpaare her. 16 und 17 (Paris und Helena) und her. 20 und 21 (Acontius und Cydippe).” Dissertation, Augsburg.
Fish, J. (2004) “Physician, Heal Thyself: The Intertextuality of Ovid's Exile Poetry and the Remedia Amoris,” Latomus 63.4: 864–72.
Flaherty, S. M. (1994) “The Rhetoric of Female Self-Destruction: A Study in Homer, Euripides, and Ovid.” Dissertation, Yale University.
Flaubert, G. (1957) Madame Bovary: moeurs de province. Paris.
Foley, H. (2001) Female Acts in Greek Tragedy. Princeton.
Fränkel, H. (1945) Ovid: A Poet between Two Worlds (Sather Lectures vol. 18). Berkeley.
Frassinetti, P. (1974) “La Protesilaudamia di Levio,” in Poesia latina in frammenti: Miscellanea Filologica. Genoa: 315–26.
Frécaut, J.-M. (1972) L'Esprit et l'humour chez Ovide. Grenoble.
Fredrick, D. (1997) “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 172–96.
Fulkerson, L. (2002a) “(Un)Sympathetic Magic: A Study of Heroides 13,” American Journal of Philology 123: 61–87.
Fulkerson, L. (2002b) “Writing Yourself to Death: Strategies of (Mis)reading in Heroides 2,” Materiali e Discussioni 48: 145–65.
Fulkerson, L. (2003) “Chain(ed) Mail: Hypermestra and the Dual Readership of Heroides 14,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 133: 123–45.
Fulkerson, L. (2004) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Why the Remedia Fail,” Classical Quarterly 54: 211–23.
Fuss, D. (1989) Essentially Speaking: Feminism, Nature, and Difference. New York.
Fyler, J. M. (1971) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Incongruity and the Limitations of Structure in Ovid's Elegiac Poetry,” Classical Journal 66: 196–203.
Gager, J. G. (1992) Curse Tablets and Binding Spells from the Ancient World. Oxford.
Galinsky, G. K. (1972) The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Totowa, N.J.
Gamel, M. -K. (1998) “Reading as a Man: Performance and Gender in Roman Elegy,” Helios 25: 79–95.
Gibert, J. C. (1997) “Euripides' Hippolytus Plays: Which Came First?” Classical Quarterly 47: 85–97.
Gibson, B. (1999) “Ovid on Reading: Reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia II,” Journal of Roman Studies 89: 19–37.
Gilula, D. (1981) “A Consideration of Phaedra's EYKΛEIA,” Sileno 7: 121–33.
Giomini, R. (1993) “Ancora sulla struttura retorica nelle Heroides Ovidiane: l'Epistola di Fedra a Ippolito,” in Cultura e Lingue Classiche 3, ed. Biagio, A.. Rome.
Gold, B. K. (1993) “‘But Ariadne was Never There in the First Place’: Finding the Female in Roman Poetry,” in Feminist Theory and the Classics, eds. Rabinowitz, N. S. and Richlin, A.. New York and London: 75–101.
Goold, G. P. (1965) “Amatoria Critica,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 9: 1–108.
Goold, G. P. (1974) Review of Dörrie's text of the Heroides, Gnomon 46: 475–84.
Goold, G. P. (1977) Heroides and Amores. Cambridge, Mass.
Gordon, P. (1997) “The Lover's Voice in Heroides 15: Or, Why is Sappho a Man?” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 274–94.
Goud, T. E. and Yardley, J. C. (1988) “Dido's Burning Effigy: Aeneid 4.508,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 131: 386–8.
Grantz, F. H. (1955) “Studien zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides.” Dissertation, Kiel.
Grimal, P. (1963) “L'Originalité de Sénèque dans la Tragédie de Phèdre,” Revue des Études Latines 41: 297–314.
Guilleragues, G. J. (1972) Lettres Portugaises, ed. Deloffre, F. and Rougeot, J.. Geneva.
Habinek, T. N. (1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.
Hall, J. B. (1990) “Conjectures in Ovid's Heroides,” Illinois Classical Studies 15: 263–92.
Hall, J. B. (1999) “Ovid” (Review of Galasso and Casali). Classical Review 49: 390–2.
Hallett, J. P. (1989) “Woman as Same and Other in Classical Roman Elite,” Helios 16: 59–78.
Hardie, P. (2002) Ovid's Poetics of Illusion. Cambridge.
Harris, W. V. (1989) Ancient Literacy. Cambridge, Mass.
Harvey, E. D. (1989) “Ventriloquizing Sappho: Ovid, Donne, and the Erotics of the Feminine Voice,” Criticism 31: 115–38.
Heinze, T. (1993) “The Authenticity of Ovid Heroides 12 Reconsidered,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 94–8.
Heinze, T. (1997) P. Ovidius Naso: Der XII Heroidenbrief: Medea an Jason mit einer Beilage: Die Fragmente der Tragödie Medea: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Leiden.
Hemelrijk, E. (1999) Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.
Henderson, J. (1986) “Becoming a Heroine: Penelope's Ovid,” Liverpool Classical Monthly 11: 7–10, 114–19.
Henderson, J. (1991) “Wrapping up the Case: Reading Ovid, Amores 2,7 (+ 8): I,” Materiali e Discussioni 27: 37–88.
Herter, H. (1940) “Theseus und Hippolytus,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 89: 273–92.
Herter, H. (1971) “Phaidra in griechischer und römischer Gestalt,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 14: 44–77.
Hetzner, U. (1963) Andromeda und Tarpeia. Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie, vol. viii. Meisenheim.
Hexter, R. J. (1986) Ovid and Medieval Schooling: Studies in Medieval School Commentaries on Ovid's Ars amatoria, Epistulae ex Ponto, and Epistulae heroidum. Munich.
Hinds, S. (1987a) The Metamorphosis of Persephone: Ovid and the Self-Conscious Muse. Cambridge.
Hinds, S. (1987b) “Generalising about Ovid,” Ramus 16: 4–31.
Hinds, S. (1987c) “The Poetess and the Reader: Further Steps Toward Sulpicia,” Hermathena 143: 29–46.
Hinds, S. (1993) “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” Materiali e Discussioni 30: 9–47.
Hinds, S. (1998) Allusion and Intertext: Dynamics of Appropriation in Roman Poetry. Cambridge.
Hintermeier, C. M. (1993) Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation. Palingensiaxli. Stuttgart.
Holzberg, N. (1998) Ovid: Dichter und Werk. Munich.
Housman, A. E. (1897) “Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Review 11: 102–6, 200–4, 238–42, 286–90, 425–31.
Hross, H. (1958) “Die Klagen der verlassenen Heroiden in der lateinischen Dichtung: Untersuchungen der Motivik und zur dichterischen Form.” Dissertation, Munich.
Hubaux, J. (1926) “Ovide et Sappho,” Musée Belge 30: 197–218.
Hunter, R. L. (1989) Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book III. Cambridge.
Hunter, R. L. (1993) The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge.
Irigaray, L. (1985) This Sex Which is Not One, trans. Porter, C.. Cornell.
Jacobson, H. (1974) Ovid's Heroides. Princeton.
Jäkel, S. (1973) “The 14th Heroid Letter of Ovid and the Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Mnemosyne 26: 239–48.
James, S. L. (2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.
Jeny, H. (1989) “Troizen as the Setting of Hippolytos Stephanephoros,” American Journal of Philology 110: 400–4.
Johansen, H. F., and Whittle, E. W. (eds.) (1980) Aeschylus: The Suppliants, 3 vols. Denmark.
Johnston, S. I. (1999) Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.
Jolivet, J. -C. (2001) Allusion et fiction épistolaire dans les Héroïdes: Recherches sur l'intertextualité ovidienne. Collection de l'École Française de Rome, 289. Paris.
Kauffman, L. S. (1986) Discourses of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions. Ithaca and London.
Kennedy, D. F. (1984) “The Epistolary Mode and the First of Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 34: 413–22.
Kennedy, D. F. (1992) “‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. Powell, A.. London: 26–58.
Kennedy, D. F. (1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.
Kennedy, D. F. (2002) “Epistolarity: the Heroides,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, ed. Hardie, P.. Cambridge: 217–32.
Kenney, E. J. (1970) “Notes on Ovid: III,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 169–85.
Kenney, E. J. (1979) “Two Disputed Passages in the Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 73: 394–431.
Kenney, E. J. (1995) “‘Dear Helen…’: the pithanotate prophasis?” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 8: 187–207.
Kenney, E. J. (1996) Ovid: Heroides XVI–XXI. Cambridge.
Keuls, E. (1974) Water Carriers in Hades: A Study of Catharsis through Toil in Classical Antiquity. Amsterdam.
Kirfel, E. A. (1969) Untersuchungen zur Briefform der Heroides Ovids (Noctes Romanae 11). Bern and Stuttgart.
Knox, P. E. (1986) “Ovid's Medea and the Authenticity of Heroides 12,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 207–23.
Knox, P. E. (1995) Ovid: Heroides – Select Epistles. Cambridge.
Knox, P. E. (1998) “Ariadne on the Rocks: Influences on Ovid, Her. 10,” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, eds. Knox, P. E. and Foss, C.. Stuttgart and Leipzig: 72–84.
Knox, P. E. (2002) “The Heroides: Elegiac Voices,” in Brill's Companion to Ovid, ed. Boyd, B. W.. Leiden: 117–39.
Koltowski, I. (1960) “De Poematis Ovidio Falso Adscriptis,” Eos 50: 177–95.
Labate, M. (1977) “La Canace Ovidiana e L'Eolo di Euripide,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 7: 583–93.
Labate, M. (1984) L'arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell'elegia ovidiana. Pisa.
Lachmann, K. (1876) “De Ovidii epistulis,” in Kleinere Schriften, 2, repr. Berlin and New York 1974.
Landolfi, L. (2000) Scribentis Imago: Eroine Ovidiane e Lamento Epistolare. Bologna.
Larmour, D. H. J. (1990) “Tragic Contaminatio in Ovid's Metamorphoses: Procne and Medea; Philomela and Iphigeneia (6.424–674); Scylla and Phaedra (8.19–151),” Illinois Classical Studies 15: 131–41.
Leigh, M. (1997) “Ovid, Heroides 6.1–2,” Classical Quarterly 91: 605–7.
Lindheim, S. H. (2000) “Omnia vincit amor: Or, Why Oenone Should Have Known It Would Never Work Out (Eclogue 10 and Heroides 5),” Materiali e Discussioni 44: 83–101.
Lindheim, S. H. (2003) Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid's Heroides. Madison, Wisc.
Lipking, L. (1988) Abandoned Women and Poetic Tradition. Chicago and London.
Lloyd-Jones, H. (1963) Review of Oxyrhynchus Papyri 27, Gnomon 35: 433–55.
Lowrie, M. (forthcoming). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1994) “Vergil's Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality,” Greece and Rome 41: 187–204.
Lyne, R. O. A. M. (1998) “Love and Death: Laodamia and Protesilaos in Catullus, Propertius, and Others,” Classical Quarterly 48: 200–12.
Malherbe, A. J. (1988) Ancient Epistolary Theorists (Sources for Biblical Study, 19). Atlanta, Ga.
Maltby, R. (1991) A Lexicon of Ancient Latin Etymology. Leeds.
March, J. R. (1987) The Creative Poet: Studies on the Treatment of Myths in Greek Poetry, BICS suppl. 49. London.
Maurer, J. (1990) Untersuchungen zur poetischen Technik und den Vorbildern der Ariadne-Epistel Ovids. Frankfurt and Bern.
Mayer, M. (1885) “Der Protesilaos des Euripides,” Hermes 20: 101–43.
McKinley, K. (2001) Reading the Ovidian Heroine: “Metamorphoses” Commentaries 1100–1618. Leiden.
Means, T. (1929) “A Comparison of the Treatment by Vergil and by Ovid of the Aeneas–Dido Myth,” Classical World 23: 41–4.
Merklin, H. (1968) “Arethusa und Laodamia,” Hermes 96: 461–94.
Merone, E. (1964) Studi sulle Eroidi di Ovidio. Naples.
Milnor, K. L. (2002) “Sulpicia's (Corpo)reality: Elegy, Authorship, and the Body in [Tib.] 3.13,” ClAnt. 21: 259–82.
Miner, E. (1986) “Some Issues for Study of Integrated Collections,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. Fraistat, N.. Chapel Hill and London: 18–43.
Moi, T. (1985) Sexual/Textual Politics: Feminist Literary Theory. London and New York.
Monti, R. C. (1981) The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Leiden.
Murgia, C. E. (1985) “Imitation and Originality in Ovid: Metamorphoses 1.477 and Heroides 15,” American Journal of Philology 106: 456–74.
Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.
Naylor, H. D. (1911) “The Alleged Hyperbaton of Heroides 3.19,” Classical Review 25: 42.
Newlands, C. E. (1997) “The Metamorphosis of Ovid's Medea,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 178–210.
Nisbet, R. G. M. and Hubbard, M. (1970) A Commentary on Horace: Odes Book 1. Oxford.
Nugent, S. G. (1990) “Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, eds. Raaflaub, K. A. and Toher, M.. Berkeley: 239–57.
O'Hara, J. J. (1993) “Dido as ‘Interpreting Character’ at Aeneid 4.56–66,” Arethusa 26: 99–114.
Oppel, E. (1968) “Ovids Heroides: Studien zur inneren Form und zur Motivation.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Ottone, M. D. (2003) “Epic and Elegy in Ovid's Heroides: Paris, Helen, and Homeric Intertext.” Dissertation, Duke University.
Palmer, A. (1898) P. Ovidi Nasonis Heroides (final editing by Purser, L.). Oxford.
Paratore, E. (1953) “Sulla Phaedra di Seneca,” Dioniso 15: 199–234.
Pattoni, M. P. (1991) “Ov. Her. IX 121ss. e le Trachinie di Sofocle,” Aevum Antiquum 4: 115–52.
Pearson, C. S. (1980) “Simile and Imagery in Ovid Heroides 4 and 5,” Illinois Classical Studies 5: 110–29.
Pfeiffer, R. (1985) Callimachus, 2 vols. Oxford.
Philippides, K. (1996) “Canace Misunderstood: Ovid's Heroides XI,” Mnemosyne 49: 426–39.
Pichon, R. (1909) “La Magie dans le IVe Chant de l'Énéide,” Revue de Philologie 33: 247–54.
Pratt, L. H. (1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.
Pucci, P. (1987) Odysseus Polutropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad. Ithaca.
Pulbrook, M. (1977) “The Original Published Form of Ovid's Heroides,” Hermathena 122: 29–45.
Purnelle, G. (1990) Ovide: Epistulae Heroidum. Liège.
Quinn, K. (1982) “The Poet and his Audience in the Augustan Age,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.30: 75–180.
Rabinowitz, P. J. (1986) “Shifting Stands, Shifting Standards: Reading, Interpretation, and Literary Judgment,” Arethusa 19: 115–34.
Rahn, H. (1958) “Ovids elegische Epistel,” Antike und Abendland 7: 105–20.
Reckford, K. (1974) “Phaedra and Pasiphae: The Pull Backward,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 104: 307–28.
Reeson, J. (2001) Ovid: Heroides 11, 13 & 14: A Commentary. Leiden.
Reeve, M. D. (1973) “Notes on Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 67: 325–38.
Ribbeck, O. (1875/1968) Die römische Tragödie im Zeitalter der Republik. Leipzig.
Rimell, V. (1999) “Epistolary Fictions: Authorial Identity in Heroides 15,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 109–35.
Roberts, D. H. (1997) “Afterword: Ending and Aftermath, Ancient and Modern,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. Roberts, D. H., Dunn, F. M., and Fowler, D.. Princeton: 251–73.
Roisman, H. (1999) Nothing Is As It Seems: The Tragedy of the Implicit in Euripides' Hippolytus. Lanham, Md.
Romilly, J., (1975) Magic and Rhetoric in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, Mass.
Rosati, G. (1985) “Forma elegiaca di un simbolo letterario: la Fedra di Ovidio,” in Atti delle Giornate di Studio su Fedra, ed. Uglione, Renato. Turin: 113–31.
Rosati, G. (1988) “Il parto maledetto di Medea (Ovidio, Her. 6,156s.),” Materiali e Discussioni20–1: 305–9.
Rosati, G. (1991) “Protesilao, Paride e l'amante elegiaco: un modello Omerico in Ovidio,” Maia 43: 103–14.
Rosati, G. (1992) “L'elegia al femminile: le Heroides di Ovidio (e altre heroides),” Materiali e Discussioni 29: 71–94.
Rosati, G. (1996) “Sabinus, the Heroides and the Poet-Nightingale. Some Observations on the Authenticity of the Epistula Sapphus,” Classical Quarterly 46: 207–17.
Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1996) “Love Letters in Callimachus, Ovid and Aristaenetus or the Sad Fate of a Mailorder Bride,” Materiali e Discussioni 36: 9–31.
Rosenmeyer, P. A. (1997) “Ovid's Heroides and Tristia: Voices from Exile,” Ramus 26.1: 29–56.
Rosenmeyer, P. A. (2001) Ancient Epistolary Fictions: The Letter in Greek Literature. Cambridge.
Russ, J. (1973) “What Can a Heroine Do? Or Why Women Can't Write,” in Images of Women in Fiction: Feminist Perspectives, ed. Cornillion, S. K.. Green, Bowling, Ohio: 3–20.
Schmidt, E. A. (1967) “Ariadne bei Catull und Ovid,” Gymn. 74: 489–501.
Schmitz-Cronenbröck, W. (1937) “Die Anfänge der Heroiden des Ovid.” Dissertation, Dusseldorf.
Séchan, L. (1953) “La légende de Protésilas,” Bulletin de l'Association G. Budé 12: 3–27.
Segal, C. (1965) “The Tragedy of the Hippolytus: The Waters of Ocean and the Untouched Meadow,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology: 70: 117–69.
Segal, C. (1977) “Sophocles' Trachiniae: Myth, Poetry, and Heroic Values,” Yale Classical Studies 25: 99–158.
Segal, C. (1984) “Underreading and Intertextuality: Sappho, Simaetha, and Odysseus in Theocritus' Second Idyll,” Arethusa 17: 201–9.
Segal, C. (1986) Language and Desire in Seneca's Phaedra. Princeton.
Sharrock, A. R. (1991) “Womanufacture,” Journal of Roman Studies 81: 36–49.
Sharrock, A. R. (1994a) Seduction and Repetition in Ovid's Ars Amatoria 2. Oxford.
Sharrock, A. R. (1994b) “Ovid and the Politics of Reading,” Materiali e Discussioni 33: 97–122.
Sharrock, A. and Morales, H. (eds.) (2000) Intratextuality: Greek and Roman Textual Relations. Oxford.
Skinner, M. B. (1997) “Ego Mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. Hallett, J. P. and Skinner, M. B.. Princeton: 129–50.
Slater, N. W. (1990) Reading Petronius. Baltimore and London.
Smith, R. A. (1994) “Fantasy, Myth, and Love Letters: Text and Tale in Ovid's Heroides,” Arethusa 27: 247–73.
Smith, R. A. (1997) Poetic Allusion and Poetic Embrace in Ovid and Virgil. Ann Arbor.
Sourvinou-Inwood, C. (1979) Theseus as Son and Stepson: A Tentative Illustration of Greek Mythological Mentality, BICS suppl. 40. London.
Spentzou, E. (2003) Readers and Writers in Ovid's Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender. Oxford.
Spoth, F. (1992) Ovids Heroides als Elegien (Zetemata heft 89). München.
Spoth, F. (1993) “Ovids Ariadne-Brief (Her. 10) und die römische Liebeselegie,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 19: 239–60.
Steinmetz, P. (1987) “Die literarische Form der Epistulae Heroidum Ovids,” Gymn. 94: 128–45.
Stroh, W. (1971) Die römische Liebeselegie als werbende Dichtung. Amsterdam.
Stroh, W. (1991) “Heroides ovidianae cur epistulas scribant,” in Ovidio poeta della memoria: Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Sulmona, 19–21 ottobre 1989, ed. Papponetti, G.. Sulmo.
Svenbro, J. (1993) Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, trans. Lloyd, J.. Ithaca and London.
Tarrant, R. J. (1981) “The Authenticity of the Letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV),” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 133–53.
Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.
Torresin, G. (1998) “Ovids Phaedra in der mythologischen Tradition Ep. Her. 4 – der Brief einer Persona Delirans,” Classica et Mediaevalia 49: 163–235.
Treggiari, S. (1991) Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.
Treu, M. (1953) “Ovid und Sappho,” La Parola del Passato 8: 356–64.
Tschiedel, H. -J. (1969) “Phaedra und Hippolytus: Variationen eines tragischen Konfliktes.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Tupet, A. -M. (1970) “Didon Magicienne,” Revue des Études Latines 48: 229–58.
Tupet, A. -M. (1976) La Magie dans la poésie Latine I: des origines à la fin du régne d'Auguste. Paris.
Sickle, J. (1980) “The Book-Roll and Some Conventions of the Poetic Book,” Arethusa 13: 5–42.
Verducci, F. (1985) Ovid's Toyshop of the Heart. Princeton.
Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1969) “Notes on Ovid, Heroides 9,” Classical Quarterly 63: 349–61.
Vessey, D. W. T. C. (1976) “Humor and Humanity in Ovid's Heroides,” Arethusa 9: 91–110.
Viarre, S. (1964) “L'image et la pensée dans les Métamorphoses d'Ovide.” Dissertation, Paris.
Viarre, S. (1977) “Le rhétorique et l'imagination dans la IXe Héroide (Déjanire à Hercule),” Helmantica 28: 549–60.
Voigt, E. -M. (1971) Sappho et Alcaea. Amsterdam.
Von Albrecht, M. and Zinn, E. (1968) Ovid (Wege der Forschung 92). Darmstadt.
Albrecht, M. (1981) “Ovide et ses lecteurs,” Revue des Études Latines 59: 207–15.
Wilamowitz-Möllendorf, U. (1906) Griechische Tragödie. Berlin.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1987) “Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus, and the Fasti,” in Homo Viator: Classical Essays for J. Bramble, eds. Whitby, M.et al. Oxford: 221–30.
Webster, T. B. L. (1966) “The Myth of Ariadne from Homer to Catullus,” Greece and Rome 13: 22–31.
Webster, T. B. L. (1967) The Tragedies of Euripides. London.
Wecklein, N. (1893) “Studien zu den Hiketiden des Aeschylos,” Munchen Akademie der Wissenschaften Sitzungsberichte der Philosophisch-Philologischen und Historischen Classe 2: 393–450.
West, M. L. (1985) The Hesiodic Catalogue of Women. Oxford.
Wheeler, S. M. (1999) A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Philadelphia.
Wilkinson, L. P. (1955) Ovid Recalled. Cambridge.
Williams, G. D. (1992) “Ovid's Canace: Dramatic Irony in Heroides 11,” Classical Quarterly 42: 201–9.
Williams, G. D. (1994) Banished Voices: Readings in Ovid's Exile Poetry. Cambridge.
Williams, G. D. (1996) The Curse of Exile: A Study of Ovid's Ibis. Cambridge.
Williams, G. D. (1997) “Writing in the Mother-Tongue: Hermione and Helen in Heroides 8 (a Tomitian Approach),” Ramus 26: 113–37.
Wills, J. (1996) Repetition in Latin Poetry: Figures of Allusion. Oxford.
Winkler, J. J. (1985) Auctor and Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius' Golden Ass. Berkeley.
Winkler, J. J. (1990) The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York.
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1960) “Hippolytus: A Study in Causation,” in Euripides, Fondation Hardt Entretiens 6. Geneva: 171–91.
Winnington-Ingram, R. P. (1961) “The Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Journal of Hellenistic Studies 81: 141–52.
Winsor, E. J. (1963) “A Study in the Sources and Rhetoric of Chaucer's Legend of Good Women and Ovid's Heroides.” Dissertation, Yale University.
Wyke, M. (1994) “Taking the Woman's Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy,” Ramus 23: 111–28.
Zeitlin, F. (1985) “The Power of Aphrodite: Eros and the Boundaries of the Self in Euripides' Hippolytus,” in New Directions in Euripidean Criticism, ed. Burian, P.. Durham, N.C.
Zetzel, J. E. G. (1980) “Horace's Liber Sermonum: The Structure of Ambiguity,” Arethusa 13: 59–78.
Zinn, E. (1960) “Elemente des Humors in augustischer Dichtung,” Gymn. 67: 41–56.
Zoellner, F. (1892) Analecta Ovidiana. Leipzig.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.