Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Reading dangerously: Phyllis, Dido, Ariadne, and Medea
- 2 Reading the future?: Hypsipyle, Medea, and Oenone
- 3 Benefits of communal writing: Canace and Hypermestra
- 4 A feminine reading of epic: Briseis and Hermione
- 5 Reading magically: Deianira and Laodamia
- 6 Reading like a virgin: Phaedra and Ariadne
- 7 Caveat lector: thoughts on gender and power
- Appendix: The authenticity (and “authenticity”) of Heroides 15
- Bibliography
- Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 September 2009
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- List of abbreviations
- Introduction
- 1 Reading dangerously: Phyllis, Dido, Ariadne, and Medea
- 2 Reading the future?: Hypsipyle, Medea, and Oenone
- 3 Benefits of communal writing: Canace and Hypermestra
- 4 A feminine reading of epic: Briseis and Hermione
- 5 Reading magically: Deianira and Laodamia
- 6 Reading like a virgin: Phaedra and Ariadne
- 7 Caveat lector: thoughts on gender and power
- Appendix: The authenticity (and “authenticity”) of Heroides 15
- Bibliography
- Index
- Index Locorum
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Ovidian Heroine as AuthorReading, Writing, and Community in the Heroides, pp. 159 - 170Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005
References
(1984) “Zu Ovids Dido-Brief,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 10: 121–34.Google Scholar
Allan, W. (2000) The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy. Oxford.
Anderson, W. S. (1986) “The Theory and Practice of Poetic Arrangement from Vergil to Ovid,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. . Chapel Hill and London: 44–65.Google Scholar
(1971) “Ovid's Epistle from Sappho to Phaon (Heroides 15),” Transactions of the American Philological Association 102: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993a) “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993b) “Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2, 1 e Ovidio, Tristia II,” Materiali e Discussioni 31: 149–84.Google Scholar
(1994) Review of Friedrich Spoth, Ovids Heroides als Elegien, Atene e Roma 39: 111–12.Google Scholar
(1995) Review of Cornelia Hintermeier, Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation, Journal of Roman Studies 85: 325–7.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997b) “Endgames: Ovid's Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. , , and . Princeton: 181–208.Google Scholar
Barreca, R. (1993) “Writing as Voodoo: Sorcery, Hysteria, and Art,” in Death and Representation, eds. and . Baltimore and London: 174–91.Google Scholar
Barreno, M. I., Horta, M. T., and Velho da Costa, M. (1975) The Three Marias: New Portuguese Letters, trans. . New York.Google Scholar
Barrett, W. S. (1964) Euripides: Hippolytus. Oxford.
(1969) “Jason as Love-hero in Apollonios' Argonautika,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10: 31–55.Google Scholar
(1877) “Animadversiones ad Ovidi heroidum epistulas,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 32: 386–432.Google Scholar
(1976, 1977, and 1980) P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar (Bücher vi–vii, viii–ix, and x–xi). Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bond, G. W. (1963) Euripides: Hypsipyle. Oxford.
Bopp, H. (1966) “Inscia capta puella: Akontius und Kydippe bei Kallimachos und bei Ovid.” Dissertation, Westfalia.
(1991) Death in Quotation Marks: Cultural Myths of the Modern Poet. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) “Laodamia ‘ammaestra’ Protesilao (Ov. Her. 13): una lezione di viltà,” Aufidus 29: 27–70.Google Scholar
Brownlee, M. S. (1990). The Severed Word: Ovid's Heroides and the Novela Sentimental. Princeton.CrossRef
Cantarella, R. (1964) Euripide: I Cretesi. Milan.
(1992) “Enone, Apollo pastore e l'amore immedicabile: giochi ovidiani su di un topos elegiaco,” Materiali e Discussioni 28: 85–100.Google Scholar
(1995b) “Strategies of Tension (Ovid, Heroides 4),” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 41: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995c) “Tragic Irony in Ovid, Heroides 9 and 11,” Classical Quarterly 45: 505–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) “Quaerenti plura legendum: On the Necessity of ‘Reading More’ in Ovid's Exile Poetry,” Ramus 26.1: 80–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998a) “Ovidio e la preconoscenza della critica: qualche generalizzazione a partire da Heroides 14,” Philologus 142: 94–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) “Ovid's Canace and Euripides' Aeolus: Two Notes on Heroides 11,” Mnemosyne 51: 700–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, T. (1982) Clarissa's Ciphers: Meaning and Disruption in Richardson's Clarissa. Ithaca and London.
Chelte, J. S. (1994) “Philomela's Tapestry: Empowering Voice through Text, Texture, and Silence.” Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
(1995) Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forma della communicazione letteraria. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
(1995) “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: Allusion and Exemplarity,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 42: 60–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) (1997) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art. Princeton.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. and Mayer, R. (1990) Seneca: Phaedra. Cambridge.
(1974) “His Dupes and Accomplices: A Study of Ovid the Illusionist in the Amores,” Ramus 3: 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B.(1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Vergil and Other Latin Poets, trans. . Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius' Satyricon, trans. E. Fantham. (Sather Lectures vol. 60). Berkeley.
(1965) “Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 12: 63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Echtheitskritik: Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides Again,” Classical Journal 93: 157–66.Google Scholar
(1995) “Ma il giudice delle dee non era un pastore?: Reticenze e arte retorica di Paride (Ov. Her. 16),” Materiali e Discussioni 34: 135–52.Google Scholar
(1975) Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Curley, D. E. (1999) “Metatheater: Heroines and Ephebes in Ovid's Metamorphoses.” Dissertation, University of Washington.
(1967) “Chaucer's Complaint, A Genre Descended from the Heroides,” Comp.Lit. 19: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Corte, F. (1969) “Perfidus hospes,” in Hommages à Marcel Renard, ed. J. Bibauw. Brussels: Collection Latomus: 312–21 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 29–38).
Della Corte, F. (1970) “I Miti delle Heroides,” in Scripti in honorem Marii Untersteiner. Genoa: 157–69 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 39–51).
(1993) “When Dido Reads Vergil: Gender and Intertextuality in Ovid's Heroides 7,” Helios 20: 56–68.Google Scholar
(1994) “The Essential Seriousness of Heroides 4,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 137: 312–30.Google Scholar
(1967) “Die dichterische Absicht Ovids in den Epistulae Heroidum,” Antike und Abendland 13: 41–55.Google Scholar
(1968) Der heroische Brief: Bestandaufnahme, Geschichte, Kritik einer humanistisch-barocken Literaturgattung. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1975) P. Ovidius Naso: Der Brief der Sappho an Phaon (Zetemata 58). Munich.
Duchêne, R. (1998) “La Lettre: genre masculin et pratique féminine,” in L'Épistolaire, un genre féminin? ed. . Paris: 27–50.Google Scholar
(1989) “On the Way from Colchis to Corinth: Medea in Book 4 of the ‘Argonautica’,” Hermes 117: 455–70.Google Scholar
Eggerding, F. (1908) “De Heroidum Oviduanarum Epistulis Quae Vocantur Commentationes: Agitur Imprimis de Didone, Phaedra, Penelopa.” Dissertation, Frederick Halensis Academy.
Ehwald, R. (1900) “Exegetischer Kommentar zur XIV Heroide Ovids.” Programm des Herzoglichen Gymnasium Ernestinum zu Gotha. Gotha.
(1977) “Ariadne in Art, Prehistory to 400 B.C.,” Rivista di Studi Classici 25: 165–81.Google Scholar
(1941) “La magie comme motif Littéraire chez les Grecs et les Romains,” Symbolae Osloenses 21: 39–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) (1991) Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York and Oxford.
(1998) “Reading and Writing the Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 307–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1992) “Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. . London: 1–25.Google Scholar
(1978) The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
Fischer, U. (1969). “Ignotum hoc aliis ille novavit opus: Beobachtungen zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Briefpaare her. 16 und 17 (Paris und Helena) und her. 20 und 21 (Acontius und Cydippe).” Dissertation, Augsburg.
(2004) “Physician, Heal Thyself: The Intertextuality of Ovid's Exile Poetry and the Remedia Amoris,” Latomus 63.4: 864–72.Google Scholar
Flaherty, S. M. (1994) “The Rhetoric of Female Self-Destruction: A Study in Homer, Euripides, and Ovid.” Dissertation, Yale University.
(1974) “La Protesilaudamia di Levio,” in Poesia latina in frammenti: Miscellanea Filologica. Genoa: 315–26.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. (1997) “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. and . Princeton: 172–96.Google Scholar
(2002a) “(Un)Sympathetic Magic: A Study of Heroides 13,” American Journal of Philology 123: 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) “Writing Yourself to Death: Strategies of (Mis)reading in Heroides 2,” Materiali e Discussioni 48: 145–65.Google Scholar
(2003) “Chain(ed) Mail: Hypermestra and the Dual Readership of Heroides 14,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 133: 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Why the Remedia Fail,” Classical Quarterly 54: 211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Incongruity and the Limitations of Structure in Ovid's Elegiac Poetry,” Classical Journal 66: 196–203.Google Scholar
(1972) The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Totowa, N.J.Google Scholar
(1997) “Euripides' Hippolytus Plays: Which Came First?” Classical Quarterly 47: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Ovid on Reading: Reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia II,” Journal of Roman Studies 89: 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giomini, R. (1993) “Ancora sulla struttura retorica nelle Heroides Ovidiane: l'Epistola di Fedra a Ippolito,” in Cultura e Lingue Classiche 3, ed. . Rome.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (1993) “‘But Ariadne was Never There in the First Place’: Finding the Female in Roman Poetry,” in Feminist Theory and the Classics, eds. and . New York and London: 75–101.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (1997) “The Lover's Voice in Heroides 15: Or, Why is Sappho a Man?” in Roman Sexualities, eds. and . Princeton: 274–94.Google Scholar
and (1988) “Dido's Burning Effigy: Aeneid 4.508,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 131: 386–8.Google Scholar
Grantz, F. H. (1955) “Studien zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides.” Dissertation, Kiel.
(1963) “L'Originalité de Sénèque dans la Tragédie de Phèdre,” Revue des Études Latines 41: 297–314.Google Scholar
(1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
(1989) “Ventriloquizing Sappho: Ovid, Donne, and the Erotics of the Feminine Voice,” Criticism 31: 115–38.Google Scholar
(1993) “The Authenticity of Ovid Heroides 12 Reconsidered,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 94–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, T. (1997) P. Ovidius Naso: Der XII Heroidenbrief: Medea an Jason mit einer Beilage: Die Fragmente der Tragödie Medea: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Leiden.
(1999) Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar
(1986) “Becoming a Heroine: Penelope's Ovid,” Liverpool Classical Monthly 11: 7–10, 114–19.Google Scholar
(1991) “Wrapping up the Case: Reading Ovid, Amores 2,7 (+ 8): I,” Materiali e Discussioni 27: 37–88.Google Scholar
(1971) “Phaidra in griechischer und römischer Gestalt,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 14: 44–77.Google Scholar
(1963) Andromeda und Tarpeia. Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie, vol. viii. Meisenheim.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. (1986) Ovid and Medieval Schooling: Studies in Medieval School Commentaries on Ovid's Ars amatoria, Epistulae ex Ponto, and Epistulae heroidum. Munich.
(1987c) “The Poetess and the Reader: Further Steps Toward Sulpicia,” Hermathena 143: 29–46.Google Scholar
(1993) “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” Materiali e Discussioni 30: 9–47.Google Scholar
(1993) Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation. Palingensiaxli. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
(1897) “Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Review 11: 102–6, 200–4, 238–42, 286–90, 425–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hross, H. (1958) “Die Klagen der verlassenen Heroiden in der lateinischen Dichtung: Untersuchungen der Motivik und zur dichterischen Form.” Dissertation, Munich.
(1973) “The 14th Heroid Letter of Ovid and the Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Mnemosyne 26: 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1989) “Troizen as the Setting of Hippolytos Stephanephoros,” American Journal of Philology 110: 400–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jolivet, J. -C. (2001) Allusion et fiction épistolaire dans les Héroïdes: Recherches sur l'intertextualité ovidienne. Collection de l'École Française de Rome, 289. Paris.
(1986) Discourses of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
(1984) “The Epistolary Mode and the First of Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 34: 413–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1992) “‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. . London: 26–58.Google Scholar
(1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2002) “Epistolarity: the Heroides,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, ed. . Cambridge: 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970) “Notes on Ovid: III,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979) “Two Disputed Passages in the Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 73: 394–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “‘Dear Helen…’: the pithanotate prophasis?” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 8: 187–207.Google Scholar
(1974) Water Carriers in Hades: A Study of Catharsis through Toil in Classical Antiquity. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(1969) Untersuchungen zur Briefform der Heroides Ovids (Noctes Romanae 11). Bern and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
(1986) “Ovid's Medea and the Authenticity of Heroides 12,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P. E. (1998) “Ariadne on the Rocks: Influences on Ovid, Her. 10,” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, eds. and . Stuttgart and Leipzig: 72–84.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (2002) “The Heroides: Elegiac Voices,” in Brill's Companion to Ovid, ed. . Leiden: 117–39.Google Scholar
(1977) “La Canace Ovidiana e L'Eolo di Euripide,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 7: 583–93.Google Scholar
(1984) L'arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell'elegia ovidiana. Pisa.Google Scholar
(1876) “De Ovidii epistulis,” in Kleinere Schriften, 2, repr. Berlin and New York 1974.Google Scholar
(1990) “Tragic Contaminatio in Ovid's Metamorphoses: Procne and Medea; Philomela and Iphigeneia (6.424–674); Scylla and Phaedra (8.19–151),” Illinois Classical Studies 15: 131–41.Google Scholar
(2000) “Omnia vincit amor: Or, Why Oenone Should Have Known It Would Never Work Out (Eclogue 10 and Heroides 5),” Materiali e Discussioni 44: 83–101.Google Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. (2003) Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid's Heroides. Madison, Wisc.
Lowrie, M. (forthcoming). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome.
(1994) “Vergil's Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality,” Greece and Rome 41: 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Love and Death: Laodamia and Protesilaos in Catullus, Propertius, and Others,” Classical Quarterly 48: 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987) The Creative Poet: Studies on the Treatment of Myths in Greek Poetry, BICS suppl. 49. London.Google Scholar
(1990) Untersuchungen zur poetischen Technik und den Vorbildern der Ariadne-Epistel Ovids. Frankfurt and Bern.Google Scholar
(2001) Reading the Ovidian Heroine: “Metamorphoses” Commentaries 1100–1618. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1929) “A Comparison of the Treatment by Vergil and by Ovid of the Aeneas–Dido Myth,” Classical World 23: 41–4.Google Scholar
(2002) “Sulpicia's (Corpo)reality: Elegy, Authorship, and the Body in [Tib.] 3.13,” ClAnt. 21: 259–82.Google Scholar
Miner, E. (1986) “Some Issues for Study of Integrated Collections,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. . Chapel Hill and London: 18–43.Google Scholar
(1981) The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Leiden.Google Scholar
(1985) “Imitation and Originality in Ovid: Metamorphoses 1.477 and Heroides 15,” American Journal of Philology 106: 456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.
Newlands, C. E. (1997) “The Metamorphosis of Ovid's Medea,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 178–210.
Nugent, S. G. (1990) “Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, eds. and . Berkeley: 239–57.Google Scholar
Oppel, E. (1968) “Ovids Heroides: Studien zur inneren Form und zur Motivation.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Ottone, M. D. (2003) “Epic and Elegy in Ovid's Heroides: Paris, Helen, and Homeric Intertext.” Dissertation, Duke University.
(1980) “Simile and Imagery in Ovid Heroides 4 and 5,” Illinois Classical Studies 5: 110–29.Google Scholar
(1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1987) Odysseus Polutropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad. Ithaca.
(1982) “The Poet and his Audience in the Augustan Age,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.30: 75–180.Google Scholar
(1986) “Shifting Stands, Shifting Standards: Reading, Interpretation, and Literary Judgment,” Arethusa 19: 115–34.Google Scholar
(1974) “Phaedra and Pasiphae: The Pull Backward,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 104: 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Epistolary Fictions: Authorial Identity in Heroides 15,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. H. (1997) “Afterword: Ending and Aftermath, Ancient and Modern,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. , , and . Princeton: 251–73.Google Scholar
Roisman, H. (1999) Nothing Is As It Seems: The Tragedy of the Implicit in Euripides' Hippolytus. Lanham, Md.
Rosati, G. (1985) “Forma elegiaca di un simbolo letterario: la Fedra di Ovidio,” in Atti delle Giornate di Studio su Fedra, ed. . Turin: 113–31.Google Scholar
(1988) “Il parto maledetto di Medea (Ovidio, Her. 6,156s.),” Materiali e Discussioni20–1: 305–9.Google Scholar
(1991) “Protesilao, Paride e l'amante elegiaco: un modello Omerico in Ovidio,” Maia 43: 103–14.Google Scholar
(1992) “L'elegia al femminile: le Heroides di Ovidio (e altre heroides),” Materiali e Discussioni 29: 71–94.Google Scholar
(1996) “Sabinus, the Heroides and the Poet-Nightingale. Some Observations on the Authenticity of the Epistula Sapphus,” Classical Quarterly 46: 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) “Love Letters in Callimachus, Ovid and Aristaenetus or the Sad Fate of a Mailorder Bride,” Materiali e Discussioni 36: 9–31.Google Scholar
Russ, J. (1973) “What Can a Heroine Do? Or Why Women Can't Write,” in Images of Women in Fiction: Feminist Perspectives, ed. . , Ohio: 3–20.Google Scholar
Schmitz-Cronenbröck, W. (1937) “Die Anfänge der Heroiden des Ovid.” Dissertation, Dusseldorf.
(1965) “The Tragedy of the Hippolytus: The Waters of Ocean and the Untouched Meadow,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology: 70: 117–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977) “Sophocles' Trachiniae: Myth, Poetry, and Heroic Values,” Yale Classical Studies 25: 99–158.Google Scholar
(1984) “Underreading and Intertextuality: Sappho, Simaetha, and Odysseus in Theocritus' Second Idyll,” Arethusa 17: 201–9.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1986) Language and Desire in Seneca's Phaedra. Princeton.
Skinner, M. B. (1997) “Ego Mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. and . Princeton: 129–50.Google Scholar
(1994) “Fantasy, Myth, and Love Letters: Text and Tale in Ovid's Heroides,” Arethusa 27: 247–73.Google Scholar
(1979) Theseus as Son and Stepson: A Tentative Illustration of Greek Mythological Mentality, BICS suppl. 40. London.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. (2003) Readers and Writers in Ovid's Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender. Oxford.
Spoth, F. (1992) Ovids Heroides als Elegien (Zetemata heft 89). München.
(1993) “Ovids Ariadne-Brief (Her. 10) und die römische Liebeselegie,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 19: 239–60.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1991) “Heroides ovidianae cur epistulas scribant,” in Ovidio poeta della memoria: Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Sulmona, 19–21 ottobre 1989, ed. . Sulmo.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1993) Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, trans. . Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
(1981) “The Authenticity of the Letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV),” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.
(1998) “Ovids Phaedra in der mythologischen Tradition Ep. Her. 4 – der Brief einer Persona Delirans,” Classica et Mediaevalia 49: 163–235.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991) Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.
Tschiedel, H. -J. (1969) “Phaedra und Hippolytus: Variationen eines tragischen Konfliktes.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.
(1976) La Magie dans la poésie Latine I: des origines à la fin du régne d'Auguste. Paris.Google Scholar
Viarre, S. (1964) “L'image et la pensée dans les Métamorphoses d'Ovide.” Dissertation, Paris.
(1977) “Le rhétorique et l'imagination dans la IXe Héroide (Déjanire à Hercule),” Helmantica 28: 549–60.Google Scholar
Von Albrecht, M. and Zinn, E. (1968) Ovid (Wege der Forschung 92). Darmstadt.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1987) “Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus, and the Fasti,” in Homo Viator: Classical Essays for J. Bramble, eds. et al. Oxford: 221–30.Google Scholar
(1966) “The Myth of Ariadne from Homer to Catullus,” Greece and Rome 13: 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1893) “Studien zu den Hiketiden des Aeschylos,” Munchen Akademie der Wissenschaften Sitzungsberichte der Philosophisch-Philologischen und Historischen Classe 2: 393–450.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (1999) A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Philadelphia.
(1992) “Ovid's Canace: Dramatic Irony in Heroides 11,” Classical Quarterly 42: 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. D. (1996) The Curse of Exile: A Study of Ovid's Ibis. Cambridge.
(1997) “Writing in the Mother-Tongue: Hermione and Helen in Heroides 8 (a Tomitian Approach),” Ramus 26: 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1985) Auctor and Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius' Golden Ass. Berkeley.
(1990) The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar
(1960) “Hippolytus: A Study in Causation,” in Euripides, Fondation Hardt Entretiens 6. Geneva: 171–91.Google Scholar
(1961) “The Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Journal of Hellenistic Studies 81: 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, E. J. (1963) “A Study in the Sources and Rhetoric of Chaucer's Legend of Good Women and Ovid's Heroides.” Dissertation, Yale University.
(1994) “Taking the Woman's Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy,” Ramus 23: 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1985) “The Power of Aphrodite: Eros and the Boundaries of the Self in Euripides' Hippolytus,” in New Directions in Euripidean Criticism, ed. . Durham, N.C.Google Scholar
(1984) “Zu Ovids Dido-Brief,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 10: 121–34.Google Scholar
Allan, W. (2000) The Andromache and Euripidean Tragedy. Oxford.
Anderson, W. S. (1986) “The Theory and Practice of Poetic Arrangement from Vergil to Ovid,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. . Chapel Hill and London: 44–65.Google Scholar
(1971) “Ovid's Epistle from Sappho to Phaon (Heroides 15),” Transactions of the American Philological Association 102: 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993a) “Future Reflexive: Two Modes of Allusion and Ovid's Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 95: 333–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1993b) “Insegnare ad Augusto: Orazio, Epistole 2, 1 e Ovidio, Tristia II,” Materiali e Discussioni 31: 149–84.Google Scholar
(1994) Review of Friedrich Spoth, Ovids Heroides als Elegien, Atene e Roma 39: 111–12.Google Scholar
(1995) Review of Cornelia Hintermeier, Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation, Journal of Roman Studies 85: 325–7.Google Scholar
Barchiesi, A. (1997b) “Endgames: Ovid's Metamorphoses 15 and Fasti 6,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. , , and . Princeton: 181–208.Google Scholar
Barreca, R. (1993) “Writing as Voodoo: Sorcery, Hysteria, and Art,” in Death and Representation, eds. and . Baltimore and London: 174–91.Google Scholar
Barreno, M. I., Horta, M. T., and Velho da Costa, M. (1975) The Three Marias: New Portuguese Letters, trans. . New York.Google Scholar
Barrett, W. S. (1964) Euripides: Hippolytus. Oxford.
(1969) “Jason as Love-hero in Apollonios' Argonautika,” Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies 10: 31–55.Google Scholar
(1877) “Animadversiones ad Ovidi heroidum epistulas,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 32: 386–432.Google Scholar
(1976, 1977, and 1980) P. Ovidius Naso Metamorphosen: Kommentar (Bücher vi–vii, viii–ix, and x–xi). Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Bond, G. W. (1963) Euripides: Hypsipyle. Oxford.
Bopp, H. (1966) “Inscia capta puella: Akontius und Kydippe bei Kallimachos und bei Ovid.” Dissertation, Westfalia.
(1991) Death in Quotation Marks: Cultural Myths of the Modern Poet. Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) “Laodamia ‘ammaestra’ Protesilao (Ov. Her. 13): una lezione di viltà,” Aufidus 29: 27–70.Google Scholar
Brownlee, M. S. (1990). The Severed Word: Ovid's Heroides and the Novela Sentimental. Princeton.CrossRef
Cantarella, R. (1964) Euripide: I Cretesi. Milan.
(1992) “Enone, Apollo pastore e l'amore immedicabile: giochi ovidiani su di un topos elegiaco,” Materiali e Discussioni 28: 85–100.Google Scholar
(1995b) “Strategies of Tension (Ovid, Heroides 4),” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 41: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995c) “Tragic Irony in Ovid, Heroides 9 and 11,” Classical Quarterly 45: 505–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1997b) “Quaerenti plura legendum: On the Necessity of ‘Reading More’ in Ovid's Exile Poetry,” Ramus 26.1: 80–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998a) “Ovidio e la preconoscenza della critica: qualche generalizzazione a partire da Heroides 14,” Philologus 142: 94–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998b) “Ovid's Canace and Euripides' Aeolus: Two Notes on Heroides 11,” Mnemosyne 51: 700–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castle, T. (1982) Clarissa's Ciphers: Meaning and Disruption in Richardson's Clarissa. Ithaca and London.
Chelte, J. S. (1994) “Philomela's Tapestry: Empowering Voice through Text, Texture, and Silence.” Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
(1995) Poesia e lettori in Roma antica: forma della communicazione letteraria. Rome and Bari.Google Scholar
(1995) “Catullus 64 and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius: Allusion and Exemplarity,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 42: 60–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) (1997) Medea: Essays on Medea in Myth, Literature, Philosophy, and Art. Princeton.Google Scholar
Coffey, M. and Mayer, R. (1990) Seneca: Phaedra. Cambridge.
(1974) “His Dupes and Accomplices: A Study of Ovid the Illusionist in the Amores,” Ramus 3: 18–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conte, G. B.(1986) The Rhetoric of Imitation: Genre and Poetic Memory in Vergil and Other Latin Poets, trans. . Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
Conte, G. B. (1996) The Hidden Author: An Interpretation of Petronius' Satyricon, trans. E. Fantham. (Sather Lectures vol. 60). Berkeley.
(1965) “Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 12: 63–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Echtheitskritik: Ovidian and Non-Ovidian Heroides Again,” Classical Journal 93: 157–66.Google Scholar
(1995) “Ma il giudice delle dee non era un pastore?: Reticenze e arte retorica di Paride (Ov. Her. 16),” Materiali e Discussioni 34: 135–52.Google Scholar
(1975) Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics, and the Study of Literature. Ithaca.Google Scholar
Curley, D. E. (1999) “Metatheater: Heroines and Ephebes in Ovid's Metamorphoses.” Dissertation, University of Washington.
(1967) “Chaucer's Complaint, A Genre Descended from the Heroides,” Comp.Lit. 19: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Della Corte, F. (1969) “Perfidus hospes,” in Hommages à Marcel Renard, ed. J. Bibauw. Brussels: Collection Latomus: 312–21 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 29–38).
Della Corte, F. (1970) “I Miti delle Heroides,” in Scripti in honorem Marii Untersteiner. Genoa: 157–69 (= Opusculaiv. Genoa: 39–51).
(1993) “When Dido Reads Vergil: Gender and Intertextuality in Ovid's Heroides 7,” Helios 20: 56–68.Google Scholar
(1994) “The Essential Seriousness of Heroides 4,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 137: 312–30.Google Scholar
(1967) “Die dichterische Absicht Ovids in den Epistulae Heroidum,” Antike und Abendland 13: 41–55.Google Scholar
(1968) Der heroische Brief: Bestandaufnahme, Geschichte, Kritik einer humanistisch-barocken Literaturgattung. Berlin and New York.Google Scholar
Dörrie, H. (1975) P. Ovidius Naso: Der Brief der Sappho an Phaon (Zetemata 58). Munich.
Duchêne, R. (1998) “La Lettre: genre masculin et pratique féminine,” in L'Épistolaire, un genre féminin? ed. . Paris: 27–50.Google Scholar
(1989) “On the Way from Colchis to Corinth: Medea in Book 4 of the ‘Argonautica’,” Hermes 117: 455–70.Google Scholar
Eggerding, F. (1908) “De Heroidum Oviduanarum Epistulis Quae Vocantur Commentationes: Agitur Imprimis de Didone, Phaedra, Penelopa.” Dissertation, Frederick Halensis Academy.
Ehwald, R. (1900) “Exegetischer Kommentar zur XIV Heroide Ovids.” Programm des Herzoglichen Gymnasium Ernestinum zu Gotha. Gotha.
(1977) “Ariadne in Art, Prehistory to 400 B.C.,” Rivista di Studi Classici 25: 165–81.Google Scholar
(1941) “La magie comme motif Littéraire chez les Grecs et les Romains,” Symbolae Osloenses 21: 39–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, and (eds.) (1991) Magika Hiera: Ancient Greek Magic and Religion. New York and Oxford.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (1991) Vergil's Georgics and the Traditions of Ancient Epic: The Art of Allusion in Literary History. New York and Oxford.
(1998) “Reading and Writing the Heroides,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 94: 307–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feeney, D. C. (1992) “Si licet et fas est: Ovid's Fasti and the Problem of Free Speech under the Principate,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. . London: 1–25.Google Scholar
(1978) The Resisting Reader: A Feminist Approach to American Fiction. Bloomington, Ind.Google Scholar
Fischer, U. (1969). “Ignotum hoc aliis ille novavit opus: Beobachtungen zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Briefpaare her. 16 und 17 (Paris und Helena) und her. 20 und 21 (Acontius und Cydippe).” Dissertation, Augsburg.
(2004) “Physician, Heal Thyself: The Intertextuality of Ovid's Exile Poetry and the Remedia Amoris,” Latomus 63.4: 864–72.Google Scholar
Flaherty, S. M. (1994) “The Rhetoric of Female Self-Destruction: A Study in Homer, Euripides, and Ovid.” Dissertation, Yale University.
(1974) “La Protesilaudamia di Levio,” in Poesia latina in frammenti: Miscellanea Filologica. Genoa: 315–26.Google Scholar
Fredrick, D. (1997) “Reading Broken Skin: Violence in Roman Elegy,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. and . Princeton: 172–96.Google Scholar
(2002a) “(Un)Sympathetic Magic: A Study of Heroides 13,” American Journal of Philology 123: 61–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2002b) “Writing Yourself to Death: Strategies of (Mis)reading in Heroides 2,” Materiali e Discussioni 48: 145–65.Google Scholar
(2003) “Chain(ed) Mail: Hypermestra and the Dual Readership of Heroides 14,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 133: 123–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2004) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Why the Remedia Fail,” Classical Quarterly 54: 211–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1971) “Omnia Vincit Amor: Incongruity and the Limitations of Structure in Ovid's Elegiac Poetry,” Classical Journal 66: 196–203.Google Scholar
(1972) The Herakles Theme: The Adaptations of the Hero in Literature from Homer to the Twentieth Century. Totowa, N.J.Google Scholar
(1997) “Euripides' Hippolytus Plays: Which Came First?” Classical Quarterly 47: 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Ovid on Reading: Reading Ovid. Reception in Ovid Tristia II,” Journal of Roman Studies 89: 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giomini, R. (1993) “Ancora sulla struttura retorica nelle Heroides Ovidiane: l'Epistola di Fedra a Ippolito,” in Cultura e Lingue Classiche 3, ed. . Rome.Google Scholar
Gold, B. K. (1993) “‘But Ariadne was Never There in the First Place’: Finding the Female in Roman Poetry,” in Feminist Theory and the Classics, eds. and . New York and London: 75–101.Google Scholar
Gordon, P. (1997) “The Lover's Voice in Heroides 15: Or, Why is Sappho a Man?” in Roman Sexualities, eds. and . Princeton: 274–94.Google Scholar
and (1988) “Dido's Burning Effigy: Aeneid 4.508,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 131: 386–8.Google Scholar
Grantz, F. H. (1955) “Studien zur Darstellungskunst Ovids in den Heroides.” Dissertation, Kiel.
(1963) “L'Originalité de Sénèque dans la Tragédie de Phèdre,” Revue des Études Latines 41: 297–314.Google Scholar
(1998) The Politics of Latin Literature: Writing, Identity, and Empire in Ancient Rome. Princeton.Google Scholar
(1989) “Ventriloquizing Sappho: Ovid, Donne, and the Erotics of the Feminine Voice,” Criticism 31: 115–38.Google Scholar
(1993) “The Authenticity of Ovid Heroides 12 Reconsidered,” Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 38: 94–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinze, T. (1997) P. Ovidius Naso: Der XII Heroidenbrief: Medea an Jason mit einer Beilage: Die Fragmente der Tragödie Medea: Einleitung, Text und Kommentar. Leiden.
(1999) Matrona Docta: Educated Women in the Roman Elite from Cornelia to Julia Domna. London.Google Scholar
(1986) “Becoming a Heroine: Penelope's Ovid,” Liverpool Classical Monthly 11: 7–10, 114–19.Google Scholar
(1991) “Wrapping up the Case: Reading Ovid, Amores 2,7 (+ 8): I,” Materiali e Discussioni 27: 37–88.Google Scholar
(1971) “Phaidra in griechischer und römischer Gestalt,” Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 14: 44–77.Google Scholar
(1963) Andromeda und Tarpeia. Beiträge zur Klassischen Philologie, vol. viii. Meisenheim.Google Scholar
Hexter, R. J. (1986) Ovid and Medieval Schooling: Studies in Medieval School Commentaries on Ovid's Ars amatoria, Epistulae ex Ponto, and Epistulae heroidum. Munich.
(1987c) “The Poetess and the Reader: Further Steps Toward Sulpicia,” Hermathena 143: 29–46.Google Scholar
(1993) “Medea in Ovid: Scenes from the Life of an Intertextual Heroine,” Materiali e Discussioni 30: 9–47.Google Scholar
(1993) Die Briefpaare in Ovids Heroides: Tradition und Innovation. Palingensiaxli. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
(1897) “Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Review 11: 102–6, 200–4, 238–42, 286–90, 425–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hross, H. (1958) “Die Klagen der verlassenen Heroiden in der lateinischen Dichtung: Untersuchungen der Motivik und zur dichterischen Form.” Dissertation, Munich.
(1973) “The 14th Heroid Letter of Ovid and the Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Mnemosyne 26: 239–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(2003) Learned Girls and Male Persuasion: Gender and Reading in Roman Love Elegy. Berkeley.Google Scholar
(1989) “Troizen as the Setting of Hippolytos Stephanephoros,” American Journal of Philology 110: 400–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) Restless Dead: Encounters between the Living and the Dead in Ancient Greece. Berkeley.Google Scholar
Jolivet, J. -C. (2001) Allusion et fiction épistolaire dans les Héroïdes: Recherches sur l'intertextualité ovidienne. Collection de l'École Française de Rome, 289. Paris.
(1986) Discourses of Desire: Gender, Genre, and Epistolary Fictions. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
(1984) “The Epistolary Mode and the First of Ovid's Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 34: 413–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (1992) “‘Augustan’ and ‘Anti-Augustan’: Reflections on Terms of Reference,” in Roman Poetry and Propaganda in the Age of Augustus, ed. . London: 26–58.Google Scholar
(1993) The Arts of Love: Five Studies in the Discourse of Roman Love Elegy. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. F. (2002) “Epistolarity: the Heroides,” in The Cambridge Companion to Ovid, ed. . Cambridge: 217–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1970) “Notes on Ovid: III,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 74: 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1979) “Two Disputed Passages in the Heroides,” Classical Quarterly 73: 394–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1995) “‘Dear Helen…’: the pithanotate prophasis?” Papers of the Liverpool Latin Seminar 8: 187–207.Google Scholar
(1974) Water Carriers in Hades: A Study of Catharsis through Toil in Classical Antiquity. Amsterdam.Google Scholar
(1969) Untersuchungen zur Briefform der Heroides Ovids (Noctes Romanae 11). Bern and Stuttgart.Google Scholar
(1986) “Ovid's Medea and the Authenticity of Heroides 12,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 90: 207–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knox, P. E. (1998) “Ariadne on the Rocks: Influences on Ovid, Her. 10,” in Style and Tradition: Studies in Honor of Wendell Clausen, eds. and . Stuttgart and Leipzig: 72–84.Google Scholar
Knox, P. E. (2002) “The Heroides: Elegiac Voices,” in Brill's Companion to Ovid, ed. . Leiden: 117–39.Google Scholar
(1977) “La Canace Ovidiana e L'Eolo di Euripide,” Annali della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 7: 583–93.Google Scholar
(1984) L'arte di farsi amare: modelli culturali e progetto didascalico nell'elegia ovidiana. Pisa.Google Scholar
(1876) “De Ovidii epistulis,” in Kleinere Schriften, 2, repr. Berlin and New York 1974.Google Scholar
(1990) “Tragic Contaminatio in Ovid's Metamorphoses: Procne and Medea; Philomela and Iphigeneia (6.424–674); Scylla and Phaedra (8.19–151),” Illinois Classical Studies 15: 131–41.Google Scholar
(2000) “Omnia vincit amor: Or, Why Oenone Should Have Known It Would Never Work Out (Eclogue 10 and Heroides 5),” Materiali e Discussioni 44: 83–101.Google Scholar
Lindheim, S. H. (2003) Mail and Female: Epistolary Narrative and Desire in Ovid's Heroides. Madison, Wisc.
Lowrie, M. (forthcoming). Writing, Performance, and Authority in Augustan Rome.
(1994) “Vergil's Aeneid: Subversion by Intertextuality,” Greece and Rome 41: 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1998) “Love and Death: Laodamia and Protesilaos in Catullus, Propertius, and Others,” Classical Quarterly 48: 200–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1987) The Creative Poet: Studies on the Treatment of Myths in Greek Poetry, BICS suppl. 49. London.Google Scholar
(1990) Untersuchungen zur poetischen Technik und den Vorbildern der Ariadne-Epistel Ovids. Frankfurt and Bern.Google Scholar
(2001) Reading the Ovidian Heroine: “Metamorphoses” Commentaries 1100–1618. Leiden.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1929) “A Comparison of the Treatment by Vergil and by Ovid of the Aeneas–Dido Myth,” Classical World 23: 41–4.Google Scholar
(2002) “Sulpicia's (Corpo)reality: Elegy, Authorship, and the Body in [Tib.] 3.13,” ClAnt. 21: 259–82.Google Scholar
Miner, E. (1986) “Some Issues for Study of Integrated Collections,” in Poems in Their Place: The Intertextuality and Order of Poetic Collections, ed. . Chapel Hill and London: 18–43.Google Scholar
(1981) The Dido Episode and the Aeneid: Roman Social and Political Values in the Epic. Leiden.Google Scholar
(1985) “Imitation and Originality in Ovid: Metamorphoses 1.477 and Heroides 15,” American Journal of Philology 106: 456–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, K. S. (1994) Ovid's Causes: Cosmogony and Aetiology in the Metamorphoses. Ann Arbor.
Newlands, C. E. (1997) “The Metamorphosis of Ovid's Medea,” in Clauss and Johnston 1997: 178–210.
Nugent, S. G. (1990) “Tristia 2: Ovid and Augustus,” in Between Republic and Empire: Interpretations of Augustus and his Principate, eds. and . Berkeley: 239–57.Google Scholar
Oppel, E. (1968) “Ovids Heroides: Studien zur inneren Form und zur Motivation.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Ottone, M. D. (2003) “Epic and Elegy in Ovid's Heroides: Paris, Helen, and Homeric Intertext.” Dissertation, Duke University.
(1980) “Simile and Imagery in Ovid Heroides 4 and 5,” Illinois Classical Studies 5: 110–29.Google Scholar
(1993) Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pucci, P. (1987) Odysseus Polutropos: Intertextual Readings in the Odyssey and the Iliad. Ithaca.
(1982) “The Poet and his Audience in the Augustan Age,” Aufstieg und Niedergang der römischen Welt 2.30: 75–180.Google Scholar
(1986) “Shifting Stands, Shifting Standards: Reading, Interpretation, and Literary Judgment,” Arethusa 19: 115–34.Google Scholar
(1974) “Phaedra and Pasiphae: The Pull Backward,” Transactions of the American Philological Association 104: 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1999) “Epistolary Fictions: Authorial Identity in Heroides 15,” Proceedings of the Cambridge Philological Society 45: 109–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, D. H. (1997) “Afterword: Ending and Aftermath, Ancient and Modern,” in Classical Closure: Reading the End in Greek and Latin Literature, eds. , , and . Princeton: 251–73.Google Scholar
Roisman, H. (1999) Nothing Is As It Seems: The Tragedy of the Implicit in Euripides' Hippolytus. Lanham, Md.
Rosati, G. (1985) “Forma elegiaca di un simbolo letterario: la Fedra di Ovidio,” in Atti delle Giornate di Studio su Fedra, ed. . Turin: 113–31.Google Scholar
(1988) “Il parto maledetto di Medea (Ovidio, Her. 6,156s.),” Materiali e Discussioni20–1: 305–9.Google Scholar
(1991) “Protesilao, Paride e l'amante elegiaco: un modello Omerico in Ovidio,” Maia 43: 103–14.Google Scholar
(1992) “L'elegia al femminile: le Heroides di Ovidio (e altre heroides),” Materiali e Discussioni 29: 71–94.Google Scholar
(1996) “Sabinus, the Heroides and the Poet-Nightingale. Some Observations on the Authenticity of the Epistula Sapphus,” Classical Quarterly 46: 207–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1996) “Love Letters in Callimachus, Ovid and Aristaenetus or the Sad Fate of a Mailorder Bride,” Materiali e Discussioni 36: 9–31.Google Scholar
Russ, J. (1973) “What Can a Heroine Do? Or Why Women Can't Write,” in Images of Women in Fiction: Feminist Perspectives, ed. . , Ohio: 3–20.Google Scholar
Schmitz-Cronenbröck, W. (1937) “Die Anfänge der Heroiden des Ovid.” Dissertation, Dusseldorf.
(1965) “The Tragedy of the Hippolytus: The Waters of Ocean and the Untouched Meadow,” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology: 70: 117–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1977) “Sophocles' Trachiniae: Myth, Poetry, and Heroic Values,” Yale Classical Studies 25: 99–158.Google Scholar
(1984) “Underreading and Intertextuality: Sappho, Simaetha, and Odysseus in Theocritus' Second Idyll,” Arethusa 17: 201–9.Google Scholar
Segal, C. (1986) Language and Desire in Seneca's Phaedra. Princeton.
Skinner, M. B. (1997) “Ego Mulier: The Construction of Male Sexuality in Catullus,” in Roman Sexualities, eds. and . Princeton: 129–50.Google Scholar
(1994) “Fantasy, Myth, and Love Letters: Text and Tale in Ovid's Heroides,” Arethusa 27: 247–73.Google Scholar
(1979) Theseus as Son and Stepson: A Tentative Illustration of Greek Mythological Mentality, BICS suppl. 40. London.Google Scholar
Spentzou, E. (2003) Readers and Writers in Ovid's Heroides: Transgressions of Genre and Gender. Oxford.
Spoth, F. (1992) Ovids Heroides als Elegien (Zetemata heft 89). München.
(1993) “Ovids Ariadne-Brief (Her. 10) und die römische Liebeselegie,” Würzburger Jahrbücher für die Altertumswissenschaft 19: 239–60.Google Scholar
Stroh, W. (1991) “Heroides ovidianae cur epistulas scribant,” in Ovidio poeta della memoria: Atti del Convegno Internazionale di Studi Sulmona, 19–21 ottobre 1989, ed. . Sulmo.Google Scholar
Svenbro, J. (1993) Phrasikleia: An Anthropology of Reading in Ancient Greece, trans. . Ithaca and London.Google Scholar
(1981) “The Authenticity of the Letter of Sappho to Phaon (Heroides XV),” Harvard Studies in Classical Philology 85: 133–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissol, G. (1997) The Face of Nature: Wit, Narrative, and Cosmic Origins in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Princeton.
(1998) “Ovids Phaedra in der mythologischen Tradition Ep. Her. 4 – der Brief einer Persona Delirans,” Classica et Mediaevalia 49: 163–235.Google Scholar
Treggiari, S. (1991) Roman Marriage: Iusti Coniuges from the Time of Cicero to the Time of Ulpian. Oxford.
Tschiedel, H. -J. (1969) “Phaedra und Hippolytus: Variationen eines tragischen Konfliktes.” Dissertation, Erlangen-Nürnberg.
(1976) La Magie dans la poésie Latine I: des origines à la fin du régne d'Auguste. Paris.Google Scholar
Viarre, S. (1964) “L'image et la pensée dans les Métamorphoses d'Ovide.” Dissertation, Paris.
(1977) “Le rhétorique et l'imagination dans la IXe Héroide (Déjanire à Hercule),” Helmantica 28: 549–60.Google Scholar
Von Albrecht, M. and Zinn, E. (1968) Ovid (Wege der Forschung 92). Darmstadt.
Wallace-Hadrill, A. (1987) “Time for Augustus: Ovid, Augustus, and the Fasti,” in Homo Viator: Classical Essays for J. Bramble, eds. et al. Oxford: 221–30.Google Scholar
(1966) “The Myth of Ariadne from Homer to Catullus,” Greece and Rome 13: 22–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(1893) “Studien zu den Hiketiden des Aeschylos,” Munchen Akademie der Wissenschaften Sitzungsberichte der Philosophisch-Philologischen und Historischen Classe 2: 393–450.Google Scholar
Wheeler, S. M. (1999) A Discourse of Wonders: Audience and Performance in Ovid's Metamorphoses. Philadelphia.
(1992) “Ovid's Canace: Dramatic Irony in Heroides 11,” Classical Quarterly 42: 201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, G. D. (1996) The Curse of Exile: A Study of Ovid's Ibis. Cambridge.
(1997) “Writing in the Mother-Tongue: Hermione and Helen in Heroides 8 (a Tomitian Approach),” Ramus 26: 113–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, J. J. (1985) Auctor and Actor: A Narratological Reading of Apuleius' Golden Ass. Berkeley.
(1990) The Constraints of Desire: The Anthropology of Sex and Gender in Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar
(1960) “Hippolytus: A Study in Causation,” in Euripides, Fondation Hardt Entretiens 6. Geneva: 171–91.Google Scholar
(1961) “The Danaid Trilogy of Aeschylus,” Journal of Hellenistic Studies 81: 141–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winsor, E. J. (1963) “A Study in the Sources and Rhetoric of Chaucer's Legend of Good Women and Ovid's Heroides.” Dissertation, Yale University.
(1994) “Taking the Woman's Part: Engendering Roman Love Elegy,” Ramus 23: 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeitlin, F. (1985) “The Power of Aphrodite: Eros and the Boundaries of the Self in Euripides' Hippolytus,” in New Directions in Euripidean Criticism, ed. . Durham, N.C.Google Scholar