Antonello, P. and Gifford, P. (eds.) 2015. How We Became Human: Mimetic Theory and the Science of Evolutionary Origins. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press.Google Scholar

Benz, M., Alt, K. W., Erdal, Y. S., Şahin, F. S., and Özkaya, V. 2018. Re-presenting the past: evidence from daily practices and rituals at Körtik Tepe. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar

Bloch, M. 2008. Why religion is nothing special but is central. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (June): 2055–2062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bloch, M. 2010. Is there religion at Çatalhöyük … or are there just houses? In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge University Press, pp. 146–162.Google Scholar

Buchli, V. 2014. Material register, surface, and form at Çatalhöyük. In Hodder, I. (ed) Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society: Vital Matters, Cambridge University Press, pp. 280–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cauvin, J. 1994. Naissance des divinités, naissance de l’agriculture. Paris: CNRS.Google Scholar

Cauvin, J., Hodder, I., Rollefson, G., Bar-Yosef, O., and Watkins, T. 2001. The Birth of the Gods and the Origins of Agriculture by Jacques Cauvin, trans. T. Watkins. New Studies in Archaeology. Cambridge University Press. Reviewed by Hodder, I., Rollefson, G. O., and Bar-Yosef, Ofer with a response by Watkins, T.. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 11 (1): 105–121. doi:10.1017/S0959774301000063Google Scholar

Clare, L., Dietrich, O., Notroff, J., Sönmez, D., and Ercan, M. 2018. Establishing identities in the Protoneolithic: history making at Göbekli Tepe in the late 10th millennium cal bc. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar

Duru, G. 2018. Sedentism and solitude: exploring the impact of private space on social cohesion in the Neolithic. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar

Flannery, K. and Marcus, J. 2013. The Creation of Inequality: How our Prehistoric Ancestors Set the Stage for Monarchy, Slavery, and Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Girard, R. 1986 [1982]. The Scapegoat. Trans. Y. Freccero. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Girard, R. 1987 [1978]. Things Hidden since the Foundation of the World: Research undertaken in collaboration with J.-M. Oughourlian and G. Lefort. Trans. S. Bann and M. Metteer. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (ed.) 2010. Religion in the Emergence of Civilisation: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodder, I. (ed.) 2014. Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society: Vital Matters. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Hodder, I. 2016. More on history houses at Çatalhöyük: a response to Carleton et al. Journal of Archaeological Science 10.1016/j.jas.2015.10.010Google Scholar

Hodder, I. (ed.) 2018a. Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hodder, I. 2018b. Things and the slow Neolithic: the Middle Eastern transformation. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 25 (1): 155–177.Google Scholar

Hodder, I. and Pels, P. 2010. History houses: a new interpretation of architectural elaboration at Çatalhöyük. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. Cambridge University Press, pp. 163–186.Google Scholar

Kopenawa, D. and Albert, B. 2015. The Falling Sky: Words of a Yanomami Shaman. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Matthews, W. 2018. Creating settled life: micro-histories of community, ritual and place – the central Zagros and Çatalhöyük. In Hodder, I. (ed), Religion, History and Place in the Origin of Settled Life. Boulder: University of Colorado Press.Google Scholar

Miller, D. 1985. Artifacts as Categories: A Study of Ceramic Variability in Central India. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Mills, B. 2014. Relational networks and religious sodalities at Çatalhöyük. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society: Vital Matters. Cambridge University Press, pp. 159–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Nakamura, C. and Pels, P. 2014. Using “magic” to think from the material: tracing distributed agency, revelation, and concealment at Çatalhöyük. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society: Vital Matters. Cambridge University Press, pp.187–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Patton, K. C. and Hager, L. D. 2014. “Motherbaby”: A Death in Childbirth at Çatalhöyük. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society: Vital Matters. Cambridge University Press, pp. 225–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pinker, S. 2011. The Better Angels of our Nature: The Decline of Violence in History and its Causes. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

Van Der Leeuw, S. E. 1990. Archaeology, material culture and innovation. SubStance 19 (2/3): 92–109.Google Scholar

Weismantel, M. 2014. The Hau of the house. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society: Vital Matters. Cambridge University Press, pp. 259–268.Google Scholar

Wengrow, D. and Graeber, D. 2015. Farewell to the “childhood of man”: ritual, seasonality, and the origins of inequality. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 21 (3): 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Whitehouse, H. and Hodder, I. 2010. Modes of religiosity at Çatalhöyük. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion in the Emergence of Civilization: Çatalhöyük as a Case Study. (Cambridge University Press, pp. 122–145.Google Scholar

Whitehouse, H., Mazzucato, C., Hodder, I., and Atkinson, Q. D. 2014. Modes of religiosity and the evolution of social complexity at Çatalhöyük. In Hodder, I. (ed.) Religion at Work in a Neolithic Society: Vital Matters, pp. 134–158.Google Scholar

Winterhalder, B. 1986. Diet choice, risk, and food sharing in a stochastic environment. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 5 (4): 369–392.Google Scholar