Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 On animals and men
- 2 Games and gladiators
- 3 Trials by combat, tournaments, and duels
- 4 Battles, campaigns, wars, and politics
- 5 From bloody games to bloodless wars
- 6 Enter the computer
- 7 The females of the species
- 8 Conclusions: The mirrors and the mirrored
- Index
- References
3 - Trials by combat, tournaments, and duels
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 April 2013
Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- 1 On animals and men
- 2 Games and gladiators
- 3 Trials by combat, tournaments, and duels
- 4 Battles, campaigns, wars, and politics
- 5 From bloody games to bloodless wars
- 6 Enter the computer
- 7 The females of the species
- 8 Conclusions: The mirrors and the mirrored
- Index
- References
Summary
A certain kind of justice
As a look at the literature will show, the line between trial by combat on one hand and single combat and combat of champions on the other has always been rather vague. As long ago as the Middle Ages, various authors referred to the same episodes by different terms or used the same terms when referring to very different episodes. In all three cases the fight, rather than being an integral part of ongoing hostilities, is clearly separated from them by means of challenge and response as well as the fact that it took place in a location specially set apart for the purpose. Often it is supposed to act as a substitute for those hostilities or to put an end to them, albeit that in most cases things did not work out as planned, the terms of the preliminary agreement were violated, and hostilities opened or resumed. In all three cases the fight is carefully stage-managed, the objective being to enable as many people as possible to watch it. In all three cases, the fighting serves as an ordeal and is intended to prove a point – either that God is on one’s side, or that one’s cause is just, or simply that one trusts in one’s prowess and stands ready to take on any enemy who dares to present himself. What sets trial by combat apart from the other two is a unique characteristic which justifies treating it separately: namely the fact that, in this case, the fight is neither an exhibition nor a contest but part of a formal judiciary process. As such it takes place at the behest of a judge, or judges, who commands both sides and presides over the proceedings.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- WargamesFrom Gladiators to Gigabytes, pp. 97 - 138Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2013
References
The Mirror of Justices, , ed., London: Selden Society, 1895
, “Trial by Combat Among the Greeks,” Greece and Rome, 19, 56, June 1950, pp. 73–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “‘Placita’ and the Settlement of Disputes in Later Merovingian Francia,” in and , eds., The Settlement of Disputes in Early Medieval Europe, Cambridge University Press, 1986, p. 16.Google Scholar
, “The Religious Elements of the Icelandic Holmganga,” Modern Language Review, 27, 3, July 1932, pp. 307–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Growth of Trial by Jury in England,” Harvard Law Review, 10, 3, 1896, pp. 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “I. Trial by Battle and the Writ of Right,” Journal of Legal History, 1, 2, 1980, p. 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Saxon Mirror: A “Sachsenspiegel” of the Fourteenth Century, , trans., Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1999, pp. 87–8Google Scholar
, “II. Trial by Battle and the Appeals of Felony,” Journal of Legal History, 1, 2, 1980, p. 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “First Catch Your Toad: Medieval Attitudes to Ordeal and Battle,” Cambrian Law Review, 50, 1990, p. 55.Google Scholar
, “Trial by Combat in Medieval Jewish History,” Proceedings of the American Academy for Jewish Research, 46−7, 1928–9, pp. 8–19.Google Scholar
, The Last Duel: A True Story of Crime, Scandal and Trial by Combat in Medieval France, New York: Broadway, 2004Google Scholar
, “Ordeal by Combat and the Rejection of Chivalry in Diu Crône,” Speculum, 51, 2, April 1976, pp. 262–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “The Baronial Context of the English Civil War,” Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 5th series, 40, 1990, p. 93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Crossroads of Justice: Law and Culture in Late Medieval France, Leiden: Brill, 1993, pp. 54–73.Google Scholar
, A Brief Display of the Origins of Ordeals . . . and the Decision of Private Quarrels by Single Combat, London: by the author, 1821, p. 26.Google Scholar
, The Trial by Combat of Henry de Essex and Robert de Monfort at Reading Abbey, London: Elliot, 1919, p. 26.Google Scholar
The Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor, , trans., New York: Oxford University Press, 1997, no. 303, p. 435Google Scholar
, The Grand Strategy of the Byzantine Army, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2009, pp. 10 and 397.Google Scholar
, Hoefische Kultur: Literatur und Gesellschaft im hohen Mittelalter, Munich: Deutsche Taschenbuch Verlag, 1986, pp. 357–60.Google Scholar
, “Historia Rerum Anglicarum,” in Chronicles of the Reigns of Stephen, Henry II and Richard I, , ed., London: Rolls Series, 1885, vol. II, pp. 422–3.Google Scholar
Chronique, and , eds., Adamant, 2005
The History of William the Marshal, London: Birkbeck College, 2002, line 3421.
, War and Chivalry: The Conduct and Perception of War in England and Normandy, 1066–1217, Cambridge University Press, 1996, pp. 149–50.Google Scholar
, ed., in Die Wundergeschichten des Caesarius von Heisterbach, Bonn: Hanstein, 1937
, ed., Analecta novissima spicilegii solesmensias, Paris: Didot, 1888, vol. II, no. 52.
Rudolf von Ems, Der guote Gêrhart, , ed., Tuebingen: Altdeutsche Textbibliothek, 1989, lines 3437ff.
, The Royal Book of Horsemanship, Jousting, and Knightly Combat, and , trans., Highland Village, TX: Chivalry Bookshelf, 2005 [c. 1438], pp. 75, 76, 79, 100.Google Scholar
, “Wesen und Bedeutung von Kampfsagen und Trefferzhalenskitzzen fuer die Geschichte des spaetmittelalterlichen Tourniers,” in and , eds., Sport zwischen Eigenstaendigkeit und Fremdbestimmung, Bonn: Institut fuer Sportwissenschaft, 1986, pp. 82–112.Google Scholar
, Le Jouvencel, Nabu, 2010, vol. II, 100.
, “Chivalric Culture in the Age of Dante,” Renaissance Studies, 2, 2, 1988, pp. 122ff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, “An Unknown MS of Freydal,” Burlington Magazine for Connoisseurs, 48, 278, May 1928, pp. 235–42.Google Scholar
, Blood and Violence in Early Modern France, Oxford University Press, 2006, pp. 132–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Memoires contenans les anecdotes de la cour de France . . . touchant les duels, in Œuvres complètes, Paris: Foucault, 1803, vol. VI, pp. 70–1.Google Scholar
, Dueling: The Cult of Honor in Fin-de-Siècle Germany, Princeton University Press, 1994, p. 18.Google Scholar
, An Inquiry into the Causes of the Frequent Executions at Tyburn, London: Kraus, 1975 [1725], pp. 31–2.Google Scholar
, The Duel in Early Modern England, Cambridge University Press, 2003, pp. 87–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, Ritualized Violence, Russian Style: The Duel in Russian Literature and Culture, Stanford University Press, 1999, pp. 64–5.Google Scholar
, Honor and Violence in Golden Age Spain, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2008, pp. 21–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
, The Romance of Duelling in All Times and Countries, London: Chapman and Hall, 1868, vol. II, p. 249.Google Scholar
, ed., Mitteilungen der Algemeine Anti-Duell Liga fuer Oesterreich, Vienna, 1903.
, ed., Vergleichende Darstellung des deutschen und auslaendischen Strafrechts, Berlin: Liebman, 1906, vol. III, pp. 125–59.
, “Die Mensur, ein wesentliches Merkmal des Verbandes,” in , ed., Wir wollen Männer, wir wollen Taten! Deutsche Corpsstudenten 1848 bis heute, Berlin: Siedler, 1998, pp. 383–5.Google Scholar
, Das Duel und die Sonderrole des Militaers: Zur preussisch-deutschen Entwicklung von Militaer- und Zivilgewalt im 19. Jahrhundert, Berlin: Duncker & Humboldt, 1992, pp. 34–5, 85–7.Google Scholar
, The German Officer Corps in State and Society, 1660–1945, New York: Praeger, 1965, p. 119Google Scholar
, quoted in , ed., Reminiscences of Marx and Engels, Moscow: Foreign Languages Publishing House, 1959, p. 159Google Scholar
: “Die Ehreauffassung der SS: Nationalsozialismus und das Duell. Himmler als Burschenschafter: Das Duell R. Strunk gegen Horst Krutschinna,” Einst und Jetzt, 38, 1993, pp. 265–70Google Scholar