Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-21T04:24:08.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Trade-Offs Between Distributive Equity and Democratic Process: The Case of Child Welfare Reform in South Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2014

Krista Johnson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

This essay examines the tensions that emerged when South Africa's newly democratic government attempted to deliver reforms rapidly in the interest of distributive equity, sidelining the slower and more inclusive process of consultation with stakeholders outside of government. Its focus is on policy debates in the welfare sector over the new Child Support Grant proposed in 1997. An analysis of these policy debates reveals that consultation with stakeholders outside of government strengthened the democratic process and provided a necessary venue for citizens to engage government and have a say in the development process. However, this essay also suggests that with the introduction of the government's Macro-Economic Strategy for Growth, Employment and Redistribution (GEAR), the policy terrain has become less consultative as the ANC government has increasingly centralized decision-making powers within the executive and cabinet. While in the short term this may be seen as a necessary measure in order to begin to address many of the pressing needs of the electorate, in the long run it has the effect of installing undemocratic practices and shifting the locus of power to those institutions of government that are least representative and accountable.

Résumé:

Résumé:

Cet article examine les tensions qui émergent lorsque le nouveau gouvernement démocratique d'Afrique du Sud essaie de mettre en place des réformes rapides dans l'intérêt d'une équité de distribution, tout en mettant en marge le processus plus lent et plus inclusif de consultation avec les parties intéressées à l'extérieur du gouvernement. Cet article se concentre plus particulièrement sur les débats politiques survenus dans le secteur des prestations sociales à propos de la nouvelle bourse d'allocation pour enfant proposée en 1997. L'analyse de ces débats politiques révèle que la consultation avec les parties intéressées à l'extérieur du gouvernement renforce le processus démocratique et offre aux citoyens l'arène nécessaire leur permettant d'interpeller le gouvernement et d'avoir une voix dans le processus de développement. Cependant, cet article suggère également qu'en raison de l'introduction par le gouvernement de la stratégie macroéconomique de Croissance, Emploi et Redistribution (Growth, Employment and Redistribution—GEAR), le terrain politique est devenu moins consultatif à mesure que le gouvernement de l'ANC centralisait de plus en plus les pouvoirs décisionnels au niveau de l'exécutif et du Cabinet. Si à courte échéance cette mesure peut être considérée comme nécessaire pour vite commencer à répondre aux nombreux besoins pressants de l'électorat, son effet à long terme est d'insuffler des pratiques non démocratiques et de déplacer le centre du pouvoir vers ces institutions gouvernementales moins représentatives et moins responsables.

Type
Articles
Information
African Studies Review , Volume 43 , Issue 3 , December 2000 , pp. 19 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © African Studies Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, Glen, and Webster, Eddie. 1995. “Challenging Transition Theory: The Labor Movement, Radical Reform, and Transition to Democracy in South Africa.” Politics & Society 23: 75–106.Google Scholar
African National Congress (ANC, Johannesburg). 1997. “Statement of the National Executive Committee.” 07 14.Google Scholar
African National Congress (ANC, Cape Town). 1994. Reconstruction and Development Programme: A Policy Framework Google Scholar
Atkinson, Doreen, ed. 1992. “The State and Civil Society.” Theoria 79 (05).Google Scholar
Sash, Black. 1997. Written submission to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Welfare on the Child Support Grant. Cape Town, 04.Google Scholar
Business Day (Johannesburg). 1997a. 03 14.Google Scholar
Business Day (Johannesburg). 1997b. 03 17.Google Scholar
Business Day (Johannesburg). 1997c. 05 16.Google Scholar
Business Day (Johannesburg). 1997d. 05 28.Google Scholar
Cape Times (Cape Town). 1997a. 03 6.Google Scholar
Cape Times (Cape Town). 1997b. 04 30.Google Scholar
Community Law Centre, University of the Western Cape. 1997a. Press Statement on the Child Support Benefit. 04 29.Google Scholar
Community Law Centre, University of the Western Cape. 1997b. “The Lund Committee Report and Human Rights.” Prepared for the parliamentary public hearings. 04.Google Scholar
Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU, Cape Town). 1997. Written submission to the Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Welfare on the Child Support Grant. 04.Google Scholar
Department of Welfare and Population Development (Pretoria). 1997a. “The Child Support Benefit: An update following recent announcements in the media.” 07.Google Scholar
Department of Welfare and Population Development (Pretoria). 1997b. “White Paper on Welfare and Population Development.”Google Scholar
Greenstein, Ran. 1998. “The Function of Knowledge: Social Research and Political Transformation in South Africa.” Paper presented at the HSRC/CODESRIA/ Wits International Symposium on Globalization and Social Sciences in Africa, Johannesburg, 09 14–18.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Ran, Heinrich, Volkhart, and Naidoo, Kumi. 1998. The State of Civil Society in South Africa. Johannesburg: CASE.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephen, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 1995. The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. 1991. The Third Wave: Democratization in the Late Twentieth Century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Lund, Francie. 1996. “Report of the Lund Committee on Child and Family Support.” Prepared for the Department of Welfare and Population Development, Pretoria, 08.Google Scholar
Lund, Francie. 1998. “Social Welfare and Social Security.” Paper presented at the Conference on the Politics of Economic Reform, Cape Town, 01.Google Scholar
Mail and Guardian (Johannesburg). 1996. 10 4.Google Scholar
Mail and Guardian (Johannesburg). 1997. 05 9–15.Google Scholar
Marais, Hein. 1998. South Africa—Limits to Change: The Political Economy of Transition. London: Zed Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Anthony. 1992. Lessons of Struggle: South African Internal Opposition, 1960–1990. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mayekiso, Mzwanele. 1996. Township Politics: Civic Struggles for a New South Africa. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
McKinley, Dale. 1997. The ANC and the Liberation Struggle. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Neocosmos, Michael. 1998. “From Peoples' Politics to State Politics: Aspects of National Liberation in South Africa.” In Olukoshi, A., ed., The Politics of Opposition in Contemporary Africa. Uppsala, Sweden: Nordic Africa Institute.Google Scholar
Nzimande, Blade, and Sikhosana, Mpume. 1992. “Civil Society and Democracy.” African Communist (first quarter).Google Scholar
O'Donnell, Guillermo, Schmitter, Philippe, and Whitehead, Laurence, eds. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Ruk: Prospects for Democracy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Minerals and Energy. 1999a. Press release, Cape Town, 03 10.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Minerals and Energy. 1999b. Minutes of the public hearings on the Nuclear Energy and National Nuclear Regulator Bills, Cape Town, 02 22–23.Google Scholar
Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Welfare. 1997. Report on the public hearings on the Child Support Benefit, Cape Town, 06.Google Scholar
Pereira, Luis C. B., Maravall, Jose M., and Przeworski, Adam. 1993. Economie Reforms in New Democracies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economie Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, Adam, et al 1995. Sustainable Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Swilling, Mark. 1990. “Political Transition, Development and the Role of Civil Society.” Africa Insight 20 (3).Google Scholar
Tilley, Alison. 1997. “Is Parliamentary Advocacy All It's Cracked up to Be?” Black Sash National Newsletter (Cape Town).Google Scholar