Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 November 2008
This article examines the mounting pessimism of policy-makers concerning the implications of societal ageing. It is argued that underlying this pessimism are primarily macroeconomic worries about the economic ‘burden’ that older people are said to represent to the economy and, specifically, the working population. It is suggested that, in turn, these particular concerns are ideologically inspired; hence it is the public expenditure costs of pensions and health care rather than, for example, the economic costs of ageing for older people and their families, that are the chief causes of anxiety. Thus political ideology has distorted and amplified the macroeconomic consequences of population ageing in order to legitimate anti-welfare state policies.
While Britain and the US represent leading examples of this trend, there is a danger that, inspired to some extent by the leading international economic agencies, other countries will follow their lead. An unintended result of doing so may be the growth of inter-generational conflict. This concept has achieved quite wide currency in the US literature and has been influential in some policy circles. It is subjected to close scrutiny and found deficient as a basis for policy-making. In conclusion some lessons are drawn about the failure of orthodox social gerontology to counteract the pessimistic accounts emanating from economic and demographic analyses and the need for a more critical stance by the discipline.
1 Council of Europe, The Projection of the Very Old. Council of Europe, Strasburg, 1984Google Scholar; Heller, P., Hemming, R. and Kolmert, P., Ageing and social expenditure in the major industrialised countries 1980–2025, Occasional Paper 47. IMF, Washington DC, 1986Google Scholar; OECD, Health and Pension Policies Under Economic and Demographic Constraints. OECD, Paris, 1988aGoogle Scholar; idem, Reforming Public Pensions. OECD, Paris, 1988b; idem, Ageing Populations – The Social Policy Implications. OECD, Paris, 1988c; ISSA, Long-term Care for the elderly provided within the framework of health care systems. Report presented at XXII General Assembly, Montreal, 2–12 September, 1986; ILO, Into the Twenty-first Century: the Development of Social Security. ILO, Geneva, 1984.Google Scholar
2 Walker, A., Care of elderly people. In Berthoud, R. (ed.), Challenges to Social Policy pp. 185–209. Gower, London, 1984.Google Scholar
3 See, for example, Hoskins, I., Intergenerational equity: an overview of a public policy debate in the United States. Ageing International, Spring, 1987, pp. 5–8Google Scholar; Moody, H. R., Generational equity and social insurance. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 13, 1 (1988), 31–56CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Harbor, J. C., Economic policy, international equity and the social security trust fund buildup. Social Security Bulletin, 50, 10 (1987). 13–18Google Scholar; Minkler, M., ‘Generational equity’ and the new victim blaming: an emerging public policy issue. International Journal of Health Services, 16, 4 (1986), 539–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Binney, E. A. and Estes, C. L., The retreat of the State and its transfer of responsibility: the intergenerational war. International Journal of Health Services, 18, 1 (1988), 83–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4 OECD (1988b), op. cit. p. 34.
9 Johnson, P., The structured dependency of the elderly: a critical note. In Jefferys, M. (ed.), Growing Old in the Twentieth Century, p. 66. Routledge, London, 1989.Google Scholar
12 United Nations, The Ageing of Populations and Its Economic and Social Implications. UN, New York, 1956.Google Scholar
13 Thomas, K., Age and authority in early modern England. Proceedings of the British Academy, LXII (1976), 205–48.Google Scholar
15 Titmuss, R. M., Essays on ‘the Welfare State’, second edition. Allen & Unwin, London, 1963.Google Scholar
16 OECD (1988c), op. cit. p. 35.
19 Op. cit. p. 90.
21 Walker, A., Pensions and the production of poverty in old age. In Phillipson, C. and Walker, A. (eds), Ageing and Social Policy, pp. 184–216. Gower, London, 1986.Google Scholar
22 Manton, K., The linkage of morbidity and mortality implications of increasing life expectancy at later ages for health service demand. In Economic Council of Canada (ed.), Ageing With Limited Health Resources, pp. 39–59Economic Council of Canada, Ottawa, 1987Google Scholar; Walker, A., Meeting the needs of Canada's elderly with limited health resources: some observations based on British experience.Google Scholar In idem, pp., 27–39.
23 OECD (1988b), op. cit. p. 35.
24 OECD (1988c), op. cit. p. 40.
25 OECD, (1988b), op. cit. p. 66.
30 Walker, A., Early retirement: release of refuge from the labour market? The Quarterly Journal of Social Affairs, 1, 3 (1985), 211–29Google Scholar; idem, The benefits of old age? In McEwan, E. (ed.), Age: The Unrecognised Discrimination, pp. 58–70. Age Concern, Mitcham, 1990, pp. 58–70.Google Scholar
31 Walker, A., Thatcherism and the new politics of old age. In Myles, J. and Quadagno, J. (eds), States, Labour Markets and the Future of Old Age Policy. Temple University Press, New York, 1990.Google Scholar
32 OECD (1988c), op. cil. p. 39.
34 OECD (1988c), op. cit. p. 71.
36 Jones, J., Ageing and generational equity: an American perspective. Paper given to an international seminar on the ageing of the population, Futuribles International, Paris, 1988, p. 13.Google Scholar
37 DHSS, op. cit. p. 18.
39 The Sheffield Group, The Social Economy and the Democratic State, p. 15. Lawrence and Wishart, London, 1989.Google Scholar
44 Townsend, P., Elderly people with disabilities. In Walker, A. and Townsend, P. (eds), Disability in Britain., pp. 91–118. Martin Robertson, Oxford, 1981.Google Scholar
46 Johnson, P. and Falkingham, J., Intergenerational Transfers and Public Expenditure on the Elderly in Modem Britain, p. iii. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London, 1989.Google Scholar
48 Walker, A., Towards a political economy of old age. Ageing and Society, 1, 1 (1981). 73–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem. The politics of ageing in Britain. In Phillipson, C., Bernard, M. and Strong, P. (eds), Dependency and Interdependency in Old Age, pp. 30–45. Croom Helm, London, 1986.Google Scholar
49 Dunleavy, P. and Husbands, C., British Democracy at the Crossroads. Allen & Unwin, London, 1985.Google Scholar
51 OECD (1988b), op. cit. p. 72.
53 Phillipson, C. and Walker, A., the case for a critical gerontology. In di Gregorio, S. (ed.), Social Gerontology: New Directions, pp. 1–13. Croom Helm, London 1987.Google Scholar
55 Townsend, P., Ageism and social policy. In Phillipson, C. and Walker, A. (eds), Ageing and Social Policy, pp. 15–44. Gower, London, 1986.Google Scholar