Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-544b6db54f-6mft8 Total loading time: 1.509 Render date: 2021-10-24T07:23:15.027Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Returns to work after retirement: a prospective study of unretirement in the United Kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 October 2017

LORETTA G. PLATTS*
Affiliation:
Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, Sweden. Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
LAURIE M. CORNA
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
DIANA WORTS
Affiliation:
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
PEGGY MCDONOUGH
Affiliation:
Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
DEBORA PRICE
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine, King's College London, UK. Manchester Institute for Collaborative Research on Ageing, University of Manchester, UK.
KAREN GLASER
Affiliation:
Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science, Health and Medicine, King's College London, UK.
*
Address for correspondence: Loretta Platts, Stress Research Institute, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden E-mail: loretta.platts@su.se

Abstract

Despite the complexity of the retirement process, most research treats it as an abrupt and one-way transition. Our study takes a different approach by examining retirement reversals (unretirement) and their predictors. Using the British Household Panel Survey (1991–2008), and following participants into Understanding Society (2010–2015), we undertake a survival analysis to investigate retirement reversals among Britons aged 50–69 years who were born in 1920–1959 (N = 2,046). Unretirement was defined as: (a) reporting being retired and subsequently recommencing paid employment, or (b) beginning full-time work following partial retirement (the latter defined here as reporting being retired and working fewer than 30 hours per week). A cumulative proportion of around 25 per cent of participants experienced a retirement reversal after reporting being retired; about half of these reversals occurred within the first five years of retirement. Unretirement was more common for participants who were male, more educated, in better health, owned a house with a mortgage (compared to owning it outright) and whose partner was in paid work. However, unretirement rates were not higher for participants in greater financial need, whether measured as subjective assessment of finances or household income quintiles. These results suggest that unretirement is a strategy more often used by those who are already advantaged and that it has the potential to exacerbate income inequalities in later life.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arber, S. and Ginn, J. 2004. Ageing and gender: diversity and change. Social Trends, 34, 114.Google Scholar
Atchley, R. C. 1982. Retirement as a social institution. Annual Review of Sociology, 8, 263–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beehr, T. A. and Bennett, M. M. 2015. Working after retirement: features of bridge employment and research directions. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1, 1, 112–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Business in the Community, International Longevity Centre and The Prince's Initiative for Mature Enterprise (BIC, ILC-UK and PRIME) 2014. The Missing Million: Illuminating the Employment Challenges of the Over 50s. Business in the Community, London.Google Scholar
Business in the Community, International Longevity Centre and The Prince's Initiative for Mature Enterprise (BIC, ILC-UK and PRIME) 2015. The Missing Million: Pathways Back into Employment. Business in the Community, London.Google Scholar
Cahill, K. E., Giandrea, M. D. and Quinn, J. F. 2015. Retirement patterns and the macroeconomy, 1992–2010: the prevalence and determinants of bridge jobs, phased retirement, and reentry among three recent cohorts of older Americans. The Gerontologist, 55, 3, 384403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carr, D. C. and Kail, B. L. 2013. The influence of unpaid work on the transition out of full-time paid work. The Gerontologist, 53, 1, 92101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandler, D. and Tetlow, G. 2014. Retirement in the 21st century. IFS Report R98, Institute for Fiscal Studies, London.Google Scholar
Cleves, M. A., Gould, W. W., Gutierrez, R. G. and Marchenko, Y. 2010. An Introduction to Survival Analysis Using Stata. Third edition, Stata Press, College Station, Texas.Google Scholar
Congdon-Hohman, J. M. 2009. Three essays in labor and public economics. PhD thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.Google Scholar
Corna, L. M., Platts, L. G., Worts, D., Price, D., McDonough, P., Sacker, A., Di Gessa, G. and Glaser, K. 2016. A Sequence Analysis Approach to Modelling the Work and Family Histories of Older Adults in the UK. King's College London, London.Google Scholar
Dahl, S.-Å., Nilsen, Ø. A. and Vaage, K. 2003. Gender differences in early retirement behaviour. European Sociological Review, 19, 2, 179–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dingemans, E. 2016. Working after retirement: determinants and consequences of bridge employment. PhD thesis, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Disney, R. and Smith, S. 2002. The labour supply effect of the abolition of the earnings rule for older workers in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal, 112, 478, C136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurofound 2012. Income from Work After Retirement in the EU. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
Fasbender, U., Wang, M., Voltmer, J.-B. and Deller, J. 2016. The meaning of work for post-retirement employment decisions. Work, Aging and Retirement, 2, 1, 1223.Google Scholar
Finch, N. 2014. Why are women more likely than men to extend paid work? The impact of work–family life history. European Journal of Ageing, 11, 1, 31–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gonzales, E. and Nowell, W. B. 2016. Social capital and unretirement: exploring the bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social relationships. Research on Aging. Published online: August 23 2016.Google Scholar
Goode, W. J. 1960. A theory of role strain. American Sociological Review, 25, 4, 483–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, B. and Hesketh, B. 2008. Post-retirement work: the individual determinants of paid and volunteer work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81, 1, 101–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, S.-K. and Moen, P. 1999. Clocking out: temporal patterning of retirement. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1, 191236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, M. A. 1991. Employment after retirement: who gets back in? Research on Aging, 13, 3, 267–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, M. D., Hardy, M. A. and Liu, M.-C. 1994. Work after retirement – the experiences of older men in the United States. Social Science Research, 23, 1, 82107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jappelli, T. and Modigliani, F. 2005. The age-saving profile and the life-cycle hypothesis. In Franco, F. (ed.), The Collected Papers of Franco Modigliani. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 141–72.Google Scholar
Jonsson, H. and Andersson, L. 1999. Attitudes to work and retirement: generalization or diversity? Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 6, 1, 2935.Google Scholar
Jonsson, H., Josephsson, S. and Kielhofner, G. 2000. Evolving narratives in the course of retirement: a longitudinal study. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 54, 5, 463–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kail, B. L. 2012. Coverage or costs: the role of health insurance in labor market reentry among early retirees. Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 67B, 1, 113–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kail, B. L. and Warner, D. F. 2013. Leaving retirement: age-graded relative risks of transitioning back to work or dying. Population Research and Policy Review, 32, 2, 159–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kanabar, R. 2015. Post-retirement labour supply in England. Journal of the Economics of Ageing, 6, 123–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohli, M. and Rein, M. 1991. The changing balance of work and retirement. In Kohli, M., Rein, M., Guillemard, A.-M. and van Gunsteren, H. (eds), Time for Retirement: Comparative Studies of Early Exit from the Labor Force. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 135.Google Scholar
Lahey, K. E., Kim, D. and Newman, M. L. 2006. Full retirement? An examination of factors that influence the decision to return to work. Financial Services Review, 15, 1, 119.Google Scholar
Lain, D. 2011. Helping the poorest help themselves? Encouraging employment past 65 in England and the USA. Journal of Social Policy, 40, 3, 493512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lain, D. 2015. Work beyond age 65 in England and the USA. In Scherger, S. (ed.), Paid Work Beyond Pension Age: Comparative Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 3156.Google Scholar
Larsen, M. and Pedersen, P. J. 2013. To work, to retire – or both? Labor market activity after 60. IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 2, 1, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, H. and Jenkins, S. 2012. Documentation for derived current and annual net household income variables, BHPS waves 1–18. UK Data Archive Study 3909, Institute for Social and Economic Research, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
Lin, E. Y. 2005. Health insurance coverage and reemployment outcomes among older displaced workers. Contemporary Economic Policy, 23, 4, 529–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loretto, W. and Vickerstaff, S. 2013. The domestic and gendered context for retirement. Human Relations, 66, 1, 6586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnicol, J. 2015. Neoliberalising Old Age. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maestas, N. 2010. Back to work: expectations and realizations of work after retirement. Journal of Human Resources, 45, 3, 718–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, L. 1997. The link between social research and social policy outcomes: reverse retirement as a case in point. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 16, supplement, 90113.Google Scholar
Meghir, C. and Whitehouse, E. 1997. Labour market transitions and retirement of men in the UK. Journal of Econometrics, 79, 2, 327–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moffatt, S. and Heaven, B. 2016. ‘Planning for uncertainty’: narratives on retirement transition experiences. Ageing & Society. 37, 5, 879–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muthén, B. O. and Muthén, L. K. 2012. Mplus 7 Base Program. Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development n.d. What Are Equivalence Scales? OECD Project on Income Distribution and Poverty. Available online at http://www.oecd.org/els/soc/OECD-Note-EquivalenceScales.pdf [Accessed 7 August 2015].Google Scholar
O'Rand, A. M. and Henretta, J. C. 1999. Age and Inequality: Diverse Pathways Through Later Life. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
Pattani, S., Constantinovici, N. and Williams, S. 2004. Predictors of re-employment and quality of life in NHS staff one year after early retirement because of ill health; a national prospective study. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 61, 7, 572–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pettersson, J. 2014. Instead of bowling alone? Unretirement of pensioners in Sweden. International Journal of Manpower, 35, 7, 1016–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pleau, R. L. 2010. Gender differences in postretirement employment. Research on Aging, 32, 3, 267303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schellenberg, G., Turcotte, M. and Ram, B. 2005. Post-retirement employment. Perspectives on Labour and Income, 6, 9, 1417.Google Scholar
Scherger, S. 2015. Introduction: paid work beyond pension age – causes, contexts, consequences. In Scherger, S. (ed.), Paid Work Beyond Pension Age: Comparative Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, UK, 127.Google Scholar
Schuring, M., Robroek, S. J. W., Otten, F. W. J., Arts, C. H. and Burdorf, A. 2013. The effect of ill health and socioeconomic status on labor force exit and re-employment: a prospective study with ten years follow-up in the Netherlands. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 39, 2, 134–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sieber, S. D. 1974. Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review, 39, 4, 567–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, J. D. and Willett, J. B. 2003. Applied Longitudinal Data Analysis: Modeling Change and Event Occurrence. Oxford University Press, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, P. 2008. Sing if you're glad to be grey. Working towards a happier older age in the United Kingdom. In Taylor, P. (ed), Ageing Labour Forces: Promises and Prospects. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK, 84110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurley, D. 2011. Pension age: occupational and private pensions. Standard Note SN/05847, House of Commons Library, London.Google Scholar
University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research and National Centre for Social Research 2010. British Household Panel Survey: Waves 1–18, 1991–2009 [computer file]. SN: 5151, seventh edition, UK Data Service, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
University of Essex, Institute for Social and Economic Research, NatCen Social Research and Kantar Public 2016. Understanding Society: Waves 1–6, 2009–2015 [computer file]. SN: 6614, eighth edition, UK Data Service, Colchester, UK.Google Scholar
Warner, D. F., Hayward, M. D. and Hardy, M. A. 2010. The retirement life course in America at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Population Research and Policy Review, 29, 6, 893919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westerlund, H., Kivimäki, M., Singh-Manoux, A., Melchior, M., Ferrie, J. E., Pentti, J., Jokela, M., Leineweber, C., Goldberg, M., Zins, M. and Vahtera, J. 2009. Self-rated health before and after retirement in France (GAZEL): a cohort study. The Lancet, 374, 9705, 1889–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Westerlund, H., Vahtera, J., Ferrie, J. E., Singh-Manoux, A., Pentti, J., Melchior, M., Leineweber, C., Jokela, M., Siegrist, J., Goldberg, M., Zins, M. and Kivimäki, M. 2010. Effect of retirement on major chronic conditions and fatigue: the French GAZEL occupational cohort study. British Medical Journal, 341, c6149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, E. 1990. The abolition of the pensions ‘earnings rule’. Fiscal Studies, 11, 3, 5570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Platts Supplementary Material

Appendix

Download Platts Supplementary Material(File)
File 37 KB
14
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Returns to work after retirement: a prospective study of unretirement in the United Kingdom
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Returns to work after retirement: a prospective study of unretirement in the United Kingdom
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Returns to work after retirement: a prospective study of unretirement in the United Kingdom
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *