Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Family obligations and support behaviour: a United States–Netherlands comparison

  • TERESA M. COONEY (a1) and PEARL A. DYKSTRA (a2)
Abstract

This study draws on national survey data from the United States of America (USA) and the Netherlands to compare family obligations and support behaviour for middle-generation adults who have a living aged parent and adult child. Consistent with a familialism by default hypothesis based on welfare state differences, the US sample espouses stronger family obligations than the Dutch sample. Yet, the Dutch respondents are more likely to engage in family support behaviours with both the younger and older generations, contrary to a family-steps-in hypothesis. The connection between family obligations and support behaviour is also tested, revealing a stronger association in the US sample, consistent with a family-steps-in hypothesis, but only in regard to relations with ageing parents. We conclude that Dutch respondents are more likely to act on their individual preferences whereas American respondents are more influenced by general norms of obligation towards family members. The findings are discussed in terms of social policy differences between the two countries, and in light of results from comparative European studies of intergenerational relations.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Teresa M. Cooney, Human Development & Family Studies, The University of Missouri, 314 Gentry Hall, Columbia, MO 65211-7700, USA. E-mail: CooneyT@missouri.edu
References
Hide All
Acock, A. C. 2005. Working with missing values. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67, 4, 1012–28.
Albertini, M., Kohli, M. and Vogel, C. 2007. Intergenerational transfers of time and money in European families: common patterns different regimes? Journal of European Social Policy, 17, 4, 319–34.
Attias-Donfut, C. and Arber, S. 2000. Equity and solidarity across the generations. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and the State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London, 121.
Attias-Donfut, C., Ogg, J. and Wolff, F. C. 2005. European patterns of intergenerational financial and time transfers. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 3, 161–73.
Attias-Donfut, C. and Wolff, F. C. 2000. The redistributive effects of generational transfers. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and the State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London, 2246.
Bansak, C. and Raphael, S. 2007. The effects of state policy design features on take-up and crowd-out rates for the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 26, 1, 149–75.
Brandt, M., Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2009. Intergenerational help and care in Europe. European Sociological Review, 25, 5, 585601.
Cox, D. and Jakubson, G. 1995. The connection between public transfers and private interfamily transfers. Journal of Public Economics, 57, 1, 129–67.
Daatland, S. O. and Herlofson, K. 2003. ‘Lost solidarity’ or ‘changed solidarity’: a comparative European view of normative family solidarity. Ageing and Society, 23, 5, 537–60.
Daatland, S. O. and Lowenstein, A. 2005. Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance. European Journal of Ageing, 2, 3, 174–82.
De Leeuw, E. D. and De Heer, W. 2001. Trends in household survey nonresponse: a longitudinal and international comparison. In Groves, R. M., Dillman, D. A., Eltinge, J. L. and Little, R. J. A. (eds), Survey Nonresponse. Wiley, New York, 4154.
Dykstra, P. A. 2010. Intergenerational Family Relationships in Ageing Societies. United Nations, New York and Geneva.
Dykstra, P. A., Kalmijn, M., Knijn, T. C. M., Komter, A. E., Liefbroer, A. C. and Mulder, C. H. 2005. Codebook of the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study, a Multi-actor, Multi-method Panel Study on Solidarity in Family Relationships, Wave 1. NKPS Working Paper No. 4, Netherlands Interdisciplinary Demographic Institute (NIDI), The Hague.
Finch, J. and Mason, J. 1990. Filial obligations and kin support for elderly people. Ageing and Society, 10, 2, 151–75.
Finley, N. J., Roberts, M. D. and Banahan, B. F. III. 1988. Motivators and inhibitors of attitudes of filial obligation toward aging parents. The Gerontologist, 28, 1, 73–8.
Freeman, L. C. and Romney, A. K. 1987. Words, deeds and social structure: a preliminary study of the reliability of informants. Human Organisation, 46, 4, 330–4.
Grundy, E. and Henretta, J. C. 2006. Between elderly parents and adult children: a new look at the intergenerational care provided by the ‘sandwich generation’. Ageing and Society, 26, 5, 707–22.
Haberkern, K. and Szydlik, M. 2010. State provision, societal opinion and children's care of older parents in 11 European countries. Ageing and Society, 30, 2, 299323.
Hagestad, G. O. 2003. Interdependent lives and relationships in changing times: a life-course view of families and aging. In SetterstenJr., R. A. Jr., R. A. (ed.), Invitation to the Life Course: Toward New Understandings of Later Life. Baywood, Amityville, NY, 135–59.
Hank, K. 2007. Proximity and contacts between older parents and their children: a European comparison. Journal of Marriage and Family, 69, 1, 157–73.
Hill, R., Foote, N., Aldous, J., Carlson, R. and MacDonald, R. 1970. Family Development in Three Generations. Schenkman, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Huang, J., Guo, B., Kim, Y. and Sherraden, M. 2010. Parental income, assets, borrowing constraints and children's post-secondary education. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 4, 585–94.
Kalmijn, M. and Saraceno, C. 2008. A comparative perspective on intergenerational support: responsiveness to parental needs in individualistic and familistic countries. European Societies, 10, 3, 479508.
Klein Ikkink, K., van Tilburg, T. and Knipscheer, K. C. P. M. 1999. Perceived instrumental support exchanges in relationships between elderly parents and their adult children: normative and structural explanations. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 4, 831–44.
Kline, P. 1986. A Handbook of Test Construction: Introduction to Psychometric Design. Methuen, London.
Kohli, M. 1999. Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies, 1, 1, 81104.
Kohli, M., Künemund, H., Motel, A. and Szydlik, M. 2000. Families apart? Intergenerational transfers in East and West Germany. In Arber, S. and Attias-Donfut, C. (eds), The Myth of Generational Conflict: The Family and the State in Ageing Societies. Routledge, London, 8899.
Künemund, H. 2008. Intergenerational relations within the family and the state. In Saraceno, C. (ed.), Families, Ageing and Social Policy. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, 105–22.
Künemund, H. and Rein, M. 1999. There is more to receiving than needing: the arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing and Society, 19, 1, 93121.
Lee, G. R., Netzer, J. K. and Coward, R. T. 1994. Filial responsibility expectations and patterns of intergenerational assistance. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 56, 3, 559–65.
Lowenstein, A. and Daatland, S. O. 2006. Filial norms and family support in a comparative cross-national context: evidence from the OASIS study. Ageing and Society, 26, 2, 203–23.
Lye, D. 1996. Adult child–parent relationships. In Hagan, J. and Cook, K. (eds), Annual Review of Sociology. Annual Reviews, Inc., Palo Alto, California, 79102.
Millar, J. and Warman, A. 1996. Family Obligations in Europe. Family Policy Studies Centre, London.
Olsen, G. M. 2007. Toward global welfare state convergence? Family policy and health care in Sweden, Canada and the United States. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 34, 2, 143–64.
Polakow, V. 1997. Family policy, welfare, and single motherhood in the United States and Denmark: a cross-national analysis of discourse and practice. Early Education and Development, 8, 3, 245–64.
Quadagno, J. and Street, D. 2006. Recent trends in U.S. social welfare policy: minor retrenchment or major transformation? Research on Aging, 28, 3, 303–16.
Royston, P. 2005. Multiple imputation of missing values: update. Stata Journal, 5, 2, 88102.
Salganicoff, A., Cubanski, J., Ranji, U. and Neuman, T. 2009. Health coverage and expenses: impact on older women's economic well-being. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 30, 2, 222–47.
Saraceno, C. 2010. Social inequalities in facing old-age dependency: a bi-generational perspective. Journal of European Social Policy, 20, 1, 3244.
Saraceno, C. and Keck, W. 2010. Can we identify intergenerational policy regimes in Europe? European Societies, 12, 5, 675–96.
Schutz, G., Ursprung, H. W. and Woßmann, L. 2008. Education policy and equality of opportunity. KYKLOS, 61, 2, 279308.
Shen, Y. and Zuckerman, S. 2003. Why is there state variation in employer-sponsored insurance? Health Affairs, 22, 1, 241–51.
Silverstein, M., Gans, D. and Yang, F. M. 2006. Intergenerational support to aging parents: the role of norms and needs. Journal of Family Issues, 27, 8, 1068–84.
Smeeding, T. M. 2005. Public policy, economic inequality, and poverty: the United States in comparative perspective. Social Science Quarterly, 86, supplement, 955–83.
Stoop, I. A. L. 2005. The Hunt for the Last Respondent: Nonresponse in Sample Surveys. Social and Cultural Planning Office, The Hague.
Stuifbergen, M. C., Dykstra, P. A., Lanting, K. N. and Van Delden, J. J. M. 2010. Autonomy in an ascribed relationship: the case of adult children and elderly parents. Journal of Aging Studies, 24, 4, 257–65.
Sweet, J. A. and Bumpass, L. L. 2002. The National Survey of Families and Households – Waves 1, 2, and 3: Data Description and Documentation. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison. Available online at http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/nsfh/home.htm [Accessed 26 March 2007].
Troll, L. E., Miller, S. J. and Atchley, R. C. 1979. Families in Later Life. Wadsworth, Belmont, California.
Ward, R. 2001. Linkages between family and societal level intergenerational attitudes. Research on Aging, 23, 1, 179208.
Wong, R., Capoferro, C. and Soldo, B. J. 1999. Financial assistance from middle-aged couples to parents and children: racial-ethnic differences. Journals of Gerontology: Social Sciences, 54B, 3, S145–53.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed