Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 7
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    HOFÄCKER, DIRK SCHRÖDER, HEIKE LI, YUXIN and FLYNN, MATTHEW 2016. Trends and Determinants of Work-Retirement Transitions under Changing Institutional Conditions: Germany, England and Japan compared. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 45, Issue. 01, p. 39.

    Lain, David and Loretto, Wendy 2016. Managing employees beyond age 65: from the margins to the mainstream?. Employee Relations, Vol. 38, Issue. 5, p. 646.

    Boehm, S. A. and Dwertmann, D. J. G. 2015. Forging a Single-Edged Sword: Facilitating Positive Age and Disability Diversity Effects in the Workplace Through Leadership, Positive Climates, and HR Practices. Work, Aging and Retirement, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    FLYNN, MATTHEW SCHRÖDER, HEIKE HIGO, MASA and YAMADA, ATSUHIRO 2014. Government as Institutional Entrepreneur: Extending Working Life in the UK and Japan. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 43, Issue. 03, p. 535.

    Kulik, Carol T. 2014. Spotlight on the Context: How a Stereotype Threat Framework Might Help Organizations to Attract and Retain Older Workers. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 456.

    Schröder, Heike Muller-Camen, Michael and Flynn, Matthew 2014. The management of an ageing workforce: organisational policies in Germany and Britain. Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 24, Issue. 4, p. 394.

    LAIN, DAVID 2011. Helping the Poorest Help Themselves? Encouraging Employment Past 65 in England and the USA. Journal of Social Policy, Vol. 40, Issue. 03, p. 493.


The United Kingdom government's ‘business case’ approach to the regulation of retirement

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 20 January 2010

In the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, the United Kingdom government set a ‘default’ retirement age of 65 years after which an employer can compulsorily retire workers, and made it obligatory for employers to consider the ‘business case’ for any employees' requests to continue in work after the default age. This is a ‘light touch’ approach to reducing age discrimination at the workplace and to changing the established ‘culture of retirement’. While encouraging productive staff to remain in post beyond 65 years of age, it leaves implementation of the policies and achievement of their goals to the discretion of employers. This article explores how British employers are adapting to the law, by drawing from interviews with 70 managers from a wide range of organisations. Overall the collected evidence shows the limits of a business case approach as a means of changing employers' practices. It was found that line managers, rather than senior managers or human resources specialists, generally decide which employees can stay employed after age 65 years. Consequently, the research suggests that opportunities for workers aged 65 or more years to stay employed are more the result of individual arrangements with their immediate managers than changes in an organisation's policies and practices. Altogether, the evidence suggests that consolidation rather than eradication of the established retirement culture has occurred.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Matthew Flynn, The Business School, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, LondonNW4 4BT, UK E-mail:
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

J. Arrowsmith and A. E. McGoldrick 1997. A flexible future for older workers? Personnel Review, 26, 4, 258–73.

W. C. K. Chiu , A. W. Chan , E. Snape and T. Redman 2001. Age stereotypes and discriminatory attitudes towards older workers: an East–West comparison. Human Relations, 54, 5, 629–61.

C. Coupland , S. Tempest and C. Barnatt 2008. What are the implications of the new UK age discrimination legislation for research and practice. Human Resource Management Journal, 18, 4, 423–31.

L. Dickens 2006. Beyond the business case: a three-pronged approach to equality action. Human Resource Management Journal, 9, 1, 9–19.

C. Duncan 2003. Assessing anti-ageism routes to older worker re-engagement. Work, Employment and Society, 17, 1, 101–20.

C. Duncan 2008. The dangers and limitations of equality agendas as means for tackling old age prejudice. Ageing & Society, 28, 8, 1133–58.

C. Duncan , W. Loretto and P. White 2000. Ageism, early exit and British trade unions. Industrial Relations Journal, 31, 3, 220–34.

R. Laughlin 1991. Environmental disturbances and organizational transitions and transformations: some alternative models. Organization Studies, 12, 2, 209–32.

W. Loretto and P. White 2006. Employers' attitudes, practices and policies towards older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 16, 3, 313–30.

P. Lyon , J. Hallier and I. Glover 1998. Divestment or investment? The contradictions of HRM in relation to older employees. Human Resource Management Journal, 8, 1, 5666.

R. McIntyre , S. Bartle , D. Landis and M. Dansby 2002. The effects of equal opportunity fairness attitudes on job satisfaction, organizational commitment and perceived work group efficacy. Military Psychology, 14, 4, 299319.

K. Riach 2006. Older workers: learning from three international experiences. Social Policy and Society, 5, 4, 551–63.

A. Robertson and C. S. Tracy 1998. Health and productivity of older workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 24, 2, 8597.

M. Sargeant 2008. The Law on Age Discrimination in the EU. Kluwer Law, London.

E. Snape and T. Redman 2003. Too old or too young: the impact of perceived age discrimination. Human Resource Management Journal, 13, 1, 7889.

P. Taylor and P. Urwin 2001. Age and participation in vocational education and training. Work Employment and Society, 15, 4, 763–79.

P. Taylor and A. Walker 1994. The aging workforce: employers' attitudes towards older-people. Work Employment and Society, 8, 4, 569–91.

P. Taylor and A. Walker 1998. Policies and practices towards older workers: a framework for comparative research. Human Resource Management Journal, 8, 3, 6176.

S. Vickerstaff , J. Cox and L. Keen 2003. Employers and the management of retirement. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 3, 271–87.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *