Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The United Kingdom government's ‘business case’ approach to the regulation of retirement

  • MATTHEW FLYNN (a1)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

In the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, the United Kingdom government set a ‘default’ retirement age of 65 years after which an employer can compulsorily retire workers, and made it obligatory for employers to consider the ‘business case’ for any employees' requests to continue in work after the default age. This is a ‘light touch’ approach to reducing age discrimination at the workplace and to changing the established ‘culture of retirement’. While encouraging productive staff to remain in post beyond 65 years of age, it leaves implementation of the policies and achievement of their goals to the discretion of employers. This article explores how British employers are adapting to the law, by drawing from interviews with 70 managers from a wide range of organisations. Overall the collected evidence shows the limits of a business case approach as a means of changing employers' practices. It was found that line managers, rather than senior managers or human resources specialists, generally decide which employees can stay employed after age 65 years. Consequently, the research suggests that opportunities for workers aged 65 or more years to stay employed are more the result of individual arrangements with their immediate managers than changes in an organisation's policies and practices. Altogether, the evidence suggests that consolidation rather than eradication of the established retirement culture has occurred.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Address for correspondence: Matthew Flynn, The Business School, Middlesex University, The Burroughs, Hendon, LondonNW4 4BT, UK E-mail: m.flynn@mdx.ac.uk
References
Hide All
Arrowsmith J. and McGoldrick A. E. 1997. A flexible future for older workers? Personnel Review, 26, 4, 258–73.
Barnes H., Parry J. and Taylor R. 2004. Working After State Pension Age: Qualitative Research. Department for Work and Pensions, London.
Bunt K., Adams L., Carter K. and Hopkins I. 2005. Age Positive Business Case Studies. DWP Age Positive Group, Sheffield, UK.
Chiu W. C. K., Chan A. W., Snape E. and Redman T. 2001. Age stereotypes and discriminatory attitudes towards older workers: an East–West comparison. Human Relations, 54, 5, 629–61.
Colling T. 1997. Collective Bargaining and Equal Opportunities in Europe: The Case of British Gas in the United Kingdom. European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin.
Coupland C., Tempest S. and Barnatt C. 2008. What are the implications of the new UK age discrimination legislation for research and practice. Human Resource Management Journal, 18, 4, 423–31.
Department for Work and Pensions 2009. Building a Society for All Ages. Stationery Office, Norwich, UK. Available online at http://www.hmg.gov.uk/media/33830/fullreport.pdf [Accessed 1 November 2009].
Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) 2005. Equality and Diversity, Coming of Age: Consultation on the Employment Equality Regulations 2006. DTI, London.
Dickens L. 2006. Beyond the business case: a three-pronged approach to equality action. Human Resource Management Journal, 9, 1, 9–19.
Doling J., Finer C. J. and Maltby T. 2005. Ageing Matters: European Policy Lessons from the East. Ashgate, Farnham, UK.
Duncan C. 2003. Assessing anti-ageism routes to older worker re-engagement. Work, Employment and Society, 17, 1, 101–20.
Duncan C. 2008. The dangers and limitations of equality agendas as means for tackling old age prejudice. Ageing & Society, 28, 8, 1133–58.
Duncan C., Loretto W. and White P. 2000. Ageism, early exit and British trade unions. Industrial Relations Journal, 31, 3, 220–34.
Forbes I. 1996. The privatisation of sex equality policy. In Lovenduski J. and Norris P. (eds), Women in Politics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 145–62.
IRS Management Review 2001. Employing older workers: the business case, the business reasons for and benefits of, establishing an age-diverse workforce. IRS Management Review, 21, 6–15.
Itzin C., Phillipson C. and Laczko F. 1993. Age Barriers at Work: Maximising the Potential of Mature and Older Workers. Metropolitan Authorities Recruitment Agency, Solihull, UK.
Kohli M., Rein M., Guillemard A. and Gunsteren H. 1991. Time for Retirement: Comparative Studies of Early Exit from the Labour Force. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Laughlin R. 1991. Environmental disturbances and organizational transitions and transformations: some alternative models. Organization Studies, 12, 2, 209–32.
Loretto W. and White P. 2005. Older workers and the Scottish labour market: an analysis of employment practices and employers' attitudes. Paper presented at the ESRC Seminar Series The Employability of Older Workers; Employers' Approaches, 16 February, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Loretto W. and White P. 2006. Employers' attitudes, practices and policies towards older workers. Human Resource Management Journal, 16, 3, 313–30.
Lyon P., Hallier J. and Glover I. 1998. Divestment or investment? The contradictions of HRM in relation to older employees. Human Resource Management Journal, 8, 1, 5666.
Maxwell N. L. and D'Amico R. J. 1986. Employment and wage effects of involuntary job separation. Academy of Management Review, 76, 2, 373–77.
McIntyre R., Bartle S., Landis D. and Dansby M. 2002. The effects of equal opportunity fairness attitudes on job satisfaction, organizational commitment and perceived work group efficacy. Military Psychology, 14, 4, 299319.
McNair S. and Flynn M. 2005. The Age Dimension of Employer Practices: Employer Case Studies. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
McNair S., Flynn M. and Dutton Y. 2007. Employer Responses to an Ageing Workforce: A Qualitative Study. Department for Work and Pensions, London.
Meadows P. 2004. Retirement Ages in the UK: A Review of the Literature. Department of Trade and Industry, London.
Metcalf H. and Meadows P. 2006. Survey of Employers' Policies, Practices and Preferences Relating to Age. Department for Work and Pensions, London.
National Statistics 2002. UK Standard Industrial Classification of Economic Activities SIC(92). National Statistics, London. Available online at http://www.statistics.gov.uk/methods_quality/sic/contents.asp [Accessed 3 November 2009].
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) 2006. Live Longer, Work Longer: Synthesis Report. OECD, Paris.
Phillipson C. 1987. The transition into retirement. In Cohen G. (ed.), Social Change and the Life Course. Tavistock, London, 156–83.
Riach K. 2006. Older workers: learning from three international experiences. Social Policy and Society, 5, 4, 551–63.
Riley R., Metcalf H. and Forth J. 2007. The Business Case for Equal Opportunities: An Econometric Investigation. Department for Work and Pensions, London.
Robertson A. and Tracy C. S. 1998. Health and productivity of older workers. Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment and Health, 24, 2, 8597.
Sargeant M. 1999. Age Discrimination in Employment. Institute of Employment Rights, London.
Sargeant M. 2008. The Law on Age Discrimination in the EU. Kluwer Law, London.
Smeaton D. and McKay S. 2003. Working After State Pension Age: Quantitative Analysis. Department for Work and Pensions, Sheffield, UK.
Snape E. and Redman T. 2003. Too old or too young: the impact of perceived age discrimination. Human Resource Management Journal, 13, 1, 7889.
Taylor P. 2002. New Policies for Older Workers. Policy, Bristol, UK.
Taylor P. 2003. Population ageing: implications for employment and the economy in the UK regions. Paper for Regions for All Ages Conference, 11 March, Glasgow. Available online at http://www.ageconcern.org.uk/AgeConcern/Documents/regions_pop_ageing_taylor.pdf[Accessed 1 November 2009].
Taylor P. and Urwin P. 2001. Age and participation in vocational education and training. Work Employment and Society, 15, 4, 763–79.
Taylor P. and Walker A. 1994. The aging workforce: employers' attitudes towards older-people. Work Employment and Society, 8, 4, 569–91.
Taylor P. and Walker A. 1998. Policies and practices towards older workers: a framework for comparative research. Human Resource Management Journal, 8, 3, 6176.
Vickerstaff S., Cox J. and Keen L. 2003. Employers and the management of retirement. Social Policy and Administration, 37, 3, 271–87.
Wainwright Trust 1997. Decentralisation and Devolution: The Impact on Equal Opportunities at Work. The Wainwright Trust, Standon, Ware, UK.
Walker A. 1990. The benefits of old age? Age discrimination and social security. In McEwen E. (ed.), Age: The Unrecognised Discrimination. Age Concern, London, 5870.
Williamson J. and Higo M. 2007. Why Do Japanese Workers Remain in the Labour Force So Long? Center for Retirement Research, Boston, Massachusetts.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Ageing & Society
  • ISSN: 0144-686X
  • EISSN: 1469-1779
  • URL: /core/journals/ageing-and-society
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 197 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.