Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-fnprw Total loading time: 0.306 Render date: 2022-08-15T01:45:58.540Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Identification of Cultigen Amaranth and Chenopod from Rockshelter Sites in Northwest Arkansas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Gayle J. Fritz*
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC 27514

Abstract

The cultigen Amaranthus hypochondriacus has been recognized in four samples of desiccated plant remains from Holman Shelter in Madison County, Arkansas. That site, excavated in 1932, yielded the domesticated Chenopodium berlandieri ssp. nuttalliae described by Hugh Wilson (1981). Cultigen chenopod has been found in one other Madison County rockshelter. Samples containing the two species are described in detail and placed in general cultural context by combining information from excavation notes with regional archaeological data. Mesoamerican origins would exclude both cultigens from the Eastern Agricultural Complex. Current evidence favors a late prehistoric introduction into the eastern United States, but determination of spatial and temporal ranges will depend upon future recovery and analysis.

Type
Reports
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Asch, David L., and Asch, Nancy B. 1977 Chenopod as Cultigen: A Re-evaluation of Some Prehistoric Collections from Eastern North America. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 2: 345.Google Scholar
Asch, David L., and Asch, Nancy B. 1978 The Economic Potential of Iva Annua and its Prehistoric Importance in the Lower Illinois Valley. In The Nature and Status of Ethnobotany, edited by I. Ford, Richard, pp. 300341. Anthropological Papers No. 67, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Asch, David L., and Asch, Nancy B. 1982 A Chronology for the Development of Prehistoric Horticulture in Westcentral Illinois. Paper presented at the 47th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Minneapolis. Center for American Archeology, Archeobotanical Laboratory Report No. 46.Google Scholar
Asch, David L., and Asch, Nancy B. 1983 Archeobotany. In Excavations at the Smiling Dan Site: Delineation of Site Structure and Function during the Middle Woodland Period, edited by D. Stafford, Barbara and Sant, Mark B., pp. 635725. Center for American Archeology, Contract Archeology Program, Reports of Investigations No. 137.Google Scholar
Bohrer, Vorsila L. 1962 Ethnobotanical Materials from Tonto National Monument. In Archeological Studies at Tonto National Monument, Arizona, edited by Caywood, L. R., pp. 75114. Technical Series Vol. 2, Southwestern Monuments Association, Globe, Arizona.Google Scholar
Brown;, James A. 1982 Peer Review: Arkansas Archeology in Review. In Arkansas Archeology in Review, edited by L. Trubowitz, Neal and Jeter, Marvin D., pp. 351360. Research Series No. 15, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Brown, James A., Bell, Robert E., and Wyckoff, Don G. 1978 Caddoan Settlement Patterns in the Arkansas River Drainage. In Mississippian Settlement Patterns, edited by D. Smith, Bruce, pp. 169200. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Chapman, Carl H. 1980 The Archaeology of Missouri, Vol. II. University of Missouri Press, Columbia.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, James B. 1968 University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates XII. Radiocarbon 10: 61114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, Richard I. 1981a Gardening and Farming Before A. D. 1000: Patterns of Prehistoric Cultivation North of Mexico. Journal of Ethnobiology 1: 627.Google Scholar
Ford, Richard I. 1981b New Ideas About the Origin of Agriculture Based on 50 Years of Museum-Curated Plant Remains. In The Research Potential of Anthropological Museum Collections, edited by Cantwell, Anne-Marie E., Griffin, James B., and Rothschild, Nan A., pp. 345356. New York Academy of Sciences Annals No. 276.Google Scholar
Fritz, Gayle J. 1979 Mounds in Northwest Arkansas: A More Positive Approach to Late Prehistory in the Ozarks. Paper presented at the 21st Annual Caddo Conference, Arkadelphia, Arkansas.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Melvin R. 1931 Vegetal Remains of the Ozark Bluff-Dweller Culture. Papers of the Michigan Academy of Science, Arts and Letters, Vol. 14: 83102.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Melvin R. 1935 Ethnobotany Laboratory Report No. 71a. Report on file, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Gilmore, Melvin R. 1936 Ethnobotany Laboratory Report No. 72a. Report on file, Museum of Anthropology, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Harrington, Mark R. 1960 The Ozark Bluff-Dwellers. Indian Notes and Monographs, Vol. 12, Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Heiser, Charles B. Jr., and Nelson, David C. 1974 On the Origin of the Cultivated Chenopods. Genetics 78: 503505.Google Scholar
Henbest, Wayne 1932a Bluff Shelter Survey, Archeological Field Book No. 4. Ms. on file, University of Arkansas Museum, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Henbest, Wayne 1932b Bluff Shelter Survey, Archeological Field Book No. 6. Ms. on file, University of Arkansas Museum, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Michael P. 1982 The Pendulum and the Pit: Vogues in Interpretation of Mississippian Period Occupation in the Southwestern Arkansas Ozarks. Paper presented at the 39th Southeastern Archeological Conference, Memphis.Google Scholar
Pal, Mohinder, and Khoshoo, T. N. 1974 Grain Amaranths. In Evolutionary Studies in World Crops: Diversity and Change in the Indian Subcontinent, edited by Sir Joseph, Hutchinson, pp. 129136. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Raab, L. Mark 1982 Expanding Prehistory in the Arkansas Ozarks. In Arkansas Archeology in Review, edited by L. Trubowitz, Neal and Jeter, Marvin D., pp. 233239. Research Series No. 15, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Robertson, Kenneth R. 1981 The Genera of Amaranthaceae in the Southeastern United States. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum 62: 267314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabo, George III 1981 A Preliminary Report on Excavations at the Huntsville Mound Site (3MA22), Madison County, Arkansas. Paper presented at the 23rd Annual Caddo Conference, Norman, Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Sabo, George III 1982 Structural Features in Mound A at the Huntsville Site (3MA22), Madison County, Arkansas. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Caddo Conference, Fayetteville, Arkansas.Google Scholar
Sauer, Jonathan D. 1950 The Grain Amaranths: A Survey of their History and Classification. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 37: 561633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Jonathan D. 1967 The Grain Amaranths and Their Relatives: A Revised Taxonomic and Geographic Survey. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Gardens 54: 103137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Jonathan D. 1969 Identity of Archaeological Grain Amaranths from the Valley of Tehuacan, Puebla, Mexico. American Antiquity 34: 8081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauer, Jonathan D. 1976 Grain Amaranths. In Evolution of Crop Plants, edited by Simmonds, N. W., pp. 47. Longman, London and New York.Google Scholar
Scholtz, Sandra C. 1975 Prehistoric Plies: A Structural and Comparative Analysis of Cordage, Netting, Basketry, and Fabric from Ozark Bluff Shelters. Research Series No. 9, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Struever, Stuart, and Vickery, Kent D. 1973 The Beginning of Cultivation in the Midwest-Riverine Area of the United States. American Anthropologist 75: 11971220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trubowitz, Neal L. 1980 Pine Mountain Revisited: An Archeological Study in the Arkansas Ozarks. Research Report No. 23, Arkansas Archeological Survey, Fayetteville.Google Scholar
Trubowitz, Neal L. 1983 Caddoan Settlements in the Arkansas Ozarks: The Upper Lee Creek Valley. Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology 8: 197210.Google Scholar
Wilson, Hugh D. 1980 Artificial Hybridization among Species of Chenopodium sect. Chenopodium. Systematic Botany 5: 253263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Hugh D. 1981 Domesticated Chenopodium of the Ozark Bluff Dwellers. Economic Botany 35: 233239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Hugh D., and Heiser, Charles B. Jr. 1979 The Origin and Evolutionary Relationships of'Huauzontli’ (Chenopodium nuttalliae Safford), Domesticated Chenopod of Mexico. American Journal of Botany 66: 198206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yarnell, Richard A. 1976 Early Plant Husbandry in Eastern North America. In Culture Change and Continuity, edited by E. Cleland, Charles, pp. 265273. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Yarnell, Richard A. 1983 Prehistoric Plant Foods and Husbandry in Eastern North America. Paper presented at the 48th Annual Meeting of the Society for American Archaeology, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
21
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Identification of Cultigen Amaranth and Chenopod from Rockshelter Sites in Northwest Arkansas
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Identification of Cultigen Amaranth and Chenopod from Rockshelter Sites in Northwest Arkansas
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Identification of Cultigen Amaranth and Chenopod from Rockshelter Sites in Northwest Arkansas
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *