Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-08T20:39:15.084Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Suggestions for Evaluating Archaeological Maize

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Mary Eubanks Dunn
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In his report on excavations in Costa Rica, M. J. Snarskis interpreted a carbonized fragment of a maize cob, identified as the South American race Pollo, as evidence for contact with South America. It is suggested that this interpretation is invalid because of insufficient material and because the origins and relationships of the race Pollo are unclear.

Type
Comment
Information
American Antiquity , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , January 1978 , pp. 97 - 99
Copyright
Copyright © The Society for American Archaeology 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, Edgar, and Cutler, Hugh C. 1942 Races of Zea mays: I. Their recognition andclassification. Annals of the Missouri BotanicalGarden 29:69–89.Google Scholar
Byers, Douglas S. (Editor) 1967 The prehistory of the Tehuacan valley, I: environmentand subsistence. University of TexasPress, Austin.Google Scholar
Cutler, Hugh C. 1946 Races of maize in South America. HarvardUniversity, Botanical Museum Leaflets 12:257–91.Google Scholar
Cutler, Hugh C. 1952 A preliminary survey of plant remains ofTularosa cave. Fieldiana: Anthropology 40:461–79. Chicago Natural History Museum.Google Scholar
Dunn, Mary Eubanks 1975 Ceramic evidence for the prehistoric distributionof maize in Mexico. American Antiquity 40:305–14.Google Scholar
Grant, Ulysses J., Hatheway, W. H., Timothy, D. H., Cassalett D., C., and Roberts, L. M. 1963 Races of maize in Venezuela. NationalAcademy of Sciences — National Research CouncilPublication 113–6.Google Scholar
Lenz, Lee Wayne 1948 Comparative histology of the female inflorescence of Zea mays L. Annals of the Missouri BotanicalGarden 35:353–77.Google Scholar
Linares, Olga F., Sheets, Payson D., and Rosenthal, E. Jane 1975 Prehistoric agriculture in tropical highlands. Science 187:138–45.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, Paul C. 1974 Corn: its origin, evolution, and improvement. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Mangelsdorf, Paul C, MacNeish, Richard S., and Galinat, Walton C. 1967 Prehistoric wild and cultivated maize. In Theprehistory of the Tehuacan Valley, 1, edited by Byers, Douglas S., pp. 178–200. University ofTexas Press, Austin.Google Scholar
Nickerson, Norton H. 1953 Variation in cob morphology among certainarchaeological and ethnological races of maize. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 40:79–111.Google Scholar
Roberts, L. M., Grant, U. J., E., Ricardo Ramirez, Hatheway, W. H., and Smith, D. L. in collaboration with Mangelsdorf, Paul C. 1957 Races of maize in Colombia. NationalAcademy of Sciences-National Research CouncilPublication 510.Google Scholar
Snarskis, Michael J. 1976 Stratigraphic excavations in the eastern low-land of Costa Rica. American Antiquity 41:342–53.Google Scholar
Stone, Doris 1956 Data of maize in Talamanca, Costa Rica: anhypothesis. Journal de la Société desAmericanistes, N. S. 45:189–94.Google Scholar
Wellhausen, E. J., Roberts, L. M., and Hernández, E. X. in collaboration with Mangelsdorf, Paul C. 1952 Races of maize in Mexico. Bussey Institutionof Harvard University, Cambridge.Google Scholar