Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-zdfhw Total loading time: 0.271 Render date: 2022-08-17T13:18:44.384Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Ethnoracial Homogeneity and Public Outcomes: The (Non)effects of Diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2018

Princeton University
Princeton University
Alexander Kustov is a PhD Candidate, Department of Politics, Princeton University, 001 Fisher Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 (
Giuliana Pardelli is a PhD Candidate, Department of Politics, Princeton University, 001 Fisher Hall, Princeton, NJ 08544 (


How does ethnoracial demography relate to public goods provision? Many studies find support for the hypothesis that diversity is related to inefficient outcomes by comparing diverse and homogeneous communities. We distinguish between homogeneity of dominant and disadvantaged groups and argue that it is often impossible to identify the effects of diversity due to its collinearity with the share of disadvantaged groups. To disentangle the effects of these variables, we study new data from Brazilian municipalities. While it is possible to interpret the prima facie negative correlation between diversity and public goods as supportive of the prominent “deficit” hypothesis, a closer analysis reveals that, in fact, more homogeneous Afro-descendant communities have lower provision. While we cannot rule out that diversity is consequential in other contexts, our results cast doubt on the reliability of previous findings related to the benefits of local ethnoracial homogeneity for public outcomes.

Copyright © American Political Science Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


The authors’ names appear in alphabetical order. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 2016 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. We would like to thank our colleagues, editors, and anonymous reviewers who have read and commented on previous drafts of this article. We are especially grateful to Samuel Diaz, Mark Kayser, and Ronald Inglehart for their helpful suggestions, and Joana Naritomi for kindly sharing her data with us. For their useful comments on the previous versions of our larger project on ethnic cleavages and public goods provision, we would also like to thank Rafaela Dancygier, Kosuke Imai, Tali Mendelberg, Grigore Pop-Eleches, Edward Telles, Andreas Wimmer, and Deborah Yashar. All errors and omissions are the sole responsibility of the authors. Replication files are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse:


Abascal, Maria, and Baldassarri, Delia. 2015. “Love Thy Neighbor? Ethnoracial Diversity and Trust Reexamined.” American Journal of Sociology 121 (3): 722–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alesina, Alberto, Baqir, Reza, and Easterly, William. 1999. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (4): 1243–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Devleeschauwer, Arnaud, Easterly, William, Kurlat, Sergio, and Wacziarg, Romain. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 155–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Glaeser, Edward. 2004. Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: A World of Difference. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, Stanley R. 2009. Legacies of Race: Identities, Attitudes, and Politics in Brazil. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bailey, Stanley R., Loveman, Mara, and Muniz, Jeronimo O.. 2013. “Measures of ‘Race’ and the Analysis of Racial Inequality in Brazil.” Social Science Research 42 (1): 106–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Kate, and Huber, John D.. 2010. “Economic versus Cultural Differences: Forms of Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” American Political Science Review 104 (04): 644–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertocchi, Graziella. 2016. “The Legacies of Slavery in and out of Africa.” IZA Journal of Migration 5 (24): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bethell, Leslie, ed. 1984. The Cambridge History of Latin America, Vol. 2: Colonial Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gisselquist, Rachel M. 2014. “Ethnic Divisions and Public Goods Provision, Revisited.” Ethnic and Racial Studies 37 (9): 1605–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guimarães, Antonio Sérgio Alfredo. 2004. Preconceito e Discriminação: Queixas de Ofensas e Tratamento Desigual dos Negros no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora 34.Google Scholar
Habyarimana, James, Humphreys, Macartan, Posner, Daniel N., and Weinstein, Jeremy M.. 2007. “Why Does Ethnic Diversity Undermine Public Goods Provision?American Political Science Review 101 (4): 709–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horowitz, Donald L. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kustov, Alexander. 2017. “How Ethnic Structure Affects Civil Conflict: A Model of Endogenous Grievance.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 34 (6): 660–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
La Porta, Rafael, Silanes, Florencio Lopez-de, Shleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization 15 (1): 222–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S. 2003. Race and Regionalism in the Politics of Taxation in Brazil and South Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, Evan S., and Singh, Prerna. 2012. “Conceptualizing and Measuring Ethnic Politics: An Institutional Complement to Demographic, Behavioral, and Cognitive Approaches.” Studies in Comparative International Development 47 (3): 255–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morten, Melanie, and Oliveira, Jaqueline. 2016. “Paving the Way to Development: Costly Migration and Labor Market Integration.” NBER Working Paper 22158.Google Scholar
Naritomi, Joana, Soares, Rodrigo R., and Assunção, Juliano J.. 2012. “Institutional Development and Colonial Heritage within Brazil.” The Journal of Economic History 72 (2): 393422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rushton, Michael. 2008. “A Note on the Use and Misuse of the Racial Diversity Index.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (3): 445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaeffer, Merlin. 2013. “Can Competing Diversity Indices Inform Us about why Ethnic Diversity Erodes Social Cohesion? A Test of Five Diversity Indices in Germany.” Social Science Research 42 (3): 755–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Selway, Joel Sawat. 2011. “The Measurement of Cross-Cutting Cleavages and Other Multidimensional Cleavage Structures.” Political Analysis 19 (1): 4865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sidanius, Jim, and Pratto, Felicia. 2001. Social Dominance: An Intergroup Theory of Social Hierarchy and Oppression. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, Prerna. 2015. “Subnationalism and Social Development: A Comparative Analysis of Indian States.” World Politics 67 (3): 506–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, Prerna, and Hau, Matthias vom. 2016. “Ethnicity in Time: Politics, History, and the Relationship between Ethnic Diversity and Public Goods Provision.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (10): 1303−40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soifer, Hillel David. 2016. “Regionalism, Ethnic Diversity, and Variation in Public Good Provision by National States.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (10): 1341–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Frances. 2005. “Horizontal Inequalities: A Neglected Dimension of Development.” In Wider Perspectives on Global Development, ed. UNU-WIDER. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 101–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stichnoth, Holger, and Van der Straeten, Karine. 2013. “Ethnic Diversity, Public Spending, and Individual Support for the Welfare State: A Review of the Empirical Literature.” Journal of Economic Surveys 27 (2): 364–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telles, Edward E. 1996. “Identidade Racial, Contexto Urbano e Mobilização Política.” Afro-Ásia 17: 121–38.Google Scholar
Telles, Edward E. 2006. Race in Another America: The Significance of Skin Color in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1999. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vigdor, Jacob L. 2002. “Interpreting Ethnic Fragmentation Effects.” Economics Letters 75: 271–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wimmer, Andreas. 2016. “Is Diversity Detrimental? Ethnic Fractionalization, Public Goods Provision, and the Historical Legacies of Stateness.” Comparative Political Studies 49 (11): 1407–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Kustov and Pardelli Dataset

Supplementary material: PDF

Kustov and Pardelli supplementary material

Online Appendix

Download Kustov and Pardelli supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 188 KB
Cited by

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Ethnoracial Homogeneity and Public Outcomes: The (Non)effects of Diversity
Available formats

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Ethnoracial Homogeneity and Public Outcomes: The (Non)effects of Diversity
Available formats

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Ethnoracial Homogeneity and Public Outcomes: The (Non)effects of Diversity
Available formats

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *