Hostname: page-component-5d84bcc8dc-cqzg5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-08-17T16:43:12.058Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

MPs for Sale? Returns to Office in Postwar British Politics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 October 2009

ANDREW C. EGGERS  and
JENS HAINMUELLER
ANDREW C. EGGERS*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
JENS HAINMUELLER*
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
*
Andrew C. Eggers is a Ph.D. candidate, Department of Government, Harvard University, 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (aeggers@fas.harvard.edu).
Jens Hainmueller, a Ph.D. candidate at Harvard University when this article was accepted, is now Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 (jhainm@mit.edu).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many recent studies show that firms profit from connections to influential politicians, but less is known about how much politicians financially benefit from wielding political influence. We estimate the returns to serving in Parliament, using original data on the estates of recently deceased British politicians. Applying both matching and a regression discontinuity design to compare Members of Parliament (MPs) with parliamentary candidates who narrowly lost, we find that serving in office almost doubled the wealth of Conservative MPs, but had no discernible financial benefits for Labour MPs. Conservative MPs profited from office largely through lucrative outside employment they acquired as a result of their political positions; we show that gaining a seat in Parliament more than tripled the probability that a Conservative politician would later serve as a director of a publicly traded firm—enough to account for a sizable portion of the wealth differential. We suggest that Labour MPs did not profit from office largely because trade unions collectively exerted sufficient control over the party and its MPs to prevent members from selling their services to other clients.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 103 , Issue 4 , November 2009 , pp. 513 - 533
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Abadie, A., and Imbens, G.. 2006. “Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 74 (1): 235–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, J., Imbens, G., and Rubin, D.. 1996. “Identification of Causal Effects Using Instrumental Variables.” Journal of the American Statistical Association 91 (434), 444–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aydelotte, W. 1967. “The Country Gentlemen and the Repeal of the Corn Laws.” English Historical Review 47–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baimbridge, M., and Darcy, D.. 1999. “MPs' Pay 1911–1996: Myths and Realities.” Politics 19 (2): 71–80.Google Scholar
Barro, R. 1973. “The Control of Politicians: An Economic Model.” Public Choice 14 (1): 19–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, S. 1956. “Pressure Groups and Parties in Britain.” American Political Science Review 50 (1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, S. 1965. Modern British Politics. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Besley, T. 2005. “Political Selection.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 19 (3): 43–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T. 2006. Principled Agents?: The Political Economy of Good Government. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Besley, T., and Burgess, R.. 2002. “The Political Economy of Government Responsiveness: Theory and Evidence from India*.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1415–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T., and Case, A.. 1995. “Does Electoral Accountability Affect Economic Policy Choices? Evidence from Gubernatorial Term Limits.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110 (3): 769–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, T., and Coate, S.. 1997. “An Economic Model of Representative Democracy.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breiman, L. 2001. “Random Forests.” Machine Learning 45 (1): 5–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caselli, F., and Morelli, M.. 2004. “Bad Politicians.” Journal of Public Economics 88 (3–4): 759–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, A. 1968. Sailor in a Russian Frame. London: Johnson.Google Scholar
Cox, G., and Magar, E.. 1999. “How Much is Majority Status in the US Congress Worth?” American Political Science Review 93 (2): 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dal Bó, E., Dal Bó, P., and Di Tella, R.. 2008. “Plata o Plomo??: Bribe and Punishment in a Theory of Political Influence.” American Political Science Review 100 (01): 41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, A., and Sekhon, J.. 2008. “Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects: A General Multivariate Matching Method for Achieving Balance in Observational Studies.” June 12. http://sekhon.berkeley.edu/papers/GenMatch.pdf (September 20, 2009).Google Scholar
Diermeier, D., Keane, M., and Merlo, A.. 2005. “A Political Economy Model of Congressional Careers.” American Economic Review 95 (1): 347–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doig, A. 1984. Corruption and Misconduct in Contemporary British Politics. Penguin Books. Harmonds Worth Middlesex, London.Google Scholar
Faccio, M. 2006. “Politically Connected Firms.” American Economic Review 96 (1): 369–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, T., and Voth, H.. 2008. “Betting on Hitler—The Value of Political Connections in Nazi Germany.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123 (1): 101–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz, C., and Finan, F.. 2008. “Motivating Politicians: The Impacts of Monetary Incentives on Quality and Performance.” Mimeo. 2009 NBER Working paper w14906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finer, S. 1962. Anonymous Empire: A Study of the Lobby in Great Britain. Pall Mall Press.Google Scholar
Fiorina, M. 1994. “Divided Government in the American States: A Byproduct of Legislative Professionalism?” American Political Science Review 88 (2): 304–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, J. 1994. “Political Donations to the Conservative Party.” Parliamentary Affairs 47 (1): 61–72.Google Scholar
Fisman, R. 2001. “Estimating the Value of Political Connections.” American Economic Review 91 (4): 1095–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagliarducci, S., Nannicini, T., and Naticchioni, P.. 2008. “Outside Income and Moral Hazard: The Elusive Quest for Good Politicians.” 12A Working paper No 3295, Jan 2008.Google Scholar
Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., and So, J.. n.d. “Does Political Connectedness Affect Firm Value?” Review of Financial Studies Forthcoming 22 (June 2009), 2331–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., and So, J.. 2008. “Political Connections and the Allocation of Procurement Contracts.” Working paper. University of Indiana.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groseclose, T., and Krehbiel, K.. 1994. “Golden Parachutes, Rubber Checks, and Strategic Retirements from the 102d House.” American Journal of Political Science 38 (1): 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, R., and van Houweling, R.. 1995. “Avarice and Ambition in Congress: Representatives' Decisions to Run or Retire from the US House.” American Political Science Review 89 (1): 121–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, M. 1960. Trade Unions and the Labour Party Since 1945. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC). 2007. “Quality Review of Personal Wealth National Statistics.” Technical report. HMRC. http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/stats/personal_wealth/qual-personal-wealth.pdf (September, 2009).Google Scholar
Hollingsworth, M. 1991. MPs for Hire: The Secret World of Political Lobbying. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Imbens, G. 2004. “Nonparametric Estimation of Average Treatment Effects under Exogeneity: A Review.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1): 4–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, G., and Lemieux, T.. 2007. “Regression Discontinuity Designs: A Guide to Practice.” NBER Working Paper 13039.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayachandran, S. 2006. “The Jeffords Effect.” Journal of Law and Economics 49 (2): 397–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S., and Mitton, T.. 2003. “Cronyism and Capital Controls: Evidence from Malaysia.” Journal of Financial Economics 67 (2): 351–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, D. 1984. “The Politics of MPs' Pay.” Parliamentary Affairs 37 (1): 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, M., and Merlo, A.. 2007. “Money, Political Ambition, and the Career Decisions of Politicians.” University of Pennsylvania. Mimeo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khwaja, A., and Mian, A.. 2005. “Do Lenders Favor Politically Connected Firms? Rent Provision in an Emerging Financial Market.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 120 (4): 1371–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D., Moretti, E., and Butler, M.. 2004. “Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the US House.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3): 807–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. S. 2008. “Randomized Experiments from Non-Random Selection in U.S. House Elections.” Journal of Econometrics 142 (2): 675–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mancuso, M. 1995. The Ethical World of British MPs. Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattozzi, A., and Merlo, A.. 2007. Political Careers Or Career Politicians? National Bureau of Economic Research Cambridge, Mass., USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menchik, P., and David, M.. 1983. “Income Distribution, Lifetime Savings, and Bequests.” American Economic Review 73 (4): 672–90.Google Scholar
Merlo, A. 2006. “Whither Political Economy? Theories, Facts and Issues.” In Advances in Economics and Econometrics, Theory and Applications: Ninth World Congress of the Econometric Society. R-Blundell, , Newey, W. and Persson, T. (eds), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Messner, M., and Polborn, M.. 2004. “Paying Politicians.” Journal of Public Economics 88 (12): 2423–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muller, W. 1977. The Kept Men?: The First Century of Trade Union Representation in the British House of Commons, 1874–1975, Hassocks: Harvester Press.Google Scholar
Noel-Baker, P. 1961. “The Grey Zone: The Problems of Business Affiliations of Members of Parliament.”Parliamentary Affairs 15: 87–93.Google Scholar
Norton, P. 2003. “The United Kingdom: Restoring Confidence?” Parliamentary Affairs 50 (3): 357–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, M., and Slivinski, A.. 1996. “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 111 (1): 65–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owens, A., Green, D., Bailey, C., and Kay, A.. 2006. “A Measure of Worth: Probate Valuations, Personal Wealth and Indebtedness in England, 1810–40.” Historical Research 79 (205): 382–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Duschinsky, M. 1981. British Political Finance, 1830–1980. American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.Google Scholar
Pinto-Duschinsky, M. 1989. “Trends in British Party Funding 1983–1987.” Parliamentary Affairs 42 (2): 197–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinto-Duschinsky, M. 1990. “The Funding of Political Parties since 1945.” UK Political Parties Since 1945, ed. Seldon, Anthony. New York: Philip Allan, London, 95–109.Google Scholar
Querubin, P., and Snyder, J. M.. 2008. “The Rents to Political Office in the U.S., 1840–1870.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Manuscript.Google Scholar
Redelmeier, D., and Singh, S.. 2001. “Longevity of Screenwriters Who Win an Academy Award: Longitudinal Study.” British Medical Journal 323 No 7327 1491–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, B. 1990. “A Dead Senator Tells No Lies: Seniority and the Distribution of Federal Benefits.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (1): 31–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohde, D. 1979. “Risk-Bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of Members of the United States House of Representatives.” American Journal of Political Science 23 (1): 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. R., and Donald, B. R. Rubin. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roth, A. 1957. The Business Background of MPs. London: Parliamentary Profile Services.Google Scholar
Roth, A. 1965. The Business Background of MPs. London: Parliamentary Profile Services.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. 2006. Matched Sampling for Causal Effects. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, T. 1999. “Corporate and Labor PAC Contributions in House Elections: Measuring the Effects of Majority Party Status.” Journal of Politics 61 (1): 195–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rush, M. 1969. The Selection of Parliamentary Candidates. London: Nelson.Google Scholar
Schlesinger, J. 1966. Ambition and Politics: Political Careers in the United States. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Stewart, J. 1958. British Pressure Groups: Their Role in Relation to the House of Commons. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sylvestre, M., Huszti, E., and Hanley, J.. 2006. “Do Oscar Winners Live Longer Than Less Successful Peers? A Reanalysis of the Evidence.” Annals of Internal Medicine 145 (5): 361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thistlethwaite, D., and Campbell, D.. 1960. “Regression-Dis-continuity Analysis: An Alternative to the ex Post Facto Experiment.” Journal of Educational Psychology 51: 309–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, D. 1987. Political Ethics and Public Office. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Whaley, J. 1999. “Legislative Ethics: A Comparative Analysis.” Technical report. National Democratic Institute for International Affairs.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.