Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Reubold, Jan Ludwig
Escher, Stephan
Pflugmacher, Johannes
and
Strufe, Thorsten
2022.
Dissecting chirping patterns of invasive Tweeter flocks in the German Twitter forest.
Online Social Networks and Media,
Vol. 31,
Issue. ,
p.
100228.
Mukerjee, Subhayan
Jaidka, Kokil
and
Lelkes, Yphtach
2022.
The Political Landscape of the U.S. Twitterverse.
Political Communication,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 5,
p.
565.
De Araujo, Emma
Altay, Sacha
Bor, Alexander
and
Mercier, Hugo
2022.
Dominant jerks: People infer dominance from the utterance of challenging and offensive statements.
Social Psychological Bulletin,
Vol. 16,
Issue. 4,
Lüders, Adrian
Dinkelberg, Alejandro
and
Quayle, Michael
2022.
Becoming “us” in digital spaces: How online users creatively and strategically exploit social media affordances to build up social identity.
Acta Psychologica,
Vol. 228,
Issue. ,
p.
103643.
Costello, William
Rolon, Vania
Thomas, Andrew G.
and
Schmitt, David
2022.
Levels of Well-Being Among Men Who Are Incel (Involuntarily Celibate).
Evolutionary Psychological Science,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
375.
Verbalyte, Monika
Keitel, Christoph
and
Howard, Christa
2022.
Online Trolls: Unaffectionate Psychopaths or Just Lonely Outcasts and Angry Partisans?.
Politics and Governance,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 4,
p.
396.
Lane, Daniel S.
Moxley, Cassandra M.
and
McLeod, Cynthia
2023.
The Group Roots of Social Media Politics: Social Sorting Predicts Perceptions of and Engagement in Politics on Social Media.
Communication Research,
Vol. 50,
Issue. 7,
p.
904.
Kossowska, Małgorzata
Kłodkowski, Piotr
Siewierska-Chmaj, Anna
Guinote, Ana
Kessels, Ursula
Moyano, Manuel
and
Strömbäck, Jesper
2023.
Internet-based micro-identities as a driver of societal disintegration.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications,
Vol. 10,
Issue. 1,
Barron, Patrick
Cord, Louise
Cuesta, José
Espinoza, Sabina A.
Larson, Greg
and
Woolcock, Michael
2023.
Social Sustainability in Development: Meeting the Challenges of the 21st Century.
p.
1.
Schmid, Philipp
and
Werner, Benedikt
2023.
Hostility has a trivial effect on persuasiveness of rebutting science denialism on social media.
Communications Psychology,
Vol. 1,
Issue. 1,
Littrell, Shane
Klofstad, Casey
Diekman, Amanda
Funchion, John
Murthi, Manohar
Premaratne, Kamal
Seelig, Michelle
Verdear, Daniel
Wuchty, Stefan
and
Uscinski, Joseph E.
2023.
Who knowingly shares false political information online?.
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review,
Villamil, Andrew
and
Heshmati, Saeideh
2023.
Engaging in the good with technology: a framework for examining positive technology use.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 14,
Issue. ,
Chambers, Simone
and
Kopstein, Jeffrey
2023.
Wrecking the public sphere: The new authoritarians’ digital attack on pluralism and truth.
Constellations,
Vol. 30,
Issue. 3,
p.
225.
Sandberg, Linn
Dahlberg, Stefan
and
Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth
2023.
The online hostility hypothesis: representations of Muslims in online media.
Social Influence,
Vol. 18,
Issue. 1,
Mamakos, Michalis
Finkel, Eli J
and
Rand, David
2023.
The social media discourse of engaged partisans is toxic even when politics are irrelevant.
PNAS Nexus,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 10,
Migdal, Joel S.
2023.
Beyond state law: everyday rules and the fragile public.
Journal of Chinese Governance,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 4,
p.
452.
Herzog, Lisa
2023.
III—Sympathy, Empathy, and Twitter: Reflections on Social Media Inspired by an Eighteenth-Century Debate.
Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society,
Vol. 123,
Issue. 1,
p.
51.
Hebbelstrup Rye Rasmussen, Stig
Petersen, Michael Bang
and
Contractor, Noshir
2023.
The event-driven nature of online political hostility: How offline political events make online interactions more hostile.
PNAS Nexus,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 11,
PETERSEN, MICHAEL BANG
OSMUNDSEN, MATHIAS
and
ARCENEAUX, KEVIN
2023.
The “Need for Chaos” and Motivations to Share Hostile Political Rumors.
American Political Science Review,
Vol. 117,
Issue. 4,
p.
1486.
Handley, Karen
and
Beck, Shelley
2024.
‘Everyday talk’ about working-from-home: How the affordances of Twitter enable ambient affiliation but constrain political talk.
New Media & Society,
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.