Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Collective Action, Clientelism, and Connectivity

  • MAHVISH SHAMI (a1)
Abstract

Backed by studies finding only limited propensity for free-riding when communities have an interest in self-provision, the last few decades have seen a surge of interest in community-based development. A major caveat to the “second wave” of collective action studies, however, is that collective action often breaks down under hierarchical social relationships. This is unfortunate news for developing countries’ rural societies, which are often entrenched in patron-client networks. Using a natural experiment found in the construction of a motorway, the article finds that clientelist relationships do not, in and by themselves, block peasant collective action. Rather, it is the interaction between clientelism and isolation that empowers patrons to block community-based projects. Peasants in connected villages face no such constraints, but instead rely on their patrons’ assistance in collective projects, making the hierarchical network an additional resource.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Mahvish Shami is LSE Fellow, Department of International Development, London School of Economics and Political Science, Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK (m.shami@lse.ac.uk).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

R.N. Abers 1998. “From Clientelism to Cooperation: Local Government, Participatory Policy, and Civic Organizing in Porto Alegre, BrazilPolitics and Society 26: 511–37.

H. Alavi 1972. “Kinship in West Punjab Villages.” Contributions to Indian Sociology 6: 127.

J. Auyero , P. Lapegna , and F.P. Poma . 2009. “Patronage Politics and Contentious Collective Action: A Recursive Relationship.” Latin American Politics and Society 51 (3): 131.

A. Banerjee , and L. Iyer . 2005. “History, Institutions, and Economic Performance: The Legacy of Colonial Land Tenure Systems in India.” American Economic Review 95 (4): 11901213.

M.A. Crenson 1978. “Social Networks and Political Processes in Urban Neighbourhoods.” American Journal of Political Science 22 (3): 578–94.

M. Dantas 2008. Black Townsmen: Urban Slavery and Freedom in the Eighteenth-century Americas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

M.S. Granovetter 1983. “The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited.”Sociological Theory 1: 201–33.

A. Greif , P. Milgrom , and B.R. Weingast . 1994. “Coordination, Commitment, and Enforcement: The Case of the Merchant Guild.” Journal of Political Economy 102 (4): 745–76.

A. Hadenius , and F. Uggla , 1996. “Making Civil Society Work, Promoting Democratic Development: What Can States and Donors Do?World Development 24 (10): 1621–39.

A.O. Hirschman 1984. Getting ahead Collectively: Grass-roots Experiences in Latin America. New York: Pergamon Press.

H. Ibarra , and S.B. Andrews . 1993. “Power, Social Influence, and Sense Making: Effects of Network Centrality and Proximity on Employee Perceptions.” Administrative Science Quarterly 38 (2): 277303.

A. Krishna 2002. Active Social Capital: Tracing the Roots of Development and Democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.

G. Mansuri , and V. Rao . 2004. “Community-based and -driven Development: A Critical Review.” World Bank Research Observer 19 (1): 139.

R.S. Meinzen-Dick , K.V. Raju , and A. Gulati . 2002. “What Affects Organization and Collective Action for Managing Resources? Evidence from Canal Irrigation Systems in India.” World Development 30 (4): 649–66.

B.H. Michie 1981. “The Transformation of Agrarian Patron-Client Relations: Illustrations from India.” American Ethnologist 8 (1): 2140.

E. Ostrom 2000. “Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 14 (3): 137–58.

M. Shami 2012. “The Impact of Connectivity on Market Interlinkages: Evidence from Rural Punjab.” World Development 40 (5): 9991012.

B. Simpson , and M. Macy . 2004. “Power, Identity, and Collective Action in Social Exchange.” Social Forces 82 (4): 13731409.

S. Szreter 2002. “The State of Social Capital: Bringing Back in Power, Politics, and History.” Theory and Society 31 (5): 573621.

B. Wood 1995. Women's Work, Men's Work: Informal Slave Economics of Lowcountry Georgia. Athens: University of Georgia Press.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 10
Total number of PDF views: 116 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 286 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.