Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A Pivotal Politician and Constitutional Design

  • DAVID BRIAN ROBERTSON (a1)
Abstract

“A Pivotal Voter From a Pivotal State” argues that Roger Sherman played a central role at the Constitutional Convention, but it takes a different approach to explaining Sherman's role than “Madison's Opponents and Constitutional Design.” First, the two articles are trying to answer different questions; “A Pivotal Voter” is trying to explain roll call votes, whereas “Madison's Opponents” was trying to explain the Constitution's substantive design. Second, “A Pivotal Voter” assumes that delegates' preferences were fixed, and their votes sincere, but “Madison's Opponents” finds that delegates' preferences often were contingent and votes sometimes insincere. Third, “A Pivotal Voter” ignores the sequence of choices, whereas “Madison's Opponents” argues that sequence is crucial. Finally, “A Pivotal Voter” discounts delegates' efforts to manipulate rules and agendas, whereas “Madison's Opponents” emphasizes these efforts. Together, our findings suggest the value of diversity in political science and the need for more research on the art of political manipulation.

Copyright
Corresponding author
David Brian Robertson is Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Missouri—St. Louis, One University Boulevard St. Louis, MO 63121-4499 (daverobertson@umsl.edu).
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

EskridgeWilliam N., Jr., and FerejohnJohn. 2001. “Super-Statutes.” Duke Law Journal50(March): 121576.

FennoRichard F. 1986. “Observation, Context, and Sequence in the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review80(March): 315.

MoeTerry M. 1990. “Political Institutions: The Neglected Side of the Story.” Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization6(April): 21353.

OrrenKaren, and SkowronekStephen. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

RobertsonDavid Brian. 2005a. “Madison's Opponents and Constitutional Design.” American Political Science Review99(May): 22543.

RobertsonDavid Brian. 2005b. The Constitution and America's Destiny. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

RodriguezRichard, and WeingastBarry W. 2003. “The Positive Political Theory of Legislative History: New Perspectives on the 1964 Civil Rights Act and Its Interpretation.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review151(April): 14171542.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×