Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Attitudes toward Highly Skilled and Low-skilled Immigration: Evidence from a Survey Experiment


Past research has emphasized two critical economic concerns that appear to generate anti-immigrant sentiment among native citizens: concerns about labor market competition and concerns about the fiscal burden on public services. We provide direct tests of both models of attitude formation using an original survey experiment embedded in a nationwide U.S. survey. The labor market competition model predicts that natives will be most opposed to immigrants who have skill levels similar to their own. We find instead that both low-skilled and highly skilled natives strongly prefer highly skilled immigrants over low-skilled immigrants, and this preference is not decreasing in natives' skill levels. The fiscal burden model anticipates that rich natives oppose low-skilled immigration more than poor natives, and that this gap is larger in states with greater fiscal exposure (in terms of immigrant access to public services). We find instead that rich and poor natives are equally opposed to low-skilled immigration in general. In states with high fiscal exposure, poor (rich) natives are more (less) opposed to low-skilled immigration than they are elsewhere. This indicates that concerns among poor natives about constraints on welfare benefits as a result of immigration are more relevant than concerns among the rich about increased taxes. Overall the results suggest that economic self-interest, at least as currently theorized, does not explain voter attitudes toward immigration. The results are consistent with alternative arguments emphasizing noneconomic concerns associated with ethnocentrism or sociotropic considerations about how the local economy as a whole may be affected by immigration.

Corresponding author
Jens Hainmueller is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139 (
Michael J. Hiscox is Clarence Dillon Professor of International Affairs, Department of Government, Harvard University, 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

M. Bertrand , S. Mullainathan . 2001. “Do People Mean What They Say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data.” American Economic Review 91 (2): 6772.

G. Borjas 2003. “The Labor Demand Curve Is Downward Sloping: Reexamining the Impact of Immigration on the Labor Market.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 118 (4): 1335–74.

G. Borjas 2005. Native Internal Migration and the Labor Market Impact of Immigration. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

G. Borjas , R. Freeman , and L. Katz . 1997. “How Much Do Immigration and Trade Affect Labor Market Outcomes?” In Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 1997:1, Macroeconomics, eds. George L. Perry and William C. Brainard . Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 190.

E. Brezis , P. Krugman . 1993. Immigration, Investment, and Real Wages, NBER Working Paper 4563, National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER).

P. Burns , J. Gimpel . 2000. “Economic Insecurity, Prejudicial Stereotypes, and Public Opinion on Immigration Policy.” Political Science Quarterly 115 (3): 201–25.

M. Callegaro , C. DiSogra . 2008. “Computing Response Metrics for Online Panels.” Public Opinion Quarterly 72 (5): 1008–32.

D. Card 1990. “The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 43 (2): 245–57.

D. Card 2001. “Immigrant Inflows, Native Outflows, and the Local Labor Market Impacts of Higher Immigration.” Journal of Labor Economics 19 (1): 2264.

D. Card 2005. “Is the New Immigration Really So Bad?.” Economic Journal 115 (507): F300F323.

C. E. Case , A. M. Greeley , S. Fuchs . 1989. “Social Determinants of Racial Prejudice.” Sociological Perspectives 32: 469–83.

C. R. Chandler , Y.-M. T. Tsai . 2001. “Social Factors Influencing Immigration Attitudes: An Analysis of Data from the General Social Survey.” Social Science Journal 38 (2): 177–88.

J. Citrin , D. P. Green , C. Muste , C. Wong . 1997. “Public Opinion towards Immigration Reform: The Role of Economic Motivations.” Journal of Politics 59: 858–81.

C. Dustmann , I. P. Preston . 2006. “Is Immigration Good or Bad for the Economy? Analysis of Attitudinal Responses.” Research in Labor Economics 24: 334.

C. Dustmann , I. P. Preston . 2007. “Racial and Economic Factors in Attitudes to Immigration.” B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 7 (1): Article 62.

T. J. Espenshade , K. Hempstead . 1996. “Contemporary American Attitudes toward U.S. Immigration.” International Migration Review 30: 535–70.

G. Facchini , A. Mayda . 2009. “Does the Welfare State Affect Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants? Evidence across Countries.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (2): 295314.

D. Feenberg , E. Coutts . 1993. “An Introduction to the TAXSIM Model.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12 (1): 189–94.

R. Friedberg , J. Hunt . 1995. “The Impact of Immigrants on Host Country Wages, Employment and Growth.The Journal of Economic Perspectives 9 (2): 2344.

N. Gaston , D. Nelson . 2000. “Immigration and Labor-Market Outcomes in the United States: A Political-Economy Puzzle.” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 16 (3): 104–14.

D. Green , A. Gerken . 1989. “Self-Interest and Public Opinion toward Smoking Restrictions and Cigarette Taxes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 53 (1): 116.

G. Hanson , K. Scheve , M. Slaughter . 2007. “Public Finance and Individual Preferences over Globalization Strategies.” Economics and Politics 19 (1): 133.

E. Harwood 1986. “American Public Opinion and U.S. Immigration Policy.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 487: 201–12.

R. Hero , R. Preuhs . 2007. “Immigration and the Evolving American Welfare State: Examining Policies in the US States.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 498517.

D. Kinder , D. Sears . 1981. “Prejudice and Politics: Symbolic Racism versus Racial Threats to the Good Life.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40: 414–31.

P. Krugman , M. Obstfeld . 2000. International Economics: Theory and policy. 5th ed.Reading, MA: Addison–Wesley Longman.

E. Leamer , J. Levinsohn . 1995. “International Trade Theory: The Evidence.” In Handbook of International Economics, Vol. 3, eds. G. M. Grossman and K. Rogoff . Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1339–94.

S. Longhi , P. Nijkamp , J. Poot . 2005. “A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Effect of Immigration on Wages.” Journal of Economic Surveys 19 (3): 451–77.

A. Mayda 2006. “Who Is Against Immigration? A Cross-Country Investigation of Individual Attitudes toward Immigrants.” Review of Economics and Statistics 88 (3): 510–30.

A. Mayda , D. Rodrik . 2005. “Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist than Others?European Economic Review 49 (6): 1393–430.

L. McLaren 2003. “Anti-immigration Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants.” Social Forces 81 (3): 909–36.

L. McLaren , M. Johnson . 2007. “Resources, Group Conflict, and Symbols: Explaining Anti-immigration Hostility in Britain.” Political Studies 55 (4): 709–32.

D. Mutz 1992. “Mass Media and the Depoliticization of Personal Experience.” American Journal of Political Science 36 (2): 483508.

K. Scheve , M. Slaughter . 2001. “Labor Market Competition and Individual Preferences over Immigration Policy.” Review of Economics and Statistics 83 (1): 133–45.

D. Sears , C. Funk . 1990. “The Limited Effect of Economic Self-Interest on the Political Attitudes of the Aass Public.” Journal of Behavioral Economics 19: 247–71.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score