Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All

  • RAINBOW MURRAY (a1)
Abstract

Gender quotas traditionally focus on the underrepresentation of women. Conceiving of quotas in this way perpetuates the status of men as the norm and women as the “other.” Women are subject to heavy scrutiny of their qualifications and competence, whereas men's credentials go unchallenged. This article calls for a normative shift in the problem of overrepresentation, arguing that the quality of representation is negatively affected by having too large a group drawn from too narrow a talent pool. Curbing overrepresentation through ceiling quotas for men offers three core benefits. First, it promotes meritocracy by ensuring the proper scrutiny of politicians of both sexes. Second, it provides an impetus for improving the criteria used to select and evaluate politicians. Third, neutralizing the overly masculinized environment within parliaments might facilitate better substantive and symbolic representation of both men and women. All citizens would benefit from these measures to increase the quality of representation.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Quotas for Men: Reframing Gender Quotas as a Means of Improving Representation for All
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Rainbow Murray, Queen Mary University of London (rainbowmurray@gmail.com).
References
Hide All
Anderson, Christopher, and Guillory, Christine. 1997. “Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy.” American Political Science Review 91 (1): 6681.
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 2003. “Not All Cues Are Created Equal: The Conditional Impact of Female Candidates on Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1040–61.
Bacchi, Carol. 1996. The Politics of Affirmative Action. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bacchi, Carol. 2006. “Arguing for and against Quotas: Theoretical Issues.” In Women, Quotas and Politics, ed. Dahlerup, Drude. London: Routledge, 3252.
Baldez, Lisa. 2004. “Elected Bodies: Gender Quota Laws for Legislative Candidates in Mexico.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (May): 231–58.
Baldez, Lisa. 2006. “The Pros and Cons of Gender Quota Laws.” Politics & Gender 2 (1): 102–09.
Bale, Tim, and Caramani, Daniele. 2010. “Political Data in 2009.” European Journal of Political Research 49 (7–8): 855–67.
Baltrunaite, Audinga, Bello, Piero, Casarico, Alessandra, and Profeta, Paola. 2012. “Gender Quotas and the Quality of Politicians.” Mimeo, Bocconi University.
Bauer, Gretchen, and Britton, Hannah E., eds. 2006. Women in African Parliaments. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Besley, Timothy, Folke, Olle, Persson, Torsten, and Rickne, Johanna. 2012. “Gender Quotas and the Crisis of the Mediocre Man.” Mimeo, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Bhavnani, Rikhil R. 2009. “Do Electoral Quotas Work after They Are Withdrawn? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in India.” American Political Science Review 103 (1): 2335.
Bjarnegård, Elin. 2013. Gender, Informal Institutions and Political Recruitment. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Black, Jerome H., and Erickson, Lynda. 2000. “Similarity, Compensation, or Difference? A Comparison of Female and Male Office-Seekers.” Women & Politics 21 (4): 138.
Campbell, Rosie, Childs, Sarah, and Lovenduski, Joni. 2010. “Do Women Need Women Representatives?British Journal of Political Science 40 (1): 171–94.
Caramani, Daniele, Deegan-Krause, Kevin, and Murray, Rainbow. 2011. “Political Data in 2010.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (7–8): 869–87.
Carter, David, Simkins, Betty and Simpson, W. Gary. 2003. “Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value.” Financial Review 38 (1): 3353.
Carver, Terrell. 1996. Gender Is Not a Synonym for Women. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Celis, Karen. 2006. “Substantive Representation of Women: The Representation of Women's Interests and the Impact of Descriptive Representation in the Belgian Parliament (1900–1979).” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 28 (2): 85114.
Celis, Karen, Childs, Sarah, Kantola, Johanna, and Krook, Mona L.. 2008. “Rethinking Women's Substantive Representation.” Representation 44 (2): 99110.
Celis, Karen, Krook, Mona Lena, and Meier, Petra. 2011. “The Rise of Gender Quota Laws: Expanding the Spectrum of Determinants for Electoral Reform.” West European Politics 34 (3): 514–30.
Childs, Sarah. 2004. New Labour's Women MPs. New York: Routledge.
Childs, Sarah. 2006. “The House Turned Upside Down? The Difference Labour's Women MPs Made.” In Representing Women in Parliament, eds. Sawer, Marian, Tremblay, Manon, and Trimble, Linda. Oxford: Routledge, 152–67.
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona L.. 2008. “Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation.” Political Studies 56 (3): 725–36.
Childs, Sarah, and Krook, Mona L.. 2009. “Analyzing Women's Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors.” Government and Opposition 44 (2): 125–45.
Childs, Sarah, and Webb, Paul. 2012. Sex, Gender and the Conservative Party. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Childs, Sarah, and Withey, Julie. 2006. “The Substantive Representation of Women: The Case of the Reduction of VAT on Sanitary Products.” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (1): 1023.
Collinson, David. L. 1988. “‘Engineering Humour’: Masculinity, Joking and Conflict in Shop-floor Relations.” Organization Studies 9 (2): 181–99.
Collinson, David L., and Hearn, Jeff. 2005. “Men and Masculinities in Work, Organizations, and Management.” In Handbook of Studies on Men and Masculinities, eds. Kimmel, Michael S., Hearn, Jeff, and Connell, Robert W.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crowley, Jocelyn Elise. 2004. “When Tokens Matter.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 29 (1): 109–36.
Curtin, Jennifer. 2008. “Comparing Pathways to Power: Women and Political Leadership in New Zealand and Australia.” In Public Leadership: Perspectives and Practices, eds. Hurt, Paul ‘t and Uhr, John. Canberra: Australia National University Press, 265–74.
Dahlerup, Drude. 2006. “Introduction.” In Women, Quotas and Politics, ed. Dahlerup, Drude. London: Routledge, 331.
Dahlerup, Drude. 2007. “Electoral Gender Quotas: Between Equality of Opportunity and Equality of Result.” Representation 43 (2): 7392.
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2005. “Quotas as a ‘Fast Track’ to Equal Representation for Women.” International Feminist Journal of Politics 7 (1): 2648.
Dahlerup, Drude, and Freidenvall, Lenita. 2010. “Judging Gender Quotas: Predictions and Results.” Policy and Politics 38 (3): 407–25.
Daly, Mary. 2005. “Gender Mainstreaming in Theory and Practice.” Social Politics 12 (3): 433–50.
Denis, Daphnee. 2012. “Sun Rises, French Female Minister Gets Heckled, Sun Sets.” Slate, July 19. http://www.slate.com/blogs/xx_factor/2012/07/19/cecile_duflot_and_the_floral_dress_just_another_day_in_the_french_parliment.html. Accessed August 18, 2013.
Diamond, Irene, and Hartsock, Nancy. 1981. “Beyond Interests in Politics.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 717–21.
Dollar, David, Fisman, Sandra, and Gatti, Roberta. 2001. “Are Women Really the ‘Fairer’ Sex? Corruption and Women in Government.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 46: 423–29.
Dovi, Suzanne. 2002. “Preferable Descriptive Representatives: Will Just Any Woman, Black, or Latino Do?American Political Science Review 96 (4): 729–43.
Dovi, Suzanne. 2007. The Good Representative. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Elliott, Cath. 2011. “Cameron's ‘Calm Down, Dear’ Is a Classic Sexist Put-down.” The Guardian, April 27.
Escobar-Lemmon, Maria, and Taylor-Robinson, Michelle. 2009. “Getting to the Top: Career Paths of Women in Latin American Cabinets.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (4): 685–99.
Eulau, Heinz, Wahlke, John C., Buchanan, William, and Ferguson, Leroy C.. 1959. “The Role of the Representative: Some Empirical Observations on the Theory of Edmund Burke.” American Political Science Review 53 (3): 742–56.
Falk, Erika. 2008. Women for President: Media Bias in Eight Campaigns. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M., eds. 2012. The Impact of Quotas on Women's Descriptive, Substantive, and Symbolic Representation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2008. “Gender Quotas and Women's Substantive Representation: Lessons from Argentina.” Politics & Gender 4 (3): 393426.
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2012. “Gender Quotas and Political Backgrounds.” In The Impact of Quotas, eds. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 4356.
Franceschet, Susan, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. 2014. “Sustaining Gendered Practices? Power, Parties, and Elite Political Networks in Argentina.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (1): 85110.
Galasso, Vincenzo, and Nannicini, Tommaso, 2011. “Competing on Good Politicians.” American Political Science Review 105 (1): 7999.
Grey, Sandra. 2002. “Does Size Matter? Critical Mass and New Zealand's Women MPs.” Parliamentary Affairs 55 (1): 1929.
Hawkesworth, Mary. 2003. “Congressional Enactments of Race-Gender: Towards a Theory of Raced-Gendered Institutions.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 529–50.
Hazan, Reuven Y., and Rahat, Gideon. 2010. Democracy within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Henn, Matt, Weinstein, Mark, and Hodgkinson, Sarah. 2007. “Social Capital and Political Participation: Understanding the Dynamics of Young People's Political Disengagement in Contemporary Britain.” Social Policy and Society 6 (4): 467–79.
Htun, Mala N. 2005. “Why Women, But Not Blacks or Indians, Got Quotas in Politics in Latin America.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Jones, Mark. 1998. “Gender Quotas, Electoral Laws, and the Election of Women.” Comparative Political Studies 31 (1): 321.
Júlio, Paolo, and Tavares, José. 2010. “The Good, the Bad and the Different: Can Gender Quotas Raise the Quality of Politicians?Mimeo, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
Kanter, Rosabeth Moss. 1977. Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
Karam, Azza. 1999. “Beijing +5: Women's Political Participation.” Paper presented at the UNDP Meeting on Women and Political Participation, New Delhi, India.
Karp, Jeffrey A., and Banducci, Susan A.. 2008. “When Politics Is Not Just a Man's Game: Women's Representation and Political Engagement.” Electoral Studies 27: 105–15.
Kenny, Michael (2011). “The Political Theory of Recognition: The Case of the ‘White Working Class.’British Journal of Politics and International Relations 14 (1): 1938.
Kotakorpi, Kaisa, and Poutvaara, Panu. 2011. “Pay for Politicians and Candidate Selection: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 95 (7–8): 877–85.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2006. “Gender Quotas, Norms, and Politics.” Politics & Gender 2 (1): 110–18.
Krook, Mona Lena. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide. New York: Oxford University Press.
Larson, Anna. 2012. “Collective Identities, Institutions, Security, and State Building in Afghanistan.” In The Impact of Quotas, eds. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 136–55.
Lawless, Jennifer, and Fox, Richard L.. 2010. It Still Takes a Candidate: Why Women Don't Run for Office. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lawrence, Regina, and Rose, Melody. 2010. Hillary Clinton's Race for the White House. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
LeBlanc, Robin. 2009. The Art of the Gut: Manhood, Power, and Ethics in Japanese Politics. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Lovenduski, Joni. 2005. Feminizing Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. “Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent ‘Yes.’Journal of Politics 61 (3): 628–57.
Mansbridge, Jane. 2003. “Rethinking Representation.” American Political Science Review 97 (4): 515–28.
May, Theresa. 2004. “Women in the House: The Continuing Challenge.” Parliamentary Affairs 57 (4): 844–51.
Messner, Michael A., and Solomon, Nancy M.. 2007. “Social Justice and Men's Interests.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 31 (2): 162–78.
Murphy, George E. 1998. “Why Women Are Less Likely than Men to Commit Suicide.” Comprehensive Psychiatry 39 (4): 165–75.
Murray, Rainbow, ed. 2010a. Cracking the Highest Glass Ceiling: A Global Comparison of Women's Campaigns for Executive Office. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Murray, Rainbow. 2010b. “Second among Unequals: A Study of Whether France's ‘Quota Women’ Are up to the Job.” Politics & Gender 6 (1): 93118.
Murray, Rainbow. 2010c. Parties, Gender Quotas and Candidate Selection in France. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Niven, David. 1998. “Party Elites and Women Candidates: The Shape of Bias.” Women & Politics 19 (2): 5780.
Norris, Pippa, and Lovenduski, Joni. 1995. Political Recruitment: Gender, Race and Class in the British Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa, Lovenduski, Joni, and Campbell, Rosie. 2004. Gender and Political Participation: The Activism Gap. London: Electoral Commission.
O'Brien, Diana Z. 2012. “Quotas and Qualifications in Uganda.” In The Impact of Quotas, eds. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 5771.
O'Toole, Therese, Marsh, David, and Jones, Su. 2003. “Political Literacy Cuts Both Ways: The Politics of Non-participation among Young People.” Political Quarterly 74 (3): 349–60.
Pease, Bob. 2002. “(Re)Constructing Men's Interests.” Men and Masculinities 5 (2): 165–77.
Phillips, Anne. 1995. The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pitkin, Hanna. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Prügl, Elisabeth. 2012. “’If Lehman Brothers Had Been Lehman Sisters. . .’: Gender and Myth in the Aftermath of the Financial Crisis.” International Political Sociology 6 (1): 2135.
Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan C., and Manin, Bernard. 1999. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2009. “Representation Rethought: On Trustees, Delegates, and Gyroscopes in the Study of Political Representation and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 214–30.
Rehfeld, Andrew. 2010. “On Quotas and Qualifications for Office.” In Political Representation, eds. Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan, Wood, Elisabeth Jean, and Kirshner, Alexander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 236–68.
Reingold, Beth. 2006. “Women as Office Holders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation.” Paper presented at the “Political Women and American Democracy” conference, University of Notre Dame.
Saint-Germain, Michelle A. 1993. “Paths to Power of Women Legislators in Costa Rica and Nicaragua.” Women's Studies International Forum 16 (2): 119–38.
Sapiro, Virginia. 1981. “When Are Interests Interesting? The Problem of Political Representation of Women.” American Political Science Review 75 (3): 701–16.
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie. 2010. Political Power and Women's Representation in Latin America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sénac-Slawinski, Réjane. 2010. “De la parité à la diversité: entre Deuxième sexe et discrimination seconde.” Modern and Contemporary France 18 (4): 431–44.
Stevens, Anne. 2012. “Comparing and Assessing Gender Effects in Political Leadership.” In Comparative Political Leadership, ed. Helms, Ludger. Basingstoke: Palgrave 207–26.
Sung, Hung-En. 2003. “Fairer Sex or Fairer System? Gender and Corruption Revisited.” Social Forces 82 (2): 703–23.
Swamy, Anand, Knack, Stephen, Lee, Young, and Azfar, Omas. 2001. “Gender and Corruption.” Journal of Developmental Economics 64 (1): 2555.
Swers, Michele L. 1998. “Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills than Their Male Counterparts?Legislative Studies Quarterly 23 (3): 435–48.
Swers, Michele L. 2005. “Connecting Descriptive and Substantive Representation: An Analysis of Sex Differences in Co-sponsorship Activity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 30 (3): 407–33.
Taylor, Bron R. 1991. Affirmative Action at Work. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Teigen, Mari. 2000. “The Affirmative Action Controversy.” NORA—Nordic Journal of Women's Studies 8 (2): 6377.
Tinker, Irene. 2004. “Quotas for Women in Elected Legislatures: Do They Really Empower Women?Women's Studies International Forum 27: 531–46.
Tripp, Aili Mari, and Kang, Alice. 2008. “The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 41 (3): 338–61.
UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2010. Global Education Digest 2010: Comparing Education Statistics Across the World. http://www.uis.unesco.org/Library/Documents/GED_2010_EN.pdf.
Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1997. “Knowing and Caring about Politics: Gender and Political Engagement.” Journal of Politics 59 (4): 1051–72.
Verge, Tania. 2011. “Quotas’ Effects on Political Recruitment, Candidates’ Profiles, and Routes to Political Office.” Paper presented at the European Conference on Gender and Politics, Budapest, Hungary.
Walby, Sylvia. 2005. “Gender Mainstreaming: Productive Tensions in Theory and Practice.” Social Politics 12 (3): 321–43.
Walsh, Denise. 2012. “Party Centralization and Debate Conditions in South Africa.” In The Impact of Quotas, eds. Franceschet, Susan, Krook, Mona Lena, and Piscopo, Jennifer M.. New York: Oxford University Press, 119–35.
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zetterberg, Par. 2008. “The Downside of Gender Quotas? Institutional Constraints on Women in Mexican State Legislatures.” Parliamentary Affairs 61 (3): 442–60.
Zimmer, Lynn. 1988. “Tokenism and Women in the Workplace: The Limits of Gender-Neutral Theory.” Social Problems 35 (1): 6477.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 139
Total number of PDF views: 985 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2016 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.