Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Dynamic Representation

  • James A. Stimson (a1), Michael B. Mackuen (a2) and Robert S. Erikson (a3)

If public opinion changes and then public policy responds, this is dynamic representation. Public opinion is the global policy preference of the American electorate. Policy is a diverse set of acts of elected and unelected officials. Two mechanisms of policy responsiveness are (1) elections change the government's political composition, which is then reflected in new policy and (2) policymakers calculate future (mainly electoral) implications of current public views and act accordingly (rational anticipation). We develop multiple indicators of policy activity for the House, Senate, presidency, and Supreme Court, then model policy liberalism as a joint function of the two mechanisms. For each institution separately, and also in a global analysis of “government as a whole,” we find that policy responds dynamically to public opinion change. This responsiveness varies by institution, both in level and in mechanism, as would be expected from constitutional design.

Hide All
Herbert B. Asher , and Herbert F. Weisberg . 1978. “Voting Change in Congress: Some Dynamic Perspectives on an Evolutionary Process.American Journal of Political Science 22:391–125.

David C. Barnum 1985. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision making in the Post New Deal Period.Journal of Politics 47:652–65.

David Brady , and Barbara Sinclair . 1984. “Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives.Journal of Politics 46:1033–60.

Gregory Caldeira , and James Gibson . 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.American Journal of Political Science 36:635–64.

Jonathan D. Casper 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy-making.American Political Science Review 70:5063.

J. E. H. Davidson , David F. Hendry , Frank Srba , and Steven Yeo . 1978. “Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship between Consumer's Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom.Economic Journal 88:661–92.

Robert H. Durr 1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?American Political Science Review 87:158–70.

Robert F. Engle , and C. W. J. Granger . 1987. “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.Econometrica 55:251–76.

Robert F. Engle , and Mark W. Watson . 1981. “A One-Factor Multivariate Time Series Model of Metropolitan Wage Rates.Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:774–80.

Robert S. Erikson 1976. “Is There Such a Thing as a Safe Seat?Polity 8:623–32.

Robert S. Erikson 1990. “Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote: A Review of the Macrolevel Evidence.American Journal of Political Science 34:373–99.

John Gates . 1987. “Partisan Realignment, Unconstitutional State Policies, and the U.S. Supreme Court, 1937–1964.American Journal of Political Science 31:259–80.

Michael B. MacKuen 1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.American Journal of Political Science 27:165–92.

Benjamin I. Page , and Robert Y. Shapiro . 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jeffrey A. Segal 1988. “Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts: A Research Note.Western Political Quarterly 41:135–44.

Eric R. A. N. Smith , Richard Herrera , and Cheryl L. Herrera . 1990. “The Measurement Characteristics of Congressional Roll Call Indexes.Legislative Study Quarterly 15:283–95.

Mark W. Watson , and Robert F. Engle . 1983. “Alternative Algorithms for the Estimation of Dynamic Factor, Mimic, and Varying Coefficient Regression Models. Journal of Econometrics 23:385400.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 25 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1052 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 17th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.