Skip to main content Accessibility help

Dynamic Representation

  • James A. Stimson (a1), Michael B. Mackuen (a2) and Robert S. Erikson (a3)


If public opinion changes and then public policy responds, this is dynamic representation. Public opinion is the global policy preference of the American electorate. Policy is a diverse set of acts of elected and unelected officials. Two mechanisms of policy responsiveness are (1) elections change the government's political composition, which is then reflected in new policy and (2) policymakers calculate future (mainly electoral) implications of current public views and act accordingly (rational anticipation). We develop multiple indicators of policy activity for the House, Senate, presidency, and Supreme Court, then model policy liberalism as a joint function of the two mechanisms. For each institution separately, and also in a global analysis of “government as a whole,” we find that policy responds dynamically to public opinion change. This responsiveness varies by institution, both in level and in mechanism, as would be expected from constitutional design.



Hide All
Adamany, David. 1973. “Legitimacy, Realigning Elections, and the Supreme Court.” Wisconsin Law Review, September, pp. 790846.
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1990. The Logic of Congressional Action. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Asher, Herbert B., and Weisberg, Herbert F.. 1978. “Voting Change in Congress: Some Dynamic Perspectives on an Evolutionary Process.American Journal of Political Science 22:391–125.
Barnum, David C. 1985. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision making in the Post New Deal Period.Journal of Politics 47:652–65.
Bartels, Larry M. 1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup.American Political Science Review 85:457–74.
Baum, Lawrence. 1988. “Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court.American Political Science Review 82:905–12.
Beck, Nathaniel. 1990. “Estimating Dynamic Models Using Kalman Filtering.Political Analysis 1:121–56.
Brady, David, and Sinclair, Barbara. 1984. “Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives.Journal of Politics 46:1033–60.
Caldeira, Gregory, and Gibson, James. 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.American Journal of Political Science 36:635–64.
Casper, Jonathan D. 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy-making.American Political Science Review 70:5063.
Dahl, Robert A. 1957. “Decision-making in a Democracy: The Supreme Court as a National Policy-maker.Journal of Public Law 6:279–95.
Davidson, J. E. H., Hendry, David F., Srba, Frank, and Yeo, Steven. 1978. “Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship between Consumer's Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom.Economic Journal 88:661–92.
Deutsch, Karl W. 1963. The Nerves of Government: Models of Political Communication and Control. New York: Free Press.
Durr, Robert H. 1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?American Political Science Review 87:158–70.
Easton, David. 1953. The Political System. New York: Knopf.
Engle, Robert F., and Granger, C. W. J.. 1987. “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.Econometrica 55:251–76.
Engle, Robert F., and Watson, Mark W.. 1981. “A One-Factor Multivariate Time Series Model of Metropolitan Wage Rates.Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:774–80.
Erikson, Robert S. 1976. “Is There Such a Thing as a Safe Seat?Polity 8:623–32.
Erikson, Robert S. 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.American Political Science Review 83:567–73.
Erikson, Robert S. 1990. “Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote: A Review of the Macrolevel Evidence.American Journal of Political Science 34:373–99.
Fenno, Richard. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1989. Congress: Keystone to the Washington Establishment. 2d ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Funston, Richard Y. 1975. “The Supreme Court and Critical Elections.American Political Science Review 69:795811.
Gates, John. 1987. “Partisan Realignment, Unconstitutional State Policies, and the U.S. Supreme Court, 1937–1964.American Journal of Political Science 31:259–80.
Granger, Clive W. J., and Newbold, Paul. 1974. “Spurious Regressions in Econometrics.Journal of Econometrics 26:1045–66.
Huber, John D., and Bingham Powell, G. Jr., 1994. “Congruence Between Citizens and Policymakers in Two Visions of Liberal Democracy.World Politics 46:291326.
Jacobson, Gary C. 1991. The Politics of Congressional Elections. 3d ed.Boston: Little, Brown.
Kellstedt, Paul, McAvoy, Gregory E., and Stimson, James A.. N.d. “Dynamic Analysis with Latent Constructs: The Kalman Dymimic Specification.” Political Analysis. Forthcoming.
Kingdon, John W. 1973. Congressmen's Voting Decisions. New York: Harper & Row.
Kingdon, John W. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Boston: Little, Brown.
Lee, Rex E. 1986. “Lawyering for the Government: Politics, Polemics, and Principle.Ohio State Law Journal 47:595601.
MacKuen, Michael B. 1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.American Journal of Political Science 27:165–92.
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. “Macropartisanship.American Political Science Review 83:1125–42.
Marshall, Thomas R. 1989. Public Opinion and the Supreme Court. Boston: Unwin Hyman.
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.American Political Science Review 87:87101.
Mishler, William, and Sheehan, Reginald S.. 1994. “Response: Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.American Politcal Science Review 88:716–24.
Mouw, Calvin, and MacKuen, Michael. 1992 “The Strategic Agenda in Legislative Politics.American Political Science Review 86:87105.
Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Norpoth, Helmut, and Segal, Jeffrey A.. 1994. “Comment: Popular Influence on Supreme Court Decisions.American Political Science Review 88:711–16.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.American Political Science Review 77:175–90.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Riker, William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Salokar, Rebecca Mae. 1992. The Solicitor General: The Politics of Law. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A. 1988. “Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts: A Research Note.Western Political Quarterly 41:135–44.
Smith, Eric R. A. N., Herrera, Richard, and Herrera, Cheryl L.. 1990. “The Measurement Characteristics of Congressional Roll Call Indexes.Legislative Study Quarterly 15:283–95.
Stimson, James A. 1991. Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings. Boulder: Westview.
Sundquist, James L. 1992. Constitutional Reform and Effective Government. Rev. ed. Washington: Brookings Institute.
Watson, Mark W., and Engle, Robert F.. 1983. “Alternative Algorithms for the Estimation of Dynamic Factor, Mimic, and Varying Coefficient Regression Models. Journal of Econometrics 23:385400.
Wlezien, Christopher. N.d. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science. Forthcoming.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed