Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 251
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Arceneaux, Kevin Johnson, Martin Lindstädt, René and Vander Wielen, Ryan J. 2016. The Influence of News Media on Political Elites: Investigating Strategic Responsiveness in Congress. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 60, Issue. 1, p. 5.

    Billingham, Chase M. and Kimelberg, Shelley McDonough 2016. Opinion polling and the measurement of Americans’ attitudes regarding education*. Journal of Education Policy, Vol. 31, Issue. 5, p. 526.

    Breznau, Nate 2016. Positive Returns and Equilibrium: Simultaneous Feedback Between Public Opinion and Social Policy. Policy Studies Journal,

    Brock, Clare 2016. Framing Child Nutrition Programs: The Impact of Party and District Characteristics on Elite Framing*. Social Science Quarterly,

    Choi, Seung-Whan James, Patrick Li, Yitan and Olson, Eric 2016. Presidential approval and macroeconomic conditions: evidence from a nonlinear model. Applied Economics, p. 1.

    Collins, Todd A. and Cooper, Christopher A. 2016. The Case Salience Index, Public Opinion, and Decision Making on the U.S. Supreme Court. Justice System Journal, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 232.

    De Sio, Lorenzo Franklin, Mark N. and Weber, Till 2016. The risks and opportunities of Europe: How issue yield explains (non-)reactions to the financial crisis. Electoral Studies,

    FERLAND, BENJAMIN 2016. Revisiting the ideological congruence controversy. European Journal of Political Research, Vol. 55, Issue. 2, p. 358.

    Gomez, Raul and Tonge, Jonathan 2016. New members as party modernisers: The case of the Democratic Unionist Party in Northern Ireland. Electoral Studies, Vol. 42, p. 65.

    Hassell, Hans J.G. and Monson, J. Quin 2016. Representational Inconsistency: Presentation of Self and Explanations of Washington Activity in Campaign Mail and Franked Mail. Congress & the Presidency, Vol. 43, Issue. 2, p. 206.

    Jennings, Will Farrall, Stephen Gray, Emily and Hay, Colin 2016. Penal Populism and the Public Thermostat: Crime, Public Punitiveness, and Public Policy. Governance,

    Kölln, Ann-Kristin 2016. The virtuous circle of representation. Electoral Studies, Vol. 42, p. 126.

    Krimmel, Katherine Lax, Jeffrey R. and Phillips, Justin H. 2016. Gay Rights in Congress. Public Opinion Quarterly, p. nfw026.

    Levy, Brian L. and Levy, Denise L. 2016. When love meets hate: The relationship between state policies on gay and lesbian rights and hate crime incidence. Social Science Research,

    Lizotte, Mary-Kate 2016. Investigating women's greater support of the Affordable Care Act. The Social Science Journal, Vol. 53, Issue. 2, p. 209.

    Maor, Moshe 2016. The implications of the emerging disproportionate policy perspective for the new policy design studies. Policy Sciences,

    Williams, Christopher J. 2016. Responding through transposition: public Euroskepticism and European policy implementation. European Political Science Review, p. 1.

    Aaldering, Loes and Vliegenthart, Rens 2015. Political leaders and the media. Can we measure political leadership images in newspapers using computer-assisted content analysis?. Quality & Quantity,

    Allen, Nicholas and Birch, Sarah 2015. Process Preferences and British Public Opinion: Citizens' Judgements about Government in an Era of Anti-politics. Political Studies, Vol. 63, Issue. 2, p. 390.

    Bartels, Larry M. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


Dynamic Representation

  • James A. Stimson (a1), Michael B. Mackuen (a2) and Robert S. Erikson (a3)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 September 2013

If public opinion changes and then public policy responds, this is dynamic representation. Public opinion is the global policy preference of the American electorate. Policy is a diverse set of acts of elected and unelected officials. Two mechanisms of policy responsiveness are (1) elections change the government's political composition, which is then reflected in new policy and (2) policymakers calculate future (mainly electoral) implications of current public views and act accordingly (rational anticipation). We develop multiple indicators of policy activity for the House, Senate, presidency, and Supreme Court, then model policy liberalism as a joint function of the two mechanisms. For each institution separately, and also in a global analysis of “government as a whole,” we find that policy responds dynamically to public opinion change. This responsiveness varies by institution, both in level and in mechanism, as would be expected from constitutional design.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Herbert B. Asher , and Herbert F. Weisberg . 1978. “Voting Change in Congress: Some Dynamic Perspectives on an Evolutionary Process.American Journal of Political Science 22:391–125.

David C. Barnum 1985. “The Supreme Court and Public Opinion: Judicial Decision making in the Post New Deal Period.Journal of Politics 47:652–65.

Larry M. Bartels 1991. “Constituency Opinion and Congressional Policy Making: The Reagan Defense Buildup.American Political Science Review 85:457–74.

Lawrence Baum . 1988. “Measuring Policy Change in the U.S. Supreme Court.American Political Science Review 82:905–12.

Nathaniel Beck . 1990. “Estimating Dynamic Models Using Kalman Filtering.Political Analysis 1:121–56.

David Brady , and Barbara Sinclair . 1984. “Building Majorities for Policy Changes in the House of Representatives.Journal of Politics 46:1033–60.

Gregory Caldeira , and James Gibson . 1992. “The Etiology of Public Support for the Supreme Court.American Journal of Political Science 36:635–64.

Jonathan D. Casper 1976. “The Supreme Court and National Policy-making.American Political Science Review 70:5063.

J. E. H. Davidson , David F. Hendry , Frank Srba , and Steven Yeo . 1978. “Econometric Modelling of the Aggregate Time-Series Relationship between Consumer's Expenditure and Income in the United Kingdom.Economic Journal 88:661–92.

Robert H. Durr 1993. “What Moves Policy Sentiment?American Political Science Review 87:158–70.

Robert F. Engle , and C. W. J. Granger . 1987. “Co-integration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing.Econometrica 55:251–76.

Robert F. Engle , and Mark W. Watson . 1981. “A One-Factor Multivariate Time Series Model of Metropolitan Wage Rates.Journal of the American Statistical Association 76:774–80.

Robert S. Erikson 1976. “Is There Such a Thing as a Safe Seat?Polity 8:623–32.

Robert S. Erikson 1989. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.American Political Science Review 83:567–73.

Robert S. Erikson 1990. “Economic Conditions and the Congressional Vote: A Review of the Macrolevel Evidence.American Journal of Political Science 34:373–99.

Richard Y. Funston 1975. “The Supreme Court and Critical Elections.American Political Science Review 69:795811.

John Gates . 1987. “Partisan Realignment, Unconstitutional State Policies, and the U.S. Supreme Court, 1937–1964.American Journal of Political Science 31:259–80.

Michael B. MacKuen 1983. “Political Drama, Economic Conditions, and the Dynamics of Presidential Popularity.American Journal of Political Science 27:165–92.

Michael B. MacKuen , Robert S. Erikson , and James A. Stimson . 1989. “Macropartisanship.American Political Science Review 83:1125–42.

William Mishler , and Reginald S. Sheehan . 1993. “The Supreme Court as a Countermajoritarian Institution? The Impact of Public Opinion on Supreme Court Decisions.American Political Science Review 87:87101.

Calvin Mouw , and Michael MacKuen . 1992 “The Strategic Agenda in Legislative Politics.American Political Science Review 86:87105.

Benjamin I. Page , and Robert Y. Shapiro . 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.American Political Science Review 77:175–90.

Benjamin I. Page , and Robert Y. Shapiro . 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jeffrey A. Segal 1988. “Amicus Curiae Briefs by the Solicitor General during the Warren and Burger Courts: A Research Note.Western Political Quarterly 41:135–44.

Eric R. A. N. Smith , Richard Herrera , and Cheryl L. Herrera . 1990. “The Measurement Characteristics of Congressional Roll Call Indexes.Legislative Study Quarterly 15:283–95.

Mark W. Watson , and Robert F. Engle . 1983. “Alternative Algorithms for the Estimation of Dynamic Factor, Mimic, and Varying Coefficient Regression Models. Journal of Econometrics 23:385400.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *