Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 110
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Broockman, David E. 2016. Approaches to Studying Policy Representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 181.

    Garner, Andrew D. and Palmer, Harvey D. 2016. Following the Crowd or Thinking Outside of the Box? Saliency and Issue Consistency. Social Science Quarterly,

    Germann, Micha and Mendez, Fernando 2016. Dynamic scale validation reloaded. Quality & Quantity, Vol. 50, Issue. 3, p. 981.

    Luttrell, Andrew Petty, Richard E. and Briñol, Pablo 2016. Ambivalence and certainty can interact to predict attitude stability over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 63, p. 56.

    Russo, Silvia and Stattin, Håkan 2016. Stability and Change in Youths’ Political Interest. Social Indicators Research,

    Shor, Boris and Rogowski, Jon C. 2016. Ideology and the US Congressional Vote. Political Science Research and Methods, p. 1.

    Carmines, Edward G. and D'Amico, Nicholas J. 2015. The New Look in Political Ideology Research. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 205.

    Carmines, Edward G. and D'Amico, Nicholas J. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Devine, Christopher J. 2015. Ideological Social Identity: Psychological Attachment to Ideological In-Groups as a Political Phenomenon and a Behavioral Influence. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 509.

    Freeland, Edward P. 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.

    Germann, Micha Mendez, Fernando Wheatley, Jonathan and Serdült, Uwe 2015. Spatial maps in voting advice applications: The case for dynamic scale validation. Acta Politica, Vol. 50, Issue. 2, p. 214.

    Maxwell, Rahsaan 2015. Perceived Discrimination across Institutional Fields: Racial Minorities in the United Kingdom. European Sociological Review, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 342.

    Wang, Zhengxu 2015. Socioeconomic Changes and Value Modernization in China: Changes and Continuity 1993-2011. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, Vol. 2, Issue. 3, p. 140.

    Wang, Ching-Hsing 2015. The Effects of Information and Predisposition on Individual Responses to Hypothetical Survey Questions. Asian Journal for Public Opinion Research, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 71.

    Berinsky, Adam J. Margolis, Michele F. and Sances, Michael W. 2014. Separating the Shirkers from the Workers? Making Sure Respondents Pay Attention on Self-Administered Surveys. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, Issue. 3, p. 739.

    Druckman, James N. 2014. Pathologies of Studying Public Opinion, Political Communication, and Democratic Responsiveness. Political Communication, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 467.

    Feldman, Stanley and Johnston, Christopher 2014. Understanding the Determinants of Political Ideology: Implications of Structural Complexity. Political Psychology, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 337.

    Schoonvelde, Martijn 2014. Media Freedom and the Institutional Underpinnings of Political Knowledge. Political Science Research and Methods, Vol. 2, Issue. 02, p. 163.

    van Elsas, E. J. Lubbe, R. van der Meer, T. W. G. and van der Brug, W. 2014. Vote Recall: A Panel Study on the Mechanisms That Explain Vote Recall Inconsistency. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 18.

    Vannette, David L. and Krosnick, Jon A. 2014. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of Mindfulness.


Mass Political Attitudes and the Survey Response*

  • Christopher H. Achen (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 August 2014

Students of public opinion research have argued that voters show very little consistency and structure in their political attitudes. A model of the survey response is proposed which takes account of the vagueness in opinion survey questions and in response categories. When estimates are made of this vagueness or “measurement error” and the estimates applied to the principal previous study, nearly all the inconsistency is shown to be the result of the vagueness of the questions rather than of any failure by the respondents.

Hide All

I would like to express my thanks to John Aldrich, Lloyd Etheredge, Richard Katz, Gerald Kramer, David Mayhew, Richard Niemi, Douglas Rae, and Charles Whitmore for helpful comments on earlier drafts. Remaining errors are, of course, the responsibility of the author. The data used were collected by the Survey Research Center at the University of Michigan and made available through the Inter-University Consortium for Political Research. Neither body is responsible for the analysis and interpretation presented here.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Bertrand de Jouvenal , “The Chairman's Problem,” American Political Science Review, 55 (06, 1961), 368–72

Philip E. Converse et al., “Electoral Myth and Reality: The 1964 Election,” American Political Science Review, 59 (06, 1965), 321–36

David E. RePass , “Issue Salience and Party Choice,” American Political Science Review, 65 (06, 1971), 389400

Richard W. Boyd , “Popular Control of Public Policy: A Normal Vote Analysis of the 1968 Election,” American Political Science Review, 66 (06, 1972), 429–49

Robert Axelrod , “The Structure of Public Opinion on Policy Issues,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 31 (Spring, 1967), 5160

Edward C. Dreyer , “Change and Stability in Party Identification,” Journal of Politics, 35 (08, 1973), 712–22

Donald D. Searing et al., “The Structuring Principle: Political Socialization and Belief Systems,” American Political Science Review, 67 (06, 1973), 415–32

Norman R. Luttbeg , “The Structure of Beliefs among Leaders and the Public,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 32 (Fall, 1968), 398409

Gerald M. Pomper , “From Confusion to Clarity: Issues and American Voters, 1956–1968,” American Political Science Review, 66 (06, 1972), 415–28

Steven R. Brown , “Consistency and the Persistence of Ideology: Some Experimental Results,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 34 (Spring, 1970), 6068

John C. Pierce and Douglas D. Rose have published “Nonattitudes and American Public Opinion: The Examination of a Thesis,” American Political Science Review, 68 (06, 1974), 626–49

Ward Edwards , “The Theory of Decision Making,” Psychological Bulletin, 51 (1954), 380417

Ward Edwards , “Behavioral Decision Theory,” Annual Review of Psychology, 12 (1961), 473–98

W. Andrew Collins , “Interviewers' Verbal Idiosyncrasies as a Source of Bias,” both in Public Opinion Quarterly, 34 (Fall, 1970), 412–15 and 416–22, respectively

David R. Heise , “Separating Reliability and Stability in Test-Retest Correlation,” American Sociological Review, 34 (02, 1969), 93-101, which is reprinted in the Blalock volume, pp. 348–63

Ralph B. Ginsberg , “Critique of Probabilistic Models: Application of the Semi-Markov Model to Migration” and “Incorporating Causal Structure and Exogenous Information with Probabilistic Models: With Special Reference to Choice, Gravity, Migration, and Markov Chains,” Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2 (01, 1972), 63-82 and 83103, respectively

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *