Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

No Strength in Numbers: The Failure of Big-City Bills in American State Legislatures, 1880–2000

  • GERALD GAMM (a1) and THAD KOUSSER (a2)

Do big cities exert more power than less populous ones in American state legislatures? In many political systems, greater representation leads to more policy gains, yet for most of the nation's history, urban advocates have argued that big cities face systematic discrimination in statehouses. Drawing on a new historical dataset spanning 120 years and 13 states, we find clear evidence that there is no strength in numbers for big-city delegations in state legislatures. District bills affecting large metropolises fail at much higher rates than bills affecting small cities, counties, and villages. Big cities lose so often because size leads to damaging divisions. We demonstrate that the cities with the largest delegations—which are more likely to be internally divided—are the most frustrated in the legislative process. Demographic differences also matter, with district bills for cities that have many foreign-born residents, compared with the state as a whole, failing at especially high rates.

Corresponding author
Gerald Gamm is Associate Professor of Political Science and History, University of Rochester (
Thad Kousser is Associate Professor of Political Science, University of California, San Diego (
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Scott Allard , Nancy Burns , and Gerald Gamm . 1998. “Representing Urban Interests: The Local Politics of State Legislatures.” Studies in American Political Development 12: 267302.

Robert Axelrod , and William D. Hamilton . 1981. “The Evolution of Cooperation.” Science 211: 1390–96.

Benjamin Baker . 1960. “Municipal Autonomy: Its Relationship to Metropolitan Government.” Western Political Quarterly 13: 8398.

Helen Bernhard , Urs Fischbacher , and Ernst Fehr . 2006. “Parochial Altruism in Humans.” Nature 442: 912–15.

Amy Bridges . 1984. A City in the Republic: Antebellum New York and the Origins of Machine Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nancy Burns , Laura Evans , Gerald Gamm , and Corrine McConnaughy . 2008. “Pockets of Expertise: Institutional Capacity in Twentieth-Century State Legislatures.” Studies in American Political Development 22: 229–48.

Royce Carroll , and Gary W. Cox . 2007. “The Logic of Gamson's Law: Pre-election Coalitions and Portfolio Allocations.” American Journal of Political Science 51: 300–13.

Sarah Childs , and Mona Lena Krook . 2008. “Critical Mass Theory and Women's Political Representation.” Political Studies 56: 725–36.

T. C. Desmond 1955. “States Eclipse the Cities.” National Municipal Review 44: 296300.

William A. Gamson 1961. “A Theory of Coalition Formation.” American Sociological Review 26: 373–82.

Colleen M. Grogan 1994. “Political-economic Factors Influencing State Medicaid Policy.” Political Research Quarterly 47: 589622.

Christian R. Grose 2011. Congress in Black and White: Race and Representation in Washington and at Home. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jeffrey R. Lax , and Justin H. Phillips . 2009. “How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?American Journal of Political Science 53: 107–21.

Robert D Putnam . 2007. “E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century.” Scandinavian Political Studies 30: 137–74.

Murray S. Stedman Jr. 1957. “American Political Parties as a Conservative Force.” Western Political Quarterly 10: 392–97.

Margaret Weir , Harold Wolman , and Todd Swanstrom . 2005. “The Calculus of Coalitions: Cities, Suburbs, and the Metropolitan Agenda.” Urban Affairs Review 40: 730–60.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary Materials

Gamm and Kousser Supplementary Material
Appendix Figures and Tables

 PDF (76 KB)
76 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 94 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 2605 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 27th July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.