Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 115
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Arceneaux, Kevin Johnson, Martin Lindstädt, René and Vander Wielen, Ryan J. 2016. The Influence of News Media on Political Elites: Investigating Strategic Responsiveness in Congress. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 60, Issue. 1, p. 5.

    Broockman, David E. 2016. Approaches to Studying Policy Representation. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, Issue. 1, p. 181.

    Cormack, Lindsey 2016. Extremity in Congress: Communications versus Votes. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 575.

    Egar, William T. 2016. Tarnishing Opponents, Polarizing Congress: The House Minority Party and the Construction of the Roll-Call Record. Legislative Studies Quarterly,

    Einstein, Katherine Levine Trump, Kris-Stella and Williamson, Vanessa 2016. The Polarizing Effect of the Stimulus: Partisanship and Voter Responsiveness to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 46, Issue. 2, p. 264.

    Hickey, Patrick T. 2016. Identifying the Critical Members of the House of Representatives. Congress & the Presidency, Vol. 43, Issue. 1, p. 124.

    Hogan, Robert E. Kromer, Mileah K. and Wrzenski, Rhonda L. 2016. Electoral Consequences of Lawmaking Activities for State Legislative Incumbents. Social Science Quarterly, p. n/a.

    Iaryczower, Matias and Katz, Gabriel 2016. What does IT Take for Congress to Enact Good Policies? an Analysis of Roll Call Voting in the US Congress. Economics & Politics, Vol. 28, Issue. 1, p. 79.

    McLean, Elena V. and Roblyer, Dwight A. 2016. Public Support for Economic Sanctions: An Experimental Analysis. Foreign Policy Analysis, p. orw014.

    Pyeatt, Nicholas and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Gendered Perceptions and Reelection Incentives in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 295.

    Pyeatt, Nicholas L. and Yanus, Alixandra B. 2016. Sending mixed signals: the role of gender and partisanship in evaluations of political leaders. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, p. 1.

    Bergan, Daniel E. and Cole, Richard T. 2015. Call Your Legislator: A Field Experimental Study of the Impact of a Constituency Mobilization Campaign on Legislative Voting. Political Behavior, Vol. 37, Issue. 1, p. 27.

    Birkhead, Nathaniel A. 2015. The Role of Ideology in State Legislative Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 55.

    Box-Steffensmeier, Janet Ryan, Josh M. and Sokhey, Anand Edward 2015. Examining Legislative Cue-Taking in the US Senate. Legislative Studies Quarterly, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 13.

    Canes-Wrone, Brandice 2015. From Mass Preferences to Policy. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 18, Issue. 1, p. 147.

    Carson, Jamie L. and Owens, Mark E. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.

    Carter, Jennifer and Patty, John W. 2015. Valence and Campaigns. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 4, p. 825.

    Caughey, Devin and Warshaw, Christopher 2015. The Dynamics of State Policy Liberalism, 1936-2014. American Journal of Political Science, p. n/a.

    Desmarais, Bruce A. La Raja, Raymond J. and Kowal, Michael S. 2015. The Fates of Challengers in U.S. House Elections: The Role of Extended Party Networks in Supporting Candidates and Shaping Electoral Outcomes. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 1, p. 194.

    Hare, Christopher Armstrong, David A. Bakker, Ryan Carroll, Royce and Poole, Keith T. 2015. Using Bayesian Aldrich-McKelvey Scaling to Study Citizens' Ideological Preferences and Perceptions. American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 759.


Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting

  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 March 2002

Does a typical House member need to worry about the electoral ramifications of his roll-call decisions? We investigate the relationship between incumbents' electoral performance and roll-call support for their party—controlling for district ideology, challenger quality, and campaign spending, among other factors—through a series of tests of the 1956–1996 elections. The tests produce three key findings indicating that members are indeed accountable for their legislative voting. First, in each election, an incumbent receives a lower vote share the more he supports his party. Second, this effect is comparable in size to that of other widely recognized electoral determinants. Third, a member's probability of retaining office decreases as he offers increased support for his party, and this relationship holds for not only marginal, but also safe members.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *