Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Partisanship and Economic Behavior: Do Partisan Differences in Economic Forecasts Predict Real Economic Behavior?

  • ALAN S. GERBER (a1) and GREGORY A. HUBER (a1)
Abstract

Survey data regularly show that assessments of current and expected future economic performance are more positive when a respondent's partisanship matches that of the president. To determine if this is a survey artifact or something deeper, we investigate whether partisanship is associated with behavioral differences in economic decisions. We construct a new data set of county-level quarterly taxable sales to examine the effect of partisanship on consumption. Consumption change following a presidential election is correlated with a county's partisan complexion, a result consistent with partisans acting outside the domain of politics in accordance with the opinions they express in surveys. These results support an expansive view of the role of partisanship in mass politics and help validate surveys as a method for studying political behavior.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Alan S. Gerber is Professor, Department of Political Science, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, PO Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520-8209 (alan.gerber@yale.edu).
Gregory A. Huber is Associate Professor, Department of Political Science, Institution for Social and Policy Studies, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, PO Box 208209, New Haven, CT 06520-8209 (gregory.huber@yale.edu).
References
Hide All
Anderson, Barbara A., and Silver, Brian D.. 1986. “Measurement and Mismeasurement of the Validity of the Self-Reported Vote.American Journal of Political Science 30 (4): 771–85.
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James M. Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 136–59.
Bartels, Larry. 2000. “Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952–1996.American Journal of Political Science 44 (1): 3550.
Bartels, Larry. 2002. “Beyond the Running Tally: Partisan Bias in Political Perceptions.Political Behavior 24 (2): 117–50.
Bartels, Larry. 2006. “Priming and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns.” In Capturing Campaign Effects, eds. Brady, Henry E. and Johnston, Richard. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 78112.
Berinsky, Adam J. 1999. “The Two Faces of Public Opinion.American Journal of Political Science 43 (4): 1209–30.
Bertrand, Marianne, Deflo, Esther, and Mullainathan, Sendil. 2004. “How Much Should We Trust Difference-in-Differences Estimates?Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 249–75.
Blanchard, Olivier J., and Fischer, Stanley. 1989. Lectures on Macroeconomics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip, Miller, Warren, and Stokes, Donald. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David W., and Cogan, John F.. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members’ Voting.American Political Science Review 96 (1): 127–40.
Carroll, Christopher D., Fuhrer, Jeffrey C., and Wilcox, David W.. 1994. “Does Consumer Sentiment Forecast Household Spending? If So, Why?The American Economic Review 84 (5): 1397–408.
Conover, Pamela, Feldman, Stanley, and Knight, Kathleen. 1986. “Judging Inflation and Unemployment: The Origins of Retrospective Evaluations.Journal of Politics 48 (3): 565–88.
Conover, Pamela, Feldman, Stanley, and Knight, Kathleen. 1987. “The Personal and Political Underpinnings of Economic Forecasts.American Journal of Political Science 31 (3): 559–83.
Converse, Philip E. 1964. “The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics.” In Ideology and Discontent, ed. Apter, David E.. New York: Free Press, 206–61.
De Boef, Suzanna, and Kellstedt, Paul M.. 2004. “The Political (and Economic) Origins of Consumer Confidence.American Journal of Political Science 48 (4): 633–49.
Duch, Raymond M., Palmer, Harvey D., and Anderson, Christopher J.. 2000. “Heterogeneity in Perceptions of National Economic Conditions.American Journal of Political Science 44 (4): 535652.
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael, and Stimson, James. 2000. “Peasants or Bankers Revisited: Eeconomic Expectations and Presidential Approval.Electoral Studies 19 (2–3): 295312.
Erikson, Robert S. 2004. “Economic Voting: Micro and Macro Perspectives.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Society for Political Methodology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
Evans, Geoffrey, and Andersen, Robert. 2006. “The Political Conditioning of Economic Perceptions.Journal of Politics 68 (1): 194207.
Festinger, Leon. 1957. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald. 1999. “Misperceptions about Perceptual Bias.Annual Review of Political Science 2 (1): 189210.
Gerber, Alan S., and Huber, Gregory A.. Forthcoming. “Partisanship, Political Control, and Economic Assessments.” American Journal of Political Science.
Hetherington, Marc J. 1996. “The Media's Role in Forming Voters’ Retrospective Evaluations in 1992.American Journal of Political Science 40 (2): 372–95.
Key, V. O. Jr., and Munger, Frank. 1959. “Social Determinism and Electoral Decision: The Case of Indiana.” In American Voting Behavior, eds. Burdick, Eugene and Brodbeck, Arthur. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 291–99.
Lacy, Dean. 2001. “A Theory of Nonseparable Preferences in Survey Responses.American Journal of Political Science 45 (2): 239–58.
Ladner, Matthew, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2007. “Partisan Preferences, Electoral Prospects, and Economic Expectations.Comparative Political Studies 40 (5): 571–96.
Lau, Richard R., Sears, David O., and Jessor, Tom. 1990. “Fact or Artifact Revisited: Survey Instrument Effects and Pocketbook Voting.Political Behavior 12 (3): 217–42.
Levendusky, Matthew S., Pope, Jeremy C., and Jackman, Simon D.. 2008. “Measuring District-Level Partisanship with Implications for the Analysis of U.S. Elections.The Journal of Politics 70 (3): 736–53.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., Jacoby, William G., Norpoth, Helmut, and Weisberg, Herbert. 2008. The American Voter Revisited. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Ljungqvist, Lars, and Sargent, Thomas J.. 2004. Recursive Macroeconomic Theory. 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacKuen, Michael B., Erikson, Robert S., and Stimson, James A.. 1992. “Peasants or Bankers? The American Electorate and the U.S. Economy.American Political Science Review 86 (3): 597611.
Meirowitz, Adam. 2005. “Polling Games and Information Revelation in the Downsian Framework.Games and Economic Behavior 51 (2): 464–89.
Palmer, Harvey D., and Duch, Raymond M.. 2001. “Do Surveys Provide Representative or Whimsical Assessments of the Economy?Political Analysis 9 (1): 5877.
Prior, Markus. 2007. “Is Partisan Bias in Perception of Objective Conditions Real?” Princeton University. Typescript.
Sears, David O., and Lau, Richard R.. 1983. “Inducing Apparently Self-Interested Political Preferences.American Journal of Political Science 27 (2): 223–52.
Shani, Danielle. 2009. “Knowing Your Colors: Information, Partisan Bias, and Political Perceptions.” Princeton University. Typescript.
Silver, Brian D., Anderson, Barbara A., and Abramson, Paul R.. 1986. “Who Overreports Voting?American Political Science Review 80 (2): 1324.
Suzuki, Motoshi. 1992. “Political Business Cycles in the Public's Mind.American Political Science Review 86 (4): 989–96.
Traugott, Michael W., and Katosh, John P.. 1979. “Response Validity in Surveys of Voting Behavior.Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (3): 359–77.
Trigger, Kaitlyn. 2006. “Partisan Bias in Consumer Behavior.” Yale University. Typescript.
Vavreck, Lynn. 2007. “The Exaggerated Effects of Advertising on Turnout: The Dangers of Self-Reports.Quarterly Journal of Political Science 2 (4): 325–43.
Wilcox, Nathaniel T., and Wlezien, Christopher. 1996. “The Contamination of Responses to Survey Items: Economic Perceptions and Political Judgments.Political Analysis 5 (1): 181213.
Wlezien, Christopher, Franklin, Mark, and Twiggs, Daniel. 1997. “Economic Perceptions and Vote Choice: Disentangling the Endogeneity.Political Behavior 19 (1): 717.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 13
Total number of PDF views: 115 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 550 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th April 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.