Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Party Activists as Campaign Advertisers: The Ground Campaign as a Principal-Agent Problem

  • RYAN D. ENOS (a1) and EITAN D. HERSH (a2)
Abstract

As a key element of their strategy, recent Presidential campaigns have recruited thousands of workers to engage in direct voter contact. We conceive of this strategy as a principal-agent problem. Workers engaged in direct contact are intermediaries between candidates and voters, but they may be ill-suited to convey messages to general-election audiences. By analyzing a survey of workers fielded in partnership with the 2012 Obama campaign, we show that in the context of the campaign widely considered most adept at direct contact, individuals who were interacting with swing voters on the campaign’s behalf were demographically unrepresentative, ideologically extreme, cared about atypical issues, and misunderstood the voters’ priorities. We find little evidence that the campaign was able to use strategies of agent control to mitigate its principal-agent problem. We question whether individuals typically willing to be volunteer surrogates are productive agents for a strategic campaign.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Ryan D. Enos is Assistant Professor of Government, Harvard University, 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge, MA 02138 (renos@gov.harvard.edu).
Eitan D. Hersh is Assistant Professor of Political Science, Yale University, 77 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06520 (eitan.hersh@yale.edu).
References
Hide All
2012 Obama Campaign Legacy Report . 2013. Technical report Obama for America.
AnsolabehereStephen, and Hersh Eitan. 2012. “Validation: What Survey Misreporting Reveal about Survey Misreporting and the Real Electorate.” Political Analysis 20 (4): 437–59.
AnsolabehereStephen, Snyder James M.Jr., and Stewart III Charles. 2001. “Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (1): 136–59.
BaileyMichael A., Hopkins Daniel J., and Rogers Todd. 2013. “Unresponsive and Unpersuaded: The Unintented Consequences of Voter Persuasion Efforts.” Working Paper.
BawnKathleen, Cohen Martin, Masket Seth, Noel Hans, and Zaller John. 2012. “A Theory of Political Parties: Groups, Policy Demands and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–97.
BedollaLisa García, and Michelson Melissa R.. 2012. Mobilizing Inclusion: Transforming the Electorate through Get-Out-the-Vote Campaigns. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
BenabouRoland, and Tirole Jean. 2006. “Incentives and Prosocial Behavior.” American Economic Review 96 (5): 1652–78.
BerinskyAdam J., de Benedictis-Kessner Justin, Goldberg Megan, and Margolis Michele F.. 2014. “Implicit Cue-Taking in Elections.” American Political Science Association, Annual Meeting, Washington, DC.
BonicaAdam. 2013. “Ideology and Interests in the Political Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science. 57 (2): 294311.
BullRay, and Hawkes Caroline. 1982. “Judging Politicians by their Faces.” Political Studies 30 (1): 95101.
BurgerJerry M., Messian Nicole, Patel Shebani, del Prado Alicia, and Anderson Carmen. 2004. “What a Coincidence! The Effects of Incidental Similarity on Compliance.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 30 (1): 3543.
CohenGeoffrey L. 2003. “Party Over Policy: The Dominating Impact of Group Influence on Political Beliefs.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 85 (5): 808.
CohenMarty, Karol David, Noel Hans, and Zaller John. 2009. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
ConoverPamela Johnston, and Feldman Stanley. 1982. “Projection and the Perception of Candidates’ Issue Positions.” The Western Political Quarterly, pp. 228–44.
DarleyJohn M., and Cooper Joel. 1972. “The “Clean for Gene” Phenomenon: The Effect of Students’ Appearance on Political Campaigning.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2 (1): 2433.
DownsAnthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.
DruckmanJames N., Kifer Martin J., and Parkin Michael. 2009. “Campaign Communications in U.S. Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 103 (3): 343–66.
GerberAlan S., and Green Donald P.. 2000. “The Effects of Canvassing, Telephone Calls, and Direct Mail on Voter Turnout: A Field Experiment.” American Political Science Review 94 (3): 653–63.
GillespieAndra Nicole. 2005. Community, Coordination, and Context: A Black Politics Perspective on Voter Mobilization. Ph.D. dissertation. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
GreenDonald P., and Gerber Alan S.. 2008. Get Out The Vote. 2nd ed. Washington: Brookings.
GrofmanBernard. 2004. “Downs and Two-Party Convergence.” Annual Review of Political Science 7: 2546.
Growth and Opportunity Project . 2013. Technical report. Republican National Committee.
HershEitan. 2012. “Primary Voters Versus Caucus Goers and the Peripheral Motivations of Political Participation.” Political Behavior 34 (4): 689718.
HershEitan D. 2015. Hacking the Electorate: How Campaigns Perceive Voters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HershEitan, and Schaffner Brian. 2012. “Targeted Campaign Appeals and the Value of Ambiguity.” Journal of Politics 75 (2): 520–34.
HillygusD. Sunshine, and Shields Todd G.. 2008. The Persuadable Voter: Wedge Issues in Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
HoDaniel, Imai Kosuke, King Gary, and Stuart Elizabeth. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis 15 (2): 199236.
IssenbergSasha. 2012. The Victory Lab: The Secret Science of Winning Campaigns. New York: Crown Publishing.
KeeterScott, Funk Cary, and Kennedy Courtney. October 5–7, 2005. “Deaniacs and Democrats: Howard Dean’s Campaign Activists.” State of the Parties Conference, Akron, OH. Unpublished conference paper.
KrasnoJonathan S., and Green Donald P.. 2008. “Do Televised Presidential Ads Increase Voter Turnout? Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Journal of Politics 70 (1): 245–61.
LaymanGeoffrey C., Carsey Thomas M., Green John C., Herrera Richard, and Cooperman Rosalyn. 2010. “Activists and Conflict Extension in American Politics.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 324–46.
LeighleyJan E. 2001. Strength in Numbers?: The Political Mobilization of Racial and Ethnic Minorities. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
LenzGabriel S. 2009. “Learning and Opinion Change, not Priming: Reconsidering the Priming Hypothesis.” American Journal of Political Science 53 (4): 821–37.
LenzGabriel S., and Lawson Chappell. 2011. “Looking the Part: Television Leads Less Informed Citizes to Vote Based on Candidates’ Appearance.” American Journal of Political Science 55 (3): 574–89.
LinardiSera, and McConnell Margaret A.. 2011. “No Excuses for Good Behavior: Volunteering and the Social Environment.” Journal of Public Economics 95: 445–54.
MarkusGregory B., and Converse Philip E.. 1979. “A Dynamic Simultaneous Equation Model of Electoral Choice.” The American Political Science Review 73 (4): 1055–70.
MasketSeth E. 2009. “Did Obama’s Ground Game Matter? The Influence of Local Field Offices During the 2008 Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 73 (5): 1023–39.
McCubbinsMathew D., Noll Roger G., and Weingast Barry R.. 1987. “Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 3 (2): 243–77.
McKennaElizabeth, and Han Hahrie. 2013. Groundbreakers: How Obama’s 2.2 Million Volunteers Transformed Field Campaigns in America. U.C. Berkeley. Unpublished manuscript.
MichelsonMelissa R. 2003. “Getting out the Latino Vote: How Door-to-door Canvassing Influences Voter Turnout in Rural Central California.” Political Behavior 25 (3): 247–63.
MichelsonMelissa R. 2006. “Mobilizing the Latino Youth Vote: Some Experimental Results*.” Social Science Quarterly 87 (5): 1188–206.
MiddletonJoel A., and Green Donald P.. 2008. “Do Community-Based Voter Mobilization Campaigns Work Even in Battleground States? Evaluating the Effectiveness of MoveOn’s 2004 Outreach Campaign.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 3: 6382.
MillerGary J. 2005. “The Political Evolution of Principal-Agent Models.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 203–25.
MunsonZiad W. 2008. The Making of Pro-Life Activists: How Social Movement Mobilization Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
NickersonDavid W. 2007. “Quality is Job One: Professional and Volunteer Voter Mobilization Calls.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (2): 269–82.
NickersonDavid, and Rogers Todd. 2014. “Political Campaigns and Big Data.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (2): 5174.
NielsenRasmus Kleis. 2012. Ground Wars: Personalized Communication in Political Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
OlsonMancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
OwenGuillermo, and Grofman Bernard. 2006. “Two-Stage Electoral Competition in Two-Party Contests: Persistent Divergence of Party Positions.” Social Choice and Welfare 26 (3): 547–69.
PopkinSamuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
PopkinSamuel L. 1995. “Information Shortcuts and the Reasoning Voter.” In Information, Participation and Choice: An Economic Theory of Democracy in Perspective, ed. Groffman Bernard. Ann Arbor, University of Michigan Press, 1735.
RogersTodd, Fox Craig R., and Gerber Alan S.. 2012. Rethinking Why People Vote: Voting as Dynamic Social Expression. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
RuleNicholas O., and Ambady Nalini. 2010. “Democrats and Republicans can be Differentiated from their Faces.” PLoS One 5 (1): e8733.
SamochowiecJakub, Wänke Michaela, and Fiedler Klaus. 2010. “Political Ideology at Face Value.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 1 (3): 206–13.
SchoeniRobert F., Stafford Frank, Mcgonagle Katherine A., and Andreski Patricia. 2013. “Response Rates in National Panel Surveys.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 645 (1): 6087.
ShawDaron, de la Garza Rodolfo O, and Lee Jongho. 2000. “Examining Latino Turnout in 1996: A Three-state, Validated Survey Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 338–46.
SidesJohn. 2006. “The Origins of Campaign Agendas.” British Journal of Political Science 36 (3): 407–36.
SidesJohn, and Vavreck Lynn. 2013. The Gamble: Choice and Chance in the 2012 Presidential Election. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
SinclairBetsy. 2012. The Social Citizen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
SinclairBetsy, McConnell Margaret, and Michelson Melissa R.. 2013. “Local Canvassing: The Efficacy of Grassroots Voter Mobilization.” Political Communications 30 (1): 4257.
StoneWalter J., and Abramowitz Alan I.. 1980. “Winning May Not be Everything, But It’s More Than We Thought: Presidential Party Activists in 1980.” American Political Science Review 77 (4): 945–56.
TomzMichael, and Van Houweling Robert P.. 2009. “The Electoral Implications of Candidate Ambiguity.” American Political Science Review 103 (01): 8398.
VavreckLynn. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
VerbaSidney, Schlozman Kay Lehman, and Brady Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Voter Contact Summary . 2012. Technical report, Romney for President.
ZallerJohn R. 1992. The Nature and Origin of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ZallerJohn R. 1998. “Monica Lewinsky’s Contribution to Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (2): 182–9.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 73
Total number of PDF views: 427 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 1331 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.