Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Political Polarization and the Size of Government

  • ERIK LINDQVIST (a1) and ROBERT ÖSTLING (a2)
Abstract

In this article, we study the relationship between political polarization and public spending using the dispersion of self-reported political preferences as our measure of polarization. Political polarization is strongly associated with smaller government in democratic countries, but there is no relationship between polarization and the size of government in undemocratic countries. The results are robust to a large set of control variables, including gross domestic product per capita and income inequality.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Political Polarization and the Size of Government
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Political Polarization and the Size of Government
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Political Polarization and the Size of Government
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
Erik Lindqvist is Assistant Professor, Stockholm School of Economics, P.O. Box 6501, SE-113 83 Stockholm, Sweden and Research Associate, Research Institute of Industrial Economics, P.O. Box 55665, SE-102 15 Stockholm, Sweden (erik.lindqvist@hhs.se).
Robert Östling is Assistant Professor, Institute for International Economic Studies, Stockholm University, SE-106 91 Stockholm, Sweden (robert.ostling@iies.su.se).
References
Hide All
Acemoglu, D., Chernozhukov, V., and Yildiz, M.. 2007. “Learning and Disagreement in an Uncertain World.” Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Unpublished manuscript.
Adserà, A., Boix, C., and Payne, M.. 2003. “Are You Being Served? Political Accountability and Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 19 (2): 445–90.
Alesina, A., Baqir, R., and Easterly, W.. 1999. “Public Goods and Ethnic Divisions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (4): 1167–99.
Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., and Wacziarg, R.. 2003. “Fractionalization.” Journal of Economic Growth 8 (2): 155–94.
Alesina, A., Glaeser, E., and Sacerdote, B.. 2001. “Why Doesn't the United States Have a European-style Welfare State?Brookings Paper on Economics Activity 2001 (2): 187254.
Alesina, A., and Tabellini, G.. 1990. “A Positive Theory of Fiscal Deficits and Government Debt.” Review of Economic Studies 57 (3): 403–14.
Alesina, A., and Wacziarg, R.. 1998. “Openness, Country Size and Government.” Journal of Public Economics 69 (3): 305–21.
Alesina, A., and Zhuravskaya, E.. 2008. “Segregation and the Quality of Government of Countries.” National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) Working Paper 14316.
Alt, J.E., and Dreyer Lassen, D.. 2006. “Transparency, Political Polarization, and Political Budget Cycles in OECD Countries.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 530–50.
Au, K. 1999. “Intra-Cultural Variation: Evidence and Implications for International Business.” Journal of International Business Studies 30 (4): 799812.
Au, K., and Cheung, M.. 2004. “Intra-cultural Variation and Job Autonomy in 42 Countries.” Organization Studies 25 (8): 1339–62.
Azzimonti, M. n.d. “Barriers to Investment in Polarized Societies.” American Economic Review. Forthcoming.
Bassett, W., Burkett, J., and Putterman, L.. 1999. “Income Distribution, Government Transfers, and the Problem of Unequal Influence.” European Journal of Political Economy 15 (2): 207–28.
Batson, C.D., Duncan, B.D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., and Birch, K.. 1981. “Is Empathic Emotion a Source of Altruistic Motivation?Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 40 (2): 290302.
Bawn, K., and Rosenbluth, F.. 2006. “Short versus Long Coalitions: Electoral Accountability and the Size of the Public Sector.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 251–65.
Beck, T., Clarke, G., Groff, A., Keefer, P., and Walsh, P.. 2001. “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political Institutions.” World Bank Economic Review 15 (1): 165–76. http://go.worldbank.org/2EAGGLRZ40 (accessed July 11, 2010).
Bernhardt, D., Krasa, S., and Polborn, M.. 2008. “Political Polarization and the Electoral Effects of Media BiasJournal of Public Economics 92 (5/6): 10921104.
Byrne, D. 1961. “Interpersonal Attraction and Attitude Similarity.” Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology 62: 713–15.
Byrne, D. 1971. The Attraction Paradigm. New York: Free Press.
Chen, F., and Kenrick, D.. 2002. “Repulsion or Attraction? Group Membership and Assumed Attitude Similarity.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83 (1): 111–25.
Cukierman, A., Edwards, S., and Tabellini, G.. 1992. “Seignorage and Political Instability.” American Economic Review 82 (3): 537–55.
DellaVigna, S., and Kaplan, E.. 2007. “The Fox News Effect: Media Bias and Voting.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 122 (3): 11871234.
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., and Bryson, B.. 1996. “Have Americans’ Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?American Journal of Sociology 102 (3): 690755.
Dixit, A., and Weibull, J.. 2007. “Political Polarization.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 7351–56.
Duverger, M. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
Esteban, J-M., and Ray, D.. 1994. “On the Measurement of Polarization.” Econometrica 62 (4): 819–51.
European Values Study Group and World Values Association. 2006. European and World Values Surveys Four-wave Integrated Data File 1981−2004. Version 20060423. http://www.wvsevsdb.com/wvs/WVSData.jsp (accessed July 17, 2010).
Fearon, J., and Laitin, D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 7590.
Feren, D., Carroll, S., and Olian, J.. 1988. “Effects of Managerial Performance and Attitudinal Similarity on Interpersonal Attraction.” Basic and Applied Social Psychology 9 (1): 3344.
Fernández, R., and Levy, G.. 2008. “Diversity and Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 92 (5/6): 925–43.
Freedom House. 2005. Freedom in the World Country Rankings 1973–2005. Washington, DC: Freedom House.
Frye, T. 2002. “The Perils of Polarization: Economic Performance in the Postcommunist World.” World Politics 54 (3): 308–37.
Gerber, A., Karlan, D.S., and Bergan, D.. 2006. “Does the Media Matter? A Field Experiment Measuring the Effect of Newspapers on Voting Behavior and Political Opinions.” Yale Economic Applications and Policy Discussion Paper 12.
Gerber, E., and Lewis, J.. 2004. “Beyond the Median: Voter Preferences, District Heterogeneity, and Representation.” Journal of Political Economy 112 (6): 1364–83.
Glazer, A. 1989. “Politics and the Choice of Durability.” American Economic Review 79 (5): 1207–13.
Gradstein, M., and Justman, M.. 2002. “Education, Social Cohesion, and Economic Growth.” American Economic Review 92 (4): 11921204.
Gwartney, J., and Lawson, R.. 2008. Economic Freedom of the World: 2008 Annual Report. Vancouver, Canada: Fraser Institute. http://www.freetheworld.com/release_2008.html (accessed July 17, 2010).
Hamilton, W.D. 1964. “The Genetic Evolution of Social Behaviour.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7: 152.
Inglehart, R., and Baker, W.E.. 2000. “Modernization, Cultural Change, and the Persistence of Traditional Values.” American Sociological Review 65: 1951.
Iversen, T., and Soskice, D.. 2006. “Electoral Systems and the Politics of Coalitions: Why Some Democracies Redistribute More Than Others.” American Political Science Review 100 (2): 165–81.
Keefer, P., and Stasavage, D.. 2003. “The Limits of Delegation: Veto Players, Central Bank Independence and the Credibility of Monetary Policy.” American Political Science Review 97 (3): 407–23.
La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., and Vishny, R.. 1999. “The Quality of Government.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 222–79.
Landsberger, M., and Meilijson, I.. 1990. “A Tale of Two Tails: An Alternative Characterization of Comparative Risk.” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 3 (1): 6582.
Lindqvist, E. 2007. Essays on Privatization, Identity and Political Polarization. Ph.D. diss. Stockholm School of Economics.
Linzer, D.A. 2008. The Structure of Mass Ideology and Its Consequences for Democratic Governance. Ph.D. diss. University of California, Los Angeles.
Lipset, S.M., and Rokkan, S. (eds). 1967. Party Systems and Voter Alignments: Cross-national Perspectives. New York: Free Press.
Luttmer, E.F.P. 2001. “Group Loyalty and the Taste for Redistribution.” Journal of Political Economy 109 (3): 500–28.
Marshall, M.G., and Jaggers, K.. 2007. Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions 1800−2007. Polity IV Project. University of Maryland. http://www.systemicpeace.org/inscr/inscr.htm (accessed May 14, 2010).
McGrath, J.E. 1984. Groups: Interaction and Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Meltzer, A.H., and Richard, S.F.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (5): 914–27.
Moene, K.O., and Wallerstein, M.. 2001. “Inequality, Social Insurance, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 95 (4): 859–74.
Mouw, T. and Sobel, M.E.. 2001. “Culture Wars and Opinion Polarization: The Case of Abortion.” American Journal of Sociology 106 (4): 913–43.
Newcomb, T.M. 1961. The Acquaintance Process. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Olson, J.M., Vernon, P.A., and Jang, K.L.. 2001. “The Heritability of Attitudes: A Study of Twins.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80 (6): 845–60.
Olson, M. 1965. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Organisation for Economic Development. http://www.oecd.org/document/58/0,3343,en_2649_201185_1889402_1_1_1_1,00.html (accessed May 2010).
Östling, R. 2008. Bounded Rationality and Endogenous Preferences. Ph.D. diss. Stockholm School of Economics.
Park, J., and Schaller, M.. 2005. “Does Attitude Similarity Serve as a Heuristic Cue for Kinship? Evidence of an Implicit Cognitive Association.” Evolution and Human Behavior 26: 158–70.
Perotti, R., and Kontopoulos, Y.. 2002. “Fragmented Fiscal Policy.” Journal of Public Economics 86 (2): 191222.
Persson, T., and Svensson, L.E.O.. 1989. “Why a Stubborn Conservative Would Run a Deficit: Policy with Time-inconsistent Preferences.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 104 (2): 325–45.
Persson, T., and Tabellini, G.. 2003. The Economic Effects of Constitutions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Riker, W.H. 1982. “The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76 (4): 753–66.
Rodrik, D. 1998. “Why Do More Open Economies Have Bigger Governments?Journal of Political Economy 106 (5): 9971032.
Shalom, S., and Sagie, G.. 2000. “Value Consensus and Importance.” Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 31 (4): 465–97.
Shayo, M. 2009. “A Model of Social Identity with an Application to Political Economy: Nation, Class, and Redistribution.” American Political Science Review 103 (2): 147–74.
Suedfeld, P., Bochner, S., and Wnek, D.. 1972. “Helper-Sufferer Similarity and a Specific Request for Help: Bystander Intervention during a Peace Demonstration.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 2 (1): 1723.
Svensson, J. 1998. “Investment, Property Rights and Political Instability: Theory and Evidence.” European Economic Review 42 (7): 1317–41.
Teorell, J., Holmberg, S., and Rothstein, B.. 2008, May. The Quality of Government Dataset. Version 1.5. Quality of Government Institute, University of Gothenburg. http://www.qog.pol.gu.se (accessed May 18, 2010).
Tesser, A. 1993. “The Importance of Heritability in Psychological Research: The Case of Attitudes.” Psychological Review 100 (1): 129–42.
Tsebelis, G. 1999. “Veto Players and Law Production in Parliamentary Democracies: An Empirical Analysis.” American Political Science Review 93 (3): 591608.
Tsebelis, G. 2002. Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Vigdor, J.L. 2004. “Community Composition and Collective Action: Analyzing Initial Mail Response to the 2000 Census.” Review of Economics and Statistics 86 (1): 303–12.
World Bank. 2009. World Development Indicators 2009. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×
Type Description Title
EXCEL
Supplementary materials

Lindqvist and Ostling supplementary material
Data set

 Excel (371 KB)
371 KB
EXCEL
Supplementary materials

LINDQVIST Supplementary Material
Table.xls

 Excel (371 KB)
371 KB
EXCEL
Supplementary materials

LINDQVIST Supplementary Material
Table.xls

 Excel (371 KB)
371 KB

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed