Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 166
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Armingeon, Klaus Guthmann, Kai and Weisstanner, David 2016. Choosing the path of austerity: how parties and policy coalitions influence welfare state retrenchment in periods of fiscal consolidation. West European Politics, Vol. 39, Issue. 4, p. 628.

    Baek, Seung-Ho Ryu, Yun-Kyu and Lee, Sophia Seung-yoon 2016. The political economy of changes in family and old-age welfare policy spending: Analysis of OECD countries, 1998-2011. International Journal of Social Welfare,

    Breznau, Nate 2016. Secondary observer effects: idiosyncratic errors in small-N secondary data analysis. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 19, Issue. 3, p. 301.

    Hortala-Vallve, Rafael and Larcinese, Valentino 2016. The Perverse Consequences of Policy Restrictions in the Presence of Asymmetric Information. Political Science Research and Methods, p. 1.

    Kaushik, Arun Kumar and Pal, Rupayan 2016. Electoral Outcomes and Provision of Public Goods: A Case Study of India. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, Vol. 15, Issue. 1, p. 91.

    Liu, Gao and Sun, Rui 2016. Economic Openness and Subnational Borrowing. Public Budgeting & Finance, Vol. 36, Issue. 2, p. 45.

    Mortensen, Peter B. and Seeberg, Henrik B. 2016. Why Are Some Policy Agendas Larger than Others?. Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 44, Issue. 2, p. 156.

    Schaffer, Lena and Spilker, Gabriele 2016. Adding Another Level Individual Responses to Globalization and Government Welfare Policies. Political Science Research and Methods, Vol. 4, Issue. 02, p. 399.

    Seeberg, Henrik Bech 2016. Opposition Policy Influence through Agenda-setting: The Environment in Denmark, 1993-2009. Scandinavian Political Studies, Vol. 39, Issue. 2, p. 185.

    Terry, William C. 2016. Yes, structurally low turnout favors the right. Politics, Groups, and Identities, Vol. 4, Issue. 3, p. 444.

    Westover, Jonathan H. 2016. The international political economy of worker satisfaction: a cross-national HLM analysis. Evidence-based HRM: a Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, Vol. 4, Issue. 2, p. 116.

    Bae, Kwang Bin 2015. Income Inequality and Redistributive Spending: Evidence from Panel Data of Texas Counties. Local Government Studies, Vol. 41, Issue. 5, p. 735.

    Bowersox, Zack 2015. Does social spending add substance to formal rights?. Journal of Human Rights, p. 1.

    Breznau, Nate 2015. The Missing Main Effect of Welfare State Regimes: A Replication of ‘Social Policy Responsiveness in Developed Democracies’ by Brooks and Manza. Sociological Science, Vol. 2, p. 440.

    Crössmann, Katharina and Mause, Karsten 2015. Rail subsidisation in the European Union: An issue beyond left and right?. Comparative European Politics, Vol. 13, Issue. 4, p. 471.

    Greer, Scott Elliott, Heather and Oliver, Rebecca 2015. Differences That Matter: Overcoming Methodological Nationalism in Comparative Social Policy Research. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, Vol. 17, Issue. 4, p. 408.

    Hansen, Kristian Kjærgaard and Jensen, Carsten 2015. Politized coalitions: Social affinity and the politics of redistribution. Comparative European Politics,

    Hooghe, Marc and Oser, Jennifer 2015. Trade union density and social expenditure: a longitudinal analysis of policy feedback effects in OECD countries, 1980–2010. Journal of European Public Policy, p. 1.

    Jensen, C. and Seeberg, H. B. 2015. The power of talk and the welfare state: evidence from 23 countries on an asymmetric opposition-government response mechanism. Socio-Economic Review, Vol. 13, Issue. 2, p. 215.

    Ng, Winnie 2015. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences.


Politics, Institutions, and Welfare Spending in Industrialized Democracies, 1960–82

  • Alexander M. Hicks (a1) and Duane H. Swank (a2)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 September 2013

We examine the roles of democratic politics and political institutions in shaping social welfare spending in 18 contemporary capitalist democracies. We explore the social spending consequences of government partisanship, electoral competition and turnout, and the self-interested behaviors of politicians and bureaucrats, as well as such relatively durable facets of political institutions as neocorporatism, state centralization, and traditionalist policy legacies. Pooled time series analyses of welfare effort in 18 nations during the 1960–82 period show that electoral turnout, as well as left and center governments increase welfare effort; that the welfare efforts of governments led by particular types of parties show significant differences and vary notably with the strength of oppositional (and junior coalitional) parties; and that relatively neocorporatist, centralized, and traditionalistic polities are high on welfare effort. Overall, our findings suggest that contrary to many claims, both partisan and nonpartisan facets of democratic politics and political institutions shape contemporary social welfare effort.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Robert R. Alford , and Roger Friedland . 1985. Powers of Theory. New York: Cambridge University Press.

R. Michael Alvarez , Geoffrey Garrett , and Peter Lange . 1991. “The Political Economy of Macroeconomic Performance.” American Political Science Review 85:539–56.

D. Austen-Smith , and J. Banks . 1990. “Stable Government and the Allocation of Policy Portfolios.” American Political Science Review 84:891906.

Peter Baldwin . 1990. The Politics of Social Solidarity: Class Bases of the European Welfare State, 1875–1975. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Francis Castles , and Robert McKinlay . 1979. “The Public Welfare Provision, Scandinavia, and the Pure Futility of the Sociological Approach to Politics.” British Journal of Political Science 9:157–71.

Francis Castles , and Peter Mair . 1984. “Left-Right Political Scales: Some Expert Judgements.” European Journal of Political Research 12:7388.

Thomas Dye . 1979. “Politics Versus Economics: The Development of the Literature on Policy Determination.” Policy Studies Journal 7:652–62.

Peter M. Evans , Dietrich Reuschemeyer , and Theda Skocpol , eds. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Robert J. Friedrich 1982. “In Defense of Multiplicative Terms.” American Journal of Political Science 26:797833.

James C. Garand 1988. “Explaining Government Growth in the U.S. States.” American Political Science Review 82:837–49.

Douglas A. Hibbs Jr., 1987. The Political Economy of Industrial Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Alexander Hicks . 1988a. “National Collective Action and Economic Performance: A Review Essay.” International Studies Quarterly 32:131–52.

Alexander Hicks . 1988b. “Social Democratic Corporatism and Economic Growth.” Journal of Politics 50:677704.

Alexander Hicks , and Duane H. Swank . 1984. “On the Political Economy of Welfare Expression.” Comparative Political Studies 17:81119.

Alexander Hicks , Duane Swank , and Martin Ambuhl . 1989. “Welfare Expansion Revisited: Policy Routines and their Mediation by Party, Class, and Crisis, 1957–1982.” European Journal of Political Research 17:401–30.

Robert Jackman . 1986. “Elections and Democratic Class Struggle.” World Politics 39:123–46.

George G. Judge , W. E. Griffith , R. C. Hill , and T. Lee . 1985. The Theory and Practice of Econometrics. 2d ed. New York: Wiley.

William Keech , and Kyoungson Pak . 1989. “Electoral Cycles and Budgetary Growth in Veterans Benefit Programs.” American Journal of Political Science 33:901–11.

Walter Korpi . 1989. “Power, Politics, and State Autonomy in the Development of Social Citizenship.” American Sociological Review 54:309–28.

Arend Lijphart , and Markus Crepaz . 1991. “Corporatism and Consensus in Eighteen Countries.” British Journal of Political Science 21:235–46.

Seymour Martin Lipset . 1983. “Radicalism and Reform: The Sources of Working Class Protest.” American Political Science Review 77:118.

Marick F. Masters , and John D. Robertson . 1988. “Class Compromise in Industrialized Democracies.” American Political Science Review 82:11831201.

William A. Niskanen 1971. “Bureaucrats and Politicians.” Journal of Law and Economics 18:617–43.

Ann Shola Orloff , and Theda Skocpol . 1984. “Why Not Equal Protections?American Sociological Review 49:726–50.

Fred C. Pampel , and John B. Williamson . 1989. Age, Class, Politics and the Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Adam Przeworski . 1985. Capitalism and Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Dennis P. Quinn , and Robert Y. Shapiro . 1991. “Business: Political Power: The Case of Taxation.” American Political Science Review 85:851–74.

Theda Skocpol . 1985. “Bringing the State Back In: Current Research” In Bringing the State Back In ed. Peter M. Evans , Dietrich Reuschemeyer , and Theda Skocpol . New York: Cambridge University Press.

John Stephens . 1979. The Transition from Capitalism to Socialism. London: Macmillan.

James Stimson . 1985. “Regression in Time and Space: A Statistical Essay.” American Journal of Political Science 29:914–47.

Duane H. Swank 1983. “Between Incrementalism and Revolution.” American Behavioral Scientist 26:291310.

Duane H. Swank 1992. “Politics and the Structural Dependence of the State in Capitalist Democracies.” American Political Science Review 86:3854.

Michael Wallerstein . 1989. “Union Organization in Advanced Industrial Societies.” American Political Science Review 83:481501.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

American Political Science Review
  • ISSN: 0003-0554
  • EISSN: 1537-5943
  • URL: /core/journals/american-political-science-review
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *